Dominion’s Meddling In Governor’s Race More Despicable than Originally Revealed

by Paul Chesser

In October, Bacon’s Rebellion contributor Steve Haner outlined a “despicable act” perpetrated by Dominion Energy on Glenn Youngkin, by sending $200,000 to a mystery PAC created to suppress turnout for the Republican gubernatorial candidate.

But now, with further public disclosures, we see the devious actions by Dominion CEO (and former Democrat operative) Bob Blue and other top executives were more “despicable” than first thought.

The severity was greater partly because Dominion actually sent $250,000 to Accountability Virginia PAC, which posed as a right-leaning group in order to raise doubts about Youngkin’s 2nd Amendment credentials with rural voters. The political strategy was to diminish enthusiasm – and therefore turnout – for the now-governor.

But the degree of deceit has even more to do with the timeline of the contributions rather than the aggregate amount.

Axios first broke the story on Sept. 28 with the headline, “Dems’ Sneaky Sabotage.” At that time Dominion’s PAC had donated only $125,000 to Accountability Virginia PAC. Blue and fellow Dominion executives then knew that media and political watchdogs were on to their activities.

But that didn’t deter the utility and its CEO. Three days later, on Oct. 1, another $75,000 was sent from Dominion’s PAC to Accountability Virginia PAC. Two weeks after that, on Oct. 15, an additional $50,000 was transferred from Dominion to the Virginia PAC.

Personal donations from Dominion executives flowed to the PAC as well. Blue sent $5,000 on Sept. 9 and then another $5,000 on Oct. 18 – again, well after the media latched on to the connection between the utility, Accountability Virginia PAC, and its deceitful ads. Fellow Dominion officials William Murray, Carlos Brown, and Edward Baine also kicked in $5,000 each of their own money, $12,500 of which came on Oct. 12 or later.

Dominion’s were the sole committee contributions to Accountability Virginia PAC. The only other corporation to donate to the cause was Armor Correctional Health Services, which provided care to inmates at roughly half the state’s prisons. At the time of its $50,000 gift, on July 9, Armor was desperately trying to prevent the cancellation of its contract with the Virginia Department of Corrections for failing to provide adequate health care for inmates.

Altogether, Armor’s and Dominion’s combined contributions accounted for more than half of Accountability Virginia PAC’s $578,706 take.

The PAC’s life, by the way, was snuffed in the crib. Started in early July by Democrat consulting firm Mele Brengarth and Associates, the project lasted just long enough to dole out final expenses after Election Day ended. According to Federal Elections Commission filings, the PAC was terminated on Dec. 21.

Expenditures over the five months for Accountability Virginia PAC matched what it took in. Among the payouts were $12,579 to Democrat law firm Perkins Coie – through Oct. 15 – and then $5,254 to the Elias Law Firm after that date. The latter practice is headed by Democrat superlawyer Marc Elias, who is among the conspirators behind the Russian dossier hoax against former President Trump. Elias left Perkins Coie in late August to start his firm. Remittances paid by Accountability Virginia PAC to the respective law practices align with Elias’s transition – Perkins/Elias provided “legal services” first, then Elias’s personal firm apparently took over those responsibilities.

Also, $40,000 was paid over four months to Saratoga Strategies, which appears to consist of an employee of one: Democrat operative Josh Schwerin. He is a veteran of both the Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden presidential campaigns, serving in top roles, and he was Terry McAuliffe’s 2013 campaign press secretary and then served in his gubernatorial administration after his victory. On his website Schwerin boasts both McAuliffe’s 2021 campaign and the Democratic Governors Association as his political clients.

And finally, $486,533 was paid to D.C.-based digital advertising firm Gambit Strategies for production and “ad buys,” according to FEC filings.

Days before Accountability Virginia PAC’s December shutdown, the remaining funds were distributed to the campaign’s top schemers. Mele Brengarth got a final $1,250 payout on Dec. 8. On Dec. 16, Elias’s law firm was paid $2,500, and Schwerin’s Saratoga consultancy extracted the remaining $1,307.96 the same day.

Finally, there’s the matter of Blue’s duplicity. After the Axios article and a Richmond Times-Dispatch report about the PAC and its ads, Blue sent a memo on Oct. 18 to Dominion employees that on its face looked like a mea culpa about the utility’s support.

“Based on our own disclosures, two news stories highlighted activities of the Accountability Virginia PAC that we would not approve or knowingly support,” the CEO wrote, according to the Times-Dispatch. “Although familiar with the Accountability Virginia PAC sponsors, we failed to vet sufficiently the scope of their intended activities. In as much, we have asked that our contributions be returned… We will not be giving to organizations of this nature in the future.”

That sentiment might have been believable, but on the same day – Oct. 18 – Blue and Baine each sent Accountability Virginia PAC $5,000 personal contributions, and Murray donated $2,500. The alleged distaste of Dominion’s association for the PAC did not extend to the CEO and his lieutenants.

And as for Dominion getting its corporate donations returned? It’s not happening – the money’s all gone, and Accountability Virginia PAC is closed for business.

Paul Chesser is director of the Corporate Integrity Project for the National Legal and Policy Center.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

27 responses to “Dominion’s Meddling In Governor’s Race More Despicable than Originally Revealed”

  1. It seems the corporatist blob wants anonymity so obviously they are defeat able.

  2. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Why not shareholder initiatives?
    ESG corporate governance – “stakeholder” – models are just the corporate version of CRT and DEI.
    And big business and government and the academy are all totally intertwined and corrupted.
    Business needs to go back to the shareholder interests model that used to be primary under Delaware law.
    The academy needs to go back to education and stop all the social indoctrination.
    Government needs to be cut back – particularly the bureaucracies.
    And they all just feed each other.

  3. Kevin W. Holt Avatar
    Kevin W. Holt

    And Carlos Brown is on the BOV at UVA.

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      As is Bob Blue

      1. Kevin W. Holt Avatar
        Kevin W. Holt

        The Governor has four BOV appointments this year. He needs to appoint people committed to reversing the leftist Ryan regime.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Maybe Kathleen Sullivan again?
          😉

          1. Kevin W. Holt Avatar
            Kevin W. Holt

            Teresa Sullivan was bad. Jim Ryan is far worse.

  4. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    Dominion since Farrell has gone Democrat and trying to be part of the Blue Wall to force rapid electrification, which is in their best interest as electron salesmen.

  5. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    Mr Blue sets the example of Dominion employees. When he says one thing and does another it is saying its OK to have situational ethics. Either the General Assembly, highly unlikely, or shareholders need to be more active in cleaning up what has become a legally corrupt company.
    The Times Dispatch enjoys exposes on those who are not woke. Well, what about expanding its agenda to include one on Dominion’s clever ways of picking the pockets of customers?

  6. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    It has been interesting to watch the session. The main front man for Dominion has been former State Senator John Watkins (R), now a paid outside lobbyist for the company. The prominent Democrats mentioned above are nowhere near the podium for the company.

    McAuliffe was promising to accelerate the VCEA schedule for building massive wind and solar projects. Of course they wanted McAuliffe to win. Moving the pretend net-zero target up ten years would have created even more capital spending, all earning a profit, and created massive stranded costs to collect (profit included) as perfectly viable fossil fuel generation was retired early. Had McAuliffe won, that probably would have translated into the Democrats retaining House control, making those moves politically easy. It was just business….

    All the bills to limit campaign contributions, either in general or from utilities in particular, are dead. All the bills to restore SCC authority over the VCEA build-outs will soon be dead. Bills restoring SCC authority over rates are all dead. I see no downside to the behavior for the company. The phrase is “got away with it.”

  7. In this country, individuals and corporations are free to donate where they like. One can be fairly confident that this sort of thing happens on both sides. Note the Republican point man. Dominion made a decision that it felt was in its best interests and time will tell what if any consequences there are.

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I love youse guys. You tell me that Dominion is too heavily regulated, and they’re goniffs. Imagine if you deregulated them.

  9. LarrytheG Avatar

    Dominion clearly screwed up. They should have done what many Conservatives do and donate to Donors Trust anonymously and from that point on , no record of the money trail is available.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donors_Trust

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      There are of course no similar avenues for dark money on the left? You have you eye patch on again, Larry. Open both eyes.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Can you name the equivalent of Donor’s trust for the “left”? For instance, did Michael Bills use a “dark money” PAC?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            re: arguing with idiots? makes you one also as well as a unrepentant hypocrite?

            I take your point about Arabella , fair point.

            But again, neither Dominion nor others chose the dark money route and they could have and if they did, we’d never know about this issue.

            That’s a fair point also – idiot!

          2. Paul Chesser Avatar
            Paul Chesser

            Tides Foundation is another one on the left. Both sides do it.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            Thank you.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Arabella Advisors is the closest parallel, probably. I don’t know why I argue with an idiot….

          https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/11/arabella-advisors-money-democrats/620553/

          Actually, I don’t argue with you. I use your feckless questions as springboards to make my point to others.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar

        I noticed also that Parents Defending Education – which bills itself as a ‘national grassroots” organization also does not disclose it’s funding.

        https://defendinged.org/about/

        My point is that Dominion has been held to account for their donation but other groups, mostly Conservative as far as I can tell, have adopted tactics to hide their donors.

        Similarly, the Pacific Legal Foundation which just won against Fairfax over TJ admissions policies, seems to not really disclose who is funding it.

        So I’m opposed to all dark money, left and right, period and just pointing out that Dominion COULD have done what many Conservative groups already do AND I’m not really aware of a “left” version of Donor’s trust and am asking you since you say you do care about dark money.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Congress could close these loopholes anytime it wishes. Both sides benefit so neither side will change this. I myself was paid with liberal dark money in 2018 when I worked for….wait for it…the Virginia Poverty Law Center on energy issues. A Democrat arranged a dark money grant to VPLC that paid my fee. You are unaware because you choose to be blind.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            We appear to agree on this but you can’t help yourself with your name calling?

            How did you get to be this old and still be so dumb?

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    $200,000 and more that they wouldn’t have had if not for the Trump tax reform.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Again, ah, no. As the 2017 bill cut the corporate taxes, those benefits were passed to ratepayers. It is supposed to be a pass thru.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Supposed to.

        You could say it was.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          I think using the word “pass through” with Dominion in the same sentence is probably an oxymoron.

Leave a Reply