Education Usurpation

You will submit.

by A.L. Schuhart

In case you missed it, Northern Virginia Community College is now not only committed to excellence in academics, it is also committed to “education programming that helps participants further understand broader issues of systemic bias and structural racism that contribute to a false hierarchy of values.”

This mission has been given to NOVA by the American Association of Colleges and Universities (AACU), which has selected NOVA to be a “Truth, Racial Healing, and Transformation Center.”

As a citizen of Virginia, and not just as a college professor, I have to ask what business it is of any public institution to determine which values citizens should have, and I have to question the honesty and ethics of educators who determine for themselves how equal citizens should view the world and what attitudes they should have. I have to ask what right educators have to use their classrooms to achieve this affective goal, and how such educators can look themselves in the mirror without seeing themselves as the traitors they are when they do so.

It is not the right of a college to decide what the values of citizens should be, and then actively work to achieve that singular political outcome. This is not the mandate given to American Education or Educators. It is the job of a college to represent the values of the citizens in the community as they exist, not to judge them, or favor one set over another. But because the AACU and NOVA’s leaders have decided that America’s values are “false,” they now believe that that have the right to alter the mission of the college to achieve the “true” values.

This foolish assumption of power by AACU, NOVA, and the VCCS cannot end well. And so, I must also question the competency of education leaders who fail to see that the system they are installing is an historically dangerous model, for once constructed to achieve this seeming social good, it will then be used to indoctrinate and control, rather than to empower and liberate, the human mind. In fact, it is a national socialist design, the same as prevailed in Germany in the 1930’s. It is promulgated in the same way, serves the same purposes, and relies upon the same instruments of persuasion: force, fear, and racial scapegoating. Its goal is the same as then: to control the education of young people in order to engineer society and create what they believe will be a better state. Its purpose is indoctrination, not education.

Why should NOVA retain tax-exempt status when it takes upon itself the deliberate and intentional mission of altering the attitudes and world views of citizens, and fails to represent and equally respect the array of ideas and attitudes that exist naturally within the community, and instead advocate for one world view? This is a political objective.

Thus, Virginia citizens should be very clear that educators or institutions, such as NOVA or the AACU, do not have the right to determine what values citizens should have. Each of our equal citizen-students has the inherent natural human right to his or her own values, even the ones we personally do not like or agree with. They have the constitutional right to develop and determine those values without our intentional interference. Once we deliberately align the institution and instruction with only one view of truth, then all truth is lost in the authoritarian design such intention creates. Then, the very processes of knowledge construction will be corrupted and knowledge creation will lack integrity. In the end, it will destroy the true source of the wealth and power and freedom in America: the ability of the people themselves to think independently, to create new things, to adapt, and to question the universe openly and freely in pursuit of their individual dreams as determined by THEM.

Finally, I have to ask, and hopefully Congress might think about asking, when and how the AACU rose to such power as to direct and coordinate a national effort to subvert democratic institutions and create a national socialized education system? When did we give the power to “racially heal” American society to the Education system?

The answer is, we never did: the system has been usurped.

A.L. Schuhart is a Professor of English at NVCC-Annandale. He holds a Doctorate in Education. His area of specialization is Scientific Rhetoric; he teaches both Scientific Writing and American Literature, among other things.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

36 responses to “Education Usurpation”

  1. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    For speaking truth, this professor risks being canceled by the Tolerant Left. One cannot, must not, challenge the Narrative. He must be defended (and this question should be asked of a lot of institutions – why does the ABA have such a role in accrediting law schools? Who appointed those Marxists God? (Which Marxists only believe in when a political opponent dies and they wish him to burn in Hell)

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Would you approve of a professor who taught from an anti-religious perspective?

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    … “education programming that helps participants further understand broader issues of systemic bias and structural racism that contribute to a false hierarchy of values.”

    Ahh, are we back to that Smithsonian poster? You remember, the one where “white” values included:

    Self-reliance
    The nuclear family
    Objective, rational linear thinking
    Cause and effect relationships
    Quantitative emphasis
    Hard work is the key to success
    Work before play

    Is that the “false hierarchy of values”?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Oh, so Northam and VDOT just gave a lesson in self-reliance?

  3. This approach is how North Korea is able to declare that Kim Jong-il created the burrito…… maybe NVCC should simply adopt our National Museum view:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a43474e77d01b653ba2b6ec347494231be27bb941a861f9a98712df1c6f7375a.jpg

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Is avalue a value?

  5. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Once upon a time NVCC offered a deal in education. Quality teaching included.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Meh, this article is hardly an indictment on the man’s teaching quality.

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Schools have always taught what values citizens should have. When I was in elementary school, we were taught that slavery was OK; that slaves were really happy at what they were doing.

    Schools try to instill patriotism. I don’t know whether students do it now, but my elementary school day always started with a pledge of allegiance to the flag. Even now, sports events start off with the singing of the National Anthem.

    We expect schools to foster good values such as honesty (no cheating on tests), hard work (why else have tests?), sportsmanship, etc.

    So, let’s not pretend that schools do not attempt to “determine which values citizens should have.” The author of this post just does not like the values that are being put forward, but that is another question altogether.

    But, on a more specific level, how does an effort “to further understand broader issues of systemic bias and structural racism” constitute “socialized education”? And is it not a function of education to try to broaden a student’s perspective and outlook on the world, rather than to allow him to stay content with a worldview that he never thought to question? No one is forcing a student to adopt any perspective; but different perspectives are being presented. I know that my college certainly opened the world up to me beyond my upbringing in rural Southside Virginia. And I am thankful for that experience.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Well said…

    2. I agree – we should broaden the student’s perspective and his/her understanding that all cultures are equal – just ask any female in Afghanistan.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Or Mississipp, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire.

    3. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      I dont expect schools to do a doggone thing in terms of values, patriotism unless they are parochial (therefore private) schools. Honesty and hard work, sportsmanship, that is basic. If people don’t work hard they simply reap that rewards. Schools don’t do pledges now – AFAIK. Schools are getting rid of hard work (homework, etc.). The values being put forth in schools now are not condusive to us working together for good.

      Because systemic bias and structual racism comes from a particular viewpoint doesn’t do anything positive. When kids are coming out now, they’re indoctrinated, they are not “broadened” to allow other viewpoints. I question more than kids and grandkids now. So I should be the one that doesn’t question, yet I am. Why is that? Indoctrination is not broadening anything. Yes, people are being forced thru CRT, CASEL, SEL, etc. to adopt a specific viewpoint. Once you start requiring or teaching systemic racism and other things, you are teaching a viewpoint and ethos.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Ah, so the Left was right to remove prayer in school? I say, “Let’s ditch the Pledge, too!”

      2. Matt Hurt Avatar
        Matt Hurt

        ” Each school board shall require the daily recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance in each classroom of the school division and shall ensure that the flag of the United States is in place in each such classroom.”
        https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title22.1/chapter13/section22.1-202/

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Indoctrination! Also a contradiction. How does a free person pledge allegiance? Why, freely of course!

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Well, hells bells, if you are not a patriot, then you’ve got messed up “values’!

          2. Matt Hurt Avatar
            Matt Hurt

            This is what we get when we design a government that you want when our party is in power. It seems that politicians lack the foresight to anticipate their eventual unseating.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I would agree, but the way they grab money, it’s as if they’ll all be voted out tomorrow.

          4. Matt Hurt Avatar
            Matt Hurt

            They all should be voted out. All incumbents should be primaried.

        2. vicnicholls Avatar
          vicnicholls

          I can quote a lot of things that I dont believe in.

        3. vicnicholls Avatar
          vicnicholls

          Guess what they give kids a bye for that.

    4. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Rights and responsibilities derive from what, exactly?
      Our collective values.

    5. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Rights and responsibilities derive from what, exactly?
      Our collective values.

    6. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      So we have always done indoctrination, Dick? This is just a natural transition to a new set of values? Nothing to see here?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        So teaching the happy slave thing was “indoctrination”?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          and so we “indoctrinated” a couple of generations of white kids about racism being “good” and “ok’ and now saying it was wrong and did have some lasting damage …. it’s wrong to say that now because it’s teaching ‘values”?

          very confusing……. rule changes…

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        By Jove, I think you’ve got it! And, we’ve done so notably many times before, like, oh say, 1776 when we decided that obeying a king was not a normative value, or 1865 when we declared human ownership was no longer a right, or 1920 when boozing for fun was unacceptable.

        But then you went and screwed it up! Yes, these are something new to see. Pay attention.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Always find you instructive.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            ‘At’s m’job, Boss.

    7. I agree with much of what you wrote regarding societal values being taught in school. However, I disagree with your conclusion that no one is forcing (or trying to force) students to adopt a certain perspective. In your quote regarding NOVA’s new educational “framework” you left out the final phrase: …that contribute to a false hierarchy of values. I think this is where the indoctrination and social engineering lie.

      The premise that our hierarchy of values is “false” is gratuitous and unfounded. As written, this new educational “framework” allows for no discussion about whether or not our values are false, it accepts and states it is fact. I do not accept this premise, and I suspect I am not alone in that regard.

      If NOVA committed itself to something like: “education programming that encourages participants to study, consider and discuss whether a history of systemic bias and structural racism have contributed to certain inequitable values in our society” then I would have no issues with their educational “framework”. However, I think instructing students based on “a false hierarchy values” being an established fact qualifies as indoctrination.

      Do you think we currently have a “false hierarchy of values” in this country?

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I would ask, “What is civics?”

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    We DO TEACH that, among other things, that it’s WRONG to steal lunch money, cheat on tests, lie, bully others, and a range of other “values”.

    No one should pretend or assert that these are not things that schools and teachers should do.

    The parent that comes to school and says their kid was bullied – expects the school to provide a “safe” place for him to learn. If that is a “value”, so be it.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      And, at the very least, we could teach the normative value that “You DO NOT overthrow the government by means of violence.”

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        well.. that “indoctrination” did not “take’….

        WaPo Poll: ” 1 in 3 Americans say violence against government can be justified, citing fears of political schism, pandemic’

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Public values are defined as those values that provide normative consensus about: (1) the rights, benefits, and prerogatives to which citizens should (and should not) be entitled; (2) the obligations of citizens to society, the state, and one another; and (3) the principles upon which governments and policies must be based (Bozeman, 2007: 13). Public values have been central to public administration over the years and the key public values are equity, impartiality, justice, honesty, fairness, probity, continuity, secrecy, accountability, transparency, responsiveness, and so on. However, the significance of public values is said to have declined in recent years. Barry Bozeman (2002) warns us about the emerging problem of ‘public-value failure’ because public-value failure occurs when: (1) mechanisms for the articulation and aggregation of values have broken down; (2) ‘imperfect monopolies’ occur; (3) benefit hoarding occurs; (4) there is a scarcity of providers of public value; (5) a short time horizon threatens public value; (6) a focus on substitutability of assets threatens conservation of public resources; and (7) market transactions threaten fundamental human subsistence. Based on the following works concerning: what exactly public values are and which specific values are the most important (Beck Jørgensen and Bozeman, 2007; Feeney and Bozeman, 2007), what constitutes the ‘publicness’ of specific values (van de Wal et al., 2008), and how public values can be safeguarded and reconciled (de Bruijn and Dicke, 2006; Kernaghan, 2000), van de Wal (2009) also asserts that public values are often not met enough by certain public policies because of an overemphasis on economic individualism.”

    Sounds like a worthy academic endeavor to me. Of course, in time when one faction of public service views its normative values to stem from demagoguery, it’s ever more important for the remainder to espouse and reinforce those values being laid to waste.

    I stand corrected. Apparently one can attain a Ed.D. with rote alone.

Leave a Reply