Culture Wars + Unearned Income Equality = Political Realignment


by James A. Bacon

If you want to understand the political realignment taking place in the United States — and Virginia, of course — you need to read this column in The Wall Street Journal: “Income Equality, Not Inequality, Is the Problem.”

Most commentary on income inequality in the U.S. focuses on income reported to the Internal Revenue Service. It does not adjust for income taxes, welfare benefits, or household size. Once those adjustments are made, Phil Gramm and John Early contend, income differences between Americans in the bottom income quintile and the second from bottom disappear. Indeed, bottom-quintile households make slightly more disposable income than second-quintile households, and almost as much as middle-quintile households.

Actually, the situation is probably worse than Gramm and Early portray. Their adjustments include only “income transfers” — they apparently do not include a vast array of means-tested benefits like those we see in Virginia: electricity rebates for the poor, eviction moratoria, free transit fares, and college scholarships and loans. Nor do they include black market income, which some economists estimate to account for 10% of the economy.

As the sub-head of the article summarizes the picture: “Those in the middle work much harder, but don’t earn much more, than those at the bottom.”

About a year ago, I suggested that the great divide in America is between middle-class “working people” on the one hand and educated elites and the “marginalized” people who benefit from the elite’s compassion. I cited a TikTok commentary by a certain Rhonda Lee Hughes Griffin:

@rhondaleehughesgriffith

♬ original sound – Rhonda Lee Hughes Gr

Question: They’re telling the working people, vaccinate or lose your job. I have not heard anywhere, vaccinate or no welfare, vaccinate or no food stamps. Am I wrong? Or are they just not saying that? They’re only saying that to the working people.

I’m guessing Griffin has worked pretty hard all her life. And I’m guessing that she has a very different view than our virtue-signaling elites do about the people in the bottom quintile. Far from viewing them as victims of anonymous “structural” forces, people like Hughes draw a direct line between peoples’ personal choices and their lot in life. They have encountered a lot of loafers, free riders and cheaters, and they’ve seen people who collect government benefits while working side hustles and taking cash under the table. They’ve seen their share of irresponsible behavior by nephews, in-laws or people living down the street, partying too hard, having babies, saving too little, and crying poverty when they lose their jobs.

Now people like Hughes, whom I’m guessing does not have a college degree (I apologize if I’m mistaken), are treated to the multimillion-dollar magnanimity of President Joe Biden toward members of the educational elite who find themselves unable to pay back their college loans.

No wonder working people feel the system is stacked in favor of the educated elites and their wards, the poor. Unlike the rich, whom they can only read about in magazines, they see the members of the bottom quintile in action all around them. They see first-hand the abuses that occur.

“While official statistics don’t count two-thirds of those transfer payments and don’t show the income equality they produce, Americans who work hard to make ends meet are aware of it,” Gramm and Early write. “The hostility of working people is increasingly focused on a system where those who don’t break a sweat are about as well off as they are.”

Adding fuel to this combustible mix is the undisguised contempt that the educated elites display toward “working people” even as they make endless excuses for the dysfunctional behavior of the poor. Working people are “deplorables” and bitter people who “cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them.” Educated elites are assaulting the traditional values of working people in schools and popular culture and proclaiming them bigots and ignoramuses in the bargain. When boys can be girls, and girls can be boys, when obscenity is permitted in school libraries but classics like Huck Finn are banned, when values like hard work, thrift and punctuality are denounced as “Whiteness,” it’s no surprise that working people feel as if their way of life is under assault.

Gramm and Early don’t touch upon the culture wars, preferring to focus on the income equality between working people and denizens of the bottom income quintile. “This justifiable resentment is the economic source of today’s American populations,” they write. “It is ravaging the increasingly unstable Democratic political alliance between welfare recipients and blue-collar workers. … It is now driving political realignment among Hispanic voters, who are disproportionately middle-income earners.”

Combine the two — unearned income equality with the culture wars — and you get the polarized politics of the 2020s.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

28 responses to “Culture Wars + Unearned Income Equality = Political Realignment”

  1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    I do not know yet if the whole premise is correct, but as far as Virginia, my characterization/perception would be that we are among the most tax friendly to lower incomes, at the expense of taxing middle class pretty hard to make up the difference.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      If we are tax friendly to low income at the expense of the middle class then by their exclusion the upper class have it better than everyone.

      1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
        energyNOW_Fan

        not too bad for upper income…not a progressive tax structure

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      If we are tax friendly to low income at the expense of the middle class then by their exclusion the upper class have it better than everyone.

  2. Deckplates Avatar

    “…self-reliance, worker pride and labor-force participation…” Are, all, underrated and unappreciated.
    Today, in the 50 United States & U.S. territories, there are no people who do not have daily food, shelter, K-12 education, and even luxuries such as TV, cell phone, medical care and OK clothes.
    Mandating higher tax brackets, for someone who wants to get ahead, and then using those proceeds as a gift to those who are not so motivated is “the” travesty of our times. Moreover, those “not so motivated” will continue to be that way unless the “gifts” run out.
    Redundantly, which group causes the political & societal dysfunction: those who work or those who make the tax laws?

  3. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    While I do not have hard data, those whom the article consigns to an “educational elite” cohort fail to acknowledge that many of the defaulted loans involved for profit institutions from which no degree was obtained. Harly an elite without the degree.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      “About 15% of Pell grants and Stafford loans go to for-profit undergraduate students, totalling over $14.5 billion (Trends in Student Aid 2019”

      If Biden wanted to stop guaranteeing student loans to for profit colleges he could have asked for legislation to do that. He didn’t. If Biden wanted to relieve $10,000 / $20,000 in debt from students that dropped out without getting a degree he could have done that. He didn’t.

      No, Darth Vader in Depends excused $10,000 / $20,000 in student debt for anybody and everybody making under $125,000 per year.

      As Jim’s article and the related Wall Street Journal piece correctly pointed out – Biden screwed the middle class, added inflationary pressure on everybody to reward the “educational elite” that has become the center of the Democratic Party.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        News to the middle class who got their loans reduced.

      2. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Pell grants began thirty years ago and are awarded to students not institutions. For profit institutions are the highest recipients. Attempts to limit for profit access to federal funds has largely been thwarted by states where the for profits exist. Access has also been difficult with the advent of online institutions such as the University of Phoenix. The Obama administration undertook a series of efforts to deter the mass fraud perpetrated by the for profits. Every economic class of citizens were harmed by the fraud especially those who did not obtain a degree.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          Has been a long-standing problem with Veterans education benefits also.

        2. Minor correction: The Basic Educational Opportunity Grant was created by congress as part of the Higher Education Act of 1965. It was renamed in honor of Sen. Claiborne Pell in 1980. Congress has made several revisions to the grant system over the years, but the program has been around for going on 60 years.

          I’m not sure students at for-profit institutions should be cut out of the grant process altogether, but I think such institutions should have to meet eligibility requirements regarding graduation rates, job placement numbers, etc.

      3. Blacks are more likely to hold student loans that whites. One of the less discussed agendas is that loan forgiveness is to help blacks. Why? Because many political operatives in the Democratic Party believe that boosting black turnout during elections is a good thing.

    2. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      70% of all Pell grants go to low income, especially blacks and HSBCU. They get up to 20K off. An easy way to fix this is make Colleges and universities provide financial aid to students just like car manufacturers do to car buyers. 40% of all college students do not finish.

      1. Colleges do not have a huge pot of money to give out as financial aid to poor students.

        1. UVA does…

          …have a huge pot of money, that is.

          😉

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    A=B, C=B => A=C

    Culture Wars + Unearned Income Equality = Political Realignment

    Supremacy + Suppression = Political Realignment

  5. … the multimillion-dollar magnanimity of President Joe Biden toward members of the educational elite who find themselves unable to pay back their college loans.

    Anyone who makes more than about $60,000 a year is not unable to pay back student loans, they are unwilling to pay them back. Which makes them no better than leeches.

  6. … the multimillion-dollar magnanimity of President Joe Biden toward members of the educational elite who find themselves unable to pay back their college loans.

    Anyone who makes more than about $60,000 a year is not unable to pay back student loans, they are unwilling to pay them back. Which makes them no better than leeches.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar

    The core issue is where can they afford to live and is it where there are “good” schools?

    If they cannot, then how does one equate the income of those who live in neighborhoods with “good” schools and those who cannot afford it?

  8. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    If Republicans such as Gramm and Early and some of those of this blog are so concerned about the second quintile, why were they so opposed to the ACA and the expansion of Medicaid? Those two actions benefited primarily that group and would have contributed to the income after transfers.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Exactly. Gramm and like-minded have stubbornly opposed “equitable” health care for those who do not have employer-provided insurance as well as those who would get Medicaid Expansion.

      hypocrites they are.

      1. Richard Smith Avatar
        Richard Smith

        Government Health Care of all kinds… All Blatantly UnConstitutional…

  9. … the multimillion-dollar magnanimity of President Joe Biden toward members of the educational elite who find themselves unable to pay back their college loans.

    Anyone who makes more than about $60,000 a year is not unable to pay back student loans, they are unwilling to pay them back. Which makes them no better than leeches.

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    For the conservative, culture is the measure of a society’s success. For the liberal, it’s the ability to use politics to define society.

    Speakin’ of culture, after listening to the Zep on the AM and FM bands for what seemed like forever, I grew to reflexively spin the tuner whenever one of their 4 overplayed songs began… until today. Where was this hiding?

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nhyakhoE4CM

    1. dave schutz Avatar
      dave schutz

      Wow. This is nothing like what I am used to from them – nice! Thanks.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I researched it. It was released two year after they disbanded. It was scraps off the cutting room floor.

  11. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “They have encountered a lot of loafers, free riders and cheaters, and they’ve seen people who collect government benefits while working side hustles and taking cash under the table.”

    You mean CEOs and their like then…

    1. Yes. Them, too…

Leave a Reply