Despite Tighter Gun Laws, Firearm Violence Up in 2021

by James A. Bacon

What role has the availability of guns played in the surge in violent crimes in Virginia over the past two years?

The graph above summarizes the data from the 2021 Crime in Virginia report. Over the two-year period, the number of firearm-related crimes increased 10.9%, while the use of all other weapons — from fists, feet, and teeth to knives, clubs and automobiles — increased only 1.9%. That indicates that Virginia’s bad guys were not only committing more crimes in 2021 than two years previously, but they were more likely to brandish or shoot firearms when doing so.

The data show clearly that guns are a growing problem, not a receding problem, in Virginia criminality. But the implications for public policy are anything but clear.

To satisfy the idle curiosity of Bacon’s Rebellion readers, I provide here a list of the many and varied ways in which Virginians assault, maim and kill one another with weapons other than firearms. (Personal weapons are fists, feet, teeth, and the occasional head-butt.)

Remember, Virginia Democrats passed and enacted a wave of gun reform legislation in 2020, and followed up with considerable tinkering in 2021. If those laws were targeting the underlying problems, one would expect the use of guns to have declined over those two years.

But quite the reverse happened… which probably explains why not one outlet in Virginia’s mainstream media has seen fit to report the fact that gun crimes were up, not down, in 2021.

Here follows a recap of the gun laws enacted in 2020 during the frenzy of the George Floyd protests and calls for criminal justice reform. These laws went into effect July 1, 2020:

  • Virginians were allowed only one handgun purchase per month;
  • Gun owners were made subject to a red-flag law. With the issuance of Extreme Risk Protective Orders, the state could temporarily relieve an individual of his firearm when he presented a danger to others;
  • Background checks were mandated on all firearm sales and transfers;
  • Gun owners were required to report lost or stolen firearms within 48 hours;
  • Guns in households with children had to be securely stored;
  • Trigger activators (used to simulate automatic fire) were banned;
  • Child care facilities had to lock down firearms;
  • Some gun safes were exempted from sales tax;
  • Gun owners served with protective orders had to surrender their weapons to the state within 24 hours of receiving notice;
  • Localities were empowered to regulate the carrying of firearms in public places like parks and government buildings.

More reforms, mostly technical, went into effect July 1, 2021. Among them were:

  • Codification of an executive order banning firearms from Capitol Square;
  • Banning of firearms within 40 feet of polling places;
  • Authorizing school boards to ban guns in buildings they own;
  • Prohibiting individuals convicted of misdemeanor assault and battery from purchasing, possessing or transporting a firearm for three years following their conviction.

My interest here is not to debate any of these laws on their individual merits. None of them, to my mind, are terribly unreasonable — although, it must be said, I’m not a gun owner, so I don’t have a (hunting) dog in this fight.

The key takeaway is that enactment of these supposed reforms coincided with a significant uptick in murders, aggravated assaults and other assorted  crimes, which suggests that they were not targeting the real sources of gun violence. Legislators may be able to brag to their constituents that they “did something,” but that “something” missed the bulls-eye by a wide margin. Indeed, one might say that it missed the entire target.

Virginians must consider the possibility that the rise in gun violence stems not from easy access to guns but from a rise in criminality. Bringing down gun deaths in Virginia requires identifying and targeting the causes of that criminality — which may be heresy to legislators who blame violent crime on the guns and not the criminals.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

83 responses to “Despite Tighter Gun Laws, Firearm Violence Up in 2021”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I’m confused by “all others”.

    on chart 1, it seems to be comparing everything else to guns but in chart 2… it looks like “all others” is all the other that is not fist, knives, etc. – (which seems a bit weird).

    so what exactly is “all others” – does it include the fist, knives, etc or is it a separate category of everything not articulated specifically?

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      JAB’s crucial point is that the number and % of asphyxiations has significantly increased indicating that criminals are no longer as slush as they once were to afford weapons.

  2. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    A recent report from Chicago is that the cops think there are about 1,400 people causing nearly all of the mayhem in the city. Unfortunately the justice system is a revolving door there and they keep arresting the same people over and over.

    Bringing back Project Exile that added mandatory jail time for crimes committed with a gun would address their problem in Chicago. It would likely make a big difference here in Virginia too.

    The one man crime spree across several jurisdictions who was repeatedly released to strike again but finally jailed in Fairfax recently is an example. Getting repeat criminals off the street seems so obvious that it does not need mentioning. Unfortunately that ain’t the case in much of America (or Virginia) today.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      And then BR has the one-man opinion spree offering self-convincing observations about all causes and effect.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        Looking in the mirror again?

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      As for “repeat criminals”, the vast majority of recidivists are nonviolent offenders. Are you preposing to lock repeat nonviolent offenders for longer periods of time to get them off the street? The state does not have enough prison beds today to house all the offenders with sentences that would qualify them to be housed in state facilities (many serve out their sentences in local or regional jails). To get these repeat nonviolent offenders off the street, are you prepared for the state to build additional prisons, at a cost of about $150 million each, with an annual operating cost of $25-30 million each?

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        Violent versus non violent makes a difference. Penalties should be scaled to the offense. For all crimes as offenders repeat penalties should increase as well as increase for seriousness of offenses. That seems to be how our criminal laws are written.

        We really do want to get offenders attention to discourage their criminal behavior. The more serious and/or frequent the offenses the harder we try to discourage them. For violent and repeat offenses we also remove people from the general population to protect the innocent. Those are not radical, obtuse or inequitable propositions.

        You seem to know a lot about prison finances. By chance were you the DPB genius who gaffed prison construction budgets years ago? I recall the legislator’s acerbic observation that the numbers were right, but it was a question what years they applied to.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          You seem to know a lot about prison finances. By chance were you the DPB genius who gaffed prison construction budgets years ago? I recall the legislator’s acerbic observation that the numbers were right, but it was a question what years they applied to.

          Ha! That was you. That explains a lot.

      2. WayneS Avatar

        As for gun owners, the vast majority of them are law abiding citizens. Are you proposing we infringe on their rights because a very small percentage of them are committing crimes with guns?

        By the way, I have not read any comment on this blog in which someone advocated longer sentences for non-violent offenders. You have constructed a straw man, and a rather weak one at that.

        Also, the vast majority of recidivists being non-violent helps make the case that the majority of the violence and mayhem in our streets is being perpetrated by a relatively small number of individuals.

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          Instead we just throw money at something or make another law. The primary driver for crime is poverty and we’ve failed to address that in a thoughtful or intelligent manner.

          Instead of using the Ikea effect we just give people things that they don’t value.

          1. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            That and not teaching people to read. If you can’t read there is not much chance of learning to make an honest living.

    3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      The use of a firearm in the committing of a violent felony carries a minimum mandatory sentence under Virginia law, which has been the law for many years. Sec. 18.2-53.1

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        That’s nice, but the use of a gun in a crime needs to carry its own time in addition to the other crime.

        Project Exile demonstrated that separating the offenses prevented plea bargaining the gun crime away.

      2. WayneS Avatar

        That only works if the Commonwealth’s Attorney doesn’t “deal it down” to a lesser charge.

        That is where Project Exile made a difference – the feds did not make deals with the criminals.

  3. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    JAB has got it!!! It’s the rise in criminality that is causing the rise in crime. More people, more folks to commit crimes. Blaming crime on guns is irrational. It’s actually people who commit crimes and by counting that data it leads to the conclusion that criminality is the cause of rising crimes.

    Anyone can see that logic.

  4. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    When politicians will go by political paloi rather than the facts, truth, you’ll see a lot of laws that hurt the law abiding but nothing to help the problem.

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Enacting gun legislation that can pass 2A review is like trying to bail out a sinking ship with a tablespoon.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      That is what happens when you choose the wrong tool for the job.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Exactly! The 2nd needs to be repealed so we bring in a bilge pump!!

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          You have the bilge part right.

          If you will start trying to solve problems instead of repealing Constitutional rights of honest citizens you would be contributing to making the country a better place. A novel concept to you, but one worth considering.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Repealing the 2A and passing actually effective gun control measures IS solving problems.

          2. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            Eliminating constitutional rights is the first step of a tyrant. Somehow it is not surprising that you would openly advocate that. Your next step will be to repeal the 1st to keep anyone from arguing your sedition. The road to Hell is paved with bad as well as good intentions.

            A small number of people are committing acts of violence. Incarcerating them and providing mental health services to the crazy ones is both constitutional and doable now.

            But go ahead keep advocating for unconstitutional pie in the sky instead of doing effective things now. Be sure to bitch and twiddle your thumbs as the bodies continue to pile up too.

          3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            How is changing the Constitution as the FF envisioned an act of a tyrant…??🤷‍♂️. It would take a supermajority and state ratification… hardly compatible with tyranny.

            The 1st is not resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent victims each year so there is no reason to argue for its repeal. If it were, it would be a legitimate argument.

            “Incarcerating them and providing mental health services to the crazy ones is both constitutional and doable now.”

            It is already done and is not effective… meanwhile other countries with much lower gun death rates also have mentally ill citizens and criminals…. alas, but do let’s continue to sacrifice our own to your cult…

          4. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            “Incarcerating them and providing mental health services to the crazy ones is both constitutional and doable now.” It is already done and is not effective…

            In what pipe dream did that come to you? Will you share some of what you’re smoking?

          5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            We incarcerate more than any other developed country per capita and each of them have far lower gun death rates. Mental illness is not unique to the US. What is unique to the US? The 2nd amendment.

          6. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            In recent years we’ve been turning the violent criminals loose rather than locking them up. After Buffalo, Uvalde and Highland Park you cannot possibly think we actually treat people with mental illness. Instead as a solution you want to gut the Bill of Rights for 337 million people. You’re as loony as Crimo but with far bigger delusions of grandeur.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      So stop trying to do it…

      😉

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        Let the ship sink then…

  6. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    The good news is that crimes using knives and blunt objects went down, and the bad news is that crimes using fire/explosives went up by 72%. That’s about 7X the increase in gun crimes.

    Require background checks for matches and prohibit possession of butane lighters with capacity for more than 10 fires. At the time of the Constitution flint and steel was the common method of ignition. The framers could not have imagined the horror of someone being able to start a mass conflagration or lighting a fuse simply by flicking a Bic. Better yet, ban assault lighters.

  7. JayCee Avatar

    We are experiencing a rise in the number of armed Democrats. Am I missing something?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      yeah, but are they killing like the GOP does? 😉

      1. JayCee Avatar

        There is no evidence to suggest either political party is killing anyone, but there is ample evidence that jails are full of voters who are democrats.
        https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jail-survey-7-in-10-felons-register-as-democrats

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          apparently true……

  8. Randy Huffman Avatar
    Randy Huffman

    I saw a Pew research article a while ago about 2020 data, which I link here. While not perfect and a bit incomplete, it did a comprehensive job evaluating gun violence based on the data available. Conclusion, “In 2020, handguns were involved in 59% of the 13,620 U.S. gun murders and non-negligent manslaughters for which data is available, according to the FBI. Rifles – the category that includes guns sometimes referred to as “assault weapons” – were involved in 3% of firearm murders. Shotguns were involved in 1%. The remainder of gun homicides and non-negligent manslaughters (36%) involved other kinds of firearms or those classified as “type not stated.”

    https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/02/03/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/

    The problem is 36% was not classified, which is a huge unknown, but they are clear the vast majority of murders are not mass shootings, or shootings with assault rifles.

    Everyone knows about the Highland Park Parade mass shooting. But how many people know the number of murders in Chicago last weekend? 72 shootings, ten killed and 62 wounded. Every weekend countless people are shot, but rarely is an assault weapon used, or its some kind of “loner”. What is never reported is how many of these guns are legal…but we all know the answer, criminals get them on the street.

    https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/10-killed-at-least-62-wounded-in-fourth-of-july-weekend-shootings-in-chicago/2873732/

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      how does that compare with Europe and Asia criminals?

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      how does that compare with Europe and Asia criminals?

    3. WayneS Avatar

      I would offer one correction to one of your sentences:

      What is never reported is how many of these guns started out as legally-owned firearms.

      Once a criminal can get the gun “on the street” it is no longer legal.

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Once there’s 1.5 guns for every man, woman, and child, a stoppage in sales should have little effect on their use. They’re the very definition of a durable good. Bullets, not so much.

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    A Bacon’s Rebellion video editorial. This text-to-voice rendition of the article is presented by Alpo.
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-lDb0Dn8OXE

  11. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    So, you think legislation, such as these fairly modest provisions, are going to have a significant impact in one year when the society was already awash in guns?

    Fine, repeal all gun control laws. Let’s go back to the Wild West. (Ironically, there were more restrictions on guns then, than there is now. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/21907/were-firearms-prohibited-in-dodge-city-kansas-in-the-1870s#:~:text=A%20gun%20control%20law.%20They%20declared%%20%22any,OK%20Corral%22–also%20barred%20the%20carrying%20of%20guns%20openly.

    Let everybody get armed to the teeth, with everyone carrying an AR-15 along with several hundred rounds of ammunition. That should make lots of people on this blog happy and everyone feel safer.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Amazing. Maybe James is channeling Archie…

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-lDb0Dn8OXE

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I share your frustration.

      Here we have these pissy little lone wolf jerks getting all the guns and ammo they need to slaughter innocent people at will.

      And we have gun owners and conservatives saying it’s their 2A “right”!

      we have these social misfits being able to easily buy as many deadly weapons of war they want and then mow innocent people down ..in parades, and schools and grocery stores…

      and they say ” oh it’s not that bad, we got a whole lot more blacks folks killing other black folks…with THEIR guns, what about THAT”

      we are the ONLY country in the developed world that is like this and we’re becoming more like 3rd world countries than developed countries…

      and some of our folks apparently LIKE that – they call it “liberty”.

      1. James Kiser Avatar
        James Kiser

        Don’t forget denmark or France or other countries where mass murders take place

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          they do but about 1% of ours. Ours are incentivized.

        2. WayneS Avatar

          Despite the ridiculous histrionics of ‘LarrytheG’, there is no sane person on either side of the “gun debate” who says anyone has a 2nd Amendment right to kill innocent people at will.

    3. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Funny that the “Wild West” was used. Exactly what is meant by that and contrast that to life nowadays. That means everywhere – in lower income neighborhoods, etc. I’m all for people choosing what they want to carry or not carry.

      1. Times Square, NYC subways….
        ‘God created Man, Samuel Colt made them equal.”

        That’s why the Dems thought up gun control — to control the ability of colored to protect themselves. That’s why the Dems tried to outlaw ‘Saturday Night Specials — so poor inner city dwellers couldn’t protect themselves.

        1. vicnicholls Avatar
          vicnicholls

          Considering its that way because criminals are taking over … I agree with your 2nd paragraph.

    4. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      I think you fail to understand the laws of the 1800’s. You weren’t prohibited from owning any firearms at all, you just had to provide them to law enforcement if you wished to be in specific towns.

      The difference being that those law men shot on sight if you refused. There was no justice system, they were the judge, jury and executioner.

      Beyond that you have no idea what would make people on this blog happy, they have told you but you either refuse to I listen or don’t wish to listen.

      You continue to exhibit reasons why your voice in the matter deserves no respect, because you in fact give none.

    5. WayneS Avatar

      Ironically, there were more restrictions on guns then, than there is now.

      Not where I live, there weren’t – unless you count the jim crow laws aimed at preventing blacks from owning guns…

      I’d be happy to pay a $25 fine for forgetting to leave my gun locked in my car when entering a “gun free” zone – what I don’t agree with is 2 years in a state prison in New Jersey for “improperly” storing a gun while transporting it through the state.

  12. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    How about to slow the crime rate every criminal with a record who uses a gun is executed upon capture. That will bring the crime rate down real quick. Study just done in Baltimore showed about 200 individuals were responsible for 95% of the violence in the city.But democrats refuse to jail them.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Please provide a link to that study. I really would like to see a study which shows that 200 people had been convicted of 95 percent of the violence, but Democrats refused to put them in jail, but let them run free.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        It’s the January 6th Committee.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Well, that would change capital punishment from its current state of randomness.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        Interesting link, it is a finite group that generates most violent crime. Unfortunately it seems to be self perpetuating, Not surprising that much of it is conflicts over women. Testosterone makes us crazy.

  13. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    A rural Georgia monument that some conservative Christians criticized as satanic and others dubbed “America’s Stonehenge” was demolished Wednesday after a predawn bombing turned one of its four granite panels into rubble.

    The Georgia Guidestones monument near Elberton was damaged by an explosive device, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation said, and later knocked down “for safety reasons,” leaving a pile of rubble in a picture that investigators published.

    Surveillance footage showed a sharp explosion blowing one panel to rubble just after 4 a.m. Investigators also released video of a silver sedan leaving the monument.

    https://www.schliefkevision.com/wp-content/uploads/stn000.jpg

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      So what? A leftie New World Order monument fell down. Ever examine the inscriptions?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        yes, what’s wrong with them?

      2. WayneS Avatar

        I do not think people should destroy the private property of other people.

  14. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Now HERE’S a spreadsheet with which to have fun…

    Substance exposed infants… by locality by year.
    https://www.dss.virginia.gov/files/about/reports/children/cps/all_other/2021/Substance_Exposed_Infant_Count_2021.xlsx

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      oh geeze… here comes another BR tome on “culture”….

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        It comes with no definition of “substance”, so maybe no lock on the under sink cabinet?

  15. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    WTF is wrong with Japan?! Just 10 shootings last year?! Those people are sick!

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Abe might tell you different. But he can’t.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Lincoln?

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Move over ghost guns there is a new weapon in town. The firearm used to knock off Abe. Looks homemade to me. Marshall Dillon and Chester are in trouble.
          https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d1df97d41f362c00b62359a9f619265ab44b96e82856b5ade367c35593af90b8.jpg

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            can it kill dozens of people in a few minutes? This thing was big enough it should have easily been seen by his security folks, no?

          2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            NO. But fill up a tractor trailer in Texas and see how many can be killed.
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bca0ce0e857afddeca4a9e779999b81979816b62a3d9a84542adb6dbec9f6281.jpg

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            yes.. those folks trying to find a better life versus kids and parade goers just trying to enjoy their “better” life.

            I think you might be sipping some kool-aid there, fella…

            Here we talk about “freedom” but not for folks trying to immigrate… nope.. we don’t want them – go find their “freedom” somewhere else, right?

          4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            I am all for it Mr. Larry. But please. Could they use the front door? What is the point of passports, security checks, and customs at airports now? What is happening on our southern border is a national nightmare and you are cheering it on?

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            It is reported as homemade… retired navy officer. Seems about right.

          6. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            Sherlock?

          7. WayneS Avatar

            I believe that is what is known in the parlance as a “zip gun” (a simple homemade firearm).

            Not that I know anything about making such a weapon, but based on the configuration and the diameter of the tubing I would guess that it was “designed” to fire two 12 gauge shotgun shells. That would make sense, since shotgun shells are the only form of ammunition that might be readily available to a private citizen in Japan.

            UPDATE: It may be even simpler than I initially thought:

            https://www.vice.com/en/article/z34x3e/heres-what-we-know-about-the-homemade-gun-that-killed-shinzo-abe

  16. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    I’d take this more seriously if we would also prohibit anyone from hiring an armed bodyguard (except for businesses like banks and jewelry stores). Toss in a mandatory 10 year sentence for hiring an armed bodyguard. No protection for people from Manhattan’s Upper East Side, Chicago’s Gold Coast or Beverly Hills. How many entertainers are campaigning for gun control while using the protection of an armed guard?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      oh, coming from a lawyer, that sure sounds “Constitutional”. You guys… if ya’ll were really in charge, gawd knows what the country would end up looking like! geeze TMT!

  17. WayneS Avatar

    As an aside, in Japan, where private citizens cannot legally own a handgun or rifle, it appears the guy who shot the Japanese Prime Minister made his own gun.

  18. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    so when you look at intentional homicide rate by country – does the availability of guns make a difference:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/034eb06429d452d0f1710579cab23a558f6ef33ac8937bed0bb9527691e79509.jpg

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a9ef155dad711e7371e7fcc0b0d63007d95d046d388a5c8f6eff6994ad3ecb69.jpg

    also – looking at Mexico and Central America countries, irony that gun violence in those countries might be driving immigration to this country for less gun violence?

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Nations where freedom is declining. Compare with your graph. Interesting correlation.
      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/419de13bfe5b526b92b3f72c1ae73fff12752ad5383218b8009a0f74fe09710b.jpg

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        geeze James.. if Freedom IS declining, can they still get guns?

        how are all these folks dying in 3rd world countries if not from guns?

  19. henrybowman_az Avatar
    henrybowman_az

    We told them back in 2021 that those laws weren’t going to work, and exactly why they wouldn’t work. They said that was nonsense. And it played out exactly as we knew it would.

    The big question is, how long are you going to continue to listen to the real idiots in the room?

Leave a Reply