Does Virginia Have Enough Hospital Beds?

Sources: Virginia Health Information, and Google for HCA hospitals.

by James A. Bacon

Now that the COVID-19 virus has arrived in Virginia, key institutions are reacting. Several universities are extending their spring breaks; others are shifting to online classes. Event organizers are cancelling their events, from book fairs to health fairs. Major employers are telling employees to work remotely. Jails are suspending visitations to inmates. Hospitals and nursing homes are restricting the number of visitors.

That’s exactly what it takes to slow the spread of the coronavirus. There is no stopping the virus, as highly contagious as it is, from reaching epidemic proportions in the state, The strategy is to delay, delay, delay, thus avoiding a surge of severely ill patients to hospitals that lack the capacity to handle them. Realistically, the best case scenario is to spread out the epidemic temporally to minimize the number of COVID-19 patients treated in hospitals at any given time. (See the graph in Don Rippert’s most recent post here to get a visual sense of how this works.)

By my count, there are 4,662 acute-care hospital beds in the Richmond region within 20 miles of downtown. According to national figures, the bed occupancy rate runs slightly above 70%. That’s better than in the 1990s when national healthcare policy deemed high bed utilization rates a key to controlling health care costs and occupancy rates ran above 90%.

Correction: The table above includes double-counted beds for HCA hospitals. Chippenham and Johnston-Willis are part of CJW Medical center, while Henrico Doctor’s-Retreat is part of Henrico Doctor’s. A more accurate account of licensed acute care hospital beds in the Richmond region is 3,333. I have not amended the text below to reflect these numbers.

If we assume that 30% of the Richmond region’s hospital beds are empty on average, that implies that local hospitals have about 1,400 beds to spare. Is that enough?

That depends on how fast the coronavirus spreads, and what percentage of the population experiences acute distress. About 15% of the cases in China required hospitalization. On the optimistic premise that Americans on average have fewer risk factors than the Chinese — less air pollution, fewer smokers — let’s assume that only 10% of Americans who contract the disease are ill enough to warrant admission into hospitals. (That may be optimistic, however, because our population is older; an 80-or-older age is a significant risk factor.)

The Richmond region has a population of about one million. If half the population is infected, and if 10% of those infected are admitted to the hospital, that implies hospitals will have to contend with 50,000 coronavirus patients.

Fifty thousand patients, 1,400 beds. Let that sink in.

Hospitals can free up some beds by rescheduling discretionary medical procedures, but even if they emptied their rooms of every current patient, there still would be a vast gulf between supply and demand. I have not checked the licensed-bed numbers for hospitals outside the Richmond region, but I expect the pattern is similar.

If social-distancing strategies can delay the spread of the coronavirus over, say, 26 weeks, that implies about 2,000 additional hospitalizations per week. That would overload Richmond-area hospitals, but not too severely. But if social-distancing is too little, too late, and if the region experiences a geometric rate of increase as seen in other countries, we can envision hospitals getting swamped by 5,000 to 6,000 weekly.

Where will those patients go? What preparations are being made in anticipation of such a surge? This question is fundamental to Virginia’s response to the pandemic.

So far, we have heard nothing from the Northam administration or Virginia’s hospitals on what measures they are taking to expand capacity. And so far, Virginia’s established-media coverage of the coronavirus has been limited mainly to regurgitating press releases. Insofar as Virginia journalists have been inquisitive, they have focused on the shortage of testing kits, a second-tier problem.

For now, it seems, combating COVID-19 is up to the citizenry — employers, churches, event organizers, schools, and private citizens — to take every conceivable precaution in the hope that we can slow the plague’s inevitable onslaught and buffer the impact on our hospitals.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

13 responses to “Does Virginia Have Enough Hospital Beds?”

  1. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Living in a Stephen King novel for the next 60 days will be interesting. “The Stand” was one of those books you start and then read all night….

    The House of Delegates is back in town, just broke to have a briefing on the budget conference report (yes, please read before voting) and an unannounced corona virus briefing. That discussion in the committee room (being streamed) will be the story for today. The next 60 days will blow a hole in that budget, a big one. Will they admit it?

    Electric School Bus bill died promptly on a voice vote to take it by the day.

    1. djrippert Avatar
      djrippert

      In Michigan the governor declared a state of emergency the day after the first case was confirmed. In Virginia our legislature is getting its first briefing six days after the first case was confirmed. We’ll see how it all turns out.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Do we have enough hospital beds for a once-in-a-blue-moon event?

    Do we want dozens, hundreds of empty beds with the costs passed on to all of us – just so we can be “prepared” for these kinds of crises?

    pick your poison but I bet that downstream if a report comes out talking about too many hospital beds – the torch and pitchfork folks will be on it quick!

    1. Regarding the appropriate number of hospital beds, yes, there’s a trade-off. Too many beds is the enemy of efficiency. But my interest is determining right now what Virginia’s capacity is to handle the virus, and that entails knowing how many acute-care beds we have.

      As usual, your primary interest is scoring ideological points.

      I will be happy to engage in that discussion in another time and place. But right now, I am more interested in public health than partisan and ideological purity.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Ideological? nope. It’s descriptive of the way we work these days.

        blog after blog after blog here in BR has been about hospitals and the cost of medical care and it’s fair to ask if we expect the hospitals to maintain enough reserves to deal with these kinds of issues – and for what cost?

        It’s also fair to say that this is not something that “competition” will fix.

        We are, in fact, dependent on govt to do this role. The free market will not do it.

        When this is brought up outside of events like this, it is said to be dealing with a “hypothetical” or a “straw man”.

        Now that we are having the crisis – and much criticism – it’s fair to ask about our expectations in terms of performance and cost.

        Is there really a “cost-effective” way to deal with this crisis or is it more like throwing money at it ?

        fair question, no?

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Your analysis rests on the assumption that half the Richmond population will be infected. How realistic is that assumption? What is its basis?

    1. djrippert Avatar
      djrippert

      Nobody knows.

      Yesterday in Germany Angela Merkel (who holds a doctorate in quantum chemistry) said 70% of Germans would be infected. Some apparently respected German public health expert said 40,000. That’s 58M vs 40,000!

      Yesterday the disease could only be spread by human contact. Today, the Coronavirus can live for hours suspended in air.

      Yesterday a person who tested positive needed to be isolated for 14 days. Today that person might be infectious for 37 days.

      One thing seems solid – the Chinese contained the disease through very hard core isolation efforts (if you believe the Chinese).

    2. Yes, “half the population” is a big assumption. We don’t know. There is tremendous uncertainty. The point of my post is to explore a worst-case scenario that plausibly could happen but hopefully won’t.

      We have no idea what kind of assumptions Virginia’s public health authorities are using. They have been notably reticent, and the media notably incurious.

  4. djrippert Avatar
    djrippert

    You keep saying that Americans are at less risk than Chinese. To an extent I think you’re right. However, the Chinese didn’t play any games when they quarantined / isolated Wuhan and surrounding areas. My guess is that leaving your home in the quarantine area would subject you to arrest … or worse. They contained the epidemic by force. I doubt we’ll have the same resolve.

    There are alternatives to the existing stock of hospital beds. In Seattle authorities bought a motel and used it as an isolation point. Many military bases have hospitals that can be dramatically expanded in times of war. I assume the same could be done in times of pandemic. The Navy has at least two hospital ships that can be ready in 5 days. Where are they?

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I don’t think because we don’t “see” the planning that there is none.

    I suspect there is substantial planning and contingencies ongoing.

    It’s human nature to doubt and to be honest, to panic in times like this.

    I’m quite sure – Northam is hearing both perspectives from his advisors and suspect that even his advisors might be split on how to proceed.

    As they say, do something, do ANYTHING – well.. that’s not necessarily a good thing.

    1. I’m sure there’s plenty of planning. But it’s hard to see much in the way of concrete action. If there is concrete action, public officials need to be more open about it.

      For example, is anyone securing space — in hotels, gymnasiums, public buildings, whatever — to isolate large numbers of people? Perhaps health authorities are doing so. But we haven’t heard anything about it. That would be a relevant fact to report to the public, wouldn’t you think?

  6. Here’s the situation in Italy (which has more acute-care hospital beds per 1,000 population than the United States), according to American Christina Higgins posting on her Facebook page:

    “Today the ICUs in Lombardy are at capacity – more than capacity. They have begun to put ICU units in the hallways. If the numbers do not go down, the growth rate of contagion tells us that there will be thousands of people who in a matter of a week? two weeks? who will need care. What will happen when there are 100, or a 1000 people who need the hospital and only a few ICU places left?

    “On Monday a doctor wrote in the paper that they have begun to have to decide who lives and who dies when the patients show up in the emergency room, like what is done in war. This will only get worse.

    “There are a finite number of drs, nurses, medical staff and they are getting the virus. They have also been working non-stop, non-stop for days and days. What happens when the drs, nurses and medical staff are simply not able to care for the patients, when they are not there?”

  7. Ventilators may be the critical shortage from a death rate percentage. I heard there are only 60K nationwide. There are about 1M hospital beds (with 75% or so typical occupancy).

Leave a Reply