Do Something “Transformational” with $6.8 Billion in COVID Relief

Credit: Venomspartan on Deviant Art

by James A. Bacon

The $1.9 trillion COVID-relief bill just passed by Congress will shower billions of dollars upon Virginia citizens, businesses and government. State Secretary of Finance Aubrey Layne expects Virginia state government to receive about $3.8 billion and local governments to get about $3 billion, for a total of $6.8 billion.

The crazy thing, says Layne, is that Virginia made it through the COVID-19 pandemic in decent fiscal shape, so it doesn’t need the federal funds to maintain core functions of government as some other states do. Rather, he worries, legislators will be tempted to fritter away this once-in-a-lifetime bounty on pet projects or, worse, on new programs. This COVID-relief money is a one-time source of funding, he says, and it would be unwise to make financial commitments the state will have to continue honoring in subsequent years.

Congress has limited what the states can do with the money. Virginia can’t share this manna from heaven to citizens by reducing taxes. Nor can the state use it to reduce unfunded pension liabilities. As the guardian of the state fisc, Layne would like plow the revenue into one-time capital investment projects. This is Virginia’s opportunity to do something “transformational,” he says.

Like what? Like extending broadband into every inner city and every rural jurisdiction in Virginia. Or like replacing or retrofitting every antiquated school building in Virginia. Layne doesn’t necessarily advocate those two priorities, but they illustrate the way he’s thinking. Both represent long-standing, bipartisan policies that have lagged for the lack of funding. Why not use the COVID money to address these priorities decisively?

Another possibility is using the federal dollars to pay for transportation projects. What some readers may find surprising, given that Layne served as secretary of transportation under Governor Terry McAuliffe before joining the Northam administration, is that he’s not sure that funding more roads, highways or mass transit projects is a good idea right now. Aside from the fact that the Biden administration is working on a multitrillion-dollar infrastructure bill, Layne notes that the COVID epidemic has rendered Virginia’s transportation demand forecasts meaningless. Hundreds of thousands of Virginians discovered that working at home was a viable alternative to commuting to work. Traffic counts receded, and Layne speculates that they may never return to previous levels. Even in Northern Virginia, once a hell-hole for commuters, traffic has has declined dramatically. At the very least, Virginians should wait and see what happens before dumping billions more dollars into transportation.

What, then, does that leave us if we follow Layne’s advice and devote that $6.8 billion to one-time capital spending projects? Here are some options.

Fix unemployment insurance. Layne thinks that a top priority should be restoring the unemployment insurance (UI) fund, and I agree. The UI fund started the COVID-19 epidemic with $1.5 billion in the bank and was on track at one point last year to go $750 million into the hole. The federal government backstops UI deficits, but state programs have to pay the loans back. Normally, higher costs are passed on to businesses, whose rates are adjusted by how many people they have laid off in the past. That’s hardly a recipe for reviving the hardest-hit sectors of the economy. The state should allocate at least $1 billion to pay back Uncle Sam and start building a cushion.

Energy-efficiency fund. Another idea, which should appeal to Greenies and fiscal conservatives alike, would be to create a revolving fund to finance energy retrofit projects in state buildings and facilities. State agencies could repay the loans from energy savings. Greenies should like the program because they prioritize energy conservation as a strategy for decarbonizing Virginia’s economy. Conservatives should like the idea because energy-efficiency projects will lower state agencies’ natural gas and electricity bills, thus lowering the operating cost of government.

Complete broadband deployment. Access to high-bandwidth Internet is critical for rural economic development, the deployment of telemedicine, and the adoption of online learning in K-12 schools.  The state has been dribbling a few tens of millions of dollars a year into this essential infrastructure but progress is slow. The COVID-relief money gives Virginia an opportunity to complete the task.

Fix the schools. I’m still not persuaded that placing children in brand spanking new school buildings will do much to improve their learning. But there is no excuse for children to attend schools in unhealthy or unsafe conditions. Virginia has been dancing around the school-building issue for years, addressing it in dribs and drabs. Let’s identify the worst school buildings, fix them or replace them, and take this issue off the table.

Virginia’s unmet needs are seemingly endless. Older cities have giant funding liabilities for antiquated storm-water overflow systems. Many water treatment facilities need upgrading. Layne points to the issue of unsafe dams that no one seems to have money for. As a budget conservative, I think the $1.9 trillion COVID-relief act is fiscally reckless and will accelerate our rendezvous with Boomergeddon. But the money is coming to us regardless, and we need to spend it as wisely as we can.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

19 responses to “Do Something “Transformational” with $6.8 Billion in COVID Relief”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Unless Northam vetoes the language the GA included in the budget, the legislature will have final say on that money. From Bacon’s comments, it sounds as if the money can be used for just about anything, other than reducing taxes. It definitely should not be used for ongoing costs. After using it to pay for vaccinations, the best uses would be expansion of broadband and replenishing the UI fund (both of those can be related to COVID, at least indirectly). As for school buildings, that might be a worthy cause, but localities should be required to put some skin into any grant program.

    One transformational use could be the establishment of a long-term, low-interest loan program for people who agree to provide medical care (nurses, doctors, dentists, etc.) in underserved rural and urban areas.

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Rural broadband is a particularly bad idea. Urbanization has been ongoing for over a century. Railroads didn’t end it, roads didn’t end it, electrification didn’t end it, subsidized telephony didn’t end it, narrowband internet didn’t end it and broadband won’t end it. Virginia has already poured a fortune from the tobacco indemnification fund into the rural areas of the state for economic development. As far as I can tell, a failure.

    Please show me one state where at least 500,000 people were substantially better off due to rural broadband.

    If broadband created a rural economic miracle then loan the money to jurisdictions. They’ll clearly be able to pay back the loans with the additional tax proceeds from the higher wages.

    Beyond all that … high speed satellite internet is being built as we speak.

    https://spacenews.com/spacex-launches-second-batch-of-starlink-broadband-satellites/

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I maybe don’t disagree but I think electrification and telephone has helped rural economies especially agriculture.

      But the problem is if you give someone money to spend, they won’t spend it like it was their own.

      So “good ideas” don’t get hard vetting.

      Most schools HVACs need updating for the modern pandemic era.

      I know Mr. Moret once said that the state lacks “big” shovel-ready commercial development sites. These are sites with water/sewer/electric/internet – ready to build.

      Seems like that might lead to longer term jobs.

      I wonder if Mr. Moret has thoughts.

      1. “Most schools HVACs need updating for the modern pandemic era.”

        That would be a good use for some of that $6.8 billion.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          How about windows that can open?

    2. Matt Hurt Avatar
      Matt Hurt

      I agree that rural broadband is a bad idea- low Earth orbit service providers will provide a better cost/benefit solution. According to the article below, Starlink currently has 1264 satellites in orbit. This is not a one shot deal, as there are other companies in competition to provide these services to folks around the world. I don’t know how much of our great grandchildren’s money we’d have to spend for the government to effectively provide this kind of high speed coverage out in the sticks, but it’s probably more than has been allocated in all of the Covid relief bills.

      https://www.newsweek.com/what-spacex-starlink-satellites-do-how-many-space-how-big-1576154

      However, for some reason, some folks don’t have the faith in this type of service.

      https://roanoke.com/news/can-starlink-solve-virginia-s-broadband-challenges/article_0492cb64-8792-11eb-82c3-4b2f14a831b4.html

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    One-time money. Can it be spend on something that will result in adding long term jobs?

    Probably not.

    The GA will have no trouble frittering away every penny. Layne is
    the gatekeeper.

  4. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    Get rid of the car tax, or at least reduce the burden.
    This tax hurts our economy and hinders buying new and greener cars. Makes us less competitive with Maryland.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      But, but, but….Congress foresaw that and prohibits the use of the funds to offset tax decreases. There are, of course, work arounds.

      Not clear whether Layne reached out to Bacon, or maybe Bacon just saw him out and about in the glorious weather in our shared neighborhood. I like the way Layne is thinking but I often (not always) do. I won’t endear myself to the business community by saying I don’t want the UI fund completely restored without some of the usual tax increases. There could be some of that.

      First and foremost, build up the reserves. Think hard about the impact of 5% inflation by 2024 or 25….hope it isn’t a return to stagflation.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      one time money……….

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Layne speculates that they may never return to previous levels”

    This is a fact – eventually it will even if telecommuting rates do not drop substantially, growth will eventually return the transportation system to commuter hell. Take this “silver lining” result of Covid and the funding as an opportunity to improve the NoVA transportation system permanently (or at least more permanently). Yes, that means mass transit (Metro) needs to be expanded and improved – maybe incorporating high speed rail…

  6. StarboardLift Avatar
    StarboardLift

    Replenishing UI and completing the stalled update to its software is the first, logical use of these funds. After that, I like the “last mile” broadband project–that is a game changer for a state with so much rural territory, fertilizer for years of human capital, a better-educated populace, and attractive to employers. I’m rarely a fan of pumping dollars into schools because they are generally so poorly managed, no material improvement makes its way to student outcome.

  7. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Unless Northam vetoes the language the GA included in the budget, the legislature will have final say on that money. From Bacon’s comments, it sounds as if the money can be used for just about anything, other than reducing taxes. It definitely should not be used for ongoing costs. After using it to pay for vaccinations, the best uses would be expansion of broadband and replenishing the UI fund (both of those can be related to COVID, at least indirectly). As for school buildings, that might be a worthy cause, but localities should be required to put some skin into any grant program.

    One transformational use could be the establishment of a long-term, low-interest loan program for people who agree to provide medical care (nurses, doctors, dentists, etc.) in underserved rural and urban areas.

  8. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Use the money to move every kid out of the RVA school system…. the kids deserve better.
    They could shut down VMI, redo the barracks, and send every RVA high school student there to start from scratch. They might be able to save a generation.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Or, they would degerate to hazing and racism in a month.

  9. Bet it all on a 16 to one long shot in the Kentucky Derby.

    What? They’re probably going to piss it away on things that won’t benefit the citizens of the Commonwealth in any tangible form, anyway. And besides, they might just win. And pissing away $108.8 billion is a much greater accomplishment than pissing away a mere $6.8 billion…

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Close, but if they want to quadruple the money then offer it as a lottery jackpot.

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I need help from one of youse really, really smart fiscal conservatives.

    Where is it? I’ve been looking for it for 40 years, and youse guys have been telling me that it’ll definitely happen. So, where is it?

  11. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    A revolving loan fund sounds promising if it can be used for that.

    That could help things like schools upgrade their facilities then pay back and maybe some would get full or partial grants.

    A revolving loan fund for commercial large site development – with the locality having to support the project and have some skin in it also.

Leave a Reply