by Jim McCarthy

Virginia’s new governor has proposed a legislative amendment preempting the normal election cycle and terms of office for a county school board in what can only be described as a “do over.” The amendment moves a school board election date from 2023 to 2022 and authorizes a new election for the nine-member body.

Politically, the move, an increasingly familiar trope among some conservative legislatures, echoes the “big steal” theme and tactics to magnify electoral results by officials. While not drawing inordinate attention, it is, at its core, a pernicious attempt to scuttle the democratic process that seated the board at its last election.

The ostensible rationale is related to the handling of sex crimes by the Loudoun County School Board occurring in late 2021 at the height of the campaign season. The Republican gubernatorial candidate, and ultimate winner, capitalized on the contentious issue declaring his conclusions while calling for an investigation stating:

I am calling for an immediate investigation into the Loudoun County School Board for their gross negligence. They had a duty of care and they failed.  They endangered our students and violated the Virginia Constitution. As a father, I am ignited by an unwavering resolve to not just fix this but to hold those who have failed our children accountable.

In April of this year, the Attorney General announced the convening of a special grand jury to investigate the school board, one day after the governor submitted his legislative amendment. The polished accompanying message to the amendment from a spokesperson from the governor’s office appeared to be an attempt to disguise or soften its actual effect:

The last few years signified some real challenges with the Loudoun County School Board. So, in the spirit of transparency and accountability, my Amendment gives parents the ability to elect their school board this year, one year earlier than it was stated in the original legislation. This election can reflect the will of parents and it’s a chance with my amendment to do that right now, this November.

Thus, despite well rehearsed kabuki to avoid being tagged a Trumper, the governor has marinated some red meat and barbecued it to taste for a base starved for signs of a radical revival of the kind of  antics for which the former president was known. The amendment “do over” and grand jury investigation place the Commonwealth’s administration squarely within the mainstream of conservative Republican schemes advocating so-called election integrity. Collateral damage to the tradition of nonpartisan school board elections is being ignored in the dash to satisfy a campaign pledge and reward supporters.

A handful of states have begun to shift to partisan school board campaigns as a measure to afford voters “more information” about candidates. In most cases, school board elections remain nonpartisan. It is estimated that only 94 of the country’s 1,000 largest districts authorize school board candidates to identify with political parties. The current intensity of focus by parents may have been exacerbated by the COVID shut-in, creating time for increased parental participation in school board activities. Inviting or encouraging voters to participate in the practice of mulliganism in elections is poor leadership.

The governor’s amendment poses far deeper danger to public education and public policy than the debates over CRT, DEI, and school books which, at least, remain in the open. It portends a precedent that legislators and the electorate need to consider carefully. Withdrawal would be statecraft of a high order.

Jim McCarthy is a retired New York City attorney now living in Virginia.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

44 responses to “Election Mulligan”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Way to far!

  2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    “tradition of nonpartisan school board”

    This no longer exists. Never will again.

    If the LCPS school board is so competent, an election should be welcomed. This school system is crooked and corrupt beyond belief. Remember the contrast in candidates last fall? Youngkin is delivering on that promise. Loudoun deserves better stewardship.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiH2ipjtVxw&t=14s

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      With all that solid insight, your testimony before the grand jury is a duty. Do not hesitate.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        January 2024, a newly seated local and state government will render the verdict.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          You should do your duty and testify.

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            I will give you credit for something. At least you use your real name. I respect that.

          2. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            If you favor partisan school board elections, you should say so with reasons instead of offering a pronouncement that it does not exist.

          3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            I love the block user feature. Adding you to the list. Be gone Mr. McCarthy!

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Well, according to a poll shown this am, only 1/3 of Republicans consider homophobic and/or racist as a stopper for a candidate, so this CRT-baiting and the “grooming” accusations are a real plus.

    All of ya are slime, with a probability of more than 33%.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Conservative Platform 2022: “We need our kids to be groomed into racist homophobes”

    2. I guess it’s a good thing I’m a republican, then, and not a Republican.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        And stay that way… which republic?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            And a fine flag it is too, Sir! Does it come in a stout? Or, is your republic segregated?

          2. Strictly equal opportunity. This is from Section 1 of the Constitution of Beerenstein:

            It shall be illegal in the Republic of Beerenstein to discriminate against any lager, ale, bock, porter, stout, or any other form of beverage made from yeast-fermented malt flavored with hops, on the basis of its color, hue, appearance, taste, aroma, texture or the size of its head.

          3. Lefty665 Avatar

            Oh oh, how do I apply for citizenship? Can I do it today? I can maintain dual citizenship with Scotchistan can’t I?

          4. Yes. We have a memorandum of understanding with Scotchistan.

  4. Ronnie Chappell Avatar
    Ronnie Chappell

    Well put.

  5. I’m not a fan of adjusting election cycles for political reasons.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Well then, 1st Tuesday in November for all then?

      1. Minor correction: 1st Tuesday after the 1st Monday in November.

        Or, as the federal law says: “the Tuesday next after the first Monday in the month of November”

        It keeps election day from being November 1.

        ….

        But I don’t know why we don’t want election day to be the 1st day in November.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          “On This Day in History, November 1, The British Parliament passed the Stamp Act against the American Colonies in 1765. This unpopular tax would eventually lead to the American Revolution and independence for the colonies. On November 1, 1938, Seabiscuit upset the horse racing champion War Admiral.”

          Clearly, a significant reason NOT to hold elections. Bars need to remain open to toast Seabiscuit.

          1. Agreed.

            Excellent historical research, by the way.

    2. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      In fact, the original bill was intended to stagger the terms of the nine member board similar to that process in the US Seante.

      1. In all seriousness, I like the idea of staggered terms for any elected body. But the “bull in a china shop” approach is probably not the best way to bring it about.

  6. Fred Costello Avatar
    Fred Costello

    That School Boards are non-partisan is a joke. The party affiliation of the candidates is well known. The party endorsements are well known — at least to those who pay attention.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Pay attention?

    2. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      But….conservatives tend to believe in and support facially neutral laws and regulations no matter their effect.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        They are also known to stand at Dealey Plaza awaiting the reincarnation of JKF.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          JKF? Zat the long rumored illegitimate half brother John Kennedy Fitzgerald?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Still Irish.

      2. Lefty665 Avatar

        Glad they don’t support facism, it’s a short trip from there to fascism.

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Fait accompli

    If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon’s but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. -Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President (27 Apr 1822-1885)

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      Boy that would sure scramble the ranks of todays Repubs and Dems, It would make a lot of strange bedfellows. Superstition, ambition and ignorance would have a huge advantage in manpower.

  8. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    VCU’s Bob Holsworth was on WRVA this morning arguing that the audience for the school board election amendment is national more than state. To quote my favorite fictional British politician, you might say so, Dr. Bob, but I couldn’t possibly comment. That will be one of the easier efforts to get all the Senate Democrats to block vote it down. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are joined by some Republicans. Let’s see.

    As to the grand jury, that may indeed fizzle but I wouldn’t dismiss it at this point.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Some friends in Loudoun disagree with the assertion about. audience composition. Some politics is local.

  9. By the way, Mr. McCarthy, is this a news article or an opinion piece?

    🙂

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      I think the question would be is this fact or alleged, in regards to Mr. McCarthy.

    2. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      I think the question would be is this fact or alleged, in regards to Mr. McCarthy.

    3. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      It is what it is and what you make of it.

  10. Lefty665 Avatar

    On the one hand, and then on the other, The majority on the Loudoun school board is rotten and needs to go, but on the other hand fixed election cycles give our system stability. Not sure I’m ready to over turn that. The possibility of future unintended consequences seems high.

    Sam Adams wanted all election cycles to be annual to keep representatives close to the people who elected them. That certainly would have addressed the issue in Loudoun.

    There are remedies in our system for elections gone sour. One Loudoun school board member has resigned under threat of recall, and I believe at least two others have had recall petitions filed. That seems to be a better vehicle to redress an election gone awry. It is one that is institutionalized in our republican form of government and seems to be working. If it ain’t broke, why fix it?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Recall run amok. It takes only 10% of the votes cast in the election to force a recall election of the California governor. This is so easily accomplished that it virtually guarantees the event, which raises the question, “Why not save time, and include on the ballot for governor, a vote for recall?”

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        It’s a twofer. I like it.

        Considering the quality of California candidates it would be a feature if your idea for bundling recall was included for every election in the state. Too bad it could not be implemented retroactively.

        I once had a customer who was worried about the security of printed computer output. He was not at all amused when I offered to set the shredder up in the output bin of the line printer. That too would have been remarkably efficient while maintaining the value of my paper mfr stock.

  11. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Overturning elections again, Herr Youngkin?

Leave a Reply