Dysfunction Exposed in COVID Demands Overhaul of Virginia’s Government

by James C. Sherlock

Great Seal of Virginia

We all like to discuss the politics of things. That in many instances is appropriate. But political leadership is neither the problem nor the solution I will discuss here today.  

We will spend every day between now and November’s election debating how the politicians responded to COVID. And we should. But our state government has failed both us and our elected leaders.  

I submit that the failures of the bureaucracies would have crippled elected officials from either party. We need desperately to fix the laws, regulations and bureaucratic structures that harbor such failures as permanently as we are able.

I will suggest a path.

What needs to be done?

I wrote in late March in praise of Virginia’s pandemic influenza emergency plan and published key details the next day. Two days later I discovered the coverup. The plan had been removed from public view on state websites, never to be heard of again.

In what universe does a bureaucracy take action to hide from the public its pandemic emergency action plan because it is embarrassed by its utter lack of preparation and compliance? Answer: In the universe that is Virginia.

Start there, with the plan.  

I found it excellent, but I may be one of the few Virginians, including government employees, who has actually read it. There was no evidence at the onset of COVID that the state agencies to which the plan assigned specific tasks ever prepared for them much less carried them out in the emergency.  

We must examine what the plan required and why it was not implemented. Examine the role and functioning of the Department of Emergency Management. Did it have enough authority to force preparation and compliance by the rest of the bureaucracy? Did it try?

Assess the role of Virginia’s understaffed healthcare facility inspection regime in the deadly performance of some nursing homes. Take a deep look at the nation’s worst management and administration of COVID tests and vaccines. Examine the effects of COPN on hospital availability for the emergency. Review school preparations, school safety and in-person instruction or lack of it. 

Look at Virginia’s thick blanket of appointed boards. Did they help or hinder? Did you know that the Board of Health:

“Makes emergency orders and regulations for the purpose of suppressing nuisances dangerous to the public health and communicable, contagious and infectious diseases and other dangers to the public life and health (§32.1-13)”?  

Did the Board members know it? Did the Health Commissioner? Are we retrospectively glad the Board didn’t do what the law requires? Does the structure of the Board of Health reflect their legal responsibilities? 

Similar questions surround the Board of Education and perhaps others in the forest of such boards that are supposed to provide oversight of the executive departments.

We must assess the relationship between the Governor’s office and the Supreme Court in an emergency. In COVID that relationship was certainly controversial. Does it need to be better defined in law? Did the staffs of the courts and the law department (Attorney General) prove efficient and effective in the time of COVID? 

The sampling above is not even close to complete.

Many of the failures were not exclusively or even primarily political, but rather represented failure of what were supposed to be the structural supports to all of us as well as to the decision-makers.  

Do we want the next Governor, Democrat or Republican, to take office with an executive department not even in the process of review with an eye towards reform? Are we to leave it with the same embedded dysfunctionality we have just witnessed?

A Proposal

COVID has exposed flaws so deeply ingrained in the government of Virginia that I propose that next year’s General Assembly establish a Commission on the Performance of the Structures of Virginia Government in COVID Response. I chose the name carefully.

To be of any use — to get anything done — and most importantly to gain the trust of the people of Virginia, it must be bipartisan and charged to focus exclusively on the structures of government and their performance in the emergency, not the performance of political leadership.

That Commission should examine every aspect of the government response — executive, legislative, courts and law department (AG’s office) — for laws, regulations and the structural and bureaucratic components of government that either failed to respond at all or did so ineffectively. 

And then recommend changes to laws, regulations and structures. Identify individual accountability in the bureaucracies as necessary to prevent it from happening again. 

I worked under contract to the federal government in the Clinton/Gore reinventing government initiative. From that experience I will guarantee that new rules and structures that leave in place the same failed leaders of the career bureaucracies do not a solution make. As a start, find and name the government official who ordered the hiding of the pandemic emergency plan.

I propose that this Commission emulate the structure of the Commission on Constitutional Revision, authorized by joint resolution at the General Assembly’s 1968 Session and appointed by Governor Mills E. Godwin, Jr. That Commission, chaired by former Governor Albertis S. Harrison, Jr., reported to the Governor and the General Assembly in January 1969. Out of that effort we got an entirely new constitution.

No Virginian, including our elected representatives, wants either to repeat the failures of government emergency response or the day-to-day failures that underwrote that failed emergency response in COVID or to allow them to persist unexamined and uncorrected.  

So, appoint a blue-ribbon Commission, assure that it is bipartisan, skilled, is supported by experienced and skilled staff, is charged and empowered adequate to the task, and then fix the problems it unearths.

Consider hiring one of Virginia’s Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) such as Mitre to help staff the Commission. They know what they are doing and have no political dog in the fight.

But there is really no alternative to such a Commission. The General Assembly can and must appoint one.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

97 responses to “Dysfunction Exposed in COVID Demands Overhaul of Virginia’s Government”

  1. I agree. We do need a commission to look into the performance of government agencies in response to COVID-19.

    We can argue endlessly over how Governor Northam should have handled the crisis. Invariably, the arguments will be politically tainted. Accountability should occur at the political level.

    But Northam was served by a pre-existing government administration, which, as you rightly point out, failed utterly to execute the plan it had written. That failure left Northam in the lurch and, to some degree, compromised his ability to respond effectively. It should be a matter of bipartisan interest to identify the root dysfunction.

    1. sherlockj Avatar

      Thank you. I hope the response of the General Assembly can be as mature.

  2. I agree. We do need a commission to look into the performance of government agencies in response to COVID-19.

    We can argue endlessly over how Governor Northam should have handled the crisis. Invariably, the arguments will be politically tainted. Accountability should occur at the political level.

    But Northam was served by a pre-existing government administration, which, as you rightly point out, failed utterly to execute the plan it had written. That failure left Northam in the lurch and, to some degree, compromised his ability to respond effectively. It should be a matter of bipartisan interest to identify the root dysfunction.

    1. sherlockj Avatar

      Thank you. I hope the response of the General Assembly can be as mature.

  3. sherlockj Avatar

    Thank you. I hope the response of the General Assembly can be as mature.

  4. djrippert Avatar

    No governor who is a lame duck on his inauguration day will ever be able to fix the deep rot in the bureaucracies of our state government. And the bureaucrats know it. That’s why every other state in America allows a sitting governor to stand, at least once, for reelection. We need to follow suit.

    No part-time legislature with far too many life-long politicians will ever preside over a reworking of the state government. Too many of them are fat, dumb and happy with the status quo. We need term limits for the General Assembly.

    No state that throttles voter turnout with obscure off-year elections will ever have an accountable political class. We need to follow the federal election schedule with our state elections.

    No state that allows unlimited campaign contributions will ever force its political class to put the voters first. We need campaign contribution limits.

    No state that allows election of judges by the legislature (without even a review commission) will ever effectively rein in its legislature or its state government departments. We need a different way to elect judges.

    Let’s be honest – the 1971 constitution was an attempt by the Byrd Machine to come into compliance with Federal laws (especially around racial equity) while preserving the running of the state by the plantation elite. In other words, by perpetuating the Byrd Machine. We need a new state constitution.

    1. sherlockj Avatar

      Excellent assessment.

      I am trying to thread a political needle with my recommendation that perhaps can woo Democrats. If so, I will have succeeded. I don’t care who gets credit.

      If not, Republicans will have to run on the issue and try to supplant their opposition in control of government and then do it. If they are well enough informed and wise enough to do so. Which is up in the air.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead V

      I never thought about this way before Mr. DJ. Maybe it is a good time to give the state constitution a 50 year tune up. It is ironic that the hand of Harry Byrd is still all over the structure of state government. Mr. Byrd is probably grinning from the grave.
      http://www.foundagrave.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/2759_123870000146-e1462485771657.jpg

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        You and Don should be careful of what you ask for. The current constitution was drafted by a special commission appointed by the Governor. That commission submitted its recommended revised Constitution to the General Assembly, which made some significant changes to the recommendations, and submitted it to the voters for adoption in a referendum. Do you really want this current General Assembly involved in drafting a new constitution? From the comments of many on this blog about the makeup of the GA, I would think you would want to keep them away from the constitution as much as possible.

        1. sherlockj Avatar

          I could not agree with you more, Dick. My recommendation was precisely targeted for a reason. If it is done right, elected officials from both parties and the rest of us will benefit immensely. Talk of a constitutional convention will derail that.

        2. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead V

          Ahh Mr. Dick! You have hit the essence of the debate between Jefferson and Madison. Jefferson believed that the “earth belonged to the living” generation. 19 years to be exact. Madison’s rebuttal was the rejection of the majority binding the minority. I suspect the 1971 state constitution will endure. For now at least.

        3. LarrytheG Avatar

          And that’s the essential issue when talk of changing how the State is governed.

          All of the things that DJ cites as issues are indeed legitimate issues. I just think most states have their own warts also and attempts to reform, no matter how well-intentioned will end up being decided by some of the very people we think are part of the problem to start with!

          in other words as Dick cautioned – be careful what you wish for!

          This is why I favor – more work-a-day folks in the legislature. Right now, the GA has quite a few folks who are wealthy enough they don’t have to work at a regular job every day while they are in Richmond. AND some who are not wealthy enough may well be more open to receiving campaign donations.

          And this is why I favor citizen-initiated referendum like is already the case in places like California and Colorado.

          https://cdn.ballotpedia.org/images/8/8d/US_Map_I%26R.png

          These are two issues that the public would likely strongly support and legislatures would be on the bubble not supporting – and candidates who challenge them and promise support could win.

          To me , that’s how change could happen.

          I just don’t think demanding reform from the existing deeply embedded legislators is going to get much of a hearing especially if the Governor is opposed and the effort is mostly partisan.

        4. LarrytheG Avatar

          Another point to make is that we are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the two political parties. It’s those two parties that actually will agree on how to redistrict the state and likely will be some horsetrading.

          Look at our election infrastructure. It’s essentially controlled by the GOP and Dems.

          Even the Chaffin issue – the concern is not so much about “representing” the people in that district. It’s much more about whether it will be a GOP or Dem.

          The two parties control large swaths of governance and are much more tuned in to their own respective party concerns than votes.

          This actually is part of what divides the State and the Country.

          So.. what if the Governor had no choice, actually no involvement at all in filling a vacant seat. The process would automatically start no matter whether the Gov was a GOP or a Dem?

          How would you get there? Well.. you won’t get there as long as it’s left up to the Gov and both parties want it that way – when their guy is Gov. The other party won’t usually have the votes to win in the GA or override the Gov.

          Our political ecosystem is co-owned by the GOP and the Dems and what’s good for actual citizens is not necessary what either one of them want – but that’s exactly how it works now.. Majority PARTY wins, not citizens.

          Our two-party system is a pox on our governance.

  5. djrippert Avatar

    No governor who is a lame duck on his inauguration day will ever be able to fix the deep rot in the bureaucracies of our state government. And the bureaucrats know it. That’s why every other state in America allows a sitting governor to stand, at least once, for reelection. We need to follow suit.

    No part-time legislature with far too many life-long politicians will ever preside over a reworking of the state government. Too many of them are fat, dumb and happy with the status quo. We need term limits for the General Assembly.

    No state that throttles voter turnout with obscure off-year elections will ever have an accountable political class. We need to follow the federal election schedule with our state elections.

    No state that allows unlimited campaign contributions will ever force its political class to put the voters first. We need campaign contribution limits.

    No state that allows election of judges by the legislature (without even a review commission) will ever effectively rein in its legislature or its state government departments. We need a different way to elect judges.

    Let’s be honest – the 1971 constitution was an attempt by the Byrd Machine to come into compliance with Federal laws (especially around racial equity) while preserving the running of the state by the plantation elite. In other words, by perpetuating the Byrd Machine. We need a new state constitution.

    1. sherlockj Avatar

      Excellent assessment.

      I am trying to thread a political needle with my recommendation that perhaps can woo Democrats. If so, I will have succeeded. I don’t care who gets credit.

      If not, Republicans will have to run on the issue and try to supplant their opposition in control of government and then do it. If they are well enough informed and wise enough to do so. Which is up in the air.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead V

      I never thought about this way before Mr. DJ. Maybe it is a good time to give the state constitution a 50 year tune up. It is ironic that the hand of Harry Byrd is still all over the structure of state government. Mr. Byrd is probably grinning from the grave.
      http://www.foundagrave.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/2759_123870000146-e1462485771657.jpg

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        You and Don should be careful of what you ask for. The current constitution was drafted by a special commission appointed by the Governor. That commission submitted its recommended revised Constitution to the General Assembly, which made some significant changes to the recommendations, and submitted it to the voters for adoption in a referendum. Do you really want this current General Assembly involved in drafting a new constitution? From the comments of many on this blog about the makeup of the GA, I would think you would want to keep them away from the constitution as much as possible.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead V

          Ahh Mr. Dick! You have hit the essence of the debate between Jefferson and Madison. Jefferson believed that the “earth belonged to the living” generation. 19 years to be exact. Madison’s rebuttal was the rejection of the majority binding the minority. I suspect the 1971 state constitution will endure. For now at least.

        2. sherlockj Avatar

          I could not agree with you more, Dick. My recommendation was precisely targeted for a reason. If it is done right, elected officials from both parties and the rest of us will benefit immensely. Talk of a constitutional convention will derail that.

        3. LarrytheG Avatar

          And that’s the essential issue when talk of changing how the State is governed.

          All of the things that DJ cites as issues are indeed legitimate issues. I just think most states have their own warts also and attempts to reform, no matter how well-intentioned will end up being decided by some of the very people we think are part of the problem to start with!

          in other words as Dick cautioned – be careful what you wish for!

          This is why I favor – more work-a-day folks in the legislature. Right now, the GA has quite a few folks who are wealthy enough they don’t have to work at a regular job every day while they are in Richmond. AND some who are not wealthy enough may well be more open to receiving campaign donations.

          And this is why I favor citizen-initiated referendum like is already the case in places like California and Colorado.

          https://cdn.ballotpedia.org/images/8/8d/US_Map_I%26R.png

          These are two issues that the public would likely strongly support and legislatures would be on the bubble not supporting – and candidates who challenge them and promise support could win.

          To me , that’s how change could happen.

          I just don’t think demanding reform from the existing deeply embedded legislators is going to get much of a hearing especially if the Governor is opposed and the effort is mostly partisan.

        4. LarrytheG Avatar

          Another point to make is that we are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the two political parties. It’s those two parties that actually will agree on how to redistrict the state and likely will be some horsetrading.

          Look at our election infrastructure. It’s essentially controlled by the GOP and Dems.

          Even the Chaffin issue – the concern is not so much about “representing” the people in that district. It’s much more about whether it will be a GOP or Dem.

          The two parties control large swaths of governance and are much more tuned in to their own respective party concerns than votes.

          This actually is part of what divides the State and the Country.

          So.. what if the Governor had no choice, actually no involvement at all in filling a vacant seat. The process would automatically start no matter whether the Gov was a GOP or a Dem?

          How would you get there? Well.. you won’t get there as long as it’s left up to the Gov and both parties want it that way – when their guy is Gov. The other party won’t usually have the votes to win in the GA or override the Gov.

          Our political ecosystem is co-owned by the GOP and the Dems and what’s good for actual citizens is not necessary what either one of them want – but that’s exactly how it works now.. Majority PARTY wins, not citizens.

          Our two-party system is a pox on our governance.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar

    Yep, the GOP in Va sure did a good job with the SCC and Dominion.. ‘more! more!

    😉

    I think DJ has some excellent criticisms but not totally fair in that many states have similar issues. It’s the nature of the beast of government and we do have JLARC and APC and the GA can also stand up Ad Hoc commissions.

    The part-time citizen legislature is a sham as many who are there are wealthy enough they can be away from their jobs during GA season.

    We need some REAL citizens in the GA – folks that have normal jobs and work-a-day lives. We need to help them run and pay their existing job salaries while they are in Richmond.

    1. djrippert Avatar

      We are very different than “most states”.

      1. We are the only state where the governor cannot stand for re-election.
      2. We are one of only two states where the legislature elects judges without recommendations from an independent commission.
      3. We are one of only four states with off-year elections of the legislature. A fifth state, Kentucky, elects its governor off-year.
      4. We are one of only four states with no campaign contribution limits of any kind.

      “We need some REAL citizens in the GA – folks that have normal jobs and work-a-day lives. We need to help them run and pay their existing job salaries while they are in Richmond.”

      Maybe. Kirk Cox is a lifetime public school history teacher. I have no idea who taught his classes while the GA was in session every year. Substitutes I guess.

      However, we definitely need REAL citizens on the university Boards of Visitors. That crew is almost entirely composed of smoked salmon and caviar, night at the opera bought-in appointees. And we wonder how the public colleges and universities keep getting their BoVs to rubber stamp ridiculous tuition and fees increases year after year. “Lovie, have you seen the Professor lately?” Do you think any of them wear yachting hats to the board meetings?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        re: ” Maybe. Kirk Cox is a lifetime public school history teacher. I have no idea who taught his classes while the GA was in session every year. Substitutes I guess.”

        so how did he actually earn a living while not teaching?

        could most teachers do that?

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead V

          My bet is Mr. Cox had a student teacher fill in for him during his time away from the classroom.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Right. But did Mr. COx get paid by the school while he was away and if he did not then how did he pay his bills and such?

            So here’s the question. How representative is the GA if many of them there are not like most folks who actually have to work for a living?

            They’re making laws that affect people who actually have to work every day for a living and they don’t?

            And so we call that a “citizen” legislature? Really?

          2. sherlockj Avatar

            We are blessed that anyone would take a General Assembly job that has a work-a-day occupation.

            I often criticize that actions of some of them, but representative democracy can’t exist if we don’t have ordinary people willing to stand for office. And we can’t stand to have nothing but lawyers and heirs in those offices.

        2. sherlockj Avatar

          Larry, of course school teachers are paid by their school districts while the are serving in Richmond. Just like National Guard and Reserve troops are paid when called up. Is this news to you?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Jim – is that a law that requires School Districts to do that?

            I did not know that was a law. You’d think there would be a whole bunch of work-a-day teachers in the GA – especially Dems, right?

          2. sherlockj Avatar

            It may be a law, but not as far as I know. But there is also no school district, or to that point any other employer that can’t figure out that this is the right thing to do. Even if some employer might be inconvenienced, they can do a cost-benefit analysis and realize that penalizing their Senator or Delegate might not be in their best interests.

            Sometimes, a law or regulation is not necessary. This is one of those times.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            perhaps –

            but – a 6th grade teacher or a pharmacy tech or a manager at a McDonalds or a truck driver , nurse, deputy, etc, etc…

            they would bring a wealth of actual working-man experience to go with all that existing lawyer, small business, insurance, doctor jobs.

            Perhaps make it term-limited. Three years and time for another work-a-day person to go to Richmond.

            And the truth is that some of those GA jobs are more than just when they are in session.

    2. “I think DJ has some excellent criticisms but not totally fair in that many states have similar issues.”

      Because other states have some of the same issues as Virginia it’s not fair to criticize Virginia for having them? That makes no sense whatsoever.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Maybe you missed my point. It’s not a Virginia-specific issue, it’s more of a general governance issue across many states.

        No, it’s not good but it’s a tougher nut to crack that just viewing Virginia as an egregious outlier much worse than other states.

        It’s more widely endemic than that – IMHO.

      2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        Yes, but remember, any solutions to congruent problems found in any other States must also meet the Virginia criteria of preserving tradition over progress…

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Virginia, many eastern states started out with the “educated” gentry running the state, tantamount to “The Virginia Way”, i.e. “we know what is best”.

          As migration moved west – the folks who got involved in Governance were not near as much aristocratic “gentry” (some were landed gentry), as common man types. And that’s where we see states that have citizen-inititated referenda.

          It’s not really a “citizen” legislature if it’s mostly professionals and people with enough wealth that they don’t need to work at a work-da-day job.

          I fully realize that consequences will be he election of some who would be Amanda chase types but we’d end up with enough less party loyalists that coalitions would have to be formed no matter what the party of the Governor was.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar

    Yep, the GOP in Va sure did a good job with the SCC and Dominion.. ‘more! more!

    😉

    I think DJ has some excellent criticisms but not totally fair in that many states have similar issues. It’s the nature of the beast of government and we do have JLARC and APC and the GA can also stand up Ad Hoc commissions.

    The part-time citizen legislature is a sham as many who are there are wealthy enough they can be away from their jobs during GA season.

    We need some REAL citizens in the GA – folks that have normal jobs and work-a-day lives. We need to help them run and pay their existing job salaries while they are in Richmond.

    1. djrippert Avatar

      We are very different than “most states”.

      1. We are the only state where the governor cannot stand for re-election.
      2. We are one of only two states where the legislature elects judges without recommendations from an independent commission.
      3. We are one of only four states with off-year elections of the legislature. A fifth state, Kentucky, elects its governor off-year.
      4. We are one of only four states with no campaign contribution limits of any kind.

      “We need some REAL citizens in the GA – folks that have normal jobs and work-a-day lives. We need to help them run and pay their existing job salaries while they are in Richmond.”

      Maybe. Kirk Cox is a lifetime public school history teacher. I have no idea who taught his classes while the GA was in session every year. Substitutes I guess.

      However, we definitely need REAL citizens on the university Boards of Visitors. That crew is almost entirely composed of smoked salmon and caviar, night at the opera bought-in appointees. And we wonder how the public colleges and universities keep getting their BoVs to rubber stamp ridiculous tuition and fees increases year after year. “Lovie, have you seen the Professor lately?” Do you think any of them wear yachting hats to the board meetings?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        re: ” Maybe. Kirk Cox is a lifetime public school history teacher. I have no idea who taught his classes while the GA was in session every year. Substitutes I guess.”

        so how did he actually earn a living while not teaching?

        could most teachers do that?

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead V

          My bet is Mr. Cox had a student teacher fill in for him during his time away from the classroom.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Right. But did Mr. COx get paid by the school while he was away and if he did not then how did he pay his bills and such?

            So here’s the question. How representative is the GA if many of them there are not like most folks who actually have to work for a living?

            They’re making laws that affect people who actually have to work every day for a living and they don’t?

            And so we call that a “citizen” legislature? Really?

          2. sherlockj Avatar

            We are blessed that anyone would take a General Assembly job that has a work-a-day occupation.

            I often criticize that actions of some of them, but representative democracy can’t exist if we don’t have ordinary people willing to stand for office. And we can’t stand to have nothing but lawyers and heirs in those offices.

        2. sherlockj Avatar

          Larry, of course school teachers are paid by their school districts while the are serving in Richmond. Just like National Guard and Reserve troops are paid when called up. Is this news to you?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Jim – is that a law that requires School Districts to do that?

            I did not know that was a law. You’d think there would be a whole bunch of work-a-day teachers in the GA – especially Dems, right?

          2. sherlockj Avatar

            It may be a law, but not as far as I know. But there is also no school district, or to that point any other employer that can’t figure out that this is the right thing to do. Even if some employer might be inconvenienced, they can do a cost-benefit analysis and realize that penalizing their Senator or Delegate might not be in their best interests.

            Sometimes, a law or regulation is not necessary. This is one of those times.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            perhaps –

            but – a 6th grade teacher or a pharmacy tech or a manager at a McDonalds or a truck driver , nurse, deputy, etc, etc…

            they would bring a wealth of actual working-man experience to go with all that existing lawyer, small business, insurance, doctor jobs.

            Perhaps make it term-limited. Three years and time for another work-a-day person to go to Richmond.

            And the truth is that some of those GA jobs are more than just when they are in session.

    2. “I think DJ has some excellent criticisms but not totally fair in that many states have similar issues.”

      Because other states have some of the same issues as Virginia it’s not fair to criticize Virginia for having them? That makes no sense whatsoever.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Maybe you missed my point. It’s not a Virginia-specific issue, it’s more of a general governance issue across many states.

        No, it’s not good but it’s a tougher nut to crack that just viewing Virginia as an egregious outlier much worse than other states.

        It’s more widely endemic than that – IMHO.

      2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        Yes, but remember, any solutions to congruent problems found in any other States must also meet the Virginia criteria of preserving tradition over progress…

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Virginia, many eastern states started out with the “educated” gentry running the state, tantamount to “The Virginia Way”, i.e. “we know what is best”.

          As migration moved west – the folks who got involved in Governance were not near as much aristocratic “gentry” (some were landed gentry), as common man types. And that’s where we see states that have citizen-inititated referenda.

          It’s not really a “citizen” legislature if it’s mostly professionals and people with enough wealth that they don’t need to work at a work-da-day job.

          I fully realize that consequences will be he election of some who would be Amanda chase types but we’d end up with enough less party loyalists that coalitions would have to be formed no matter what the party of the Governor was.

  8. Eric the Half a Troll Avatar
    Eric the Half a Troll

    Vaccine-wise , today Becker’s has us ranked at #15 in terms of percent of distributed vaccine administered (70.66%). In terms of doses distributed as a percentage of population, we are now ranked 13th at 10.14%. If the trend from 1/26 to date continues (may very well not if we don’t get more doses from the feds at a faster pace) we would cross the 70% level circa 5/4/2021.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      and “news” you WON’T get from BR… typically.. If it’s not an indictment of Northam , it’s not “news” fit to print!

      1. Eric the Half a Troll Avatar
        Eric the Half a Troll

        It takes a little time to spreadsheet the data but, heck, I’m interested…

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Meh, these guys lost interest before the first turn. They just like to point out that Virginia was near last leaving the gate, which vindicates their bias.

      2. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead V

        The Bugs Bunny cartoon with the Sheriff of Nottingham always reminds me of Mr. Northam.
        http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-KIomqc2wMvM/TgtAkmLo7hI/AAAAAAAAyD8/LXis1OeE17Q/s1600/rabbit-hood.png
        Bugs Bunny : Sheriff of Nottingham, in gratitude for your faithful service, I shall knight thee.

        Sheriff of Nottingham : Your most gracious Majesty.

        Bugs Bunny : In the name of my most royal Majesty, I knight thee.

        Bugs Bunny : [Conks the Sheriff on the head with his scepter] Arise, Sir Loin of Beef.

        Bugs Bunny : [Conks him again] Arise, Earl of Cloves.

        Bugs Bunny : [Conk] Arise, Duke of Brittingham.

        Bugs Bunny : [Conk] Arise, Baron of Munchausen.

        Bugs Bunny : [Conk] Arise, Essence of Myrrh…

        Bugs Bunny : [Conk] Milk of Magnesia…

        Bugs Bunny : [Conk] Quarter of ten.

        Sheriff of Nottingham : [extremely dazed] You are too kind, Your Majesty.

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead V

            Those two should have made a movie together. Too funny.

          2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
            Nancy_Naive

            They did! But you probably, like all of us, didn’t notice anyone other than Jessica.

            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=k0F2waRX0_g

          3. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead V

            Spare tire. That Bugs was really a stinker!

      3. sherlockj Avatar

        Larry, if you found with your unique microscope an indictment of the Governor in my column, you possess insight denied to most humans. The recommendation, should you have read it, is for a Commission to assess the performance of the bureaucracies, not the elected officials. Try to pay attention.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Oh maybe in this column. 😉 Have you not been a critic of Northam in other columns, maybe on a fairly regular basis but you just left the name out this time? 😉

          But , yes, I did notice.

          Are we bored tonight after no more comments on COPN?

          1. sherlockj Avatar

            You are the prisoner of a single idea, and judge others by your own standards.

            Try to read what people write, not what you assume they write or what you assume they mean. You will be a better and more informed person for it.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            I SO ENJOY your lectures… 😉

            I think I have you calibrated… you’re pretty predictable.

            Can I lecture you back or are you mostly perfect?

    2. sherlockj Avatar

      Interesting, but not very. That has no bearing on the necessity for a professional and candid review of the performance of the bureaucracy in this actual extended emergency. Not doing one would be a crime.

  9. Eric the Half a Troll Avatar
    Eric the Half a Troll

    Vaccine-wise , today Becker’s has us ranked at #15 in terms of percent of distributed vaccine administered (70.66%). In terms of doses distributed as a percentage of population, we are now ranked 13th at 10.14%. If the trend from 1/26 to date continues (may very well not if we don’t get more doses from the feds at a faster pace) we would cross the 70% level circa 5/4/2021.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      and “news” you WON’T get from BR… typically.. If it’s not an indictment of Northam , it’s not “news” fit to print!

      1. Eric the Half a Troll Avatar
        Eric the Half a Troll

        It takes a little time to spreadsheet the data but, heck, I’m interested…

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          Meh, these guys lost interest before the first turn. They just like to point out that Virginia was near last leaving the gate, which vindicates their bias.

      2. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead V

        The Bugs Bunny cartoon with the Sheriff of Nottingham always reminds me of Mr. Northam.
        http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-KIomqc2wMvM/TgtAkmLo7hI/AAAAAAAAyD8/LXis1OeE17Q/s1600/rabbit-hood.png
        Bugs Bunny : Sheriff of Nottingham, in gratitude for your faithful service, I shall knight thee.

        Sheriff of Nottingham : Your most gracious Majesty.

        Bugs Bunny : In the name of my most royal Majesty, I knight thee.

        Bugs Bunny : [Conks the Sheriff on the head with his scepter] Arise, Sir Loin of Beef.

        Bugs Bunny : [Conks him again] Arise, Earl of Cloves.

        Bugs Bunny : [Conk] Arise, Duke of Brittingham.

        Bugs Bunny : [Conk] Arise, Baron of Munchausen.

        Bugs Bunny : [Conk] Arise, Essence of Myrrh…

        Bugs Bunny : [Conk] Milk of Magnesia…

        Bugs Bunny : [Conk] Quarter of ten.

        Sheriff of Nottingham : [extremely dazed] You are too kind, Your Majesty.

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead V

            Those two should have made a movie together. Too funny.

          2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
            Nancy_Naive

            They did! But you probably, like all of us, didn’t notice anyone other than Jessica.

            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=k0F2waRX0_g

          3. James Wyatt Whitehead V Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead V

            Spare tire. That Bugs was really a stinker!

      3. sherlockj Avatar

        Larry, if you found with your unique microscope an indictment of the Governor in my column, you possess insight denied to most humans. The recommendation, should you have read it, is for a Commission to assess the performance of the bureaucracies, not the elected officials. Try to pay attention.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Oh maybe in this column. 😉 Have you not been a critic of Northam in other columns, maybe on a fairly regular basis but you just left the name out this time? 😉

          But , yes, I did notice.

          Are we bored tonight after no more comments on COPN?

          1. sherlockj Avatar

            You are the prisoner of a single idea, and judge others by your own standards.

            Try to read what people write, not what you assume they write or what you assume they mean. You will be a better and more informed person for it.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            I SO ENJOY your lectures… 😉

            I think I have you calibrated… you’re pretty predictable.

            Can I lecture you back or are you mostly perfect?

    2. sherlockj Avatar

      Interesting, but not very. That has no bearing on the necessity for a professional and candid review of the performance of the bureaucracy in this actual extended emergency. Not doing one would be a crime.

  10. Matt Hurt Avatar

    Government is composed of individual human beings. All human beings are inherently flawed. The flaws of humans are many, and they vary wildly from one individual to the next. In my mind, the biggest question surrounding our government should be this- how much power over our lives should we relinquish to other human beings who are as flawed as us?

    All human beings behave in a manner consistent with their personal motivations. While some appear to be motivated by intrinsic altruism, they actually derive personal satisfaction from doing good things for others. That personal satisfaction is the driving force behind those altruistic behaviors.

    My questions to everyone are as follows.
    How many politicians get into office are intrinsically motivated by these apparent altruistic motives?
    How many of these folks decide to play the political game which perverts their initially benevolent motives?
    How many politicians get into office who are motivated primarily by resentment (the other guys did this to us, now it’s our turn)?
    How many politicians get into office who are motivated primarily by political ambitions?

    Almost everyone agrees that government has a role, and to live and prosper in a society with rule of law, we have to relinquish some personal freedom. I think too little attention is paid to the tension between how much power is enough to ensure rule of law, and how much is too much that feeds the negative motivations of politicians (those which yield negative results to the citizenry).

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      These are good questions to ask.

      Then I’ll add – how many people run for office and automatically assume their chances of winning more depends on being affiliated with Dem or GOP and chances as an independent much less?

    2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      Damned few. All multi-term. The union of the last two is the complement of “Damned few”.

    3. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      Mr. Hurt,

      Very Calvin Coolidge-esk and libertarian.

      Perhaps we also need to ask of the Government (elected and unelected officials), do they know the difference of what they “can” do and what they “should” do.

  11. Matt Hurt Avatar

    Government is composed of individual human beings. All human beings are inherently flawed. The flaws of humans are many, and they vary wildly from one individual to the next. In my mind, the biggest question surrounding our government should be this- how much power over our lives should we relinquish to other human beings who are as flawed as us?

    All human beings behave in a manner consistent with their personal motivations. While some appear to be motivated by intrinsic altruism, they actually derive personal satisfaction from doing good things for others. That personal satisfaction is the driving force behind those altruistic behaviors.

    My questions to everyone are as follows.
    How many politicians get into office are intrinsically motivated by these apparent altruistic motives?
    How many of these folks decide to play the political game which perverts their initially benevolent motives?
    How many politicians get into office who are motivated primarily by resentment (the other guys did this to us, now it’s our turn)?
    How many politicians get into office who are motivated primarily by political ambitions?

    Almost everyone agrees that government has a role, and to live and prosper in a society with rule of law, we have to relinquish some personal freedom. I think too little attention is paid to the tension between how much power is enough to ensure rule of law, and how much is too much that feeds the negative motivations of politicians (those which yield negative results to the citizenry).

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      These are good questions to ask.

      Then I’ll add – how many people run for office and automatically assume their chances of winning more depends on being affiliated with Dem or GOP and chances as an independent much less?

    2. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      Damned few. All multi-term. The union of the last two is the complement of “Damned few”.

    3. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      Mr. Hurt,

      Very Calvin Coolidge-esk and libertarian.

      Perhaps we also need to ask of the Government (elected and unelected officials), do they know the difference of what they “can” do and what they “should” do.

  12. Paul Sweet Avatar
    Paul Sweet

    “Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.” JFK’s quote applies to states as well as the country.

    Mitch VanYahres ran a landscaping and tree surgery business in Charlottesville and was their Delegate back in the 80s & 90s. I remember seeing his little red pickup truck in the GA parking lot amid the other legislators’ Lexuses and such when I first moved to Richmond.

  13. Paul Sweet Avatar
    Paul Sweet

    “Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.” JFK’s quote applies to states as well as the country.

    Mitch VanYahres ran a landscaping and tree surgery business in Charlottesville and was their Delegate back in the 80s & 90s. I remember seeing his little red pickup truck in the GA parking lot amid the other legislators’ Lexuses and such when I first moved to Richmond.

  14. LarrytheG Avatar

    One way for citizens to have more influence in the GA is citizen-initiated referenda.

    another way is rank choice balloting.

    A third way is for a law that guarantees a citizen who is elected , to pay their salary at the job they work at and a guarantee they will have a job after the GA not unlike we do for the National Guard.

    More work-a-day people at the GA would add much-needed citizen perspective.

    I watch our BOS , the ones who are still working at a job and it just dominates their lives sometimes. We have some retired and every now and then a farmer or small business owner will get on the BOS. This year, we have a high school principal who truly “educates” the others on school matters.

    This is the same group (minus the school principal) that DID approve the 5000 acre solar farm and the hearings were standing room only and went on to the early am. I cannot imagine the guys who had to go to their regular jobs the next morning did so with much sleep. Several have jobs in NoVa and already were getting up at 4am.

    1. Matt Hurt Avatar

      Given the huge success of the virtual sessions, the security concerns of the unwashed masses, and now this consideration, why not turn the GA completely virtual? Think of the savings on the light bill. I’m sure employers would love to have their employees serve for the political favors, I mean out of civic duty.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Perhaps. I suppose folks realize that a whole bunch of government meetings besides GA are happening in virtual right now.

        right?

        We’re in a Federal MPO committee and we’ve been meeting virtually for months.. and I hear no “outrage” over it…. 😉

        1. Matt Hurt Avatar

          This does offer additional opportunities for sunshine to illuminate the process as well. The GA can run it on YouTube, until they violate the terms of service anyway. I bet they’d get 30-40 subscriptions.

  15. LarrytheG Avatar

    One way for citizens to have more influence in the GA is citizen-initiated referenda.

    another way is rank choice balloting.

    A third way is for a law that guarantees a citizen who is elected , to pay their salary at the job they work at and a guarantee they will have a job after the GA not unlike we do for the National Guard.

    More work-a-day people at the GA would add much-needed citizen perspective.

    I watch our BOS , the ones who are still working at a job and it just dominates their lives sometimes. We have some retired and every now and then a farmer or small business owner will get on the BOS. This year, we have a high school principal who truly “educates” the others on school matters.

    This is the same group (minus the school principal) that DID approve the 5000 acre solar farm and the hearings were standing room only and went on to the early am. I cannot imagine the guys who had to go to their regular jobs the next morning did so with much sleep. Several have jobs in NoVa and already were getting up at 4am.

    1. Matt Hurt Avatar

      Given the huge success of the virtual sessions, the security concerns of the unwashed masses, and now this consideration, why not turn the GA completely virtual? Think of the savings on the light bill. I’m sure employers would love to have their employees serve for the political favors, I mean out of civic duty.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Perhaps. I suppose folks realize that a whole bunch of government meetings besides GA are happening in virtual right now.

        right?

        We’re in a Federal MPO committee and we’ve been meeting virtually for months.. and I hear no “outrage” over it…. 😉

        1. Matt Hurt Avatar

          This does offer additional opportunities for sunshine to illuminate the process as well. The GA can run it on YouTube, until they violate the terms of service anyway. I bet they’d get 30-40 subscriptions.

Leave a Reply