Diversity, Equity, Inclusion… and Conformity and Indoctrination

Janice Underwood

by James A. Bacon

Almost every public university in Virginia has diversity office dedicated to increasing minority representation — in particular African-American and Hispanic representation — in the student body, faculty and staff. But the Northam administration deems those efforts inadequate. The Governor’s Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion has just published a “Strategic Plan for Inclusive Excellence” in higher education, part of a broader ONE Virginia plan to advance “visible” diversity, equity and inclusion across state government.

Said Janice Underwood, Virginia’s Chief Diversity Office in a press release announcing the plan: “Using the Inclusive Excellence framework, ONE Virginia will help implement tangible reforms that interrupt long-held systems of structural inequity to create sustainable change, innovation, and productivity across state government, throughout Virginia, and around our country.”

As underscored by Underwood’s quote above, the strategic plan is built on the premise that Virginia’s institutions are systemically racist. The proposed remedy: Impose a politically correct regime on Virginia’s decentralized institutions that puts into place a machinery for indoctrinating faculty, staff and students and suppressing non-conforming views.

The preface to the plan makes crystal clear the ideological orientation of its authors.

Inequity is rooted in America’s foundation. Accordingly, Virginia’s history is replete with unrelenting, pervasive, structural racism starting with the extermination of its indigenous community, the chattel enslavement of Africans, racialization of immigration, citizenship and religion, exclusion of individuals with disabilities, and progressing to government-sanction oppression of generations of Black Americans and other historically underrepresented populations….

American institutions of racial domination have evolved from slavery and segregation to punitive, exploitative, and unjust systems of housing, education, labor markets, criminal justice and more. … In the 400+ years since, a plethora of laws and policies have been established to create a caste-like racial hierarchy system that limited the rights and freedoms of Black and indigenous people, and People of Color (BIPOC).

The report goes on to list milestones of racism, from 1619 when the first African slaves arrived in Virginia to the colony’s ban on interracial marriage in 1691, the Black Codes in 1865 enacted by Congress, Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act in 1924, and the Social Security Act of 1935 exempting farmworkers and domestics, both largely non-white.

Then, apparently, history froze in time. Ignoring decades of civil rights legislation, the rise of the welfare state, and multifarious efforts through the years to correct past wrongs, the narrative leaps ahead to 2020 when at long last Virginia lawmakers “championed a journey toward truth and racial reconciliation, and a new, more culturally affirming Commonwealth by advancing unprecedented equity-focused laws.”

No change since 1619. That tells you what you need to know about the ideological underpinnings of the plan and how to interpret the seemingly anodyne language of its recommendations.

Here are the stated goals.

Nearly all Virginians would agree with a concept of “inclusion” in which Virginia’s state’s public colleges and universities should be open, accessible and affordable for all citizens. Most probably would share the idea of engaging in extra outreach to historically underrepresented groups. But a lot of people will have a problem with the Northam administration’s definition of “inclusion,” entwined as it is with the Leftist ideology of systemic racism, and the proposed remedies.

Some proposals are benign. I can see no harm in setting the goal of increasing “retention and academic success of historically underrepresented and undeserved” students. A high percentage of minority students drop out of college after having borrowed thousands of dollars, which they may never be able to repay. It’s a good idea for institutions to measure degree-completion rates and to allocate resources to help students stay in school. Indeed, it’s such a good idea that the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV) is already collecting most of this data, and many institutions have the very programs called for in the study.

Here’s what should alarm everyone interested in maintaining intellectual vibrancy, free expression and freedom of speech in academia: Underwood’s plan would turn Virginia higher-ed institutions into intellectual monocultures that enforce the entire Leftist agenda on race, ethnicity, gender, and sexuality. Some “strategies” mentioned in the plan:

— Offer courses, curricula, art/artistic events, and learning opportunities at the undergraduate, graduate, and professional levels that achieve DE&I learning goals.

— Establish incentives, provide learning experiences and resources for faculty, graduate students, and academic units to adapt existing courses and programs as needed. Provide multifaceted training and education for faculty, staff and students on “difficult dialogues” in various settings, e.g., classrooms, living environments, organizations, offices, etc.

Progress in executing these strategies would be tracked by metrics and indicators such as:

— Participation of faculty, instructional graduate students, and staff in professional development programs related to curricular transformation, diversity, and inclusion.

— Student participation in cocurricular opportunities tied to inclusive excellence.

— Evaluation of programs related to inclusive teaching.

— Self-reported improvement in knowledge and skill related to teaching
and curricular development.

— Self-reported growth in awareness and competencies.

— Faculty and instructional graduate students’ assessment of diversity-related learning goals.

This plan was not created by some rogue bureaucrat. Underwood is a cabinet-level official, and Governor Ralph Northam has given the ONE Virginia initiative his imprimatur. This is where public higher education in Virginia is heading.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “Diversity, Equity, Inclusion… and Conformity and Indoctrination”

  1. I love #3 – let’s learn how concentration camps for Uighurs is a ‘cultural norm’ therefore acceptable and how slave markets in today’s Libya is also acceptable because all cultures are equal.

  2. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    The creation of a Diversity Office should strike fear in the hearts of every Virginian. The primary objective of any bureaucracy is to accrue power and budget growth, so this is just the beginning. No matter what kind of language is used in its strategic plan, and the language in this plan is chilling, it is certain that no efforts of good faith will be found acceptable.

    The meaning of diversity, equity, and inclusion will be defined and judged by the bureaucrats. Having stated her beliefs about all of the wrongs that are taking place, Ms. Underwood will search out the confirming evidence and then the corrective mandates will flow like flood waters. While she is focused right now on higher education, that is only a start.

    Colleges and universities should be institutions that teach students how to think and how to critically evaluate different ideas and theories. The guidelines set out for institutions of higher learning are designed to do just the opposite. There have already been too many cases where faculty members were censured for being politically incorrect and for espousing ideas that were in conflict with the woke ideologies that are infecting universities throughout the country.

    The Governor’s action will fail because he apparently doesn’t understand the problem and believes that it can be solved by force and indoctrination.

    Instead of creating a new office, the Governor and the General Assembly should review existing laws and regulations and eliminate any that reinforce racism and inequality. They could be replaced by a simple law that states all men and women of the Commonwealth are equal and entitled to liberty and justice under the law. Any actions that directly or indirectly violate this principle will be subject to appropriate legal action.

    Actions that violate principles of equality, fairness, and inclusion come from the values and beliefs of individuals. Changing those beliefs and values is a long term undertaking because it will come from education in the home, schools, associations, and the work place.

  3. Matt Hurt Avatar

    It seems to me that they’re shutting the barn door after the mule has already gotten out. Many of our students of color are not achieving basic reading and math skills at the same level of proficiency as their white peers as measured by SOL scores across the state. I don’t believe that SOL scores are the best determinant of college success, but if you’re deficient in reading and math skills, it will be much more difficult to get into college, and then be successful once you get there. If we want to mitigate the college problem, we need to do a significant amount of work at the K-12 level to ensure all kids get the skills they need to be successful.

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      Again, it is not color it is the economically disadvantaged that are not cutting the mark. It isn’t culture, it is money. You can’t close the gap between the have and have nots until big things change and education receives equitable funding.

      1. Matt Hurt Avatar
        Matt Hurt

        I’m not so sure that is exactly the case anymore, at least in terms of basic skill attainment as measured by the SOL test. When you look at the correlations of relative division SOL results to the relative enrollment of economically disadvantaged students, as well as minority students, we see that the effect size of economically disadvantaged enrollments is trending downwards, while the effect size for minority enrollments is trending upwards. This tells me that poverty is becoming less of an issue, and race is becoming more of an issue. Besides that, the least well funded region that had the second highest rate of poverty had the highest pass rates in the last two years SOL tests were administered. Again, I’m not stating that SOL scores are the best indicator of college success, but if our kids don’t get a good foundation in those reading and math skills, they are less likely to be college ready. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0a45023f6256091cbf75399324e2a90f8fddd9055de24f60824946a39a5ba40f.png

  4. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    These goals are fluffy. The can’t be measured and add nothing to a fix. Ms. Underwood has a lot to learn about people. Passive aggressive bureaucrats love this kind of stuff. What they are saying is this too shall pass. Note that the GA poo poohed the idea of changing the Loudoun County gifted program enrollment rules. Tells me when it comes down to it, no one is really going to change. This young lady will make a name for herself and move on.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar

    re: ” Most probably would share the idea of engaging in extra outreach to historically underrepresented groups.”

    Interesting. What exactly does ” historically underrepresented” mean?

    and actually, what does it mean to be “represented” as an antidote?

    We got the words and phrases – but I’m not sure “we” have a common understanding of what they mean.

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      Poverty and race pretty show pretty much similar results. The difference you are seeing Matt would not make me change course to pronounce equity is needed among the races. Can you flush out economically disadvantaged by race and then run your correlation. No, the data doesn’t let you look at economically disadvantaged by race. Are poor White students doing any better than poor Brown or Black students? This is the question. I am afraid that jumping on the side of only diversity by Race would lead one to not so valid conclusions and in turn bad strategies. Great run on the data by the way. The other problem is that your statistic is based on the SOL. Many poor students come to school with huge, huge gaps. While the haves have access to someone reading to them, the have nots often do not. Early intervention as measured by Head Start stats show a mixed bag of results. It is the quality of early childhood that closes the gap. In your analysis, you can’t account for teacher effectiveness. As you know, in many poor communities, teacher turnover and shortages (hence some quality factors) are high. This is a complex problem. Why do so many poor children receive special education? What does that data look like. My point- before deciding on a solution, many data points should be evaluated in order to get to the problem. I am not convinced that race is the problem. SOL acres shouldn’t be used solely for accountability, and they are not, for this reason. It took the state along time to realize this.

Leave a Reply