Democrats Allege Democratic Party Suppressed Democratic Voters in Democratic Primary

by James C. Sherlock

Virginia Congressional District 4 Eff. Jan 3, 2023

It must be Republicans’ fault.

Bill Atkinson of the Progress Index reported yesterday that Tavorise Marks, a candidate, Hopewell businessman and local civil-rights advocate, claimed to have witnessed voter suppression in Wednesday’s Democratic primary for the open House of Representatives seat in Virginia 04.

That he, Marks, a Democrat, had seen suppression of Democratic voters in a Democratic primary run by the Democratic party.

Atkinson’s reporting makes a case that the charge is true.

A law suit has already been filed by Richmond attorney Paul Goldman. Goldman’s suit alleges that Democrats restricted equal voting access: (Below is my summary of the allegations as I understand them)

  • Because the primary was scheduled on a workday.
  • Because too few polling places were concentrated only in certain areas whose locations favored a single candidate (state Senator Jennifer McClellan).
  • Resulting in very long commutes for some and long lines that sent discouraged voters home.

Mr. Marks leveled the same charges and may join the suit.

Virginia Sen. Joe Morrissey was one of those on the ballot.

He alleged well before the balloting that it was rigged for McClellan. Two of the four polling places were on McClellan’s home turf in Richmond.

It reminds me of when Captain Renault announced that he was “shocked, shocked” to see gambling in Rick’s café.

Next time Democrats in Virginia talk about voter suppression, I will pay them more attention.

They have game.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “Democrats Allege Democratic Party Suppressed Democratic Voters in Democratic Primary”

  1. You’ve got an old district map from before redistricting. You might want to update that.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Done, thanks.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      I’ll swap it out.

      1. Dunno about 2023 as you asserted before you edited it out. The new districts were in effect for the November 2022 midterm election.

        It’s easy to see. The 7th no longer abuts Richmond (it has moved north), the 5th does, while the 1st and 4th are significantly reconfigured.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    If that is Democratic primary voter suppression, it can’t hold a candle to GOP primary voter suppression!

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    A former Democratic legislator tweeted out his congrats to McClellan for achieving a Soviet-style margin of victory. I could not invent that level of tone deafness with a straight face….

    For the record, Goldman and Morrissey practice together, although I’m not sure if it’s a partnership.

    1. But it may be incest.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Sen. Morrissey has been accused of a lot of things, but not that.

        I find him refreshing except for the 17-year-old secretary thing. But he married her, and they seem supportive of one another.

      2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Sen. Morrissey has been accused of a lot of things, but not that.

        I find him refreshing except for the 17-year-old secretary thing. But he married her, and they seem supportive of one another.

        1. With all your moralizing it is sad you don’t object to Morrissey’s history of employing convicted sex offenders to run a facility serving people with intellectual disabilities. The other crimes he has been convicted of, including beating a man’s head against a brick wall and sex with an underage girl were not attractive either, except to those who find them “refreshing”.

          Admiral, when do you plan to stop being a pervert?

          1. Matt Adams Avatar

            Sounds like standard activities for our politicians. There is a reason why Epstein’s black book hasn’t been made public or any prosecution from it

        2. “I find him refreshing except for the 17-year-old secretary thing.”

          So you think putting convicted sex offenders running a facility for intellectually disabled people is “refreshing”.

          Yet you have moral outrage at Loudoun schools. It wasn’t the rape, like it was for the rest of us, it was the boy in a skirt that offended you wasn’t it. Amazing.

          Admiral have you no sense of decency?

        3. Sherlock, this is a man who had a sexual relationship with a minor. Who took and distributed nude photos of this then 17-year-old girl.

          I am bewildered that this site, which has had its hair on fire about the corruption of the youth, is just perfectly fine with a literal groomer running for public office. It’s a not even a Republican or conservative, so it’s not like there’s a reluctant play for the greater good here. It’s okay if they put a ring it?

          The guy is a predator and should have stayed locked behind bars. Shame on Northam for pardoning such slime.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Paul Goldman? The same Paul Goldman who steered Doug Wilder’s campaign?

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Yes.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Goldman is a clever fellow. 1985 was never supposed to happen but it did. Great campaign story. Maybe there is one more rabbit in the hat.
          https://aliciapatterson.org/stories/doug-wilders-campaign

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      I did not know that part about Goldman.

      It is my memory that courts defer to the parties no matter how they run their candidate selection processes.

      So it appears to be little more than the taking of an opportunity by the counselor to get his name in the paper, but we’ll see I guess.

Leave a Reply