VDOE Does Define Educational Equity as Equal Outcomes

Superintendent of Public Instruction James Lane

by James C. Sherlock

An African American Superintendent’s Advisory Council (AASAC) was formed by the Virginia Superintendent of Public Instruction in 2020.

It is charged “to develop policy recommendations to advance African American students’ academic success and social emotional well being to inform VDOE priorities and strategies”.

It has proven extremely influential.

I have yet to find an AASAC recommendation that has not been adopted by the Virginia Board of Education (VBOE) and VDOE in drafting and approving regulations and standards.

Given that track record, I will present below the recommendations presented by AASAC on March 17, 2021, to the Virginia Board of Education’s (VBOE) Special Committee to Review the Standards of Accreditation.

These actual recommendations will perhaps quell some of the controversy on this site about what the left intends for Virginia schools.

First, it is important to understand the AASAC’s definition of racial equity (from the AASAC slide deck) requires equal outcomes.

“The systematic fair treatment of people of all races, resulting in equitable opportunities and outcomes for all. It is not just the absence of discrimination and inequities, but also the presence of deliberate systems and supports to achieve and sustain racial equity.”

I have seen nothing from the Virginia Board of Education or VDOE that challenges that definition of equity. Indeed, the Superintendent himself writes that his goal, in addition to closing opportunity gaps, is “eliminating disproportionality in student outcome data.” So, when reading the recommendations below, that is the context.

Everyone favors equal opportunity. Fewer work to achieve it.

The AASAC instead wants standards and regulations that force equal outcomes across more than a million students in the public schools. That goal runs counter to thousands of years human experience and science, results in policies that harm all students, and is the single core issue that divides.

AASAC Recommendations 

Academic Achievement & Opportunity Gaps

  1. Revise Instructional and Graduation Requirements to ensure that course progressions provide equal emphasis on career/workforce readiness.
  2. Include discipline disproportionality as an indicator in the state’s accountability system.
  3. Require reporting of demographic data on enrollment in gifted programs/specialty academic centers on Virginia’s School Quality Profiles.
  4. Create an opportunity and access indicator.
  5. Require schools and divisions to report on student enrollment in (advanced) courses as well as report on the details of course offerings by school.
  6. Include a measure of access to academic rigor in accreditation, which could be a composite indicator. 
  7. Require schools offer open enrollment in advanced level academic coursework
  8. Require divisions to evaluate master schedules to ensure equitable student assignment in honors/advanced and AP courses and require reporting on demographic enrollment in these courses.  
  9. Establish Model Guidance on equitable enrollment procedures for Governor’s schools and accelerated programs.

Culturally Responsive & Equitable Schools

  1. Establish a single indicator or composite score related to school climate, which also includes indicators of antiracism and Culturally Responsive and Inclusive school climate.
  2. Require an equity advisory committee at the division level.
  3. Incorporate racism, racial equity, social justice as part of standards of learning.
  4. Establish a single indicator or composite score related to school climate, which also includes indicators of antiracism and Culturally Responsive and Inclusive school climate.
  5. Require an equity advisory committee at the division level.
  6. Incorporate racism, racial equity, social justice as part of standards of learning.
  7. Require each school board to adopt an equity plan that includes the establishment of equity goals.
  8. Establish Model efficacy tools to evaluate Culturally Responsive and Inclusive instructional practice.
  9. Establish Model Culturally Responsive and Inclusive Audit for all approved instructional materials (curriculum and textbooks).
  10. Require Educator Preparation Programs to include programs of study and experiences that prepare teachers to be culturally responsive by revising regulations Governing the Review and Approval of Education Programs in Virginia  8VAC20-543-10 et seq to include guidance on: Diversity, equity, cultural responsiveness and competence; Anti-racism; and Diverse field placements.
  11. Requirement for a Culturally Responsive and Inclusive Practices Coordinator at every division.
  12. Require equitable distribution of teachers to disrupt the disparity of the most experienced teachers being assigned to the lowest poverty schools.
  13. Reconfigure division boundaries and zoning to promote better integration and to advance equitable access for all students by amplifying best practices, issuing model guidance, and advocating for inclusive school division boundaries.

Teacher Diversity

  1. Require reporting on student to teacher racial ratios in the form of a single indicator or composite score related to teacher/student demographics. This should be reported on School Quality Profiles as a Teacher Diversity Index.
  2. Establish Model Guidance for mentoring and coaching program for the retention of Teachers of Color.
  3. Modify licensure regulations to permit alternative pathways, other than the Praxis (such as through micro-credentials) to meet licensure requirements.

So, using the AASAC’s own definition of equity, those recommendations demand not only equal racial outcomes in school boundaries, student discipline, student achievement, teacher acceptance into the profession, and teacher ratios in each school, but also changes to curricula, materials and gifted programs and a huge new bureaucracy to oversee and audit those things.

VBOE/VDOE are granting those demands as fast as they can.

Neither the AASAC nor the VBOE/VDOE acknowledge and indeed may not care that an equal outcomes mandate will result in policies that are both likely to harm the very students they intend to help and certain to generate fierce opposition.

The AASAC would be widely supported if it sought opportunity improvements. Some examples:

  • Demand intense early instruction for disadvantaged students in math and reading and extended school days and year-round instruction in the most disadvantaged schools – not just in Richmond but in every school system with underperforming schools;
  • Ask for a Virginia constitutional amendment to require the state take over school districts or schools that routinely fail to educate their students — including failing schools in Fairfax County;
  • Ask for a law that requires state school funding to follow the kids to whatever schools their parents choose rather than directly to public schools to which they are assigned geographically. This will create the proper incentives for public school performance;
  • Seek a change to Virginia law to ease the path for the introduction in Virginia of charter schools that have proven so successful with minority populations in New York and elsewhere. Ensure that they get the same funding as the other public schools;
  • Seek a law that requires VDOE to recruit and support Success Academy and its high performing counterparts to open campuses in Virginia’s most challenged school locations.

But such opportunity improvements did not make the AASAC list. They do not fall within approved leftist dogma. So they skipped that step and went straight to outcomes.

Without addressing early and intense initial and remedial instruction, for example, how can such a body advocate open enrollment in advanced programs for the same minority students who routinely test as unable to either read or multiply in the fourth grade?

Stark non-sequiturs like that are truly mystifying to the unconverted. They represent social dogma rather than functional policy.

Bottom line, AASAC and VDOE will never gain wide public approval of guaranteed equal outcomes regardless of individual effort or talent. And such policies have the distinct disadvantage of guaranteed failure.

It is a road that ends at a cliff. They need to wake up and realize it.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

25 responses to “VDOE Does Define Educational Equity as Equal Outcomes”

  1. Publius Avatar
    Publius

    Clearly where they are headed…
    Check out this article on recent California proposals. VA beat Cali to this craziness!
    https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/05/california-state-board-of-ed-dumbing-down-k-12-math-curriculum-to-ensure-equitable-outcomes/

    This page has all the “culturally responsive” definitions –
    https://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/page-759-math-framework.png

    Let’s quit kidding ourselves. The public schools – even the so-called “good” ones – merely because the parents are generally wealthy and educated and live in more expensive neighborhoods – are a cesspool. No amount of money can fix this. Quit having out of wedlock children. Follow the success path – graduate high school, get a job, get married, have children then.
    School boards need to be taken over. School choice is needed.

  2. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    I have been searching and searching for a private school ETF for my investment portfolio.

  3. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    One day the backlash from kids will be really really horrible.

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    The Virginia Lottery is going to need to sell many more tickets to pay for this.

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    In not one of the items listed did I find a recommendation or demand for equal outcomes. There is a stress on equity. VDOE defines equity as not being able to predict student outcomes on the basis of extraneous factors such as gender, race, zip code, or socioeconomic status. You are reading your own definition into the term equity that is not justified by the position of VDOE.

    1. Publius Avatar
      Publius

      Come on Dick. They can’t come out and say it, so they hide behind amorphous words, which are not objectionable in themselves…until you understand what they really mean.
      Jim Ryan wants to make UVA Great & Good…OH, you mean UVA wasn’t good before you came? And this is how you define good?

      Did you notice intelligence wasn’t one of the factors in measuring outcomes? Isn’t that the single most predictive factor?

      What can this mean other than equal outcomes…or else?
      Require divisions to evaluate master schedules to ensure equitable student assignment in honors/advanced and AP courses and require reporting on demographic enrollment in these courses.
      So there must be equal enrollment, whether qualified or not, and then what happens when the non-qualified but admitted fail at a greater rate? Why, more evidence of racism and more need for more money to “fix” the problem. A never ending cycle of self-perpetuating grievance.
      How about have standards and people meet those standards or not? If you really believe black academic under-achievement is due to systemic racism, then I would argue you are a racist. Of course there are socio-economic factors – how many of those negative behaviors are self-inflicted? I know white people with all the privilege in the world and they have blown up their lives. I have known black and white people who had tougher circumstances and achieved greatly. Individual agency matters.
      The standards are poison and they have to be hidden in a spoonful of sugar to make the grievance medicine go down.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I do not agree with your construing equitable student assignment as meaning equal assignment. Here is another way of explaining the difference:

        “Much has been made of the difference between equity and equality. While equality means treating every student the same, equity means making sure every student has the support they need to be successful. Equity in education requires putting systems in place to ensure that
        every child has an equal chance for success. That requires understanding the unique challenges and barriers faced by individual students or by
        populations of students and providing additional supports to help them overcome those barriers. While this in itself may not ensure equal outcomes, we all should strive to ensure that every child has equal opportunity for success.”

        https://www.thinkingmaps.com/equity-education-matters/

        1. Publius Avatar
          Publius

          This is from your reply above –
          Equity in education requires putting systems in place to ensure that
          every child has an equal chance for success

          Every child does not and cannot have an equal chance for success. This denies that different people act differently. A poor black child might over achieve, while an entitled, rich white kid might do drugs and achieve nothing. You cannot achieve equal results no matter what you do. You can have neutral processes and standards and equal opportunity.

          Next edu-speak –
          That requires understanding the unique challenges and barriers faced by individual students or by
          populations of students and providing additional supports to help them overcome those barriers.

          What are they saying here? Are they saying they will tailor teaching to each student? Or are they really saying disparate outcome requires additional supports to “overcome those barriers?” What barriers? How many barriers are from the parents’ choices? The students” choices?
          If people really cared about fixing achievement gaps, they would quit subsidizing fatherlessness – for blacks AND whites. The single biggest predictor of problems for crime and education and poverty. That would be compassion, but it would require making a moral choice and condemning harmful behavior.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            so you would not give help to a child with a learning disability like dyslexia? Or special education for kids with special needs?

            Or kids whose parents are basically uneducated and can’t really help their kids in school?

          2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            In your first paragraph, you morph from “equal chance for success” to “equal results”. You are right that students’ choices often result in unequal results. But, at least, the students should had an equal chance.

            As you point out, fatherlessness and poverty are substantial barriers. They may be the parents’ choices, but they were not the students’ choices. And I agree that we should do whatever we can to minimize single-parent homes.

          3. Publius Avatar
            Publius

            So it seems we have a point of agreement in equal opportunity, and I presume in what would follow – equal application.
            Where we diverge is you think they speak in turgid jargon in good faith, while I think they do so to obfuscate and deceive. And, based on history, I think my suspicions are correct.
            As an example, the dedication of the enslaved laborers memorial at UVA. At the dedication, the speaker said the debt can never be repaid. If so, why bother? What kind of graceless world is that? Can the debt to the founders ever be repaid? Shouldn’t we have some focus on that? Someone said forgive as we have been forgiven. But the world of CRT, being Marxist, does not allow for grace or mercy, just power and perpetual grievance in the further pursuit of power (and riches). If we must tell the full history, then shouldn’t that include that the Africans had wars and killed or sold the defeated? Western Civ, as developed from the Judeo Christian worldview, has nothing to apologize for – it starts with all men are sinners and all are in need of grace – find any society where those statements are not true – and has allowed for these impostors to speak and spread their poison. I refuse to allow them any right of judgment. They are hypocrites and destroyers.

        2. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Dick, this is the very heart of the “systemic racism” discussion, with the assumption by so many that disparate outcomes per se result from racism. That is CRT. Focus on individual effort and mere equal opportunity, you are damned in no uncertain terms as a total racist. By some.

          If an employer lacks a fair (as defined by someone) minority share of new hires, promotions, executives, bonus recipients, OT payments, (fill in the blank), the onus is on them if challenged to prove there was no racial bias involved. The numbers alone constitute prima facie evidence, at best a rebuttable presumption. What is now employment law is moving to the schools.

          Some of those suggestion above are fine, but they in themselves won’t produce equal outcomes.

          1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            Unless one believe that minority students are inherently incapable of achieving the same levels as whites, which I know is not your position, then it seems reasonable to consider that minorities being in the lower rungs of achievement is prima facie evidence of inequity.

        3. so does that mean a student must be allowed to take a test an infinite number of times until they get a perfect score? EQUAL OUTCOMES

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            No, it does not.

            But here’s a question. When we talk about “equal outcomes” (which is totally bogus), does it mean White kids and Hispanic kids also?

            So equal outcomes for ALL races?

            Is that what this “equity” stuff is really all about?

          2. Then please do define what Equity’s ‘equal outcomes’ looks like for a test —- in hard fact based specific words. When we develop new methodologies we must define each in precise terms.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            equity does not mean equal outcomes.

            It’s an idiotic belief.

            Take kids with serious disabilities. Does anyone think you can make their outcomes equal to others without those disabilities?

            Don’t think race. Think all white if that helps then think about all whites getting equal outcomes from “equity”.

            dumb, huh?

          4. And yet, there is no explanation of how to ensure tests are scored in order to
            “result in equitable outcomes for all.” [to paraphrase the AASAC’s definition as stated above]. Or what that means.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            because it’s NOT about that. Think in terms of two kids ,both have the same IQ but one has a learning disability.

            What should be done?

            What would be equitable?

            What would enable both of them to achieve their potentials?

            Not about race except to racists.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Dick, you must be scanning, not reading. I directly quoted both the AASAC and the Superintendent defining equity as requiring equal outcomes. You are being hardheaded. Take their word for it.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Where in those lists do they say “equal outcomes”?

        1. JAMES Avatar

          It is not in the lists, Dick, it is in the definition of racial equity provided by the AASAC itself:
          “The systematic fair treatment of people of all races, resulting in equitable opportunities and outcomes for all. It is not just the absence of discrimination and inequities, but also the presence of deliberate systems and supports to achieve and sustain racial equity.”

          Then the Superintendent writes that his goal, in addition to closing opportunity gaps, is “eliminating disproportionality in student outcome data.” So, when reading the recommendations, that is the context.

        2. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          It is in the definition he quoted. Come on, Dick, in the legislative world the key is always in the definitions! We both know that. This is the same. You can’t just read the text of the bill without applying the specific defined terms in the opening section or if there is one the statement of purpose.

  6. Ronnie Chappell Avatar
    Ronnie Chappell

    Thanks for posting. The proposals are more likely to harm schools than to help them. People seem to forget that unlike a food stamp or a housing voucher or Medicaid-funded healthcare, an education is the one public good you can’t give someone. It actually has to be earned. I wonder if the “educrats” also plan to eliminate attendance requirements? Are there huge numbers of minority teachers available to hire who are being passed over? Has anyone taken the time to correlate per student school spending to student performance? Is there any evidence that spending more improves student outcomes? Or do poor “single high school” districts in rural VA with significant minority populations outperform uban schools with significant minority populations? Has anyone done a broad survey of VA educators to determine if they mete out discipline based on race or behaviour? Do they believe their disciplinary actions are influenced by implicit bias? Do they believe they have the ability to effectively manage disruptive students and teach effectively? Teacher’s unions generally oppose merit based compensation programs because they know so many factors influencing student achievement are factors they cannot control or change.

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      The BIPOC kids at RVA schools can’t read or add…. not sure how they’ll be a part of this next generation of educators…
      Oh wait, they’re dropping the Praxis and will allow alternative licensing…
      I hope these people get exactly what they think they want.
      But like the Obamas, no well off Black family will send their kids to inner city “diverse” schools. Their kids will go to prestigious college prep schools…

Leave a Reply