Cuccinelli: The Scary Winner at the Tea Party


O

ne fact coming out of the Tea Party convention hasn’t really come out on these blog postings, but it is probably the most important one: Kenneth Cuccinelli is the big beneficiary.

Any political ambitions that the highly ambitious attorney general might have had got a huge boost when the Cooch got a standing ovation at the Greater Richmond Convention Center. Everywhere, along with “Guns Save Lives” paste-on paper slogans, there were Cuccinelli stick-ons. Cars in the parking lot across the street were slathered in pro-Cooch propaganda.
It may not be so hard to understand why the Tea Partiers like him. Fairly affluent with incomes of from $50,000 to $100,000, white, and middle aged the Tea Partiers project the resentment of outsiders not unlike the 1960s’ “Silent Majority” angry with civil rights, the sex revolution and underclass “welfare” that Richard M. Nixon so skillfully tapped.

Cooch is perfect for them. He’s a loose cannon, bows to no larger power and is unabashedly hard right whether he’s taking on imagined fraud in global warming research, peddling questionable legal opinions on police power on stopping suspected immigrants or making certain that gays and lesbians have no legal right to protection against discrimination on public college campuses.

Given the groundswell of support for him by the masses at the convention center, it is clear where they are really coming from. Fellow bloggers may try to paint the event as a truly diverse, sincere and sympathetic gathering (one blogger even said he has decided to “endorse” the movement and is now a “patriot” as if we couldn’t wait for his decision). But the fact is that what you are really seeing is a big move to the far right among the conservative movement.

This is what is frightening. More traditional Republicans such as George Allen, Bob McDonnell and Bill Bolling all hustled to get a place at the Tea Party table. House Minority Whip Eric Cantor wisely didn’t show up. Say what you want about these politicians, but they aren’t imbued with a kind of self-righteous fanaticism. With the exception of Cantor, they seem willing to compromise and at least consider, to varying degrees, the views of others.
Not so the Cooch. He sees himself as stubbornly correct in his convictions. When an Albemarle County judge kissed off his “civil investigative demands” against the University of Virginia and a former professor who is an expert on global warming, Cuccinelli charged back with a scaled down attack. This one involves a state global warming research grant whose state funding totaled less than the $350,000 or so that U.Va.’s alumni and other community members have coughed up to fight off Cuccinelli’s first attacks.
Its this kind of single mindedness that would make Cuccinelli downright dangerous if he were to attain higher office such as governor or in Congress. There would be no room to consider the views others. Whatever the “Cooch” thinks is morally correct. It is a quality of certainty that could date back to the Jesuits which ran a private high school in Washington that Cuccinelli attended. I attended another such high school in the D.C. area and I while I have great respect for the Society of Jesus, I can sniff out a certain strain of righteousness that should give one pause.
The Tea Partiers running around with their funny tri-cornered hats, anti-Obama stickers, and 9 mm. automatic pistols in slick Velcro holsters may not realize what they are getting into by giving Cuccinelli a jet-assisted political boost. Lots of politicians have cleverly exploited the politics of resentment even though it didn’t seem to me that the Tea Partiers were particularly down and out. Well-fed and well-dressed, they seemed just as interested in taking the U.S. back five or six decades to some wonderful and imaginary White Toast era than in affecting decent change.
The most important single political statement they came was backing some kind of constitutional amendment letting states shun federal laws they don’t like. It is the same logic used by the Southern racists to shun integration back in the 1950s and 1960s. Imagine if we had someone in office as self-assured and single-minded as Cuccinelli to oversee such as states’ rights campaign.
If that were to happen, the Tea Partiers would see violations of civil rights beyond their wildest dreams.
Peter Galuszka

Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

20 responses to “Cuccinelli: The Scary Winner at the Tea Party”

  1. We come here today in deference to the memory of those stalwart patriots who on July 4, 1776, pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to establish and defend the proposition that governments are created by the people, empowered by the people, derive their just powers from the consent of the people, and must forever remain subservient to the will of the people.

    Old news, different party, same result.

  2. Groveton Avatar

    The more you publicize the Tea Party – they stronger they get.

    Maybe this is a truly brilliant liberal / Democratic ploy.

    The Tea Party crowd is a bit odd with the tri-corner hats and the pistols. Yes, they have a right to wear the hats and yes, they have a right to bear arms. I have a right to smear myself in sausage gravy and then roll around in chicken feathers before I go out. I just don't exercise that right.

    The Tea Party has begun to get some of their politicians through the primaries. Most of them are pretty poor candidates (although not all of them – by any means). They may win this year due to the anti-Democratic backlash but I don't see a lot of staying power.

    Moreover, the political power of the Tea Party will be spent by the time Obama comes up for re-election in two years. There are only so many rallies people will watch before they start thinking "fringe element". Some of the Tea Party backed politicians who get elected this November will say or do historically stupid things between their inauguration and the next presidential election.

    Maybe the Democrats are smart for publicizing the Tea Party. Maybe the Tea Party (or, more likely, its candidates) will fail in a spectacular fashion. Then, the country will have two spectacular failures – the Obama Administration and the Tea Party.

    However, if guys like Cuccinelli can keep the fires of frustration burning he could well be part of a trend to tip the balance of power back from the expansionist federal government to the states. Especially is he has some help in Washington.

    As for the "states rights" abuses of the past here in Virginia … there were abuses. All put in motion and led by a racist states right advocate. A Democrat named Harry F. Byrd.

  3. Anonymous Avatar

    Groveton is remarkably balanced in his comments, however, he didn't address Cuccinelli's loony lawsuit against an academic.

    The lawsuit boils down to a demand to inspect a broad sweep of 10-year old documents because the academic put on his RESUME a reference to some controversial research paper (although these paper's conclusions are routinely shown to be valid by subsequent follow ups by independent researchers). Cuccinelli wants to prove that this citation on Michael Mann's CV influenced the UVA panel in awarding Mann a grant on a completely unrelated research project on African Savannah.

    Have you ever heard of a more frivolous lawsuit in your life? Even Fox News is having a hard time digesting this lawsuit as they have yet to issue their "spin' on the subject — that should tell you something right there.

    And this guy is Virginia's top lawyer and a hero to the Tea party. It is hard to imagine a more ridiculous and profoundly scary character gaining even more power unless, perhaps, it is that Tea party candidate from Delaware who thinks the government is growing human brains in mice.

  4. Anonymous Avatar

    Mr. Gooze:

    You must have missed it.

    The role of the Atty Gen was just what I asked Mr. Bacon about in the last string. Mr. Bacon acknowledged just what you said: the Atty Gen is very, very popularity among the Tea Partyers.

    In all these tea stained posts there is a lot of effort wasted on tossing rocks at empty pigeon holes.

    What specifically do you propose to transform the political process into one that represents the citizens best long term interests in 2010?

    Mr. Groveton says it is the xIP.

    Professor Risse say it is AntiPartisanism.

    What do you say?

    Mr. Gross points out the problem is NOT Big Government.

    Mr. Bacon demonstrates that tossing red meat to the Anger of Ignorance crowd (no empty pigeon hole there, it is full of very angry people, they just have no well informed idea about what they are angry) sells books. But does it solve the larger needs of society?

    By the way, Professor Mann did a very good job of defending himself – and science – in a recent Wash Post Op Ed.

    Homo sapiens need answers, what do you prescribe, learned scribe.

    Observer.

  5. Anonymous Avatar

    Peter writes about the state AG: "peddling questionable legal opinions on police power on stopping suspected immigrants."

    The US Supreme Court wrote about state power to address illegal immigration: "Although the State has no direct interest in controlling entry into this country, that interest being one reserved by the Constitution to the Federal Government, unchecked unlawful migration might impair the State’s economy generally, or the State’s ability to provide some important service. Despite the exclusive federal control of this Nation’s borders, we cannot conclude that the States are without power to deter the influx of persons entering the United States against federal law, and whose numbers might have a discernible impact on traditional state concerns."

    TMT

  6. Gooze Views Avatar
    Gooze Views

    TMT,
    Being an undocumented worker is a civil not criminalmatter involving the federal government not the states. SDtates have no right to start making immigration law. Nor can Virginia or Hawaii declare war on another country. I'd say the Cooch might read up on the constitution.

    Peter Galuszka

  7. The Feds ARE dealing with immigration.

    Obama is doing more than Bush ever did.

    He's auditing employers.

    He's deported about 400K of ones who are criminals or have had run in's with the law.

    He's increased personnel and drones and the like at the border.

    It's not like he has ignored the issue and done nothing.

    Arizona simply DISAGREES with what the Feds are doing and is demanding that the Feds do what they think should be done – AND that if the Feds don't do what they think should be done – they're going to do it.

    That's the long and short of it.

    Pick ANY Fed role and pick ANY State or anyone within that state that disagrees with it .. and you have a State's Rights issue.

    Cooch is popular with the Tea Pots but even the Tea Pots favor the Feds taxing paychecks for SS and Medicare by about 2-1.

    It's the Tea Party funders like Dick Armey, the Koches, New Gingrich that have historically and consistently been opposed to the Feds doing SS and Medicare.

    If Cooch succeeds in his challenge, it will be quickly followed by a direct challenge to SS and Medicare – which is the actual goal of the major funders of the Tea Pots.

    and always has been…

    At some point the Tea Pots are going to realize that they are being used…. by ultra right wing zealots… who could care less about what the Tea Pots really care about….

  8. The Feds ARE dealing with immigration.

    Obama is doing more than Bush ever did.

    He's auditing employers.

    He's deported about 400K of ones who are criminals or have had run in's with the law.

    He's increased personnel and drones and the like at the border.

    It's not like he has ignored the issue and done nothing.

    Arizona simply DISAGREES with what the Feds are doing and is demanding that the Feds do what they think should be done – AND that if the Feds don't do what they think should be done – they're going to do it.

    That's the long and short of it.

    Pick ANY Fed role and pick ANY State or anyone within that state that disagrees with it .. and you have a State's Rights issue.

    Cooch is popular with the Tea Pots but even the Tea Pots favor the Feds taxing paychecks for SS and Medicare by about 2-1.

    It's the Tea Party funders like Dick Armey, the Koches, New Gingrich that have historically and consistently been opposed to the Feds doing SS and Medicare.

    If Cooch succeeds in his challenge, it will be quickly followed by a direct challenge to SS and Medicare – which is the actual goal of the major funders of the Tea Pots.

    and always has been…

    At some point the Tea Pots are going to realize that they are being used…. by ultra right wing zealots… who could care less about what the Tea Pots really care about….

  9. Anonymous Avatar

    Peter – the United States Supreme Court said that states have authority to deal with illegal immigration. Justice William Brennan, liberal icon, said so. States cannot set immigration standards, but can enforce federal ones. That's what Arizona has been doing.

    I have no problem with Obama's approach of going after employers' records instead of plant raids. But enforcing the law would go further. What about contractors on projects with federal funds? For example, building Dulles Rail. Could all of the contractors and subs prove they are employing only citizens and resident aliens? I doubt it.

    As far as rewriting the demands for information in the Mann case, this happens all of the time. I'm working on two federal lawsuits right now. Parties on both sides object to requests for information. Sometimes the judges agree. In that case, we go back and rewrite the requests in an attempt to meet the judges' standards while still getting the information. The AG is doing the very same thing. A good lawyer is not going to walk away from getting the information unless it is impossible to get.

    TMT

  10. DesertCactus Avatar
    DesertCactus

    What is amazing is how truly lacking in understanding the Left has of the American people and what is going on with their engagement with their government. First, they didn't realize that the elites would consider them just radicals, we are – but so were the original founders – or fringe; meaning of worthless value to the American political debate. I won't even comment on this in that most of the those who are speaking out today are well educated, many fought for their country because they were asked, and many have been successful and have provided both for their family and often, job for other families.

    In closing – and getting to my point in a torturous path for some, these people are not static. They are far more flexible and cohesive than you give them credit for. You make them out to be homogenized old white people, but even that is flexible as more and more people understand the message – and not the propaganda from our truly pathetic media.

    You should be afraid – very afraid. Your world is about to fundamentally change. (I think I heard those words before but it was OK coming from a Socialist to the Progressives and those on the Left.)

    DesertCactus
    http://www.can-you-hear-us-now.com

  11. "That's what Arizona has been doing. "

    ================================

    I read a story in the Arizona paper that said, based on the decline in Latino births in Arizona, it is estimated that 250,000 of them have left the state.

    Where did they go? Back to Mexico?

    Is Arizona better off because of this? Are the schools better? Are they spending less on emergency medical care? Has crime dropped substantially? Is business better?

    These are not rhetorical questions. If the arguments made in favor of strong enforcement against undocumented aliens are correct, then you should start seeing changes in some of these metrics.

  12. Regardless of what happens in the elections in Sept. Tea Party members are going to find it is very difficult to get their agenda enacted into law. Right now, they are drunk on essence of attention, and they think it will all be this easy.

    Just wait until they try to cut some piece of government that protects the special interests of a particular group. the idea that they will be able to make major changes or disensct current laws seems to me more than a little optimistic.

  13. "A good lawyer is not going to walk away from getting the information unless it is impossible to get."

    ==================================

    A good lawyer that works for the people isn't going to waste their money, either.

  14. What about contractors on projects with federal funds? For example, building Dulles Rail. Could all of the contractors and subs prove they are employing only citizens and resident aliens? I doubt it.

    ==================================

    When I was working in the Pentagon, there were thousands of latinos there working on repairing damage after 9/11 and other upgrades.

    I have a hard time believing they were all legal, especially considering the variety of south american accents I heard.

    Maybe they were brought in by "crew chiefs" that pay to get expedited service from the INS for temporary work visas. Even if that is the case, one has to ask how many of them will go home when the project is over.

  15. "…and whose numbers might have a discernible impact on traditional state concerns."

    =================================

    Arizonans will tell you they have no personal animosity towards Hispanics. In fact, they admire their work ethic and dedication to their families. But there is nothing like the refusal of service seen at lunchcounters in the south.

    Many Arizonans and Latinos seem to switch back and forth seamlessly between English and spanish according to elaborate and unwritten rules of courtesy and convenience.

    But, Arizonans will tell you that they have a problem with latinos collectively, because of the numbers. They believe they increase crime and expenses for schools and emergency rooms etc.

    They have already caused 250,000 Latinos to leave Arizona.

    At what point will they have reduced the numbers sufficiently that they no longer have authority to enforce the law under this ruling?

  16. So I took a litle jog over to
    "American Thinker" which is listted in the Profile of DesertCactus.

    The first three blog entries had zero comments, the forth entry, entitled "Stink of desperation attends Jon Stewart DC rally" drew a number of comments, predictably similar.

    Likewise, the entry entitled "Lesson in Liberal Finance" drew a number of entries or the type best characterized as "Hear, Hear, chearleading responses.

    If you choose to enter a response on the American Thinker you first have to register, which leads me to think they have at least some reservations about free speech.

    And then there is this:

    "American Thinker welcomes donations from our readers. Because we reserve the right to be partisan, we do not qualify for tax exempt nonprofit organization status."

    Which I translate as "We have already done all our thinking, please send money."

    Then there are his other top picks "Tea Party Patriots" (as if there is no other kind of patriot)

    and

    "Great American Hero" (as if conservatives had a lock on heroes.)

    So, I'm all in favor of a little self promotion, but these three titles seem particularly grandiose.

    Why not just go for it, with a blog titled "Conservatives Rule the Universe are Always Correct and Can Do No Wrong"

  17. Anonymous Avatar

    "A good lawyer that works for the people isn't going to waste their money, either." Redrafting data requests probably only takes a few hours of legal time on the AG's staff.

    When people take taxpayer money, they generally take it subject to various terms and conditions. We would generally be better off were the government, at all levels, either to enforce the terms and conditions or not give away taxpayer money. Much of Virginia's economy is dependent on taxpayer dollars. That is a weakness, especially with the grand retrenching that is going to happen in all parts of the government. DoD spending cannot be exempt.

    TMT

  18. Gooze Views Avatar
    Gooze Views

    Jim,
    Your dissing of Krugman is off mark.
    Plenty of trained economists believe that more money should be spent now to kick start the economy. Others do not and cling to the idea that we have to address deficits now to prevent supposed disaster far down the road. Among them is Krugman who understands that deficit mania can choke off recovery and stick us with with a much worse downturn. After all, you need the economy to be humming to generate revenue to pay down deficits.
    I am more in sympathy with Krugman's view than with yours.
    You and I have one trait in common. Neither one of us is a trained economist. So why should anyone listen seriously to you? Or to me?

    Peter Galuszka

  19. Overall about 30% of the economy depends on government spending. It has varied from 25% to 30% since 1949. Cut government spending by 33% and cut the economy by 10%, on first principles. That puts 333 billion back in private pockets. Some of it gets saved, some pays down debt, some gets invested and some gets invested in the US.

    That gets offset by 333 billion that does not get spent on government services, payments, and contracts.

    For the short term its not a good tradeoff. Long term, no one knows, but fiscal conservatives claim they do.

    5 to 15 years out, they are probably correct, but if I needed a job today, the net present most probable value just has no comparison.

    We are about to go to the polls and make a huge mistake.

    I just got my quarterly 401 k report. It is now within a few thousand of its highest ever value. In the last three months it made substantially more than I did working every day. Some of it came from overseas. Yet people persist in thinking the economy is in the tank and Obama is to blame.

    We were in the tank at the peak of the bubble. Now we are close to a normal, sustainable trajectory.

    It is only greed and immediate gratification that makes this seem unsatisfactory.

  20. HB 1418 Special license plates; DON'T TREAD ON ME

Leave a Reply