COVID-19 No Justification for Mail-In Voting

by Brian Glass

With the COVID-19 epidemic, adherents of mail-in voting in Virginia and around the country believe they have found the “hook” to pass their favored legislation. That idea needs to be revisited before the primary elections in June and the presidential election in November. Regardless of the epidemic, voting by mail is still a bad idea.

In the 2017 Dallas, Tex., City Council election, there were approximately 700 fraudulent mail-in ballots signed by the same person. The number of fraudulent ballots were larger than the difference in the vote tally in one of he races.

In the 2018 North Carolina gubernatorial election, 61% of mail-in ballots favored the Republican candidate even though registered Republicans accounted for only 19% of those who requested mail-in ballots. The Republican won by a 905-vote margin. The results were thrown out and a new election resulted in the election of a Democratic governor.

In 2016, 83 registered voters in San Pedro, Calif., received ballots at the same address, an apartment complex.

A bipartisan Federal Election Reform Commission, formed in 2005 and chaired by former President Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, and former secretary of State James Banker, a Republican, articulated key several principles of electoral integrity that hold true today:

  • “The right to vote is a vital component of U.S. citizenship, and all states should use their best effort to obtain proof of citizenship before registering voters.”
  • “We recommend that states use the registration and ID process to enfranchise more voters than ever. … There is likely to be less discrimination against minorities if there is a single, uniform ID, than if poll workers can apply multiple standards.”
  • “The electoral system cannot inspire public confidence if no safeguards exist to deter or detect fraud or to confirm the identity of voters.”

Opponents of voter ID laws routinely claim that they are costly and work against people of color. However, federal law requires that anyone receiving welfare or Social Security benefits have to prove citizenship and have a photo ID.

Moreover, the historical record suggests that Photo ID does not repress minority participation. In the 2008 presidential primary, in Georgia, which had passed a photo ID law, the number of African-Americans voting doubled from 2004, while Mississippi, without a voter ID law, saw only a 2.35% increase in African-American primary voters.

If citizens vote by mail, the ballots have to be counted manually. In a close election that can result in fraud. In Florida, fraud ultimately cost the Broward County Supervisor of Elections her job.

If voters mail their ballots early and information surfaces that might change their thinking, they cannot change their vote. With the closeness of the 2016 Presidential election, would you really want to vote early this year? Who can predict what the last-minute surprises might be?

If a voter is fearful of being in a crowd on election day 2020, a better alternative would be to opt for an “absentee” ballot. You can cast your ballot in person before Election Day without a crowd while maintaining the integrity of the system.

Brian Glass, a commercial real estate broker, lives in Henrico County.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “COVID-19 No Justification for Mail-In Voting”

  1. ksmith8953 Avatar
    ksmith8953

    Trust me, I could vote today and wouldn’t have any doubt in my choice. Florida was a good lesson for all of us to consider. Has anyone considered making it possible to have more places open to go to vote so that the crowd is more dispersed? Or perhaps having at least one site in each precinct reserved for those that feel they might be to at risk for Covid19 to vote? Maybe let them drive up, vote, and clean the machine before the next person? The voting machine could be near a door? Petersburg shares one large site for all precincts. Stupid. It is too crowded and the six foot rule would be ridiculous. But opening up seven sites would make more sense.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I have long been averse to voting by mail. I like the civic tradition of the country coming together on one day to elect its leaders.

    But I have softened my stance, primarily because voting by mail increases participation. And democracy depends on participation as large as possible.

    Voting by mail is not inherently subject to greater levels of fraud. The states of Oregon and Washington have had voting by mail for years. In the 2016 election, there were 54 causes of voter fraud in Oregon. Washington experienced 142 cases in the 2018 election. There have to be safegurds built in to voting by mail or absentee voting programs. For example, the idea of one person collecting the votes of many others in order to take them to the polling place (“ballot harvesting”) easily lends itself to fraud and should not be allowed.

    1. John Harvie Avatar
      John Harvie

      Nor should Internet voting be allowed. What a hackers panacea that would be.
      If Equifax can be hacked, anything can be.

      1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
        Nancy_Naive

        Do you a bank app? Buy stocks and bonds with on online broker?
        Wait, you trust Bank of America online but not voting?

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          No, I do not bank by internet. And I agree with John Harvie–no internet voting. The truth is that we are regressing in our voting mechanisms. Going from touch screens to paper ballots.

          1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
            Nancy_Naive

            We need purple thumbs

          2. djrippert Avatar
            djrippert

            Even if you don’t use the internet to bank I can assure you that all of your accounts are maintained on computers with no paper backup.

  3. Nancy_Naive Avatar
    Nancy_Naive

    You’re right COV2 is not a good reason. But just about everything else is.

  4. TooManyTaxes Avatar
    TooManyTaxes

    The use of paper ballots provides a back-up in case of system failure and permits better recounts.

    In terms of the number of incidences of voter fraud, how serious is the effort to identify voter fraud? I would seriously question whether the party in power in a state has a true interest in identifying voter fraud for an election it won. It would be like letting the Washington Post editorial staff conduct a recount. It invites dishonesty. A review process should involve people who believe there is voter fraud just to keep the system honest.

    Dilution of a voter’s vote is just as wrong as denying a lawful registered voter the right to vote. Both must be stopped and neither it more important than the other.

  5. djrippert Avatar
    djrippert

    Elections have been compromised in the United States in the past and it didn’t take computers or the internet. From the Washington Post …

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2000/11/17/another-race-to-the-finish/c810a41c-7da9-461a-927b-9da6d36a65dc/

  6. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
    Reed Fawell 3rd

    What are the chances now of a free and fair Presidential election at all in America anymore, an election that the losing party will accept? Based on the last election, as shown over past 3.5 years, those kinds of elections are now a thing of the past. Will we even keep the peace this time? Or have an insurrection?

  7. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    If you issue each voter a ballot with a bar code – and that bar code is unique to that voter – only one ballot with that bar code will be scanned and accepted.

    Someone can make a gazillion copies but only the first scan is accepted. After that, any barcodes that are received that are duplicates of the original will not be accepted.

    There are other ways to do this. For instance using two-factor authentication… so that even the first ballot is no good if it does not contain the code sent separately to the voter.

    You can do this with a paper ballot or an internet ballot… and while I’d never say it could never be compromised… it can be made pretty secure – as secure as as any procedure that only scans the unique number one time and after that – any duplicates are ignored.

    The thing is – there are ways to make this secure – but some folks don’t want it done no matter what – the “concerns” are really about more folks voting.

    1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
      Nancy_Naive

      Yeah, no. The point is “secret ballot”. Identifying a voter to the ballot means that if you then catch him with a $2 bill, you’ll know he sold his vote.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        oh you are right.. I had indeed forgotten that but how do absentee ballots work right now with respect to knowing if they are valid or not? And where does the claim that multiple ballots from one person were fraudulently done or ballots from dead people, etc come from?

        1. Nancy_Naive Avatar
          Nancy_Naive

          I don’t think an absentee ballot is actually attached to the request. I think it works like at the poll. The registration is checked and the ballot sent. It’s counted last and sometimes only if it could change results of the polling place.

          Fraud? It’s a figment of a sick mind or the work of a fraudulent campaign, e.g., NC9.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    A bar code would not be tied to a specific person… but since the code itself would be unique – only one ballot with that code would be counted. All duplicates would be recognized as dups and not counted.

    But how you’d keep that one ballot from being intercepted by someone else in the house and sent back fraudulently, not sure how you’d stop that even with a regular absentee ballot. Seems like a similar problem.

    1. TooManyTaxes Avatar
      TooManyTaxes

      But how can the average voter trust that the government will identify and destroy duplicate or otherwise fraudulent ballots? I don’t. If we move to voting by mail, we need a lot more security than we have today. There needs to be participation by people/groups that suspect fraud and will make all efforts to identify it.

  9. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The same way we trust the govt to register voters in the first place or to send out just absentee ballots right now.

    How do they validate absentee ballots right now? In fact, what is the difference between a mail-in ballot and an absentee ballot anyhow?

    Also ask yourself how do the actual polling places know whether you have already voted or not? Do you trust them to do that?

    here’s something worth reading on the subject:

    https://www.dictionary.com/e/absentee-ballot-vs-mail-in-ballot/

Leave a Reply