Don’t Let “Scarring” Hinder Economic Recovery

by James A. Bacon

Tom Barkin, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, is optimistic overall about the nation’s economic recovery. The housing market is strong. Job creation has resumed. Disposable incomes are up. And families are saving more and paying down their credit cards. 

But he worries about “scarring” — a term that economists use to describe longer-term negative impacts that can hinder economic recovery. “Severe downturns can leave scars that, while not always permanent, take a long time to heal,” he said in a March 21st speech at the virtual Credit Suisse Asian Investment Conference.

COVID-19 lockdowns hit hit primary caregivers particularly hard by closing schools and child care facilities, putting pressure on at least one parent to stay home. Labor force participation for parents, said Barkin, is about 6 percentage points below where it was prior to the pandemic. “If parents who left the workforce don’t return, that would have long-term negative implications for our growth potential.”

The country also faces “potentially huge losses” in human capital from the COVID-driven shift from in-person learning to virtual learning, Barkin said.

We know from decades of research that learning builds on itself. That means that disruptions to schooling are likely to have lifelong consequences. In the Fifth District, students outside of the suburbs are less likely to have access to computers and fast broadband at home, greatly impeding their ability to learn remotely. Students in low-income neighborhoods are more likely to suffer persistent negative effects from the shift to remote learning, further widening the education gap that existed before the pandemic.

Another concern: By accelerating automation, boosting demand for online retail, telemedicine and other technologies and business models that eliminate face-to-face interactions, the epidemic also could accelerate the decline in demand for low-skill, personal-contact jobs that still suffer from lingering high unemployment. (Barkin did not mention this, but the decline in demand for lower-wage high-contact job occurs at the same time Virginia is hiking its minimum wage.)

The pandemic also may have a lasting effect on the urban renaissance if people are afraid to get into crowded subways and elevators. “We risk scarring out urban platforms of collaboration and innovation.

Barkin alluded to another type of scarring — the record deficit spending that fueled a $4 trillion increase in federal debt last year.

That point bears some elaboration: The latest $1.9 trillion stimulus package will stoke another year of massive borrowing, plus the Biden administration has proposed spending another $3 trillion on infrastructure and climate change initiatives. Even without that $5 trillion in added national debt, the Congressional Budget Office’s latest forecast says that the structural budget deficit will bottom out around $900 billion yearly and then ratchet relentlessly higher to nearly $1.9 trillion yearly. Within another 10 years, the national debt will be $35 trillion. That’s the optimistic scenario.

“While there are no immediate signs of a U.S. debt crisis,” says Barkin, “we should be wary of diminishing our fiscal capacity to respond aggressively to the next crisis.”

That’s an understatement.

U.S. fiscal and monetary policy is beyond the control of elected officials in Richmond to address. But Barkin highlighted some areas where state/local policy can reduce the scarring of local labor markets and help Virginia’s economy return to its full potential for economic growth.

Pay special attention to programs that allow primary caregivers to return to work. This includes support for child care, elder care, and safely reopening schools.

Help displaced personal-contact service workers make the transition to new occupations. Reduce licensing restrictions and add instructors for in-demand occupations such as nursing or commercial trucking.

Invest further in education — in particular, provide tutoring and extra instruction, including summer sessions — to students who lost ground academically during the COVID classroom shutdowns.

“We will see scarring from this downturn, as always,”  Barkin concluded. “But we have in our control the ability to limit the unique damage of this one.”

(Hat tip: Mary Trigiani’s Newsletter)


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

13 responses to “Don’t Let “Scarring” Hinder Economic Recovery”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    interesting article:

    ” High-Income Tax Avoidance Far Larger Than Thought, New Paper Estimates
    The very top sliver of high-income Americans may underreport their income at levels far beyond what was suggested by prior IRS research, according to a new paper”

    https://emailshare.cmail20.com/t/n/d-l-8dd9bf9e8cb311ebbcb6249cc5917daa-l-d-r-l/

    and another:

    How to Collect $1.4 Trillion in Unpaid Taxes
    Wealthy Americans are concealing large amounts of income from the I.R.S. There is a straightforward corrective.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/20/opinion/sunday/unpaid-tax-evasion-IRS.html?searchResultPosition=3

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Two poorly constructed articles that conflate tax avoidance with tax evasion. The former is legal, the latter is not. I’m all for enforcing the existing statutes against tax evasion but but so-called “pass through” entities like partnerships are perfectly legal under US law and have been for decades (centuries?).

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        The 1st was avoidance. It even says so. From what I read in the second was underreporting. That is not avoidance, that’s evasion.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        The 1st was avoidance. It even says so. From what I read in the second was underreporting. That is not avoidance, that’s evasion.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Just to point out right now during tax season. We have folks who are receiving 25K in pensions – that’s their entire income for the year – and they owe taxes on it – about 10% or so. Many have managed to own their homes. The claim that low income people do not pay taxes is totally false. Independent contractors – who clean houses for a living barely make 25K a year and owe 15% of that for self-employment taxes IN ADDITION to income taxes.

    So some of this is about everyone paying their fair share and when not everyone does, we do end up short on paying for the spending.

    Yes, we need to cut the spending – no question but if all we do is cut the spending and the lower income keep paying their fair share and others find ways to pay – essentially less than their fair share then we’ve stil got issues paying for what we are providing.

    Medicare? Nursing homes and Medicaid? Who is paying for that? Well.. low income people are in part – that’s their share…

    To be sure, seniors – both low income, middle income and even higher income depend on Medicare to save them from poverty – which many would fall into without Medicare. And many more depend on Medicaid later while we have others blaming government for nursing homes that are funded from minimal reimbursements from Medicaid.

    Nobody likes to pay taxes, rich or poor but in the end , it’s the gig we signup for when ourselves and our parents depend on Medicare and Medicaid for their senior years.

    I don’t see too many people advocating that we get rid of Medicare and Medicaid but I hear a lot of folks saying they don’t think they should have to pay taxes to fund it.

    And to end by reminding that most folks, even those who get 25K a year in pension – do pay taxes… on it.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Sounds like a job for CarShield.

      Oh god, will they ever stop robocalling me? Them, and the decidedly Indian sounding “US Medicare” representatives.

      Oh, and I got my first “This is the IRS. We are freezing your accounts, please press 1 to speak to…”

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Wait. Somethings missing. Isn’t this where the “fiscal conservatives” are supposed to wring their hands and raise the specter of inflation? Chrometophobia

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      From the first article … “Overall, the paper estimates that the top 1% of households fail to report about 21% of their income, with 6 percentage points of that due to sophisticated strategies that random audits don’t detect.”

      Next paragraph ….

      “These strategies include offshore tax avoidance, which may have waned after stricter reporting requirements took effect about a decade ago. But many high-income Americans also use partnerships and similar entities to avoid taxes, and such behavior may be increasing and becoming harder for tax authorities to find and untangle, said Daniel Reck of the London School of Economics, the paper’s lead nongovernment author.”

      Failure to report = evasion.
      Partnerships = avoidance.

      Meanwhile, here are the headers to the article …

      “High-Income Tax Avoidance Far Larger Than Thought, New Paper Estimates

      The very top sliver of high-income Americans may underreport their income at levels far beyond what was suggested by prior IRS research, according to a new paper.”

      Combining avoidance and evasion without being clear that one is legal and the other is not is disingenuous at best.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Well, we can all surmise why Romney didn’t want to release his 2010 return… offshore amnesty year.

        Yes, you are correct, but unless I am mistaken income reporting requirements includes tax-free and/or pass through. The 1041 has two alternative reporting mechanisms aside from the K-1. I haven’t used them, but the trusts (partnerships too?) have to report to the IRS any distributions whether burdened or unburdened.

        My company was “employee owned”. I know for a fact that some of the 20% owners bought and sold stock without reporting gains because there was no mechanism for reporting other than Schedule D and honesty. Believe me, I have looked for who is burdened for filing a 1099 and there just ain’t one. There’s an effing boatload of S corporations in this country and all those private transactions are potentially untaxed.

        I have always reported my company stock sales hoping that the IRS will question them and I can rat out my buddies. Nothing yet.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          I worked for a partnership for 20 years. Once I stopped being an employee and became a partner my tax returns were prepared for free (to me) by the partnership. If I wanted to do my own taxes or hire somebody else then those returns had to be reviewed and approved by the tax people at the partnership. The tax rules were stringently applied.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            DJ – do you know the tax rate for long-term capital gains?

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Maybe you had smart partners who protected themselves. We were an S-corp.
            “S” corporations are the most common. Up to 100 shareholders and using subsidiary arrangements this can get any number of persons you want. SAIC is/was an S-corporation, for example.
            Once the company issues the shares, they’re done. All sales of stock are private between the set of persons defined in the shareholder agreement. In my case the set was employees, all former employees (upto 20% max) and family. Only if the company does a buyback is there an IRS reporting requirement. The company must keep track of the ownership of the shares, not the transactions, hence no reporting of money changing.
            One of the BIG advantages to being an S-corp is the company can issue a dividend and then keep it as a loan from the shareholders with 51% vote. We never did it, but it’s a thing. In fact, it’s one of the warnings to small shareholders that can be found in IRS pubs as a technique to force out small shareholders.

  4. Brendan Van Ormer Avatar
    Brendan Van Ormer

    Can someone explain to me why Virgnia’s northern D.C. suburb counties and the Richmond metro areas aren’t getting much money per the county-by-county breakdown of the American Rescue Bill or whatever?

    https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/2021/03/10/covid-19-stimulus-bill-joe-bidens-plan-explained-6-graphics/4601454001/

Leave a Reply