“DEI Is Dead” at VMI

by James A. Bacon

The Youngkin administration has just unloaded a HIMARS rocket attack on Virginia Military Institute’s Diversity, Equity & Inclusion program.

Speaking Friday in a session of mandatory “inclusive excellence training,” Martin D. Brown, Youngkin’s chief of Diversity, Opportunity & Inclusion, left steaming rubble where VMI’s DEI program had been standing.

“Let’s take a moment right now to kill that cow. DEI is dead,” said Brown. “We’re not going to bring that cow up anymore. It’s dead. It was mandated by the General Assembly, but this governor has a different philosophy of civil discourse, civility, treating — living the golden rule, right?”

VMI recorded the speech and made it available to Washington Post reporter Ian Shapira, who proceeded to consult a half-dozen DEI supporters and quote them extensively to suggest that there is widespread concern about the Youngkin administration’s position.

It is difficult portraying Brown as a racist, as Shapira’s sources have done to conservative white alumni critical of VMI’s implementation of DEI. Brown is African-American. But Shapira did squeeze in criticism of his invocation of Jesus in an opening prayer. How, he reported one attendee as asking, could Brown claim to support inclusiveness if he opened with a Christian prayer?

While Governor Glenn Youngkin has worked behind the scenes to appoint members to public-university boards of visitors across Virginia who are willing to fight for diversity, opportunity & inclusion, he has not openly taken sides in university disputes. Brown’s intervention in VMI’s contentious DEI debate represents a first. And it could be a signal that the Governor intends to be more assertive in the future.

Said Brown, as quoted by Shapira:

VMI’s in a unique space … You’ve been at the tip of the spear in serving our country in sending warriors to battle, but in a way, you’re at the tip of the spear in this cultural war as well. Generally, when you are focusing on equity, you’re not pursuing merit or excellence or achievement. Not all the time, but you’re looking at equal outcomes….

What we’ve done is we’ve made diversity the mission. Wrong mission … The challenge is keeping your eyes on the mission rather than the attendant challenges that we experience trying to complete the mission. And when we focus on those challenges, what happens is the mission is undermined … One of the things we want to focus on is whatever the goal of the organization is, that goal is paramount, and diversity and inclusion supports whatever the goal is.

At various points during his talk, Shapira wrote, Brown suggested that race relations in the country have dramatically improved over the last several decades.

Because they’re better, we can’t ascribe perpetual victimization or even motives because they’re different. Acknowledging those truths frees us up to deal with the issues, the real issues, of today.

In an email response to a question, Brown added:

It’s proven that institutions achieve more with a more diverse and inclusive workforce. However, equity has become a tradeoff for excellence. Our aim is to expand opportunities but not guarantee equal results.

Other than Brown, Shapira quoted DEI proponents exclusively. One professor conceded that the culture of DEI had not taken deep root. “Other colleges have had DEI embedded at their schools for a long time, but at VMI, it’s new and not fully supported by alumni and staff,” he said. “It’s a place where you can stomp it out.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

85 responses to ““DEI Is Dead” at VMI”

  1. Wahoo'74 Avatar
    Wahoo’74

    Terrific! The first major shot over the bow at DEI. I sure hope this means that the Youngkin Administration will also intervene to stop the VMI Administration and Board’s attempt to shut down the student run paper The Cadet and squelch their free speech.

    Their sin? Criticizing the DEI imposed culture of Superintendent Cedric Wins and select members of the Board.

    As Winston Churchill said after the British victory over Gen. Irwin Rommel at the battle of El Alamein, for DEI at VMI this “may not be the end, not even the beginning of the end but, possibly, the end of the beginning.”

    One can only hope.

    1. M. Purdy Avatar

      Do you know anyone in college or trying to find a job right now? Anyone in the military? Are you retired? Do you know anyone under the age of 18?

      1. Wahoo'74 Avatar
        Wahoo’74

        Yes to all the above. I come from a multi-generational military family. How about you?

        1. M. Purdy Avatar

          Me too. How many are anti-DEI? How many have careers that don’t involve DEI or attend schools that are anti=DEI?

          1. Wahoo'74 Avatar
            Wahoo’74

            All are anti-DEI.

            A nephew was an active duty Green Beret for 6 years, still SF National Guard. Just suffered through a 2 year MBA program infused with DEI that offered very few internships after his 1st year or placement opportunities upon graduation that were available for white males.

            That’s a reality and fact. The world is fixated on equal equal outcomes not equal opportunity. That is not consistent with our core American principles. He has had to virtually fly solo in seeking a job post graduation.

          2. M. Purdy Avatar

            Well, thank your nephew for his service, and I hope he enjoys working for a company without DEI, which is basically small local firms or mom and pop shops. It’s not to say he won’t be successful, mind you, but his antipathy toward DEI will cost him in terms of experience. My sense, knowing many college-age kids and mid career folks, is that your family’s ideological purity is at odds with where the average ambitious professional is. No one wants to put themselves at a disadvantage, and most are pro DEI politically. Which is why this fight is mostly carried on by retired folks, mostly white, mostly without a dog in the fight.

          3. Monica Wright Avatar
            Monica Wright

            I have a recent hire from such a program that I work with. He’s ill-informed. Nice, eager, but ignorant. Program quality matters.

          4. Wahoo'74 Avatar
            Wahoo’74

            Monica Wright, I trust you’re not attacking my nephew. He’s a decorated Green Beret, 2 tours in Afghanistan. His father was a Vietnam era Marine, his grandfather an Iwo Jima 2nd Lt. Bronze Star, Purple Heart awardee.

            None of my family on either side ever cheated on his wife or had illegitimate children.

            My nephew also graduated from an elite college where he was a student athlete lacrosse player. He chose to serve his country honorably for 6 years active duty and then join the SF National Guard. I presume you agree that’s honorable. I do.

            We differ on our perspectives on DEI. That’s no reason to engage in ad hominem attacks.

          5. Monica Wright Avatar
            Monica Wright

            I’m suggesting that people who wash out or leave the service (for whatever reasons) often have issues/concerns incompatible with military life INCLUDING family life and inclusion. I have no idea why your nephew left. My professional experience with departing service members is uniformly suspect. Many were mid-level enlisted upon departure (NOW DEGREED) and their understanding of the nation as a whole and the laws that govern it are incomplete. My own spouse obtained degrees while AD and his coursework/understanding of policy, law and practice was woefully inadequate. He obtained the degrees because it was necessary for promotion but the coursework was piss-poor compared to my own. Perhaps the courses/training available to your nephew were better.

    2. keydet16 Avatar

      How about you and Ian leave my school alone?

  2. keydet16 Avatar

    The problem with people like Mr. Brown and others (like Bert Ellis) is that they might actually have a point but they present it in such a way that their message gets lost and instead leads to articles like this.

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      Oh, right, cuz Ian Shapira is determined to always write a fair article about VMI…

      1. keydet16 Avatar

        Oh, I think Ian Shapira is a jerk, but that doesn’t change the fact that there are issues there that need to be addressed and alums and guys like this are NOT helping.

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          How are they not “helping?”
          In other words, just do what YOU say?
          What if you are wrong?
          Is that possible?
          If you are Keydet 16, then that would imply you were born in 1994. Is it possible that the “old white guys” witnessed real racial discrimination, real racial progress, and see that CRT/DEI is actually counter-productive? Harmful? Deeply racist in itself? Un-American? Merit dis-incentivizing?
          So, maybe allowing criticism is a good thing, Because I can assure you that you are not 100% “correct.”

      2. M. Purdy Avatar

        By “fair,” do you mean doesn’t give equal time to the denialists or focuses too much on women and minorities and their experiences?

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          Projecting like an Imax again, aren’t you?
          What do you mean by “denialist?”
          The only “denialists” are you present Foucault (pedo lover)/Gramscian Marxists. I remember real racial discrimination. I have lived through huge progress. The US, prior to Lefty “help” was the least racist nation in the world, and likely still is, except for the poison currently being spread and indoctrinated. CRT is false and harmful. It makes racial relations worse, and the only reason it is “preached” is to consolidate power. If you horrible people actually cared for the people you claim to be helping, you would do something about black on black crime and the Dem hellhole cities, at the root of which is the government eliminating real fathers. Fix that problem (and it not exclusively a “black” thing – growing for “whites” too) and much of our social ills would be greatly ameliorated.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            Denialists deny that there was systemic/cultural racism at VMI.

          2. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Classic Marxist move. Not permitted to believe something contrary to the narrative. So, YES, I am a denialist of your stupid Marxist denialist accusation. You are the denialist. And you have to be – because if any honest, objective investigation occurred, you would lose. So you have to shut it down to not engage in such honest debate. Homey don’t play.

  3. oldstonewall Avatar
    oldstonewall

    Too much to hope Brown went next door and counseled W&L?

  4. M. Purdy Avatar

    I know this type of story is fuel for the culture wars that this site thrives on, but I can’t imagine that as a whole potential cadets or recent grads thinks this is a good development. The cheers will be coming from mostly older alums, many of whom are retired, who have no dog in this fight other than ensuring that VMI remains an outlier institution. It’s really too bad. Also, what makes you think that there were admin or faculty supporters of this particular message who were willing to go on record? Even those skeptical of DEI are more concerned about giving the school an even larger black eye by playing into the narrative that the school is the epicenter of the culture wars.

    1. Wahoo'74 Avatar
      Wahoo’74

      M. Purdy,

      Really?

      If only older retired alumni are disgruntled, then why was this past year’s enrollment down 25% (https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2022/09/22/first-year-vmi-enrollment-plunges)? The potential young men and women who would otherwise attend VMI are equally as fed up with the the divisive DEI culture of minority victimhood and assumptions of white privilege.

      Same reason why applications to our military have plummeted.

      Those are the facts. They cannot be denied.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        Lots of reasons, including an across-the-board reduction in enrollment in schools that aren’t top-flight, demographic issues (1 million fewer college students than a decade ago), incredibly bad press driven by reactionary alums, the massive cost of attending, the economy, and a reduction in attractiveness of the military as a career. It’s not the existence of DEI, and if it were, you would also see The Citadel’s enrollment decrease. But that’s not the case, even though they’ve had a robust DEI program for nearly a decade. Their incoming class was their largest ever.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Of the reasons you provide, only the reduction in attractiveness of the military as a career could result in a 25% drop off. Then, you defeat that argument by citing The Citadel example.

          VMI seems completely mis-managed. How big a part DEI plays in that mis-management is a fair question.

          1. Monica Wright Avatar
            Monica Wright

            The Citadel is an excellent example of a military college/program openly embracing DEI and seeing positive results from it. It’s interesting to note that SC also rejected the kind of blanket/extremist policy on abortion that FL and TX adopted. That kind of moderation is probably part of the local zeitgeist and apparent to prospective students and their families.

      2. keydet16 Avatar

        The biggest contributor to that decline, based on discussions who can objectively look at the situation and are familiar with the I, is tuition – not DEI

        1. Monica Wright Avatar
          Monica Wright

          AND PAY/BENEFITS/LOCATION. The inability to ensure you won’t be stationed in a regressive state is *also* hurting accessions/retention. No one wants to publicly acknowledge it but a lot of those who’ve historically enlisted are running to/from things at home. Having to deal with horrible healthcare and LGBTQ bias by law is a problem. A survey was just done/released about this last yeat.

        2. Monica Wright Avatar
          Monica Wright

          AND PAY/BENEFITS/LOCATION for AD personnel. The inability to ensure you won’t be stationed in a regressive state is *also* hurting accessions/retention. No one wants to publicly acknowledge it but a lot of those who’ve historically enlisted are running to/from things at home. Having to deal with racism and horrible schools near bases (largely in red states), subpar maternal healthcare and LGBTQ bias by law is a problem. A survey was just done/released about this last year.

          Youth interested in military service DO NOT statistically match (ideologically or otherwise) VMI alumni. They need more. More money (to make up for the assets their parents don’t have), more inclusion (to feel comfortable/welcome) and more potential (by not running the name of the school into the ground).

      3. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        “ If only older retired alumni are disgruntled, then why was this past year’s enrollment down 25% ”

        Because 25% doesn’t wants to be associated with racist controversy?

    2. Comeflywithme Avatar
      Comeflywithme

      So much lefty hand wringing. Wokeness is going to kill the military. This coming from 3 generations of military service. Save your nonsense for the faculty lounge.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        I would be impressed if I myself wasn’t third generation military. Save your lectures for someone else.

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          Were you on the battleship where one sailor’s highlight was getting to read his gay poetry?
          That’ll scare the Chinese in the Taiwan Strait…

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            I was that sailor! Thanks for reading!

        2. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          Were you on the battleship where one sailor’s highlight was getting to read his gay poetry?
          That’ll scare the Chinese in the Taiwan Strait…

      2. Monica Wright Avatar
        Monica Wright

        The people unsuccessful in today’s military are ‘anti-woke’ …the ones who want to know (after they get out) whether they actually have to comply with federal civil rights law. YES, YES YOU DO.

    3. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      “I know this type of story is fuel for the culture wars that this site thrives on”

      It’s also a site where the publisher and moderators let you come on and be condescending. You’re welcome.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        JAB is self-aware enough to know what he’s doing and tough enough to take the criticism for it.

    4. Monica Wright Avatar
      Monica Wright

      All you have to do is read the WAPost comments. This is a relatively favorable piece, devoid of the most inflammatory accusations against Bert et al. and the comments are scathing.

    5. Monica Wright Avatar
      Monica Wright

      All you have to do is read the WAPost comments. This is a relatively favorable piece, devoid of the most inflammatory accusations against Bert et al. and the comments are scathing.

  5. Monica Wright Avatar
    Monica Wright

    Also, there’s no need to portray Brown as a ‘racist’. The label, shill, can also be applied without qualm. It’s a tried and true position/approach throughout history. Equity and excellence are *NOT* mutually exclusive and he’s provided no evidence that they are.

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated…”

    The only people who care are old white alumni and their parents.

    1. Monica Wright Avatar
      Monica Wright

      These aren’t winning arguments. When I said I was shown unsolicited cell-phone traffic about these remarks today, I was not kidding. I’d already seen it but others hadn’t. It’s making the rounds and not in a positive way.

    2. Monica Wright Avatar
      Monica Wright

      These aren’t winning arguments. When I said I was shown unsolicited cell-phone traffic about these remarks today, I was not kidding. I’d already seen it but others hadn’t. It’s making the rounds and not in a positive way.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I don’t catch your drift. There is commitment to DE&I in the military and that’s pretty much all that counts.

        1. Monica Wright Avatar
          Monica Wright

          I thought you were referring to “ANTI-WOKE” advocates. I think they’re VERY MUCH dying…they just don’t know it. I’m not a vocal “LIB” in public. To be shown this clip through rando comms with a colleague was big.

        2. William O'Keefe Avatar
          William O’Keefe

          The problem with most of these comments is the failure to distinguish diversity and inclusiveness, which no one should object to, from equity which is contrary to meritocracy. If the military had a real commitment to equity, every member should be an admiral or general.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            That’s just not accurate.

          2. William O'Keefe Avatar
            William O’Keefe

            You need to explain yourself. If equity equates to equal outcomes, meritocracy is lost. As for Nancy Naive’s comment, it is just nonsensical since promotions are based on merit and there are ranks.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Meritocracy is great!

            But you need equality of opportunity to achieve AND in the recognition of the achievement. Then, it’s a meritocracy. Otherwise, it’s just another systemic racism.

          4. William O'Keefe Avatar
            William O’Keefe

            We’re talking past each other. Equality of opportunity comes with inclusiveness and diversity. I was focusing only on equity.

          5. M. Purdy Avatar

            OK, if it’s just a matter of semantics, I agree, let’s get rid of the word equity, and keep the training. Somehow, I think that’s not going to fly for the anti-DEI crowd.

          6. M. Purdy Avatar

            It’s a trope, not a fact. Even VMI’s since taken down DEI website said that it was about putting kids in the best position to possible to succeed, not assure equal outcomes. In fact, the entire premise that equal outcomes is the intent is absurd in the context of VMI; it’s an extremely hierarchical system.

          7. William O'Keefe Avatar
            William O’Keefe

            I call that equal opportunity.

          8. M. Purdy Avatar

            That term doesn’t work. To go back to my laptop example, imagine if the policy at VMI was that no one is issued a laptop by the school, but kids who come in with a laptop they own can use them. The rule is uniform and equal; it treats all parties the same. But one group is clearly disadvantaged because of they lack the financial means to purchase a laptop, and might not even know how to type. “Equity” means that the school springs for the laptop if you don’t have finances to buy one, and also gives you free typing lessons. Note, it’s not “equal treatment”; rather, it’s based on your needs. That’s equity.

          9. William O'Keefe Avatar
            William O’Keefe

            Well, it is possible to create a scenario that justifies your position but I don’t think that is what the E in DEI means. BTW: I call your example fairness. It also changes incentives. Why should someone buy a laptop if the school will provide one using taxpayer dollars?

          10. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            You’re getting it! Equity means fairness not equal outcomes.

          11. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            The allegation that equity equates to equal outcomes is false. Generally, equity means fairness. In law including that from English common law, equity was intended to rationalize unjust outcomes of strict application of common law principles. For example, one landowner could not fairly claim chattel possession of another’s cow that trespassed.

          12. William O'Keefe Avatar
            William O’Keefe

            Your narrow definition is correct as far as it goes. But more broadly, according to McKinsey and Company “While equality assumes that all people should be treated the same, equity takes into consideration a person’s unique circumstances, adjusting treatment accordingly so that the end result is equal.”

          13. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            That’s the remarkable thing about the US military. Every soldier and sailor is a general or admiral.

            Our allies in WWII were dumbstruck by the responsibility and authority delegated to the lowest ranks.

            Don’t take my word for it. Research it.

            But recognizing equity in merit is part of it too.

  7. Monica Wright Avatar
    Monica Wright

    This speech was shared with me at work today before I could even broach the subject. There’s no need to portray Brown as a ‘racist’ because shill, can also be applied without qualm to the same effect. It’s a tried and true position/approach throughout history. Equity and excellence are *NOT* mutually exclusive and he’s provided no evidence that they are.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      That depends on how you define “equity”. Back in the old days, the term was “equality”, specifically – equality of opportunity. Then, for some mysterious reason, equality became equity. Many people believe that the change was meant to signal a change in thinking, from equality of opportunity to equality of outcomes.

      If so, consider a thought exercise …

      Imagine that equity means equality of outcomes. Does equality of outcomes mean a lessening of excellence?

      Consider the NBA.

      73% of the players are Black in a country where 12.1% of the population is Black.

      Under the equality of outcomes theory, 57.8% of the NBA’s players should be non-Hispanic White. 18.7% should be Hispanic or Latino. 12.1% should be Black.

      If the NBA enforced those percentages, do you think the quality of play (i.e. excellence) would go up or down?

      It would clearly go down.

      The real challenge is that people suspect that “equity” is a code word for “equality of outcomes”. If that’s not true then the DEI advocates need to clearly define “equity” including the provision of an explanation as to why “equality” wasn’t an effective term.

      1. Monica Wright Avatar
        Monica Wright

        This is a terrible example. Athletic talent/skill is distributed across people groups equitably. Athletic success is not equally or equitably represented by race/ethnicity in each and every sport.

      2. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Indeed, you are on track. The issue is, in fact, the capacity for merit/excellence to co-exist with the principle of equity. DEI folk are obligated to clarify that co-existence and its application particularly in the educational setting.

      3. Monica Wright Avatar
        Monica Wright

        This is a terrible example. Athletic talent/skill is distributed across people groups equitably. Athletic success is not equally or equitably represented by race/ethnicity in each and every sport.

  8. I’d love to see a story about the DIE bureaucracy at the state’s HBCUs – how many staff members, how much money it sucks up, what are the goals, how are they being achieved, etc.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      Just looked at the Virginia State University web site https://www.vsu.edu/ I found zero mention of DIE. It looks like that HBCU has its head screwed on pretty straight. That is especially true when compared to the voluminous DIE presence on UVa’s web site and the millions of dollars wasted annually there. Makes me wonder what VSU could do to educate people with those millions if they were reallocated from UVa.

      Pretty much the same on the Virginia Union University site. https://www.vuu.edu/ It does however include the following statement:

      “Diversity & Inclusion— As one of the nation’s oldest HBCUs, we embody the vision of being a learning institution that caters to many cultures, religions, and ethnicities.”

      That is a commendable goal we all agree on.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          You may note that the news item for the one (1) position recently hired is for the “newly established office of Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging”. Goals we all agree on, but excluding the debilitating “equity” that is the killer in DIE. Again, there is no mention of DIE on the VSU web site. How much educational good could VUU or other HBCUs do with the $10M+ UVa wastes each year on DIE?

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            “As a transgender man, Dr. Fowlkes has made clear his profound appreciation of diversity, equity and inclusion in the workplace. Having an alumnus with his level of commitment and expertise working at VSU is invaluable,” said VSU President, Dr. Makola M. Abdullah. “In addition, the new office supports Virginia State University’s strategic plan by ensuring a personable, stable, nurturing holistic atmosphere for all–conducive to GREATER learning, growing, and transforming.”  You guys are triggered by the word equity. If it bother you that much, take it out.

          2. Lefty665 Avatar

            Congrats you managed to find one obscure mention of lower case equity in an off the cuff statement. There is not a single mention of DIE elsewhere on the VSU web site.

            It is not my role to eliminate the evil of racist CRT/DIE at UVa and elsewhere. I can encourage others whose job it is to achieve that laudable goal, and applaud the Governor’s “Chief of Diversity, Opportunity and Inclusion”‘s address at VMI.

            I have a dream that I can achieve the much more modest goal of helping you renounce woke CRT/DIE/Kendi racism. If we together can achieve that I will feel we have accomplished something for the betterment of America. Will you take this opportunity to reject your embrace of woke CRT/DIE racism and turn in your modern equivalent of sheets and hoods?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvK3nkbcJoU

        Considering the first time white people asked new black Americans to go sailing…

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      You could encourage your children and grandchildren to apply to an HBCU. They would be welcome.

      Go one further, there’s a single family home for sale near 25&J in downtown Newport News.

      Two wonderful opportunities to increase DE&I.

  9. NOTICE. Flagging a comment is for violations of the BR rules: obscenity, personal attacks, going off topic, bad snark. Being equitable in moderating here is hard enough without wholesale flagging of comments. Please make comments based on the post, not on the commenter–and lay off the flagging option unless there is a violation of the BR rules.

Leave a Reply