Congress, Commission Renounce Reconciliation

The Confederate Memorial in Arlington.
(Arlington National Cemetery photo by Rachel Larue)

by Donald Smith

‘In passing the 2021 William M. “Mac” Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act, the United States Congress determined that Confederates and the Confederacy no longer warrant commemoration through Department of Defense assets.’

***

At such a time and under such conditions I thought it eminently fitting to show some token of our feeling, and I therefore instructed my subordinate officers to come to the position of ‘salute’ in the manual of arms as each body of the Confederates passed before us.

The first statement is from the Naming Commission, the body Congress created to review Confederate names and iconography on DOD installations. It appears to be the commissioners’ interpretation of Congress’ intent behind Section 370 of the FY 2021 National Defense Appropriations Act (NDAA), which established the Naming Commission and outlined its mission.

The second is from Union General Joshua Chamberlain. Chamberlain commanded the detachments of the Union Armies of the Potomac and James which received the surrender of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia. The “such a time and under such conditions” Chamberlain found himself confronted with, was the approach of the surrendering Confederate infantry on April 12th, 1865, at Appomattox Court House.

Apparently, Congress has chosen to agree with the Naming Commission, instead of Chamberlain. In so doing, it has chosen to play Jenga with American heritage and culture.

“Politics makes me sad sometimes.” That statement is from Glenn Reynolds, University of Tennessee law professor and the creator/proprietor of the landmark Instapundit blog. What specifically made Reynolds sad? “[T]he ongoing game of Civilizational Jenga that our ruling class is playing. One by one, they’re withdrawing the supports of civil society, in a process that will inevitably lead to a collapse. They’re taking what was a very robust society, and consuming all the safety margins, bit by bit.”

What triggered his sadness? The removal of the Reconciliation Memorial from Arlington National Cemetery. It is, according to Reynolds:

… a post Civil War memorial marking a return to American unity – as part of the post-George Floyd revisiting of the Civil War. As David Strom (of the HotAir Website) writes: ‘Speaking practically, history has shown that even though the Southern states rose against the federal government, over the past century, our most patriotic and self-sacrificial defenders of our country have come from citizens of the South. Tearing down the reconciliation monument is spitting in the face of the memory of these citizens’ ancestors and a rejection of recognizing the complications in America’s history. It is, in other words, both offensive and stupid. I say this as an admirer of Lincoln’s cause and a strong opponent of the Southern ideology.’

“[T]he American experience of reconciliation after one of the world’s bloodier and more divisive conflicts,” said Reynolds, “is one that perhaps ought to get more attention. Instead, it is being erased. There’s little enough of reconciliation in today’s politics.” And that makes Reynolds sad. It should make all of us sad. And irritated—at Congress.

In the linked Substack article, Reynolds seems to point the finger of blame at the Biden administration (“the Biden Administration is removing the Reconciliation Monument”). But Congress owns the Naming Commission, and everything associated with it. It created the commission and, most importantly, reviewed and approved its recommendations.

During the past year, as the overreach and sweep of the Naming Commission’s recommendations and judgment came to light, Congress received numerous warnings about the negative side-effects of those recommendations and judgments, the most prominent of those warnings being Jim Webb’s WSJ op-ed. Apparently it ignored all of them. OK then—it now owns this issue. Not the Defense Department. Not the Army. The Congress.

Joshua Chamberlain was no insignificant Union Army officer. As commander of the 20th Maine Infantry regiment at Gettysburg, he arguably (and personally) saved the battle for the Union. The 20th Maine held Little Round Top, the extreme left of the Union line. If the Confederates took the hill, they might have broken the Union defensive line. Chamberlain’s Mainers withstood repeated assaults from Hood’s division. With insufficient ammunition to repel another charge, Chamberlain ordered a bayonet attack. It was a classic “spoiling attack.” It surprised and scattered the Confederates at the bottom of the hill and saved Little Round Top for the Union. Jeff Daniels played Chamberlain in the Civil War epics Gettysburg and Gods and Generals.

Here’s how Chamberlain described the scene at Appomattox, as the Confederate troops approached the surrender field:

Having thus formed, the brigades standing at ‘order arms,’ the head of the Confederate column, General Gordon in command, and the old ‘Stonewall’ Jackson Brigade leading, started down into the valley which lay between us, and approached our lines…

Ah, but it was a most impressive sight, a most striking picture, to see that whole army in motion to lay down the symbols of war and strife, that army which had fought for four terrible years after a fashion but infrequently known in war.

At such a time and under such conditions I thought it eminently fitting to show some token of our feeling, and I therefore instructed my subordinate officers to come to the position of ‘salute’ in the manual of arms as each body of the Confederates passed before us.

It was not a ‘present arms,’ however, not a ‘present,’ which then as now was the highest possible honor to be paid even to a president. It was the ‘carry arms,’ as it was then known, with musket held by the right hand and perpendicular to the shoulder. I may best describe it as a marching salute in review.

When General Gordon came opposite me I had the bugle blown and the entire line came to ‘attention,’ preparatory to executing this movement of the manual successively and by regiments as Gordon’s columns should pass before our front, each in turn.

The General was riding in advance of his troops, his chin drooped to his breast, downhearted and dejected in appearance almost beyond description. At the sound of that machine-like snap of arms, however, General Gordon started, caught in a moment its significance, and instantly assumed the finest attitude of a soldier. He wheeled his horse facing me, touching him gently with the spur, so that the animal slightly reared, and as he wheeled, horse and rider made one motion, the horse’s head swung down with a graceful bow, and General Gordon dropped his swordpoint to his toe in salutation.

By word of mouth General Gordon sent back orders to the rear that his own troops take the same position of the manual in the march past as did our line. That was done, and a truly imposing sight was the mutual salutation and farewell.

I suppose that, if the Naming Commission (or the modern-day U.S. Congress) had been at Appomattox that day, they would have chastised Chamberlain.  

Appomattox was the site of the beginning of a long national and cultural reconciliation. At Appomattox, the leaders on both sides, Lee and Grant, took actions that helped end the war peacefully. Lee decided to surrender his army, instead of scattering it into the Southern countryside as guerillas. Grant offered generous surrender terms. Those actions showed a spirit of reconciliation, instead of retribution. If our modern-day elected leaders are disinterested in or indifferent to reconciliation, then they have turned their back on the spirit of Appomattox, and the honorable example that Grant, Lee and thousands of honorable men set there. That should make all of us sad. And worried.

Donald Smith was raised in Richmond. His mother was born in a house not far from VMI, and family members he still has there. 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

60 responses to “Congress, Commission Renounce Reconciliation”

  1. LesGabriel Avatar
    LesGabriel

    Something we all need to think about seriously as we enter the pivotal year of 2024. Can Americans today find enough common ground to survive as a nation despite divisions that rival those of 1865.

  2. Isn’t studying the tactics and strategies of the ANV at the USMIL academies a form of commemorating its innovation in warfighting?

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    The stacking of arms on April 12th is one of the most solemn moments in American history. Gordon and Chamberlain were the perfect men to lead this ceremony. At the 150th anniversary of Appomattox the final scene was painstakingly recreated by reenactors. I will never forget that day.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/90c8aefc39eb9113be35bf36592d487078bffde8015d282e30b7a2956821bd49.jpg

    1. Joshua Chamberlain is my favorite Civil War Union General.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        General Vincent was from around where I was born.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          He had cool sideburns. Perished on Little Round Top.

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Just prior to Chamberlain taking charge and revealing the leader he always was.

          2. Chip Gibson Avatar
            Chip Gibson

            And there, these last 4 posts demonstrate the honor bestowed upon those of greatness by following generations of honorable gentlemen.

  4. Lefty665 Avatar

    At long last I now know why Rt 1 heading south into Richmond is named Chamberlain Avenue.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Nope. Chamberlayne. Different family. Shhhh, but some Johnny Rebs among them.

      https://virginiahistory.org/research/research-resources/finding-aids/chamberlayne-family

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        I think it is named for Captain John Hampden Chamberlayne. My grandmother lived on that street and knew some of the history of that area. “Ham” was a legendary newspaper editor and hero of the Battle of the Crater. His son was a famous minister and an educator at St. Christophers. Chamberlayne was a close friend of Major Ginter.
        https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/8691817/john-hampden-chamberlayne

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          Thanks guys, I thought I had it figured out. Obviously not:)

  5. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    More votes are to be won now by pissing on Confederate graves than by leaving them alone. A century ago the situation was different and the vets and their direct descendants were a sizable voting bloc both parties sought to curry. Now disdain and insult are the net-plus political move, ironically mainly from the political party that defended slavery and started the war in the first place. That is history they really want to bury.

    1. LesGabriel Avatar
      LesGabriel

      “Now disdain and insult are the net-plus political move” I don’t think that this strategy has been in place long enough or openly enough to make a judgement about whether it is a long term net-plus or minus.

    2. Not Today Avatar

      Now disdain and insult are the net-plus political move, ironically mainly from the political party that defended slavery (and whose members now identify as Republicans having been alienated by Democratic support for the CRA)…

      All fixed!

      Un-ironically, conservatives are very true to type, seeking to enslave and subjugate women this time instead of brown people.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Well, the Confederate graves remain in place, undisturbed. What is removed is the Lost Cost memorial put up by the UDC.

        That’s the primary interest of the DOD Naming Commission also but you’d never know that listening to those “aggrieved” over the “loss” of Confederate “history”.

        1. Donald Smith Avatar
          Donald Smith

          And, it’s now obvious that progressives will go into cemeteries, scour museums and tear up memorial walks, in order to satisfy their many psychological and emotional needs.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            nope. if it’s not a UDC lost cause, it’s safe…

            the target is the Jim Crow Lost Cause “memorials”.

          2. Okay.

            But why, and by whom, was the statue of Matthew Fontaine Maury declared a “UDC Lost Cause” memorial? Yes, the UDC contributed some of the funds needed to build it, but so did The Commonwealth of Virginia, the City of Richmond, and President Woodrow Wilson. The monument to Maury was neither envisioned by, nor constructed at the behest of, the United Daughters of the Confederacy.

            The work of commissioning the sculpture and having the monument erected was done by the Matthew Fontaine Maury Association. The monument was inspired by his contributions to science, not his military career or his politics. This is clearly in evidence in the design of his statue as well as the monument itself. Maury is depicted sitting down, wearing civilian clothing. The monument contains references and allegories to his achievements in oceanography and meteorology.

            What is so offensive about that?

            Also, Maury was never a slave owner.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            UDC specialized in getting govt to build memorials and name schools, roads, and public buildings for traitors, enslavers, and segregationists. Are you talking about the statue on Monument Avenue which was a series of monuments and memorials essentially dedicated to the Lost Cause? I can show you OTHER monuments to Maury that still stand and have not been torn down because they were not put up by UDC directly or by UDC encouraging govt to do so.

            The “anti” movement may be swinging too far in the other direction, but there was a lot of stuff that was purely for the Lost Cause and the idea that slavery was not such a bad thing as folks of color had to continue to put up with such stuff in public places – LIKE Jefferson Davis Highway. How long has it
            taken to deal with that?

          4. Donald Smith Avatar
            Donald Smith

            Sorry, no sale here. If your side felt compelled to go into a cemetery and tear down a memorial that the Grand Army of the Republic and President William McKinley were willing to allow to be erected, that makes you look petty, thin-skinned and emotionally and culturally brittle.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            Nope. UDC monuments are not legitimate. They were put up as part of Jim Crow white supremacy and need to go away in more than a few people’s view including the military. “Thin skinned” is being insensitive to what such monuments mean to people of color and getting butt hurt when reality bites.

          6. Donald Smith Avatar
            Donald Smith

            “‘Thin skinned’ is being insensitive to what such monuments mean to people of color and getting butt hurt when reality bites.”

            Actually, I’ve lost count of the number of times that SCV members have told me that black people have told them, that the ones most butt-hurt by the monuments are progressive whites who can’t help patronizing people of color, and using their “sensitivity” as a chance to virtue-signal.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar

            Oh… you’ve heard from folks you know that black folks they know are not themselves concerned about
            jim crow, white supremacy UDC, and now whitewashing of history?

            I guess I’d be surprised that folks who openly support Jim Crow/White Supremacy monuments would
            actually “know” and be friends with blacks folks if those folks knew the white folks were supporters
            of Jim Crow monuments.

            Same black folks reject BLM?

            Call me skeptical.

            Most of the black folks I KNOW , tell me that Jim Crow and White Supremacy and all that is not cool… at all
            and that racism and white supremacy is STILL a problem in the US despite claims that it’s all “behind” us.

          8. Not Today Avatar

            Never mind the ACTUAL black folks with ACTUAL black families, that can and do speak for themselves RIGHT HERE, lol.

          9. LarrytheG Avatar

            I have black friends I talk to….. 😉

            and they tell me that BLM is a made-up thing from white progressives as is all this rot about Jim Crow and White Supremacy…..

          10. Not Today Avatar

            Imagine thinking that two degrees of hearsay gets you anywhere near the truth.

            Mr. Smith and his confederate friends would do well to spend more time with fact and first-hand accounts vs. conjecture:

            https://studycivilwar.wordpress.com/

          11. Larry, you are the one trying to claim the point of war memorials are to push white supremacy when the intent was always to remember those who died.

          12. LarrytheG Avatar

            I’m not claiming it Carol. It’s well known documented history. The INTENT of the UDC memorials was associated with Jim Crow:

            https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/united-daughters-of-the-confederacy/

          13. Chip Gibson Avatar
            Chip Gibson

            The fact that folks you know state an opinion does not constitute valid standing.

          14. Chip Gibson Avatar
            Chip Gibson

            Not Legitimate? That would be shallow and self-serving opinion.

          15. Donald Smith Avatar
            Donald Smith

            “nope. if it’s not a UDC lost cause, it’s safe…”

            And, pray tell, what qualifies you and your side to decide what is a Lost Cause monument or not? Your superior intellect?

            Larry, I think a growing number of Americans are getting heartily sick at the arrogance and thin skin of today’s progressives. No one wants to take cultural guidance from emotionally and culturally brittle people.

          16. LarrytheG Avatar

            pretty easy to see the actual history who had a hand in it… no? You know, that “history” ya’ll are always talking about.

            “arrogance” is pretending otherwise.

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f32e76e6103d3497ec410bbb8b298af1fe782b2092b3c2299fb4adb61724c787.png

          17. Donald Smith Avatar
            Donald Smith

            That’s a mighty-fine looking picture, with some lovely and proud ladies. Thanks for sharing, Larry.

          18. LarrytheG Avatar

            Hey – do you think that black folks that support BLM might also have opinions about UDC/Jim Crow memorials?

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a1469e9dfc721d6227eb3595edccea5cc6d6a2cc0b7c8356c6a8247753bbc395.png

          19. Chip Gibson Avatar
            Chip Gibson

            BLM is a terrorist organization. Not concerned with opinion from such a source.

          20. Chip Gibson Avatar
            Chip Gibson

            Indeed, Sir.

          21. Donald Smith Avatar
            Donald Smith

            You know, you’re welcome to submit an article for the front page. You spend a lot of time ankle-biting in the comments, so you obviously have interest in this site. I triple dog dare you to write an article yourself. Or would that trigger you? (Or whoever writes your code?)

          22. LarrytheG Avatar

            “trigger” … jeeze.. naw.. I just think stuff that reveres Jim Crow memorials needs some rebuttal from time to time.

            We keep yammering that all that racism stuff is “behind” us as we insist on keeping memorials, streets, schools, Army bases , buildings, etc named for Confederates, traitors, segregationists and racists.. and it’s past time we got rid of those symbols of Jim Crow and white supremacy IMO. I want to tell you that I live pretty close to Bloody Angle and it has a number
            of memorials in it, most of them to soldiers and not a single guy on a horse or anything like that UDC monstrosity in
            Arlington and not a single one has been defaced, damaged or torn down because none of them are overt symbols
            of white supremacy but simply memorials to those who lost their life on that battlefield. As it should be.

          23. Chip Gibson Avatar
            Chip Gibson

            Careful who you label a traitor, my friend. When you publicly insult the ancestors of a Southern Gentlemen, you risk greatly.

          24. Larry, Try reading what Arlington Cemetery had to say about the significance and history. Posting a paragraph, but there is much more that undercuts your false narrative. Read all of it.
            Section 16 https://www.arlingtoncemetery.mil/Explore/Monuments-and-Memorials/Confederate-Memorial

            The history of the Confederate Memorial embodies the complex and contested legacy of the Civil War at Arlington National Cemetery, and in American culture generally.

            In 1900, Congress authorized Confederate remains to be reinterred at Arlington National Cemetery, which designated a special section for them (in what is now Section 16). The Confederate Memorial was erected there in 1914. By the early 1900s, it had become tradition to establish a new section at Arlington for the dead from a particular war, followed by a commemorative monument. In Section 22, where many soldiers and sailors from the Spanish-American War are buried, the Spanish-American War Monument and the Rough Riders Monument memorialize that conflict. After fallen World War I service members were repatriated and buried in Sections 18 and 19, the Argonne Cross was dedicated in Section 18. In this sense, the creation of a Confederate section and memorial followed customary practice at Arlington.

          25. LarrytheG Avatar

            I’ve read it before and except this here:

            ” Unveiled in 1914, the Confederate Memorial was designed by noted American sculptor Moses Jacob Ezekiel, a Confederate veteran and the first Jewish graduate of Virginia Military Institute. The elaborately designed monument offers a nostalgic, mythologized vision of the Confederacy, including highly sanitized depictions of slavery. Standing on a 32-foot-tall pedestal, a bronze, classical female figure, crowned with olive leaves, represents the American South. She holds a laurel wreath, a plow stock and a pruning hook, with a Biblical inscription at her feet: “They have beat their swords into plough-shares and their spears into pruning hooks.” The statue stands on a pedestal with four cinerary urns, one for each year of the war, and is supported by a frieze with 14 shields, one for each of the 11 Confederate states and the border states of Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri. Thirty-two life-sized figures depict mythical gods alongside Southern soldiers and civilians.

            Two of these figures are portrayed as African American: an enslaved woman depicted as a “Mammy,” holding the infant child of a white officer, and an enslaved man following his owner to war. An inscription of the Latin phrase “Victrix causa diis placuit sed victa Caton” (“The victorious cause was pleasing to the gods, but the lost cause to Cato”) construes the South’s secession as a noble “Lost Cause.” This narrative of the Lost Cause, which romanticized the pre-Civil War South and denied the horrors of slavery, fueled white backlash against Reconstruction and the rights that the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments (1865-1870) had granted to African Americans. The image of the faithful slave, embodied in the two figures on the memorial, appeared widely in American popular culture during the 1910s through 1930s, perhaps most famously in the 1939 film “Gone with the Wind.””

            Have YOU “tried: reading other accounts, including the Wiki:

            “Position of Moses Jacob Ezekiel’s descendants
            In 2017, after the violence at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, gave additional impetus to the removal of Confederate monuments and memorials, a number of descendants of the monument’s sculptor Moses Jacob Ezekiel wrote a letter to The Washington Post calling for the monument to be removed:[203]

            Like most such monuments, this statue intended to rewrite history to justify the Confederacy and the subsequent racist Jim Crow laws. It glorifies the fight to own human beings, and, in its portrayal of African Americans, implies their collusion. As proud as our family may be of Moses’s artistic prowess, we—some twenty Ezekiels—say remove that statue. Take it out of its honored spot in Arlington National Cemetery and put it in a museum that makes clear its oppressive history.[204][205]”

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederate_Memorial_(Arlington_National_Cemetery)

          26. Nothing saying the descendants aren’t typical liberals.

          27. LarrytheG Avatar

            nothing saying they’re dealing with the truth much more honestly than others and way better than “typical” conservatives.

          28. Not Today Avatar

            Sooo, their opinion as descendants of the man depicted is irrelevant because… they don’t support the lost cause myth? Nice.

          29. Chip Gibson Avatar
            Chip Gibson

            Wiki….? In the context of history?

          30. Chip Gibson Avatar
            Chip Gibson

            Indeed, a fine photo.

          31. Chip Gibson Avatar
            Chip Gibson

            Agreed, Sir. Thou hast pricked the pit of evidence so well cloistered by progressivism. Perhaps, cultural covetousness might better describe the scene and motive?

      2. Donald Smith Avatar
        Donald Smith

        The victimhood and butthurt is strong with you, I see. But, then again, what’s new?

  6. CAPT Jake Avatar

    Glenn Reynolds is wrong. The southern states did not rise up against the federal government. The several southern states seceded from the union aka, the United States. See, this is a major problem when people interpret what happened. I’m confident his remarks are an unintentional characterization of what occurred. However, as presented he implies the several southern states combatively left the union. No. The state’s legislative and executive branches made conscious decisions to secede (Oxford: “withdraw formally from membership of a federal union”). These states thought, variously, they held the Constitutional right to do so and knew the country’s forefathers had similarly seceded from Great Britain. Following the state of S. Carolina’s firing on and capture of the federally-controlled Ft. Sumter (which SC naturally considered a part of the state), Lincoln called for troops to compel the several states to return to the union. Instead he alienated Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas, and North Carolina who seceded and joined the Confederacy.

    1. Chip Gibson Avatar
      Chip Gibson

      You have summarized the beginning of the conflict well, Sir. Compliments and thanks. This record is all documented through multitudes of historical documentations; however, those who desire to seed division and seek advantage have distorted the truths within. We must learn from the tragedy of this cruel war – preserve the clear lessons, not misrepresent its origins and end.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        is this timeline correct?

        December 20, 1860 South Carolina secedes
        Mississippi – January 9, 1861.
        Florida – January 10, 1861.
        Alabama – January 11, 1861.
        Georgia – January 19, 1861.
        Louisiana – January 26, 1861.
        Texas – February 1, 1861
        April 12, 1861 Fort Sumter
        April 15, 1861 Lincoln declares war
        April 17, 1861 Virginia Succeeds
        July 21, 1861 First Battle, Bull Run

        1. Virginia succeeds?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            yeah, got that spelling wrong …

            but what about the timeline? Is it correct?

        2. CAPT Jake Avatar

          Your dates are correct.
          However, the first battle of Bull Run is inappropriately titled.
          Down here in the Old Dominion it is known as the First Battle of Manassas. Confederates tended to name battles after nearby towns while the Federals tended to name battles for nearby rivers or creeks (ex. CSA = Sharpsburg vs. USA = Antietam).

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            So the South was able to well-equip their military to be able to go north and win that battle in that timeframe between the declaration of war and the first battle?

          2. CAPT Jake Avatar

            One can never predict who will “win” a battle or a war. History is replete with examples.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            Yep, but how long
            Between first state suseding and first battle? Prep time?

          4. CAPT Jake Avatar

            First state seceding and first battle?
            a) 12/20/1860 to 4/12/1861
            b) 12/20/1860 to 7/21/1861
            c) 12/20/1860 to 5/10/1861*
            d) other
            Your call.
            Prep time? You get what you get. You always want more. The enemy gets a vote.
            *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_Jackson_affair

Leave a Reply