Dominion Makes Big Power Move — What Does It Mean?

dominion_transmission_lineby James A. Bacon

Dominion Virginia Power is soliciting industry proposals to provide about 1,600 megawatts of electrical generating capacity by 2019-2020. “We have identified a need for additional generation in our long-term system planning,” says Roger Williams, director of power contracts. None of this will come from renewable resources.

Unlike some who opine on this blog, I’m agnostic about renewable energy. If solar, wind power, biomass and other renewable energy sources can be worked into the electric-generating mix without clobbering rate payers or creating reliability problems, I’m happy to have it. But my top priorities are keeping electric rates low and ensuring a reliable power supply. As countries like Germany have discovered, wind power quite literally changes with the wind, and solar power varies with cloud cover. That means power companies have to build and maintain an expensive backup capacity to keep the juice flowing at all times.

What I find surprising about Dominion’s announcement is that the company isn’t planning to build the added capacity itself, which is traditionally what power companies have done. The old rule of thumb was that building more power plants allows utilities to expand the rate base. Because utilities are guaranteed a financial return on the rate base (barring unusual circumstances), more capacity translates into bigger earnings. Somehow, under the new re-regulation regime, that old calculus no longer applies. I’m not sure what’s driving Dominion’s decisions financially right now.

Dominion’s solicitation requires that any new power capacity be located on the PJM regional interconnection grid that coordinates the wheeling of electricity across a region serving more than 50 million people. The utility, reports Peter Bacque with the Times-Dispatch, also wants the electricity to come from base-load plants (which generate 70% of the time) or intermediate plants (30% to 70% of the time). The electricity must be “dispatchable,” or available when needed. That last requirement excludes wind and power.

Basically, Dominion favors a Big Grid transmission framework as opposed to a Smart Grid framework. In a Big Grid arrangement, electric power can be shuttled from state to state, region to region, as supply and demand dictate — subject to the capacity of the transmission lines. The advantage of Big Grid is that power companies can select from a much broader array of options for generating capacity, not just in it own service area, which translates into lower generating costs. The flip side is that Big Grid requires more giant transmission lines to move the electricity — and people don’t like transmission lines running through their property. Another concern is that the more centralized an electric grid is, the more vulnerable it is to sabotage, extreme weather and other outside forces that could lead to cascading outages.

One alternative is the Smart Grid which allows for the two-way flow of electricity and the monitoring of electricity consumption with so-called smart meters. By collecting detailed data, power companies can better manage their power supplies, especially if rate structures give industry, business and households incentives to curtail electricity consumption during periods of peak demand. Smart grids are seen as essential to handling the variable supply created by solar and wind power, allowing power companies more flexibility in adjusting their power flows. Smart grids won’t solve all the problems caused by the variability of renewable energy, but they are part of the solution.

Another big advantage, in theory at leas:. Because smart grids are more decentralized, they can accommodate locally generated power, which creates local economic opportunities. Also, in theory, they are less vulnerable to catastrophic disruption.

Dominion has dipped its toe into the smart grid arena — home electric meters, as I recall — but I’ve seen very little written about it in the press. Frankly, I have yet to see a coherent big-picture story about where the electric power industry in Virginia — which includes Appalachian Power and local electric co-op — is heading. It is difficult to make any sense of articles like the one published in the T-D today without the bigger picture.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

6 responses to “Dominion Makes Big Power Move — What Does It Mean?”

  1. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Jim,
    You forget the Virginia Business cover story that we did back when you were publisher. Dominion wanted to be “the Saudi Arabia of electrons” and wheel electricity throughout PJM and beyond. This was in 2000 or 2001. That was partly the idea behind deregulation. Then somehow the economics didn’t quite take hold in cross-state generation and transmission (at least enough) so Dominion arranged with the General Assembly to be re-regulated.

    I agree that it was hard to tell from the TD story what industries Dominion hopes to buy from. I assume they are other utilities or maybe factories that can spin turbines.
    It isn’t certain if this is “smart grid” or just old-fashioned high tension wires.

  2. TooManyTaxes Avatar
    TooManyTaxes

    Keep in mind that, while increased investment does allow a rate-of-return regulated business earn larger profits in absolute dollars, the increased investment must be obtained from somewhere – investors, bond buyers, or retained earnings, there is a risk such capital will not be recovered through depreciation or amortization. In theory, a greater business risk means a higher rate-of-return, but having to write off $10 billion is a bigger problem than having to write off $5 billion.

    Therefore, it seems to me Dominion is getting access to power without subjecting its shareowners to the risk of bigger write-downs.

    1. I think you are correct, TMT, this is all about investment risk abatement. Dominion has, as Peter says, “arranged to be reregulated” for local delivery and retail sales purposes, and in today’s competitive electricity marketplace, keeping regulators happy calls for a different mindset than constructing and operating unregulated generating plants with huge amounts of at-risk investment capital. So, don’t build it yourself, simply buy the power under long term contract from the wholesale marketplace. PJM is Dominion’s primary wholesale marketplace, by the way, not just the local Grid operator.
      Why “dispatchable”? Because dispatchable power satisfies the regulator’s reliability criteria, and because it has a higher resale value if Dominion buys more long-term than it needs. Why not from renewable resources? Same reasons! Jim is right, renewable solar and wind power are great stuff when they are operating but they are simply not always available, and when they are unavailable it can be extremely expensive to buy replacement power from the wholesale marketplace (for the obvious reason that most everyone who buys solar or wind electricity needs an alternate source at the same time). Reliable, dispatchable fossil-fueled generation is far cheaper today; and as for the risk of generating plant obsolescence due to the vagaries of “global warming” politics, why not let someone else take that risk? Concurrently, I think Dominion will continue to encourage distributed generation (including renewable resource generation) built by its customers, in which case the investment and operating responsibilities and risk of obsolescence fall on them, not Dominion.
      In addition there is the risk that if Dominion’s regulated rate base were to grow rapidly from new generation construction, it might not recover the added cost fully or quickly enough from ratepayers – as compared with the alternative, unregulated investments Dominion might make (or the rate consequences of minimizing new investment entirely).
      So Dominion “arranged to be re-regulated” did it? Well, you can bet that along with re-regulation has come investment risk-aversion, big-time.

  3. well, here’s the thing – It’s obvious that Dominion considers the concept of a “smart grid” less important , less compelling , that the idea of a big grid.

    but I’m not understanding when they say “dispatchable” why that means shunting base load power from one part of the grid to another – as opposed to using more decentralized natural gas dispatch.

    Now the folks that run Dominion – eat, sleep, and live this stuff and the rest of us have “opinions”.

    But the thing about “risk” – is if you find safety in the status quo – is that sustainable in the longer run – so how do you assess risk – in the short term and longer term.

    Think about Kodak and Blockbuster video.. was the real threat to them – not from the dynamics in a status quo but – in change in things they could not control?

    Dominion can choose to continue to think that solar (and to a lesser extent) wind are “unreliable” and not “dispatchable” but how are consumers thinking about it – and if solar ends up being as cheap or cheaper than base load grid power – what happens?

    Even if Dominion succeeds in making it hard to sell surplus power back to the grid – what happens when people use solar to lower their utility bills?

    Dominion, obviously thinks, this is not going to happen, apparently.

    And they might be right – or they might be Kodak.

  4. They don’t want to build new facilities because distributed solar will obviate the need for new facilities. Distributed solar may obviate the need for existing facilities. Let someone else take the write off. But what company is dumb enough to accept that deal?

  5. I agree with Jim that the relatively low cost of electricity in Virginia is an important business driver for the future. For many years I have advocated natural gas for power and that’s my base case. I like renewable where it makes sense, wind, solar, trash-to-electricity etc. If someone wanted to bid to convert our trash import stream to electrons, I’d be supportive.

Leave a Reply