Data Centers Are Good for Virginia. Predictably, Opposition Is Mounting.

Location of Virginia data centers. (Three data centers in Southwest Virginia not shown). Source: Piedmont Environmental Council Geohub.

by James A. Bacon

Data centers have become such big business in Virginia that the industry has formed its own trade association, the Data Center Coalition, Unsurprisingly, that group is headquartered in Leesburg, smack dab in the middle of the largest cluster of data centers in the United States if not the world.

You know the industry is really big here in Virginia when a coalition of environmental and conservation groups — the Virginia Data Center Reform Coalition — has mobilized to constrain it.

The Reform Coalition (VDCRC) urges lawmakers to implement “common-sense regulatory and rate-making reforms” addressing the impact of data centers on the electrical grid, water resources, air quality, and land conservation efforts.

“Utilities are legally obligated to serve these data centers, no matter how much energy they require or the impact to the transmission grid. Virginia ratepayers are currently subsidizing this buildout for some of the largest and wealthiest companies in the world – which is patently unfair,” states the VDCRC website.

Data centers account for tens of billions of dollars of investment in Virginia and comprise one of the Commonwealth’s few economic-development success stories. They generate more than $1 billion in state and local tax revenues yearly, and, though they require few employees to operate, they support more than 12,000 jobs that pay significantly higher than the state average.

But server farms suck up huge volumes of electricity, and because of their geographic concentration in Northern Virginia, they require significant upgrades to Dominion Energy’s transmission grid. And nobody but nobody likes living near high-voltage electric lines, especially in the bucolic northern Virginia piedmont where property values vary in direct proportion to the quality of the scenic views.

Earlier this year, members of the VDCRC filed a lawsuit to block a proposed data center in Prince William County. “Even though Virginia has the largest data center market in the world, our regulatory oversight is behind other large markets in Europe and Asia that have also experienced data center demand exceeding available resources,” said Julie Bolthouse, land use director for the Piedmont Environmental Council, according to the Bay Journal. “We need to catch up.”

A big reason environmentalists are getting agitated about the rise of the industry is that it jeopardizes the conceit that it is possible to create a “net-zero” electric grid in Dominion’s service territory by 2045. While Dominion continues to build more solar- and wind-generating power, renewable energy output fluctuates, and electricity output cannot be relied upon to match demand fluctuations from power centers. Electricity shortfalls can lead to overheating, damage to servers, and interruption of service. Consequently, Dominion says it will need to maintain natural gas-generating capacity to accommodate variability in demand.

One environmentalist response, cited in Inside Climate News, is to dispute Dominion’s load forecasts. The forecasting history of Virginia environmentalists, however, has been abominable in recent years, consistently falling short of actual power consumption. Still, net-zero advocates persist in spinning hypothetical scenarios in which declining demand conforms to their fantasy that is possible to eliminate fossil fuels from Virginia’s electric grid within 20 years. As the Artificial Intelligence revolution takes off, electricity consumption will surge. AI requires massive data-processing power; data-processing power requires data centers; and data centers require electricity. It really is that simple.

It is perfectly fine to examine data centers’ impact on water resources and land use, as the Reform Coalition argues. But a desire to tweak the state code should not serve as a pretext for throttling growth of Virginia’s data center sector, as it appears some groups would like to do.

Even if you accept the proposition that climate change is an existential crisis and net-zero is a worthwhile goal, shutting down gas-fired power plants in Virginia won’t serve anything useful.

If data-center developers can’t get enough juice in Virginia, they will build somewhere else and displace electricity demand to states and communities more willing to supply it. Virginia could conceivably achieve net zero, but shifting economic activity from one state to a different one does nothing to reduce global CO2 emissions or hold back climate change.

The economics of Artificial Intelligence and the data centers that make it work are too powerful to halt. Virginia can benefit from the mega-trend by scrapping the net-zero delusion until new technologies make it economically feasible, or it can suppress a powerful source of capital investment, tax generation and job creation. Ironically, data centers supporting AI may be the very tool America needs to develop new technologies and improve the economics of zero-carbon energy sources in the long run. Let’s not destroy the thing that ultimately could create the very thing we want.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “Data Centers Are Good for Virginia. Predictably, Opposition Is Mounting.”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    There is a great argument underway at tbe SCC over which method to use to pretend we are conserving energy, reducing demand. The utilities have one bogus method and the enviros have another method for pretending success. In the meantime, actual demand keeps growing.

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “…and improve the economics of zero-carbon energy sources in the long run…”

    Zero-carbon is already economically viable. No need to build data centers for that.

    Interstate tidbit from the article you cited:

    “The Prince William County Board of Supervisors voted 4–3 in favor of transforming 2,100 acres of land formerly in a “rural crescent” to 23 million square feet of data centers. The board’s Democratic majority approved the project while all Republicans dissented and one Democratic supervisor abstained from the vote.”

    Who knew Republicans were such “environmentalists”…?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      And anti-business…

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “Virginia could conceivably achieve net zero, but shifting economic activity from one state to a different one does nothing to reduce global CO2 emissions or hold back climate change.”

    Actually not true. The justification for the need for additional fossil fuel generation is the explosive growth in data centers in a relatively small area. It is the density of the centers that is stressing the reliability of Dominion’s grid. Distributing the centers more widely (something the data center industry does not want to do for obvious reasons) would lessen the surge in demand on a single utility and may allow for existing natural gas and future renewable generation among the various providers to absorb the distributed demand.

  4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    I asked ChatGPT what it would cost to build a solar generating facility in rural Virginia for a typical mid-size data center. It responded that a mid-size data center demand is about 5MW which would require a solar generation facility of 48.5 acres which it estimates would cost approximately $6 million to build.

    I then asked what the annual net income was of a mid-sized data center. It answered … $6 million. I don’t know if it is right or not but if a data center can pay for an offset in its electricity demand via renewable generation in a single year, maybe it is time we ask for more from them.

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Aside from these environmental complaints, there some other serious issues associated with data center.

    On the plus side, local governments generally love this type of economic development–high tax revenue with little demand for local services such as education.

    On the other side, data centers get a significant tax break. That is one of the aspects that attract them to Virginia. For a detailed analysis of these tax breaks, see the 2019 JLARC report: https://jlarc.virginia.gov/pdfs/reports/Rpt518-1.pdf

    While theses tax breaks result in facilities that produce a lot of tax revenue, they result in relatively few additional jobs. And it is a fair question as to whether companies such as Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and other tech giants should get preferential tax treatment.

    It seems that the oppostion to the data centers in localities stems from the concentration of the facilities. For example, the project recently approved, over Republican opposition, would encompass over 2,100 acres and feature as many as 34 data centers when finished. Opponents argued that such a large concentration would severly damage the rural natrue of the area, create environmental damage by taking down many trees and create large areas of impermable surface. It would also adversely affect the Manassas Battlefield park. In addition, there was the issue of noise from the data centers’ cooling systems, which had been a long-standing complaint of residents. https://www.princewilliamtimes.com/news/residents-turn-up-the-volume-on-data-center-noise-complaints/article_08a1c042-293b-11ed-8f1c-07644ca3f58b.html; https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/12/13/prince-william-digital-gateway-data-centers/

    With all the controversy swirling around data centers, including environmentalists’ concerns about electricity usage, JLARC agreed last December to conduct a study of the “overall impacts of the data center industry in Virginia.” The report is due in December. https://jlarc.virginia.gov/pdfs/resolutions/2024_Data%20centers_JLARC.pdf

    As for the environmentalists’ concerns about electricity usage, Jim is right. Modern society is demanding more data and those centers will have be built somewhere, if not in Virginia.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      The barking is about 0ne thing: NIMBY

  6. While it is somewhat refreshing to see a return to landuse topics it is not unsurprising that this post supports Dominion albeit by use of the data center industry as a proxy.

    Dick starts to get at all of the parts of the equation that you left out. Yes there is an environmental component to the opposition but it is by no means the sole component or even the primary factor.

    What you have left out are the well-documented quality of life issues created by the irresponsible approval of data center sites next to incompatible uses (read residential) as jurisdictions chase the promise of the Golden Goose. Which leads to problem two, the lack of actual local revenues, or more precisely the failure of the industry to provide the revenues they promise. Sites that are turn key facilities operated for three-letter agencies are exempt from personal property taxes and co-location facilities typically withhold their rent rolls making it difficult if not impossible to collect such taxes. The situation may worsen depending on the outcome of the Core-Site litigation against Fairfax County.

    Another issue that industry’s voracious appetite for land, particularly industrially zoned properties, is forcing many commercial and industrial businesses out of localities as they are forced out of commercial property leases or made offers they can’t refuse that are now running in excess of $2.4 million an acre.

    Then of course there is the grid infrastructure and stability/security side of the equation. Loudoun has already experienced N-1-1 violations, Prince William appears to be on the verge of the same and Dominion is spending billions to address those violations and in conjuction with PJM, billions more to bring several gigawatts (not megawatts) of power to Commonwealth as Dominion does not and will not (in the foreseeable future) have the capacity to power these facilities. At present, new facilities being approved in NOVA are being advised by Dominion that it will be 5-6 years or more before power is available for their facilities. And who bears the cost of these billions in infrastructure, you guessed it, the ratepayers across the Commonwealth.

    I could go on for pages as the issue is very complex but I expected a little more and better research on your part.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      It is indeed a deeply complex topic, which is why I’m happy to admit I have avoided it. It also ties in with the recent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission decision on transmission siting and the allocation of costs for “national asset” transmission projects. Ratepayers in states who don’t want those projects will end up cost sharing anyway, and my impression is Virginia will benefit from that, that other state’s ratepayers will help us build the lines needed to feed these electricity hogs. So even though our own Mark Christie led the charge against the new rule, Virginia (and Dominion) may be among the winners.

      Perhaps I’ll take some time to get deeper into the topic, but the real energy nerds who read this are aware.

      Last year we drove up to Dulles (IAD) via Route 28 and I was stunned by the miles and miles of these ugly complexes. I understand the angst.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      It is indeed a deeply complex topic, which is why I’m happy to admit I have avoided it. It also ties in with the recent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission decision on transmission siting and the allocation of costs for “national asset” transmission projects. Ratepayers in states who don’t want or benefit from those projects will end up cost sharing anyway, and my impression is Virginia will benefit from that, that other states’ ratepayers will help us build the lines needed to feed these electricity hogs. So even though our own Mark Christie led the charge against the new rule, Virginia (and Dominion) may be among the winners.

      Perhaps I’ll take some time to get deeper into the topic, but the real energy nerds who read this are aware.

      Last year we drove up to Dulles (IAD) via Route 28 and I was stunned by the miles and miles of these ugly complexes. I understand the angst.

      Also, I’ve been watching SCC cases long enough to know the utilities and the enviros do this dance on load projections, both perfectly capable of forgetting their previous stances when a 180-turn suits their needs at the time.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    So here’s a question. Are these new data centers serving new demand that did not exist prior?

    Anyone know what AWS is? (Amazon web services).

    Does a company have a choice between standing up/operating their own business IT shop or signed on to AWS?

    What would “fail” if we did not build new data centers?

    Are they basically consolidating individual IT shop from various businesses into cloud computing via a data center?

    If the above is true, does it mean when a company closes some/much of it’s own IT shop/servers/etc and contracts with AWS that they’ll also lower their own energy demand?

    1. VaPragamtist Avatar
      VaPragamtist

      Yes. Especially with the AI explosion, the current number of data centers do not meet the projected need.

      Yes. AWS is the most profitable arm of Amazon, which for many years subsidized and supported the marketplace. I tend to agree with Lina Khan that this is anti-competitive behavior (but the 100-year old anti-trust laws need to be updated. . .I’d throw college athletics in there too).

      AWS, Google, Microsoft all have cloud services. There’s also boutique data centers, where smaller entities come together and all buy into one/store their servers. I’ve also heard that some streaming services, like Peacock, do it in-house. . .which is why lag and buffering is so terrible.

      Less data capabilities. Slower everything.

      Yes, IT departments have been moving toward cloud-based solutions. It’s cheaper, more reliable, and provides backup redundancy.

      Don’t know.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        One might presume that data centers are more efficient than what they replace, less energy of what they replace, less costly, etc – as opposed to less efficient, more energy consumptive and more costly.

        Do they make sense economically or not?

        Are the investors that are building them not smart and throwing their money away?

      2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        So far, more and more business applications are in the “cloud,” rather than on individual computers or in on-premises servers. Those are the choices.

        Given the existing and growing levels of electronic-commerce, government and nonprofits, what would the cost, including energy and water consumption, be for the same volume of transactions if most functions were located on individual servers in every office?

        Would we be able to work remotely and reduce driving without the cloud?

        Larry’s implied point below – the need to reduce the environmental impact of datacenters is the key. But like most things in life, the modern economy has tradeoffs.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          we agree. I suspect that consolidating separate disparate business IT’s into a cloud data center is going to be cheaper and more efficient – use less power but making that case is not simple. One presumes however that investors are putting real money into data centers and do expect a return on their investment. They must make money!

  8. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    Mark Mills, a well known energy expert, ended his most recent article–The Energy Transition Won’t Happen–this way “Credit Andreessen Horowitz’s “Techno-Optimist Manifesto” for observing that “energy is the foundational engine of our civilization. The more energy we have, the more people we can have, and the better everyone’s lives can be.” Our cloud-centric and AI-infused twenty-first-century infrastructure illustrates this fundamental point. The world will need all forms of energy production imaginable. An “energy transition” would only restrict energy supplies—and that’s not going to happen. The good news is that the U.S. does have the technical and resource capacity to supply the energy needed. The only question is whether we have the political will to allow the proverbial “all of the above” energy solutions to happen.

    Environmentalists oppose Data Centers because they use energy and show the lie of the Net Zero mind set which has been shown by numerous analyses to be impractical and uneconomic.

  9. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    Don’t forget the millions of gallons of water these data centers require for cooling.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      We got one in Spotsylvania that supposedly will be cooled with wastewater from the water treatment plant. But how about the others? Are they using municipal potable water or well water? How is it cooled before discharged?

      We got a big danged lake for Dominions Nuke at North Anna and their other one uses the James.

Leave a Reply