Dominion is Keeping Whale Data Secret, Too

Click for expanded view. Source: NOAA

by David Wojick

Secrecy abounds around the monster offshore wind (OSW) project proposed by Dominion Energy. In this case the hidden data is about the threat to the severely endangered North Atlantic Right Whales.

I earlier reported on the big hidden whale study done by the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, which is doing the Environment Impact Assessment for this huge project.

Digging into Dominion’s filing with BOEM I found something even worse. Dominion has done an actual threat assessment, but it is 100% secret! This is outrageous.

Here is a bit of background so folks can dig for themselves. There is a lot to look at. BOEM has a separate website on this monster OSW project, which would be one of the world’s largest. The project is titled Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind or CVOW. Dominion has submitted a large set of documents in what is called the Construction and Operations Plan or simply the COP. The COP is here.

There is a long main report plus 32 technical appendices. My endangered whale interest was immediately drawn to “Appendix R: Threatened and Endangered Species Review.” It is here, and the title indicates it reports on any and all species on those lists for protection.

I expected to get a discussion of the potential threats the project poses to the severely endangered North Atlantic Right Whale and what Dominion might do to minimize the adverse impact. I should also learn what other threatened and endangered species are involved, right?

Instead I just got a cover page bearing this notice: “Proprietary and Confidential Business Information Exempt from Public Disclosure.”

That is all there is to Appendix R. It is 100% secret. Even the number of pages is not disclosed, as it is with the other appendices, which one can actually read.

So the huge question is why? What is so secret that every word has to be kept from the public?

It cannot be the details of project construction and operation because these are abundant in other appendices. Nor that there are risks to others. The very next, Appendix S, is Navigation Safety Risk Assessment. There are 225 public pages there.

My guess is that Appendix R says there are real risks to the Right Whales, and maybe to other species as well. Of course there is nothing proprietary or business confidential about this sort of analysis. In fact it is central to public policy making.

That this assessment is kept secret is outrageous all by itself, but it also raises a much deeper issue. Will the BOEM Environmental Impact Assessment also include secret science?

BOEM is currently doing a draft EIA, scheduled to come out this December. Agencies are not allowed to disclose proprietary and confidential business information. Will BOEM ignore Appendix R, or even worse use it without disclosing it? The same is true of their secret, million-dollar study of Right Whale migration. Migration behavior is central to OSW risk assessment.

Speaking of migration behavior, I got some truly valuable data from a prominent whale watching and advocacy group. They say:

 As for your question regarding migrations, there is a great online resource which documents surveyed and opportunistic sightings and acoustical detections of right whales called WhaleMap. In general, a subset of the population, including pregnant females, migrates to the calving area in Southeast US around November and move back to northern waters in the spring. However, there are acoustic detections in the mid-Atlantic waters year-round and not all right whales migrate. To make things more complicated, some whales have migrated to the Southeast US, returned to the northeast waters, and then back to the southeast within the same calving season.

So, it looks like Right Whale migration is complex stuff. It is like this with some birds, blue jays for example. Maybe this is what BOEM found and does not want to release. After all, their middle name is “Ocean Energy,” so they are all for this monster project.

Speaking of bias, I am somewhat skeptical of Dominion’s secret assessment. It was done by a heavy-duty engineering group named Tetra Tech Inc.

Unfortunately, their Home Page motto is “Committed to Sustainability and Climate-Positive Actions.” Offshore wind is certainly claimed to be a “Climate-Positive Action. Saving the desperately endangered North Atlantic Right Whales from these ill-conceived actions, not so much. Clearly, Tetra Tech is committed to this OSW project.

Since all the impact assessment to date seems to have been done secretly by proponents of the project, I expect the first draft EIA to be pretty poor when it comes to protecting the whales. Hopefully, defenders of the whales will rise to the occasion.

Save the whales!

David Wojick, Ph.D. is an independent analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy. He has been on the faculty of Carnegie Mellon University and the staffs of the U.S. Office of Naval Research and the Naval Research Lab.  This article was originally published at cfact.org. 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

31 responses to “Dominion is Keeping Whale Data Secret, Too”

  1. Hey, if we’ve got to sacrifice a few whales to save the planet and make it safer for all living creatures, then I guess we just have to do it!

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      They can visit in Heaven with the eagles killed by the land turbines. Animal sacrifice is an old religious practice so why not this religion? Let’s hope a tithe is all they get from us, but I doubt that.

    2. William O'Keefe Avatar
      William O’Keefe

      There are so many problems with the Dominion rip off that whales are just the latest. An honest assessment would lead the General Assembly and the SCC to shut it down. It is well past the time to cut our losses. Read file:///Users/billokeefe/Documents/Climate–Lomborg–Is%20Our%20Climate%20in%20Crisis%3F%20A%20Q&A%20with%20Bjorn%20Lomborg%20–%20InsideSources.html an interview with Bjorn Lomborg that clearly shows that the holy grail of zero emissions is a Mugs game.

  2. Hey, if we’ve got to sacrifice a few whales to save the planet and make it safer for all living creatures, then I guess we just have to do it!

    1. David Wojick Avatar
      David Wojick

      On the contrary there is a lot of “save the birds from wind choppers” activity. Dominion’s OSW Plan says these choppers are too far from shore to bother migrating birds.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        the “save the birds” folk that are anti wind-turbines seem to be Johnny-come-lately folks who never had a problem with the eagles getting killed from power lines.

        right?

        1. David Wojick Avatar
          David Wojick

          Your reasoning is truly strange. I often cannot figure out what your point is and this is one of those times. Are you claiming that no one should protest windmills being licensed to kill over a thousand eagles a year because they did not first protest power lines? Seriously? Is that your point? It is so strange I have trouble believing it.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            In both cases, if eagles are killed, and people do care about them being killed then methods should be found for both cases to reduce the killing because we do need electricity and all sources of electricity have impacts that should be mitigated if possible with the caveat that some of it is not practically possible.

            It’s not the killing of “birds” per se. Birds die in number from a wide variety of sources. The ones that get more attention are the ones that are threatened and endangered.

            We don’t rule out something because it does threaten or endanger, we mitigate.

            If you guys REALLY cared about these issues, you would have been involved BEFORE now, so your involvement now but not before leads me to wonder if your concern is really the eagles at all and more as an excuse to oppose OSW.

            Eagles, by the way are moving off the threatened and endangered lists because they have recovered spectacularly since we banned DDT.

            Ya’ll should realize this. It sorta reveals that you really are not that aware.
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/056518ebb8808a64c234dc2371667d228ae65be3918ae1c4739c4488d468644d.jpg

    2. David Wojick Avatar
      David Wojick

      On the contrary there is a lot of “save the birds from wind choppers” activity. Dominion’s OSW Plan says these choppers are too far from shore to bother migrating birds.

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I don’t know about you, but I’m seeing a pattern here. And the pattern includes compliant “news” media running dog lackeys of the wind and solar industrial complex.

    Somebody will get the report through discovery. 🙂

  4. Everyone knows whales are ‘Proprietary’…….I guess they didn’t see that Star Trek movie…..Remember much of Gene Roddenberry put out there has come to be true.

  5. Crosswalks to Nowhere Avatar
    Crosswalks to Nowhere

    I don’t understand why people fixate on wind/solar when nuclear is better than both. New plants can be the large dual cooling tower variety, or so small that they only power a small town.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      If small nuclear plants were real, I’d agree.
      But they’re not at this point.

      There is not a single one operating as a grid power source as far as I know.

      Even if they were, good luck on putting them in urban/suburban locales. NIMBY would be on steroids.

      1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
        energyNOW_Fan

        SMR has an economics problem…very expensive. Although in our situation (military bases) that might be perfect way to use taxpayer dollars to build some SMR’s and then they are managed by the military. Just brainstorming. Just retire a sub or two and dock em in Norfolk and hook into grid.

      2. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
        energyNOW_Fan

        SMR has an economics problem…very expensive. Although in our situation (military bases) that might be perfect way to use taxpayer dollars to build some SMR’s and then they are managed by the military. Just brainstorming. Just retire a sub or two and dock em in Norfolk and hook into grid.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          more expensive than OSW? Gadzooks! But I bet the anti OSW folks would still like the SMR Nukes better, right?

          Is cost the issue? We’ve got these things on aircraft carriers and subs… there must be some other issues.

          1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
            energyNOW_Fan

            SMR very expensive. it is being seriously considered by I think Canada and a few others, but cost is astronomic. Also for US utilities, everything has to be the worlds largest for economy of scale. State monopoly utilities will never tolerate the “S” in SMR. They will say get the “L” outta here with that bullcrap.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      If small nuclear plants were real, I’d agree.
      But they’re not at this point.

      There is not a single one operating as a grid power source as far as I know.

      Even if they were, good luck on putting them in urban/suburban locales. NIMBY would be on steroids.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d0508fb44bb817d2abf8cd636ec267d58ec0edbc74c58aa623b30cd975273d89.jpg

    Don’t see the same folks here on board with outlawing the existing causes of whale deaths – ships and ocean fishing.

    Not a whimper from these folks before now.

    1. David Wojick Avatar
      David Wojick

      We obviously cannot outlaw shipping or fishing, but we can outlaw OSW, since it is in no way needed.

      Plus there is progress on reducing the harm from shipping and fishing.
      On fishing see https://ropeless.org/background/

    2. David Wojick Avatar
      David Wojick

      We obviously cannot outlaw shipping or fishing, but we can outlaw OSW, since it is in no way needed.

      Plus there is progress on reducing the harm from shipping and fishing.
      On fishing see https://ropeless.org/background/

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        re: “no way needed”… well apparently they are or else they would not be proposed and approved.

        but climate-deniers ought to at least be consistent if they think no new power is needed at all because the climate thing is really a hoax, so really no new electricity is needed including gas and nukes, right?

        have a consistent argument, even if it is bogus.

        1. David Wojick Avatar
          David Wojick

          I agree that new generation is only needed when the need for power increases or old generation wears out. Other skeptics think coal fired power is unhealthy or that we should conserve fossil fuels. These are all consistent arguments.

          Nothing bogus about AGW skepticism except AGW.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            IF OSW ends up cheaper than gas, in the same way that gas was cheaper than coal and so replaced it – then it’s purely an economics issue without regard to AGW.

            It may well be a gamble.

            but if gas ends up costing 2, 3 times what it does now in 20 yrs, then wind would be a good investment.

            Right now, we simply don’t know for either gas or wind.

            In some respects, BOTH might be “bridge” fuels until we get a breakthrough in hydrogen or small modular nukes.

            If it turns out that OSW kills whales and no way to mitigate, it will alter plans and I ‘d support it but I have to see the data first , not what-about-ism.

  7. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    The cost is going to be unimaginable with inflation and competition for metals/etc with U.S. electric car mandates etc. Has anyone calculated how much CO2 generation it will take to meet the Democrats vision of an electrified America, ASAP? I do not think we are really talking CO2 reduction, instead we are talking about transforming America into a future vision Democrats feel they can tolerate, and the whales do not figure into that calculus. But I do not sense that anyone has been checking the overall plan for feasibility.

  8. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    It is outrageous that Dominion has hidden all the EIA information. That should leave any EIA finding open to legal challenge.

    This statement from one paper on the effect on whales of noise from wind farms may be a clue to Dominion’s penchant for secrecy: “It is illegal by both state and federal law to “take” a North Atlantic right whale without a permit to do so; a “take” includes harassment (MMPA; ESA) and therefore all of the zones of noise impact listed above, except for the zone of audibility, represent potentially illegal interference with right whales.”

    That paper goes on to discuss how there is very little known about the possible effects of noise from wind farms, during construction and operation, on whales. It suggests that the whales may take actions to avoid the noise. Therefore, the presence of turbines may alter the actions of whales, rather than injure them. However, the paper does note, “It should be noted, however, that some recorded frequencies of operating turbines do fall within the vocalization range of the North Atlantic right whale and that cumulative effects of operational noise are unknown.” capecodcommission.org/resource-library/file/?url=/dept/commission/team/Website_Resources/dcpc/Whales

    Environmental groups face a conflict of interests in this case. On the one hand, most, if not all, environmental groups strongly support measures to limit climate change. On the other hand, many are devoted to opposing actions that may threaten animal life.

    It is ironic that conservatives who have spent decades decrying the use of the Endangered Species Act to delay or kill energy projects (see oil and gas pipelines) may be able to use that same, or similar, legislation to attach the offshore wind turbine projects.

  9. The Amazing Criswell Avatar
    The Amazing Criswell

    This insane windmill project must be stopped! Dominion CEO Bob Blue is taking the company, it’s rate payers and its shareholders to hell.

  10. I wish those who say they care about whales, and migrating birds, would speak up about the damage the turbines have done and will continue to do to both species. And the fact that they do not recycle, along with solar panels, should bring environmentalists screaming for better solutions.

  11. Speaking of things we don’t know – lithium (a psychoactive drug) is bound to leak into the environment as we add more batteries for EVs and solar/windmill electric storage. Is anyone addressing the hazard, or is the subject being kept off the table until we are so far down the path we can’t return?

Leave a Reply