Dominion Files to Build Third Nuke

It’s official: Dominion has filed a permit with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to build a new power plant at its North Anna complex.

Playing the Global Warming card, the power company described the new nuclear power generator as “carbon free,” avoiding the emission of 7.4 million tons of greenhouse gases, equivalent to 1.5 million cars.

Dominion could not say how much the power plant will cost because it is still negotiating with vendors. But the Richmond-based power company should enjoy considerable leverage: It is the first power company to apply for a permit using the new Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor technology, and North Anna Three could become the reference site for the entire industry. General Electric-Hitachi, which developed the technology, presumably is highly motivated to see the plant built.

Safety is sure to be a major issue with regulators and the public. The new design is simpler and dramatically safer than older designs, asserts David Christian, Dominion’s chief nuclear officer. Using passive, gravity-based systems requiring 25 percent fewer pumps, motors and valves, the GE-Hitachi design should translate into lower up-front capital costs and operating costs as well. The estimated life span of the nuclear unit is 60 years.

One feature designed to appease environmentalists is the introduction of a closed-loop cooling system that will eliminate the need to discharge any additional heated water into Lake Anna. However, Dominion did not address the issue of how spent nuclear fuel rods would be stored or reprocessed, nor did any of the journalists attending today’s press conference think to ask. (Bacon’s Rebellion tapped in via a live webcast.)

If the new unit meets regulatory approval and Dominion proceeds with construction, it could generate 1,520 megawatts of electricity — enough to power one million new homes — by 2015. that compares to the estimated 4,000 megawatts that demand is expected to increase over the next decade.

It’s hard to see how alternative fuel sources — solar, wind, biomass — could hope to meet Virginia’s soaring electricity demand within the next eight years, even if the modest conservation initiatives under review are ever implemented. The alternatives are to build another coal-fired power plant, which unquestionably would pollute more, or build high-voltage electric lines to wheel in more power from ouside the state. But, as President Thomas F. Farrell II observed, “Virginia already imports more power from outside its borders than any other state but California.”

If Virginia is going to consume massive amounts of energy, we might as well reap the benefits of producing it — as long as safety and environmental safeguards can be assured. The power plant will add millions of dollars in revenue to the local tax base and create another 750 permanent, high-paying jobs in central Virginia. Dominion’s role in pioneering the new technology also should add luster to Virginia’s emerging role as a major player in the nuclear power industry. (See “AREVA Ponders Massive Investment in Lynchburg.”)

(North Anna Three rendering credit: Dominion)


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

3 responses to “Dominion Files to Build Third Nuke”

  1. Anonymous Avatar

    Saying Nukes are carbon free is like saying M&M’s are “a fat free food”.

    Closed loop or not, that heat is going somewhere. My geothermal heat pump is closed loop, too, but I can still only accept or reject so much heat before I overload the loop.

    Google has just announced an initiative to generate I gigawatt of energy, and to do it with renewable energy at a cost less than coal. I think their plan is to do that from scratch in less than ten years. Google will use its cash flow and ability to attract smart talent in order to succeed.

    Maybe Dominion should hire Google.

    My cycnical side tells me I can hear the bargaining now: If you don;t let us build our power line, we’ll take our Nuke elsewhere. And naturally you can’t put out those four thousand meawatts with out some lines for them to travel on.

    It’s nice to know we can power a million new homes: now where are we going to put them? And since we “saved” all that carbon, each home can have a car and a half.

    Between the homesites, the power lines, and the cars, it looks like we will have some property rights, zoning, and transportation issues to solve if Dominion is going to have the customers it needs to guarantee its return on investment.

    HOO Boy, this is going to be fun to watch.

    RH

  2. Larry Gross Avatar
    Larry Gross

    folks need to take a closer look at the numbers which the press is doing a miserable job of highlighting.

    First, let’s look at the existing plant:

    “North Anna generates 1,786 megawatts from its two units — enough electricity to power 450,000 homes”

    http://www.dom.com/about/stations/nuclear/northanna/index.jsp

    That’s about 4000 per home.

    DOE says this per average home: 1,139.9 and that pretty much checks with my usage but check your own.

    http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/reps/enduse/er01_us_tab1.html

    Now, lets look at the so-called news reports:

    “…North Anna would help meet energy demand, projected to grow by 4,000 megawatts statewide over the next decade–the equivalent of adding 1 million more homes to the electric grid, he said.”

    http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2007/112007/11292007/337199

    yup, sure enough.. Dominion seems to be implying 4000 kw per home.

    then notice this in the same article:

    “The new reactor would produce about 1,500 megawatts of power.”

    my point here is to realize how numbers are being thrown around that don’t really add up.

    And more to the point – why is Dominion assuming 4000kw per home – a much higher figure than even the DOE uses.

    and more important and to the point – is the trend data truly what is being implied?

    Wouldn’t it be great if we had even one news organization in Virginia that would take the public through the numbers and then questions be put to Dominion and our legislators about what we are doing and why?

    and again.. if the R’s really want to show voters that they are Conservative fiscally and care about energy efficiency – this is an opportunity to get involved in the dialogs – to demonstrate that they can be an effective voice for citizens. Perhaps some of them could tear themselves away from fighting with each other… to tend to this.

  3. Anonymous Avatar

    CO2Stats is a free tool that monitors and offsets your blog or web site’s carbon dioxide emissions by calculating how much power your visitors are consuming to view it. For each pound of CO2 resulting from your site traffic, The CO2Stats Project purchases carbon offsets that benefit the environment. …

    Here is the website: http://www.co2stats.com.

    Sounds like a natural for bacons Rebellion.

Leave a Reply