By Peter Galuszka

Corey A. Stewart, the scourge of “illegal” immigrants and standard-holder of good old fashioned American values, is now running for lieutenant governor on the Republican ticket in 2013.

News reports of his recent announcement were predictably bland – comments in the right-wing blogosphere even more so – despite the fact that Stewart is one of the most divisive, if not downright racist, politicians in recent Virginia history.

As a member of the Board of Supervisors of Prince William County since 2003, Stewart is famous for his movement to require county police to profile anyone they suspected of being illegal immigrants if they were stopped. This law was obviously aimed at brown-skinned Latinos. Similar legal requirements were later adopted statewide in Arizona and Alabama, bringing the U.S. global derision.

One immediate effect of Stewart’s 2007 initiative was that Hispanic immigrants started fleeing the county in droves regardless of whether their papers were entirely in order or not. Stewart claims that his move caused violent crime to drop 37 percent in the largely white and wealthy suburb of Washington, D.C. chock-a-block with federal jobs and cul-de-sac homes. More informed individuals, such as Steven Camarota, research director of Center for Immigration Studies, says the link between violent crime and illegal immigration is a lot more tenuous.

Among the negative fallout from Stewart’s xenophobic grandstanding was that it pit white-skinned against dark-skinned and haves against have nots. The lead-in to the law and the aftermath brought on some very ugly scenes that drew to the soul and conscience of what had been a rather quiet, growing county.

For an idea of just how rancid Stewart’s ideas were, check out the short, award-winning film 9500Liberty by Annabel Park and Eric Byler. The 2010 documentary runs less than five minutes or so, but shows Americana at its worst. In one famous scene, an elderly white man screams at Park and Byler to “speak English” and get legal. In response, Park, who was born in South Korea, is a naturalized American citizen and studied at Boston University and Oxford, produces her U.S. passport and flashes it in his face.

Even the chief of the county police has big trouble with Stewart’s law, which Stewart later tried to expand to the rest of Virginia in his “Rule of Law” campaign. My memory of Stewart is in October 2010 at the “Virginia TeaParty Patriots Convention” in Richmond manning a little booth trying to dish out anti-immigrant ideas. He seemed to be ignored amidst the hubbub of deficit hawks, Patrick Henry re-enactors in Colonial garb and gun fanatics packing Glocks and Colt 45s in Velcro holsters.

In any event, bashing immigrants has gone out of style at least for now. The reason is the economy. Fewer undocumented foreigners are coming here because jobs are nil. Ironically, Hispanic construction workers had been flocking to Prince William about 10 years ago to help serve the demand for badly-planned cookie cutter houses, including McMansions.

When the housing market tanked, some stayed, weren’t quite legal and their brown skins became more evident to the white folks when they were shopping at the county’s many strip malls. In an odd way, it’s a bit like Arizona which had been run by dark-skinned Native Americans and Spanish for centuries and was not even a state until 1912. Then, around the 1960s, flocks of retirees of more northern European ancestry showed up. Suddenly, Arizona became “American” and had to be protected.

For his lieutenant governor’s campaign, Stewart seems to have dropped the immigrant bashing because it has gone out of style. Instead, he says, he weathered the recession by not raising taxes in Prince William but investing in roads and “public safety’ (code word for immigrant bashing?) and cutting $143 million from the county budget.

He says:  “Prince William County is a model for how to implement good conservative principles. Taxes are down, crime is down, and growth is up. I am going to bring to the Office of Lieutenant Governor the same conservative principles that I have led Prince William County with over the past 6 years.”

Naturally, he fails to mention that many of those new jobs come out of the federal budget, but no matter. The bigger point is that Stewart is going to have to come to terms sooner or later with the impact of immigration on economic growth now that recovery seems in the air. That will raise the immigration issue yet again.

Even the Wall Street Journal notes on its editorial pages today that too much visa protectionism is hurting the U.S. India is about to file a complaint with the World Trade Organization against a 2010 U.S. law that hikes fees for visas for highly skilled workers from India. Meanwhile, rejections of  H-1B and L-IB visa applications for well-qualified foreign workers are considerably up.

One wonders what Stewart, who is casting himself as  yet another “jobs” Republican, thinks about this. One thing he might be sure of. Some darker-skinned foreigners with PhD.s in highly technical fields that many Americans lack may think twice about moving to Prince William County, or maybe even the Old Dominion if he wins his state race.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. It will be interesting to see if Sean Connaughton runs again for Lieutenant Governor. The race would pit the current Prince William board of supervisors chairman against a former Prince William board of supervisors chairman. I’d put my money on Connaughton.

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    The only thing that really matters is that somebody run against Stewart. That will spark a “dumb off” in the Republican primary as the contestants vie to convince the lunatic fringe of Virginia Republicans that they are equally as crazy as the fringe members.

    We already have the makings of a “dumb off” between Cuccinelli and Bolling.

    We already have a “dumb off” between Bob Marshall and George Allen at the national level.

    The Republicans in Virginia are doomed and the state will be far better off after they are a no more than a bad memory in the Commonwealth.

    Run, Sean, Run.

  3. Wow…yo peter are You Liberal much…???–I can actually See the Liberal Foam Flying from your snout as you wrote this….Sheesh, me thinks you have a case of ‘Sour Grapes’…Far-Left, Whacked-Out Lib’s thought they had their whacky agenda going nicely & You thought noOne was noticing…But American’s Are Awake now, Conservatives And Independents alike & Since ILLEGAL Means someone in this country w/o permission, then maybe We should Speak Up & Start doing something about it……DUH…!!!

  4. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    rked,
    Do you have your sheets dry-cleaned or washed by hand?

  5. Darrell Avatar

    “We should Speak Up & Start doing something about it”

    We could start by deporting the RPV.

  6. The level of ignorance on BR is increasing. The U.S. Supreme Court wrote in Plyler v. Doe, the case that struck a Texas laws prohibiting children in the state illegally from receiving a free education in public schools, as follows.
    “Although the State has no direct interest in controlling entry into this country, that interest being one reserved by the Constitution to the Federal Government, unchecked unlawful migration might impair the State’s economy generally, or the State’s ability to provide some important service. Despite the exclusive federal control of this Nation’s borders, we cannot conclude that the States are without power to deter the influx of persons entering the United States against federal law, and whose numbers might have a discernible impact on traditional state concerns. ”
    I’ve posted this a number of times and Peter won’t address it. The Supreme C0urt has held states have authority to enforce federal laws against illegal immigration. You may not like this idea, but it is constitutional.

  7. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    “In an odd way, it’s a bit like Arizona which had been run by dark-skinned Native Americans and Spanish for centuries and was not even a state until 1912. Then, around the 1960s, flocks of retirees of more northern European ancestry showed up. Suddenly, Arizona became “American” and had to be protected.”.

    That certainly makes for a good story. And it sounds like it could be correct. But it’s probably not.

    The 1940 Census was the first to try to determine whether people were White, not Hispanic vs Hispanic Origin (of any race). The results:

    Total population … 499,261
    Hispanic origin, of any race … 101.902
    White, not of hispanic origin ..324,890

    There were also 55,076 Native Americans in the 1940 Census.

    Even adding the Hispanic origin population and the Native American population only yields about 1/2 the White population.

    Only 6,000 people lived in Arizona in 1860. By 1880 it was 40,000. By 1920 it was 334,162. By 1980 it was 1.8M.

    It is a quaint belief that there was this stable population of Hispanics and Native Americans living in Arizona for hundreds of years. Then, in the 1970s a whole bunch of white retirees moved in and “upset the apple cart”.

    In reality, being a desert, virtually nobody lived there. It took until 1900 for the population to cross 100,000. By 1960, it hit 1.3M. While there was certainly some population growth and some influx of Hispanic people my bet is that the majority of new arrivals were white, non Hispanic.

    However, if you want to read a sad statistic, the 1860 Census counted 4,040 Native Americans living in Arizona outside of reservations. The 1870 Census counted 31.

  8. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    In fact, the Hispanic population has been increasing as a percentage of the whole since 1970. In 1970, the Hispanic population of Arizona consisted of 17.3%, 1980-16.2%, 1990-18.8%, 2000-25.3%, 2010-29.6%.

    Facts are stubborn things.

Leave a Reply