Photo credit: Richmond Times-Dispatch

By Dick Hall-Sizemore

Many commenters on this blog seem to view Virginia Democrats as elitists (the “Plantation Elite”) who either ignore or look down on the needs of most Virginians or elitists who are absorbed in advancing critical race theory and other woke ideas. While battles against these perceived threats have been raging on Bacon’s Rebellion, Democrats in the General Assembly have passed, over stiff Republican opposition, a raft of legislation during the past two sessions that benefit ordinary working stiffs.

Some of this legislation has been high profile and has drawn fire on these pages, but most have gone largely unnoticed here and in the press. The best-known bills are those that increase the minimum wage and that authorize localities to engage in collective bargaining with their employees. These have been debated extensively on BR and I have no interest in resuming those debates here. (For the record, I support the minimum wage increase, but have strong reservations about public employee collective bargaining.)

One legislative action that has symbolic importance, as well as substantive effect, is the creation of the position of Secretary of Labor in the Governor’s cabinet. Generally, I do not like the creation of secretariats with only one or two major agencies to oversee, usually to appeal to a special political constituency. Examples would be the Secretary of Agriculture and Forestry and the Secretary of Veterans and Defense Affairs. The creation of a Secretary of Labor would be another such action. However, there is some legitimate reason for it. The agencies dealing with labor issues are now buried in the Commerce and Trade secretariat, which has a heavy emphasis on economic development. Issues related to the workforce are likely to take a back seat. Furthermore, the Commonwealth has a fractured workforce development infrastructure. A Secretary of Labor could serve to coordinate those efforts better.

In addition to legislative initiatives, the Northam administration has taken aggressive action on complaints of misclassification of workers on state construction projects. As reported by the Richmond Times-Dispatch, the Virginia Employment Commission, after an extensive investigation, has found that dozens of workers have been misclassified as independent contractors by firms working on the construction of the new General Assembly Building.

In addition to the bills passed (noted below), the legislature included language in the new Appropriation Act establishing a working group to “examine the procurement, wage theft, worker misclassification, and prevailing wage laws” relating to state construction projects. Other language directs Cabinet Secretaries to take steps to protect workers on state construction contracts.

Finally, Attorney General Mark Herring announced the establishment of a Worker Protection Unit within his office that “will focus on investigating, stopping, and prosecuting exploitation of Virginia workers.”

In reaction to all these developments, Frank Mahoney, spokesman for the Eastern Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters, sounded almost giddy. “It’s a great time for workers’ rights in Virginia. It seems like things are going in the right direction.”

Listed below are short summaries of the bills passed in the 2020 and 2021 sessions that expand protections for workers. The vote in each house is also shown. With a couple of exceptions, the bills were enacted over strong Republican opposition, with most passing on a straight party-line vote. Democrats are likely to try to exploit their support for, and Republican opposition to, workers in the upcoming fall elections.

Collective bargaining. HB 582 and SB 939 (2020) authorize local governments to engage in collective bargaining with employee labor unions or other associations. The bills retain the prohibition on public employee strikes.  (53-46; 21-18)

Secretary of Labor. HB 2321 (2021) creates the position of Secretary of Labor in the Governor’s cabinet.  The secretariat will consist of the Department of Labor and Industry, the Department of Professional  and Occupational Regulation, and the Virginia Employment Commission, all of which are currently under the Secretary of Commerce and Trade.  The bill abolishes the position of Chief Workforce  Development Officer.  (54-44; 21-18)

Minimum wage. HB 395 and SB 7 (2020)—Increases the state minimum wage as follows:

  • 5/1/2021 to 1/1/2022: $9.50 per hour
  • 1/1/2022 to 1/1/2023: $11.00 per hour
  • 1/1/2023 to 1/1/2025: $12.00 per hour
  • 1/1/2025 to 1/1/2026: $13.50 per hour
  • 1/1/2026 to 1/1/2027: $15.00 per hour
  • After 1/1/2027: Adjusted hourly minimum wage

The increases to $13.50 and $15.00 per hour would be effective only if reenacted by the General Assembly prior to July 1, 2024.

The provisions apply to the state government and all local and regional governments.

The bills eliminate the following current exemptions to the minimum wage requirements:

  • Employers with less than four employees;
  • Physically and mentally disabled workers; and
  • Domestic workers.

They retain the exemption for farm workers.  (55-45; 21-19)

Other wage-related issues. Non-payment of wages—Current law sets out various procedures employers must follow in paying their employees. Legislation enacted would prohibit an employer from firing or discriminating against any employee because that employee filed a complaint with the Commissioner of Labor and Industry regarding nonpayment of wages in accordance with provisions of the Code. Furthermore, if, during the investigation of a complaint, the Commissioner runs across evidence that other employees were not paid in accordance with Code procedures, the Commissioner may investigate those cases as well  Finally, employees are authorized to file a civil suit against any employer violating the Code provisions relating to the payment of wages. The civil suit can be used to recover wages and the court shall award an additional equal amount of liquidated damages and attorney fees. If the court finds that the employer knowingly failed to pay wages in accordance with the Code provisions, the court shall award triple damages. (HB 336, HB 337, SB 48, and SB 49 (2020)) (85-13; 40-0);  (SB 838 (civil action) (2020) , 52-45-1; 22-18)

Prevailing wageHB 833 and SB 8 (2020) require that any contractor for a state construction project pay at least the prevailing wage for the general area as determined by the U.S. Secretary of Labor under the Davis-Bacon Act.  (55-44; 21-19)

Misclassification—Authorizes workers to bring civil action against contractor for classifying them as “independent contractors” rather using the correct classification of “employees.” The legislation establishes a presumption of “employee” being the correct classification unless the worker is shown to meet the definition of ‘independent contractor” as defined by the U.S. Internal Services. Furthermore, the legislation prohibits retaliation against an employee or independent contractor who reports misclassification or participates in an investigation of misclassification. (Civil Action—HB 984 (69-30; 22-18) and SB 894 (64-35; 21-19), Retaliation—HB 1199 (52-44; 21-19) and SB 662 (55-44; 25-13))

Subcontractors—For construction jobs worth more than $500,000, SB 838 (2020) makes the general contractor the employer of the subcontractor’s employees for purposes of how the employees shall be paid. Provides that, if the wages due to a subcontractor’s employees are not paid, the general contractor shall be subject to all the penalties, criminal and civil, that apply to an employer who fails to pay employees in accordance with provisions of state law  (52-45-1; 22-18)

Domestic workers. HB 2032 (2021)—Expands laws regarding employee safety to include domestic workers (companions, cooks, maids, etc.)  (55-43; 21-18)

HB 1864 (2021)—Expands provisions prohibiting employment discrimination to include domestic workers.  (55-44; 21-17)

SB 1310  (2021)—Incorporates same provisions as HB 2032 and HB 1864, plus expands provisions regarding time and medium of payment to employees, withholding wages, statement of earnings, etc. to include domestic workers.  (55-45; 21-18)

SB 804 (2020)—Makes domestic workers eligible for minimum wage.  Previously explicitly excluded from minimum wage requirements.  (55-44; 40-0)

Overtime and paid sick leave. HB 2137 (2021)—Requires that employers provide home health workers, who work at least 20 hours per week or 90 hours per month, with paid sick leave, to be earned at a minimum rate of one hour for every 30 hours worked. (54-46; 21-18)  This bill was a compromise from the 2020 bill that failed which covered all public and private employers with six or more workers.

HB 2063 (2021)—Requires all employers to pay at least time and a half overtime to any employee working more than 40 hours per week.  (55-43; 21-18)


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

38 responses to “Democrats Expand Worker Protections”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Note: I did not realize that Steve Haner had posted a similar article earlier today. I have been working on this one for awhile and just wanted to get online. This one covers a little more ground and provides some contrasting views.

    1. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Collective bargaining will shoot us in the foot with higher taxes. Watch restaurants go under due to minimum wage, that’s not the only issue. Go ask California. Domestic workers requires you hire a male for your young girls that need to be babysitted, if that is who applies. Same for your elderly grandma who needs home care. Aint happening. Forget it. My right to privacy and my body (my choice, remember that?) trumps anything else. Domestic workers won’t get hired a lot when their wages are shifted up to where folks can’t pay for them. Same for overtime and paid sick leave. Won’t be affordable. Take a look at HB2063 and the same thing happens there.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        They want you to hire all that from a full service company, preferably fully unionized….so yes, far higher cost. Independent contractor = bad.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Yes, it does. I appreciate you taking time to compile this. I could easily have packaged it as a list of anti-employer legislation, and pro-trial lawyer legislation. Which in many cases, it is. My prediction is this is not good for Virginia’s long term economic prospects, and being well-protected means little if you are unemployed.

      We can fight it out here and the candidates around the state will be using the same themes!

  2. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    The purpose of collective bargaining is to give employees weight in negotiations and interactions with employers. It also provides a mechanism for correcting grievances. That GA is by inference saying that state and municipal governments can’t be trusted to do the right thing. Isn’t that something. What unionization will do is calcify the employment system and enable unions to extract payments so they can grow larger and more powerful.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I don’t care if you are private sector or government, when push comes to shove, management will take advantage of employees if they are not restrained.

      it’s basic human nature. Workers need some level of protection – from other humans who will “use” them if it is easier than doing the right thing.

      And as important – equitable treatment of employees, basic fairness and equivalent treatment on their job.

      read this: ” One Black squadron commander who was interviewed, for example, said the only mentoring he received throughout his career was from other Black leaders. And he said at times Black service members make one mistake, and it ends their career.

      “You might get left behind if you don’t have someone that looks like you helping to propel you,” he said. “Black service members need to work twice as hard and you can’t mess up.”

      and this is going on in the Armed Services where theoretically, everyone IS treated the same.

      With formalized employee rights – it ought to help insure more equitable treatment than if not.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        Got it! As long as a person says what you want to hear, you believe everything that person says and accept it as fact.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          You might want to read that report and the 60 minutes transcript.

          There is hard data and quite a few opinions and personal experiences from those in leadership positions.

          1. WayneS Avatar

            What report? Did you mention a report?

      2. William O'Keefe Avatar
        William O’Keefe

        I don’t know where you worked or whether you ever ran a large organization but part of being successful is having employees who are satisfied and who believe that they are treated fairly. In well run companies modern times, unions offer little if any value added.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          I’ve worked at a number of organizations and know the difference between employees who are satisfied and happy and ones that are not.

          I just don’t buy the idea that employers can do no wrong. There are good, bad and ugly and some of them – the workers are at a distinct disadvantage in terms of fair treatment.

          Unions, for instance, offer apprenticeship opportunities as well as require the company to treat all employees equitably without showing favoritism or engage in scapegoating, etc.

          Do you realize that Pilots who fly airliners are unionized? How about UPS drivers? Do you know the highest testing states for K-12 school performance are unionized and the lowest are right-to-work?

          How about your EMS folks?

          I’m opposed to public sector strikes but think that all workers need some level of collective representation to guard their rights and keep unscrupulous employers in check.

          Unions, for instance, support E-Verify so that jobs are for US workers and some businesses PREFER to use undocumented labor because it’s cheaper and allow them to prey on workers who have no rights at all.

          1. William O'Keefe Avatar
            William O’Keefe

            LarryG, you always make comments suggesting that I said things that I never did. What’s your problem. Of course, employers can do wrong. The issue is what value added do unions add in todays world where laws and regulations provide most if not all of the protections that unions claim. BTW, how much do these union leader earn each year?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            BIll – tell me where you think I misrepresented your views.. and I’ll apologize… if true. I didn’t think I had.

            In terms of value-added, that’s interesting. You really believe that the
            unions really don’t offer any protections already present in law and regulations?

            For instance, do you think that Unions would get involved in NDAs that the law currently does not seem to address?

            Who do you think defends teachers who have been unfairly treated ? Without the VEA, teachers have been summarily fired without recourse. With the VEA, School Systems have actually had to justify their actions.

          3. William O'Keefe Avatar
            William O’Keefe

            Your comment “I just don’t buy the idea that employers can do no wrong.” clearly implies that I said or suggested that. Wrong! Teachers like other employees have recourse to discriminatory or unfair discharge. There is an abundance of evidence that students taught by non union teachers perform better than those taught by union teachers. You are entitled to your opinion but don’t distort mine.

  3. WayneS Avatar

    ” The civil suit can be used to recover wages and the court shall award an additional equal amount of liquidated damages and attorney fees. If the court finds that the employer knowingly failed to pay wages in accordance with the Code provisions, the court shall award triple damages. (HB 336, HB 337, SB 48, and SB 49 (2020)) (85-13; 40-0); (SB 838 (civil action) (2020) , 52-45-1; 22-18)”

    Aren’t you opposed to mandatory minimum sentences?

    😉

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      That is a good point. I had not thought about it from that perspective. I will have to mull that one over to determine if there is an inconsistency there.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Upon further consideration, I agree that requiring a judge to award triple damages is inconsistent with opposition to mandatory minimum sentences. The provision should read that the court may award up to triple damages.

    3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Upon further consideration, I agree that requiring a judge to award triple damages is inconsistent with opposition to mandatory minimum sentences. The provision should read that the court may award up to triple damages.

    4. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      That would be a punitive award, and in Va, it’s capped at $350K.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Virginia is famous for worker’s rights. That’s where the plantation in plantation elites comes from.

  5. If employers are cheating their employees of their paychecks, there ought to be a law. I would be astonished if that isn’t illegal already. If it is, I’d like to know what’s different about the new law.

    On a related topic not discussed in this post, I spent three years as a “contractor” when I was writing the Massey family history. I was paid well, and I liked working at home and setting my own hours. It would have been extremely disruptive if some outside entity had tried regulating the terms and conditions of a relationship that worked very well. So, please, do-gooders, please do not try to help me.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Jim – the type of work you did is what the independent contractor category was INTENDED to do. It would make no sense for you to be an “employee” for a non-permanent job not on site somewhere.

      The problem is that some employers are using that category for permanent workers reporting to a business site and functioning as an employee – i.e. being directed in their work.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      No sir, until these kind-hearted democrats came along to save the workers, it was perfectly legal for employers to steal their wages – encouraged, in fact…

      /s

    3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Currently, there is a law setting out how employees should be paid. It requires, among other provisions, payment in lawful money with a check or other negotiable instrument, no withholding of pay except for taxes, Social Security, etc, provision of a pay stub, etc. The new legislation do the following:
      1. prohibit an employer from firing someone in retaliation for complaining to DOLI about the law not being followed,
      2. Authorizes the Commissioner of DOLI, in responding to a complaint and finding evidence of provisions not being followed for other other workers, to investigate those cases, as well, and
      3. Authorizes workers to file a civil case seeking payment of wages and damages. If judge finds evidence of knowing violation, the court will award triple damages.

      Other bills deal with prevailing wages and misclassification.

      1. None of that sounds unreasonable. I’m wondering, though…. who are the people who don’t pay their employees? Are they just miserable, stinking cheaters who do this as a matter of course? Or are does nonpayment of employees usually occur when a business is going under? We’ve all heard the stereotype story of the entrepreneur who is doing everything to stave off insolvency and keep the business going, and he doesn’t know if he can meet payroll week to week. Are these the people we’re talking about, or are we talking about predatory cheaters?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Donald Trump, for one. Famous for it.

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          A little “flavor” of “why would an employer mistreat an employee unless he/she was themselves in desperate straights”?

          Well, no.. it don’t take desperate situations for some employers to do wrong and take advantage of and prey on employees.

          We have an ample history of such things.

          Workers do need some basic rights against employers who are less than honorable in their treatment of their own employees.

          For how many decades have some employers paid blacks and women less than white male employees doing the same work, for instance?

    4. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Awful lot of lawsuits on pay, e.g., kept last week(s), vacation, etc.

    5. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I guess it’s been your luck to have never worked for a Trump then, eh?

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The issue with independent contractors is looming large. A true independent contractor may work for more than one business and not be limited in the ways an employee might – as to things like hours of work or dictates on how the work is to be accomplished, etc.

    Those who have never worked as an independent contractor or know someone who does, may not realize that they also have to pay FICA tax on their earnings. It’s called self-employment tax and it’s assessed at the time that folks do their taxes and can be a nasty surprise to those not expecting it.

    So, for instance, if you earned 30K – you will owe 15.3% – $150 per thousand earned and it’s not subject to deductions and adjustments – you owe it all even if you did not have a dollar of (income) taxable income. Not to mention 30K, is a minimal income in places like NoVa.

    For folks who are true independent contractors, they have the freedom to offer their services to anyone wanting their services.

    The one big caveat is health care. No employer-provided insurance. With the advent of ObamaCare, they can afford health insurance AND part of it might actually be a deductible expense.

    I’m not sure how the minimum wages affects independent contractors though. Does anyone know?

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Independent contractors are not entitled to minimum wage. https://whoismyemployee.com/2017/04/13/are-independent-contractors-exempt-from-the-flsa/

      Here is the latest rule from the U.S. Dept.of Labor on determining what constitutes an independent contractor: https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/flsa/2021-independent-contractor

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        So, is it wrong to think that some businesses will shift from wage employees to independent contractors?

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          They do that now. That is what the lawsuit filed by employees and the investigation by the VEC was all about. Furthermore, that is what the U.S. DOL rule is about: to define the difference so that employers will not be shifting employees from wage to contractor status.

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    If they REALLY want to take on something in the way of “worker’ rights”, let ’em take up NDAs and Non-Compete Agreements. Some of these can be onerous (or is it odorous?), and go WAY beyond protecting trade secrets and customer base, placing unreasonable demands on employees freedom.

    I once worked for a company that required leaving employees to sign an agreement not to market to the company for a couple of years (3, if I recall).

    1. For once, I would agree with you. NDAs have a useful role, but they are abused way too often.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Then you are admitting that there are workers rights at issue?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Hey, give ’em a break. This is a new concept and he’s only had the scales from the eyes for, oh, 15 minutes. He’ll come around.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        It’s the NCAs that can be nothing less than “enslaving”. Yeah, that was a poke, but some of them quite literally prohibit an employee from working in the same field for years after leaving the company, and include intellectual property claims giving the company rights to anything developed by the employee, even if far afield and/or done at home.

Leave a Reply