Do Virginia Schools Have “Crisis” of Too Much Discipline?

school_discipline
Data source: Virginia Department of Education, “Discipline, Crime and Violence Annual Reports”

by James A. Bacon

The drumbeat of studies and pseudo-studies purporting to show endemic discrimination in public institutions continues with the release of a new report by the JustChildren Program of the Legal Aid Justice Center.

“Virginia schools have a crisis on their hands,” states the press release. “Waves of students are being pushed out of school through the widespread, discriminatory overuse of suspension and expulsion.” Last year Virginia schools issued more than 126,000 out-of-school suspensions to approximately 70,000 students. One fifth were issued to elementary pre-K and elementary school students. The majority of suspensions were for “relatively minor, non-violent, subjective behavior like ‘disruption,’ ‘defiance’ and ‘disrespect.’”

Moreover, the suspensions were disproportionately issued to males, African-Americans and students with disabilities. African-Americans were nearly four times as likely as whites to receive short-term suspensions.

The report recommends “five proven methods” of addressing misbehavior in school, including social and emotional learning, multi-tiered systems of support, threat assessments and restorative practices.

Needless to say, the supposed discrimination against African-American students is an illusion. Some of the greatest disparities exist in school systems in majority-black cities with black superintendents, black-majority school boards and predominantly black teachers and administrators, such as Richmond and Petersburg. The problem isn’t that the students are black, the problem is that disruptive students are more likely to come from dysfunctional families characterized by no father, substance abuse, domestic violence, and chronic economic insecurity, which, for various historical reasons, affects far more black households than white households (although, in a trend that should please those who fret over such disparities, is affecting an increasing share of white households as well.)

The larger story can be seen in the chart above, taken from Virginia Department of Education annual reports on discipline, crime and violence in Virginia schools. Over the seven years leading up to 2013-2014, the number of crimes and disciplinary infractions reported by Virginia schools plummeted from 372,000 incidents to 146,000 incidents — down 60%. Over the eight years up to 2013-2014, the number of suspensions declined gradually but steadily from 199,000 to 146,000. Expulsions, not shown in the graph, have dropped more than half to 479.

Something is going on, but I’m not sure what it is. The period between 2006-2007 and 2010-2011 showed a mind-boggling decline in disciplinary incidents and then suddenly decelerated to a level almost identical to the number of short-term suspensions. Call me a cynic, but I doubt the numbers reflect the reality in Virginia schools. I would conjecture that administrators’ reporting practices changed far more than the behavior of students in hallways and classrooms.

Perhaps I’m wrong. Perhaps the touchy-feely approach to school discipline advocated by Legal Aid Justice Center is actually working. It would be a wonderful thing indeed if we could find ways to improve the behavior of the 70,000 students who received suspensions. Getting booted out of school, even temporarily, only subtracts from their time to learn. On the other hand, those 70,000 students disrupted the educations of far more students who came to school ready to learn. As documented here, the cost to non-disruptive students, who themselves are disproportionately black, is substantial.  The Legal Aid Justice Center doesn’t seem to notice them at all — perhaps because they cannot be portrayed as victims of discrimination.

I’d like to hear from readers. Is school discipline improving as much as the numbers suggest? Or are the numbers a mirage? Are local administrators ignoring infractions in order to report numbers that please their bureaucratic overlords in Richmond and Washington?


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

5 responses to “Do Virginia Schools Have “Crisis” of Too Much Discipline?”

  1. CrazyJD Avatar
    CrazyJD

    Finally, something that might support LarryG’s blame of school administrators found on another posted topic today. Ooops, except the blame isn’t because the administrators are scapegoating the teachers. It’s because the administrators are covering for the teachers as well as themselves. Darn it!!

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    re: ” Needless to say, the supposed discrimination against African-American students is an illusion. Some of the greatest disparities exist in school systems in majority-black cities with black superintendents, black-majority school boards and predominantly black teachers and administrators, such as Richmond and Petersburg. The problem isn’t that the students are black, the problem is that disruptive students are more likely to come from dysfunctional families characterized by no father, substance abuse, domestic violence, and chronic economic insecurity, which, for various historical reasons, affects far more black households than white households”

    I’m not sure I’ve seen real data from credible folks that back these claims up. It sounds like more made up stuff from folks who enjoy making things things up for those who prefer that to the facts.

    re: “what is going on” and “administrators blaming”…

    well from the VDOE report itself: ” Limitations of Data (page 9)
    Limitations of data presented in this report arise from three primary sources: (1) changes in reporting requirements across time; (2) variations in local methods of collecting and managing data; and (3) variations in local student conduct policies and programming across school divisions.”

    but read this .. if you really want to understand the motivation for administrators to write the “right kind of report”:

    ” Use of DCV Data to Identify Persistently Dangerous Schools

    In Virginia, a “persistently dangerous school” is one that exceeds a threshold of offense incidents over a three-year period as established by the Virginia Board of Education’s Persistently Dangerous Schools Identification Process and Criteria ….

    A school that exceeds its established threshold for three consecutive years is designated as a “persistently dangerous school.” In year one the school is in “caution” status and in year two the school is “on probation.” Schools so designated must develop corrective action plans and are subject to graduated interventions.

    Each state receiving funds under the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 is required to establish and implement a statewide policy requiring that a student attending a persistently dangerous school be allowed to attend a safe school. ”

    so there you go – if those low-income neighborhood schools are declared “persistently dangerous” guess what happens – all those kids go flood the “good” schools in those “nice” suburban neighborhoods… gawd forbid that might happen – so if you want to keep your job you better not be generating any report that causes trouble… eh?

    All of this is going to come crashing down with the re-written No Child Left Behind… these low-income neighborhood schools that many school districts are hiding… are going to get exposed …

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    ” Each state receiving funds under the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 is required to establish and implement a statewide policy requiring that a student attending a persistently dangerous school be allowed to attend a safe school. ”

    this is actually a good example of simple-minded responses to tough issues like poor neighborhood schools with a lot of discipline problems.

    you have several hundred kids at a school that is “declared” to be “unsafe” and thus all those kids, in theory, are going to get bused to other schools in that school district – whether or not there is physical room for them or enough teachers to teach them , etc…

    So what Principal and what School District Administrators are going to actually write a report that essentially declares that school to be “unsafe” and to be shut down, the teachers fired and the kids sent to other schools in the district?

    Crazy’s “solution” – private schools… where you do what with disruptive kids? Well – you kick them out , and make them go to public school, right?

    What’s the public school solution to this? kick the kid out also and let those kids stay at home or wander the streets like they would in a 3rd world country?

    that’s the ” I’m sick of bad kids, bad parents, bad genes and bad teachers” – “solution” from the right these days.

    Read every article, every blog post that details all the gory details of problems with public education – then at the end – find out what they are proposing to do actually do about it. No, they never come right out and say – “kick the kid out permanently and let them wander the streets”.

    but what exactly do they actually say should be done?

    basically it’s: 1. condemn the system 2. burn it down and 3. walk away

    1. CrazyJD Avatar
      CrazyJD

      Larry,

      Again you fail to miss the point. Private schools with vouchers don’t have the many crazy mandates perpetrated by your beloved state. They can actually handle the kids, because they have a different ethic than the “public” schools. Just take Elijah House Academy here in Richmond. All inner city at risk kids. They take the Christian approach, they have very few they have to toss out. It is a matter of the culture you create. If you allow the prevailing public school culture to predominate, you will have the result that you talk about. But in your world, the Elijah House way is prohibited. That’s the state doing that, Larry, not the private schools. But you are so invested in the state, there can be no other solution for you.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Crazy – I don’t think the Elijah House should be prohibited at all. I think if it does work -then fine – let it work and let it expand – even – if it’s a real enterprise with real results that we can see and verify … I’m all for it but on the same basis of public schools – transparency and accountability and apples to apples policies for admittance.

    I’d actually like to know more about how it works and see it’s budget and academic performance results – and if it does what you say it does – then I’m all for it expanding -even with public tax dollars.

    I’m no supporter at all of the current way low-income neighborhood schools are operated.. they’re a scandal… on many levels… and it’s not just because of “rules” – it’s because they are often short-funded and short-staffed with experienced teachers.

    But I strongly suspect that the Elijah House would not accept the majority of the kids that are in these low-income neighborhood schools… because the Elijah House also has it’s own “rules” … right?

    You’re totally wrong about public schools in general – with the exception of the terrible job they do with low-income neighborhoods – they tend to do a reasonably good job especially in the top tier states that DO spend 13-14K per student. Fairfax County is not only one of the biggest school systems in Va but it’s also one of the best academically.. including the at-risk demographics – but again it does cost to do that.

    I’m a skeptic on schools like Elijah House but willing to be proven wrong if the data shows it but most of these schools do not provide the data. They make claims about their effectiveness – but the results are not provided so it’s more “feel good” than real.

    But you totally misunderstand me on low income neighborhood schools – they’re a scandal and a travesty.. no question about it.

Leave a Reply