Confessions of a Buffalo Hunter

wingfieldby Greg Wingfield

Hello, my name is Greg and I was a Buffalo Hunter for more than 35 years.

In economic development parlance a “buffalo hunter” is a marketing professional who is only after the “big game” — the hundred-million-dollars-in- capital-investment/1,000-new-jobs economic development projects that are rare and far between.

Over 35 years I had my share of wins, but could my time and the funding provided have been better used in ways that generated more return on the resources provided?

For instance, could retention of existing business in the region been better focused and more resources provided? Probably, as traditionally only a small percentage of funds are devoted to “keeping the existing clients happy.”

Could new business formation been more fully explored and coordinated in the metro Richmond area? Absolutely. There were and still are several great accelerators, business incubators and venture capital entities concentrating on this effort, but most of the work is done in silos.

So, when did I see the light, find the new economic development “religion,” and start to propagate it? Sadly, late in my economic development career. It wasn’t until I retired and had the time to explore other economic development job and capital-investment options without the pressures of board oversight and investors to satisfy.

Let me be clear, an ideal economic development program needs to attract new business to a community. But like a three legged stool, it also needs to retain existing businesses and help create new business formation.

So where is my “burning bush?” I believe the greatest economic development value add is assisting the community’s existing businesses to export their goods and services beyond the U.S. borders.

When I was hired as a fellow in Virginia Commonwealth University’s Wilder School in the summer of 2015, my charge through the Center of Urban and Regional Analysis (CURA) was to work with all the partners, allies, local governments, chambers of commerce, state and federal agencies that had a stake in promoting exports, to create a Metropolitan Richmond Export Initiative (MREI).

The rationale was compelling. The share of foreign direct investment entering the U.S. was in steady decline, falling from 45% in 1984, to just 12% in 2012. Eighty-one percent of the potential demand for American products comes from outside the U.S. Finally, as a region, we were under performing compared to the national Metro export average.

CURA, working with the Brookings Global Cities Initiative, identified five other regions we benchmarked ourselves against. We received funding to begin the planning of the MREI through a grant from J P Morgan Chase (JPMC) in the summer of 2015. CURA then surveyed local businesses, interviewed local stakeholders, undertook focus groups in order to create a draft plan or “Straw Man” for all the stakeholders to critique and provide feedback on.

This process proceeded throughout the fall into the winter and in March 2016 we rolled out our third community-wide export initiative meeting. In that meeting we unveiled the MREI Goal and Metrics for metro-wide comments and feedback.

The goal is simple but aggressive: Increase export success of small and medium enterprises by 40% by 2020.

We will measure success through the number of exporting companies that enter new foreign markets, companies that export for the first time, and product innovations and patents by firms in the metro area.

Implementation of the MREI kicked off September 8th and the region’s two economic development partners are now co-leads as a series of new export training courses are being designed, grants to businesses formulated, a new web site to be created and MREI marketing materials to be prepared.

The MREI was the first in Virginia to be created and could be a model for other regions to follow as they look for longer term more sustainable models for economic development.

To read the MREI document, please look here.

Greg Wingfield, the recently retired president of the Greater Richmond Partnership, is a senior fellow at Virginia Commonwealth University’s Center for Urban and Regional Analysis at the L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “Confessions of a Buffalo Hunter”

  1. AuerDrive Avatar

    Greg: your exceptional history as a buffalo-hunter is undisputed. Your professional growth in acknowledging the importance of creating/implementing programs and policies that support retention, expansion and trade is welcomed, and significant for all of us in this profession.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    If you want to export to other countries – won’t those countries expect us to accept their goods to be imported?

    when you do that – and THEIR labor costs are cheaper – how do we keep our own companies from then moving their operations to the cheaper labor country and exporting to us?

  3. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Yep, growing exports – winning strategy. Now if I want that to continue, which of the two Major Party Disappointments do a I vote for? Aren’t they both in a competition to prove which is the more protectionist? (And the comment above shows it’s because Larry the G must be on the advisory group for one of them….)

    Yes, Larry, if we want free trade rights to sell to them they will demand free trade rights to sell back to us. And that will be a good outcome. We’ve been a maritime, exporting nation since the Virginia Company started us as a commercial colony, not a political experiment…..

  4. LarrytheG Avatar

    re: ” Larry the G must be the advisory group for one of them”

    nope… it was an open question.. I too hear the two candidates and how NAFTA took our jobs and the TPP will take even more…

    but at the simple level – if we want to sell anything to other countries -they’re going to want to get the same reverse deal.

    how you get this simple truth – into the political fray seems not an easy thing… and I have to say – so many potential voters who don’t understand this simple concept and instead believe we can export but not import to “keep our jobs” … well.. it seems a totally ignorant thing… that apparently no one actually wants to come out and admit.

    The folks that supported NAFTA and then TPP – understood that basic quid-pro-quo concept… and it was a no-brainer… now.. anyone who supports TPP is an enemy of America and it’s jobs, apparently.

    here we have a major issue in the election – and we can’t seem to admit the truth for fear of losing votes…. we’ve sure gone downhill…

  5. Maybe I should be paying more attention to reading these blogs instead of looking for a retirement homestead in foreign countries and remote red neck enclaves. But it occurred to me to ask a simple question.

    If all these exporting countries are doing the NAFTA/TPP quid pro quo, shouldn’t our exports be closer to our imports? I only ask because in my wandering around I keep finding these little back alley shops in places like Hong Kong and elsewhere that are really good at hand making just about any item a Richmond small business might want to sell overseas.

    Then I look at this foreign owned Bud Light in my hand and wonder if maybe the reality of global trade is Go Big or Stay Home? Maybe the only living thing on the Global Plain… is Buffalo.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar

    re: trade deficit –

    http://cdn.tradingeconomics.com/charts/united-states-balance-of-trade.png?s=ustbtot&v=201609081917o

    what we need to sell more of is not the same things that we’d buy from overseas – but things we make that they don’t or can’t – as well or as good.

    but also – for things we are also in competition with other OECD countries and we are top-heavy with people with 20th century manufacturing grade skills and education who are, without re-training, not able to out-compete globally to build/create 21st century products and services.

    In other words – we have too many folks who got and relied on 20th century manufacturing jobs – and when those jobs went away – they had no alternative skills…

    And it’s not just jobs overseas – it’s robots, automation, “industry” in this country that is front-loaded with required expertise in moving and manipulating data, information, knowledge.

    watching robots welding a thousand points on a rotating car chassis on “How it’s Made” is equal parts mesmerizing, boring, .. and terrifying in terms of realizing that that one bot is doing what a team of 20-40 workers used to to and the end product is …better.

    It’s not the fault of the workers – all of this changed much more rapidly than prior generations… but the simple reality is protectionist trade policies won’t fix it.

    We have to have better education and skills… if we want to compete and get our share of 21st century jobs… and it’s no longer feasible to get a high school education and go look for a manufacturing job.

    the easy paths to a lifelong career are no more… you gotta have a solid basic core education and the you gotta layer onto that some significant value-added higher ED….. or be stranded….

    Note that high paid jobs right now – go begging… and employers end up importing labor… from other countries.. that should not be
    but again shutting off trade of products nor labor will fix our problem… companies that can’t get good labor – leave… and go to where they can – also – just like manufacturing except we can keep the high tech jobs if we have the labor force to do it.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar

    Of course a good question might be is it the fault/responsibility of the govt to do something about the advance of technology and requirement for higher and higher education levels in the “free market”?

    Is it the responsibility of the govt to “protect” workers from the “free market” or should the govt stand back and let the free market work?

  8. Thank you, Greg, for your observations from deep experience. Obviously free trade policies support that export leg of your three-legged stool. And yes LG, I certainly agree education is the key response to job dislocations from free trade.

    But Darrel’s question is a good one. And I’ll go one further: is the TPP itself a good deal, from Greg’s and Darrel’s point of view? Because it ain’t over yet for us to push for more Asian trade generally and for the TPP specifically while Obama is still in office.

Leave a Reply