swedish hospitalBy Peter Galuszka

As the right wing echo chamber continues to crank up after the botched launch of the Affordable Care Act, here are a couple of items that direct us back to reality.

One gives us a picture of how the U.S. really compares with comparable advanced countries with universal or near-universal coverage.

The other, an op-ed by three Democratic governors in Washington, Kentucky and Connecticut, notes that their states actually had a fairly successful launch of Obamacare because they pro-actively helped it along instead of taking every chance to throw spanners into the process.

In the first story, The Commonwealth Fund has released its annual survey of how 11 advanced countries rate in medical access, cost and affordability. Here the salient points:

  •  In 2013, more than one-third (37%) of U.S. adults went without recommended care, did not see a doctor when they were sick, or failed to fill prescriptions because of costs, compared with as few as 4 percent to 6 percent in the United Kingdom and Sweden.
  • Roughly 40 percent of both insured and uninsured U.S. respondents spent $1,000 or more out-of-pocket during the year on medical care, not counting premiums. High deductibles and cost-sharing, along with no limits on out-of-pocket costs, may explain why even insured people in the U.S. struggled to afford needed health care, the researchers said.
  • Nearly one-quarter (23%) of U.S. adults either had serious problems paying medical bills or were unable to pay them, compared with fewer than 13 percent of adults in the next-highest country, France, and 6 percent or fewer in the U.K., Sweden, and Norway.
  • About one of three (32%) U.S. adults spent a lot of time dealing with insurance paperwork and disputes or were either denied payment for a claim or paid less than expected. Only 25 percent of adults in Switzerland, 19 percent in the Netherlands, and 17 percent in Germany—all countries with competitive health insurance markets—reported these problems. U.S. insurers spent $606 per person on administrative costs, more than twice the amount in the next-highest country. Such high costs result from a complex, fragmented insurance system, the researchers write.
  • The vast majority (75%) of U.S. adults said their health system needs to undergo fundamental changes or be rebuilt completely.
  • The U.S. spends $8,508 per person on health care. That is nearly $3,000 more per person than Norway, the second-highest spender.

So, no matter how much Obamacare critics, in some cases rightfully, criticize the launch and execution of the reform, it is crucially important to remember where we were at launch.

Speaking of launch, Govs. Jay Inslee, Steve Beshear and Daniel P. Malloy of Washington, Kentucky and Connecticut report that the problem today isn’t merely non-working websites. People are signing up for expanded care because those states laid the groundwork for the reform. They expanded Medicaid benefits and helped create exchanges for people to buy plans. They write that their states “have avoided the temptation to use health-care reform as a political football.”

Not the case at all in Virginia where Obamacare is most definitely a political football, albeit one played by a team as lousy as the hapless Washington Redskins.

Outgoing Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli – the failed gubernatorial candidate – has done everything in his power to make the ACA fail. He was one of the first attorneys general to sue to get rid of it and kept coming on even after the U.S. Supreme Court passed most of the law. He tried to create a myth of massive Medicaid “fraud” by setting up special investigative units to pounce. He perhaps should have spent more time on a real issue, such as rooting out conflicts of interest and ethics problems in state government in some cases where he was very much a player. His refusal to resign as attorney general while running for governor has helped rack up extra legal bills of more than $500,000 for taxpayers in the Star Scientific and ChefGate scandals.

Meanwhile, Republican Robert F. McDonnell likewise has done everything in his power to ensure that the ACA never gets off the ground. No state exchanges. No support on extended Medicaid coverage. The State Corporation Commission punts on its role.

Both politicians have delivered on their roles as spoilers so the Fox News-Jim Bacon echo chamber can reverberate with how bad it all is with truly ludicrous statements such as the worst legislation in the nation’s history.

As they pingback, little is done to improve America’s embarrassing ratings among advanced countries. Once again, the goal here is not to help the people or even government bureaucrats. The game is to back up Big Managed Care, Big Pharma and Big Hospital who provide the Big Money to Congressmen like Eric Cantor, the House Majority Leader.

Nothing is going to get better until the wrecking crew is disbanded.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “Disband the ObamaCare Wrecking Crew”

  1. Hah! Hah The Fox News-Jim Bacon echo chamber? That’s a good one. I NEVER watch Fox News. But I’ll bet you do watch MSNBC. Maybe I’ll start referring to the MSNBC-Peter Galuszka echo chamber!

  2. And so it begins… the MSNBC-Peter Galuszka echo chamber has begun advancing the argument that the colossal failure of the Obamacare roll-out is not the result of flawed legislation written by clods who didn’t even know what the bill contain — as Nancy Pelosi famously said, we’d have to pass Obamacare to find out what was in it — but due to the machinations and obstructionism of those evil Republicans!

    Good luck with that one.

  3. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    MSNBC-Peter Galuszka echo chamber? I really like that idea! Go to it!

  4. Peter wrote, “Once again, the goal here is not to help the people or even government bureaucrats. The game is to back up Big Managed Care, Big Pharma and Big Hospital who provide the Big Money to Congressmen like Eric Cantor, the House Majority Leader.”

    Peter, you are utterly divorced from reality on this one. Big Managed Care, Big Pharma and Big Hospital all signed on to Obamacare! The Obama administration cut deals with those lobbies to ensure that they would not oppose it. To tar Eric Cantor by association with those rent-seeking lobbies is simply bizarre.

  5. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Why not address my points? No? You can’t and I win

  6. Peter,

    The president could have taken an approach to drive out costs before expanding coverage. As the earlier posted video shows, there are many ways to reduce costs without reducing care. I give Obama credit, as his administration has gone after Big Pharma on pay for delay. But why is the U.S. paying for most of Pharma research? Why do we accept paying the highest prices for patented drugs? Why not a law that says that, in order to have patent protection in the U.S., a Pharma company must sell its drugs at the lowest-accepted price in the world given consideration for volume discounts? Ditto for medical devices.

    Another huge area for cost savings is concentration of hospital ownership. The higher the HHI, the higher the prices for hospital care.

    Larry, how about some credit for seeing a role for Uncle Sam in health care?

  7. TMT – I’m speechless!

    you say why not a law like Europe and our VA have?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/18/washington/18cnd-medicare.html?_r=2&

    re: the right wing echo chamber and FAUX News.

    I listen to FAUX, MSN, CNN and C-SPAN and PBS…but when Peter
    says right-wing echo chamber – he means all the other media that are aligned with FAUX news – and you do not need to listen to FAUX News to “get” the standard echo chamber narrative. So I suspect that while Jim Bacon does not listen to FAUX that he DOES listen to other conservative media – who are promoting almost verbatim what you see and hear on FAUX news because Jim B’s point and narrative are virtually identical.

    re: the “exchanges”.

    Virginia could have set up it’s own Exchange as other states including Massachusetts has.

    Virginia could even create one large insurance pool for all county school employees and save money on both administration and actual costs.

    they could have done this before ObamaCare became a name. They could do it now, independent of ObamaCare or they could do their over exchange version using only part of ObamaCare and do their their own website as other states are.

    Virginia – COULD HAVE SAID – ” No thanks, we do not need ObamaCare, we already have our own plan”.

    here’s another point. Who are the insurance companies in ObamaCare?

    are they not the very same companies already doing business in Va including providing both private and public employer-provided plans?

    so how do they agree to participate in ObamaCare and Va never asks them to participate in a Va-only version?

    As I’ve said before – ObamaCare and a bit of a CF which is what you would expect from something where opposition alters it – not to improve it – but to make it worse.

    There are great dollops of hypocrisy in most of the ObamaCare critics.

    here are the opponents – they are – at the same time – cheering the roll out problems AND opposing fixing it …

    their big hope is that the rollout problems will continue to this time next year and help them win the Senate back where they would then do what?

    this is how delusional the GOP is these days…

    they’ve never once actually propose alternative legislation that incorporated their “ideas” or addressed the pre-existing conditions, torts, or the cost issues they say that ObamaCare does not address.

    In RED Virginia, this is especially ironic as much of RED Virginia gets their health care from MedicAid – when, in turn, is huge part of our budget.

    the blue areas of Va tend to have employer-provided healthcare but who in rural Red Virginia have employer-provided insurance?

    You know – if the GOP actually passed other legislation like immigration but they disagreed on this one issue – they would have a leg to stand on – but the reality is the GOP has morphed into part of obstructionists – not only to Dems but to their own party also.

  8. Something worth reading:

    “How we got Obamacare to work”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-we-got-obamacare-to-work/2013/11/17/3f2532bc-4e42-11e3-be6b-d3d28122e6d4_story.html?tid=pm_pop&wpisrc=nl_most

    By this time next year – no matter what Virginia or other GOP opponent states do – there will be 23 that will have successfully signed up millions of people.

    What exactly is the GOP going to run on in those 23 states? That they’d take away the insurance ?

    Karl Rove and Reince Priebus and others are setting up for the November 15 elections, convinced that the country will be in open rebellion to ObamaCare but what about the 23 states that are right now signing up millions?

    This characterizes the logic of the GOP … they continue to talk about repeal even though there is no way to do it now and won’t be even if their delusional thinking produces results in Nov 2015.

    the delusion of the GOP is comical. DJ talks about the Clown Show – but he’s got the label on the wrong group.

    this is dumb. It’s in denial of the realities. A political party that “thinks” this way has no business trying to govern in the first place. It’s looney tunes.

    Here you have in Va, a candidate for GOV and his “agenda”, his talking points to gain the governorship was to oppose ObamaCare.

    He would have become governor and then do what in that regard – continue to work with other GOP to derail ObamaCare? That was his agenda for Va?

Leave a Reply