Complex Digital Sales Tax Worthy of Veto

By Steve Haner

Pick any member of the General Assembly at random, stop them in the grocery store for a chat, and quiz them about the digital sales tax they approved a week ago Saturday.  It will quickly become clear that most had no idea what they were voting for when they approved it.

What will the tax add to the cost of your Amazon Prime or Netflix? (For most, 6-7%.) Will the tax be collected on both the monthly fee and on anything extra you download (Yes) Will it add to the cost of preparing your tax to file online, your annual lease for Microsoft programs on your laptop or your security system program? (Yes, most digitally-based services will all be taxable to individuals, and many of them will be taxable to businesses. If you are doing something on a computer or phone that costs money, it is likely to become taxable.) 

Even for a business, if some software package its employees use includes a combination of online services, will it owe tax on the entire package? (Yes, unless the vendor is willing to break apart the bill, which many may refuse to do. That is because of the new language about taxing bundled services.)  If an out of state vendor does not add tax to the invoice, taxpayers will be required to calculate and pay it as a use tax, with auditors ready to pounce if they don’t.   

Think of engineering, law, banking, or medicine.  So many of their processes are now controlled by expensive software, most of which is about to be 6-7% more expensive.  At the shipyard in Newport News, paper blueprints and printed job instructions were replaced with tablets and digital design programs years ago.  

Estimated fiscal year tax collections (in millions of dollars) from the digital sales tax language in the proposed budget. Source: Office of the Governor

While not all digital services are taxed to businesses, are they also exempt from tax on the “digital personal property” roped into the sales tax law with a new definition? (No, most existing sales tax exemptions mention “tangible personal property” only.  And if tangible property is bundled with digital items, the new rules on bundled transaction may override the old exemptions. 

The fact that legislators are truly clueless on these tax issues should not surprise anyone. Tax professionals are still pondering the meaning of several provisions of the final language, some of which appeared for the first time only 48 hours before the vote. 

An army of stakeholders, lawyers, and lobbyists will spend months fighting over the regulatory guidelines which will provide crucial details. As is always the case with this inside game, if you are not at the table, you are on the menu. Who will be speaking up for the average consumer?  

Fortunately for Virginians, Governor Glenn Youngkin (R) seems determined to reverse the vote and keep the new tax out of your pockets. Unfortunately for Virginians, if the Democratic majority that voted for this without understanding it stands firm, he may have to veto the entire $190 billion state budget to wipe out this one $2 billion tax hike. 

So be it. Vetoing the entire budget is about the most drastic thing a Governor can do, but experience has proven the state can adopt a budget as late as May or June and still function when the new fiscal year begins on July 1.  The sooner serious negotiations begin, the better. 

This one tax policy change probably extracts as much or more cash from Virginians than all of the various tax increases the previous Democratic majority imposed four years ago. It may exceed the major tax package approved under Governor Mark Warner (D) exactly twenty years ago, which had stronger bipartisan support.   

The oftenlethargic business community is finally waking up.  The Virginia Chamber of Commerce issued a rare call to action to its membership March 15, available to anyone on its public website, asking for a veto of this new tax.

If anything, the Youngkin Administration’s estimate that the tax will cost Virginians $2 billion in its first two years is conservative. The current estimate is that once the tax is fully in force, the annual take will exceed $1.5 billion, or $3 billion per biennial budget.  The money goes into several government pots but comes out of just one pocket – yours.  

The other major tax increase buried in the budget opposed by Governor Youngkin is the revival of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, the electricity carbon tax Virginia quit RGGI in 2023 but the majority Democrats demand that Virginia rejoin. If this mandate stands, and if the other states of the regional CO2 allowance marketplace allow Virginia to come back, Youngkin is claiming that will be another $300 million per year. 

Again, that future RGGI tax amount may be a major underestimate. In 2023, Virginia sold $304 million in CO2 allowances based on the auction prices that year.  An auction held last week (with Virginia not participating) set a record carbon tax price of $16 per ton. That price was up 28% in one year and an amazing 111% since Virginia first imposed the tax in 2021.  

Yes, the carbon tax more than doubled in just three years. The goal of the capandtrade process is to drive up the carbon tax to higher and higher levels.  By the end of another three-year RGGI contract period, $500 million per year in Virginia carbon tax receipts will be easy to reach.  And our power grid will still rely on coal and natural gas.  

The General Assembly is banking on your apathy.  Speak up now or hold your peace and open your wallet.  

First published this morning by the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

27 responses to “Complex Digital Sales Tax Worthy of Veto”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Here is the danger of that bundled transaction provision. Say a financial advisor as part of the service gives the client access to a nice financial tracking and planning tool online. Will the inclusion of that in the fee trigger the tax on the entire advisory fee? The way I read it, it could.

  2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    We need more competent people advising delegates who vote and governors who veto!

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    This issue is a perfect example of why tax measures should not be included in the budget bill. It is doubly true for tax provisions that break new ground. As you ably demonstrate, this stuff is complicated. The policy, along with the precise wording, needs to be thoroughly vetted and discussed so that its ramifications are clear, rather than dumped into the budget bill at the last moment. Everyone was so focussed on the drama surrounding the fate of a proposed arena for professional sports teams that little attention was paid to the implications of this provision.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      The tax bills and stadium proposal were also covered with regular legislation, but when those died the budget became the vehicle. Perhaps following up on your column yesterday, the time is ripe for a Virginia Supreme Court case that imposes some rational limits on this process.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        You are right. Watts had a bill extending the sales tax to numerous enumerated services, including digital. The bill did not make it out the subcommittee of the full committee she chaired. Bless her for trying to have a serious discussion of tax policy when no one else, even members of her own party, are not willing.

        As for the stadium bills, Lucas would not even bring them up in her committee. Whether she genuinely opposed the bills on principle or initially wanted to use the issue as leverage for her priorities, I don’t kmow.

        I agree with you. The time is ripe for the Supreme Court to weigh in on this practice of using the budget bill for riders that may not get approved otherwise. It is up to Youngkin whether that happens.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Interesting WaPo article on the “skill” games and how the legislative process is continuing…

          I would imagine that few people outside the lobbyists and some selective legislators can “keep up” with the changing environment:

          https://wapo.st/3THWPzg

          1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            Lots of wheels turning.

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Do we really want the courts to tell the legislative branch how to legislate?

          1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            The state constitution tells them how to legislate. The Court has struck down laws in the past because they did not follow the constiution. I would guess that the Court would like to avoid it.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    As the economy shifts more and more to online and away from physical, it makes sense to adapt the tax policy to that shift.

    The how and why, etc, et al, is indeed a mystery to the average taxpayer as is it to most legislators also, not just for this – it’s not uncommon at all.

    I’d ask folks, where did 911 come from and how is it funded and did you know when the changes were made to tax you for it?

    Ditto for the portion of the sales tax that goes to VDOT. When did you know that happened and for what amount both in terms of taxes to you and total amount that VDOT gets from it?

    You can go on and on through the numbers but neither the average taxpayer nor the average legislator has that good a “grasp” on the issue.

    There are leaders and movers and shakers in the GA, and the rest are followers for the most part IMO.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      You have a valid point. The economy has shifted more to services and it may be time to start applying the sales tax to services. But that is a major shift in policy and should be debated in full, not stuck on the end of the budget bill, with very little debate.

      As for the two examples you provided, the issue is not whether people remember now how they were enacted. The issue is whether they were enacted in a manner in which legislators and citizens knew what was being considered and the ramifications of the proposals.

      The 911 surtax was enacted in 2000, with SB 148. That bill went through the entire legislative process: consideration by the full Senate committee with a substitute, consideration by the full Senate, with floor amendments being proposed and then full consideration in House commitee and the full House. The Governor even sent it back with a proposed amendment, which the Senate rejected.

      As for the portion of the sales tax going to Transportation, that too was part of a separate bill dealing with transportation that got a good deal of publicity. All the legislators were aware of what they were doing. They could have voted against it without voting agains the entire budget.

      The half-cent sales tax that goes to transportation was part of the package of tax increases for transportation passed during the Baliles administration in a special session of the General Assembly called for that purpose. The legislators and the public certainly knew what was being considered and acted upon.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        How about the more recent highway user fee?

        Or the tax on auto insurance premiums?

        or the regional transportation authority tax?

        My premise is that many average taxpayers know little about these taxes unless they’re in the media reports.

        You do and can find out but I bet if you asked 100 people when/where/how the 911 tax got done, they’d not have a clue. Some would say “what tax”? 😉

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          You sound almost like Steve Haner–pointing out the “small” taxes that add up.

          I agree with you. Most people have neither the time or interest to follow the legislature closely.It is harder now that the media coverage of the GA is not as extensive as it once was. However, the instiutional guardrails and tools are available–the constitutional requirement for transparency in bill titles, laws preventing GA committees from meeting in secret, the LIS that enables any citizen with a computer to read any bill introduced, the video coverage of committee meetings and floor session–that enable citizens to be as informed as they want to be.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I’m not from the all taxes (and fees) are bad school like Haner is.

            I just point out that such different kinds of fees and taxes are pretty normal and for quite a long time.

            But I also point out that trying to “follow” the legislative process can be pretty frustrating and futile because often all the zigs and zags and final outcome is far from transparent and trackable by LIS or Richmond Sunlight (which motivated LIS to be better than it used to be).

            Finally, I point out an example. Most people take 911 for granted and actually EXPECT it to be there for them but who wonders or cares about how it is paid for? And it DOES have to be paid for!

            So how? Should the legislature go out and poll people about it and then follow their preferences?

            Or would it turn into a huge political mess and stalemate that would take monumental efforts to untangle and move forward?

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Which is why there is this nice gap of several weeks between Sine Die and the Veto Session. Time to at least wake up a few people. 🙂

  5. Tax professionals are still pondering the meaning of several provisions of the final language, some of which appeared for the first time only 48 hours before the vote.

    If I served in the Virginia General Assembly, it would be my policy, and I would consider it my duty, to vote against any bill in which major revisions were proposed on such short notice. Give me adequate time to thoroughly review and understand “last-minute” revisions to your bill or plan on me voting against it.

    Otherwise, I would not be able to claim with a straight face that I was upholding my oath of office.

    1. Irene Leech Avatar
      Irene Leech

      BUT getting 48 hours minimum is pretty new and pretty much every day they are asked to vote on things they didn’t know about in advance. Sometimes amendments are made just prior to the vote.

      Our General Assembly prides itself on not being in session very long. To truly consider every idea that’s raised, we’d have to extend the session.

      Since our procedures were established before it was easy to get multiple copies, each bill is “read” three times. If we were to start fresh today, we’d likely get even less time to consider issues before voting.

      1. To truly consider every idea that’s raised, we’d have to extend the session.

        Or discuss fewer ideas, at greater length, during each session. Just because they can pass laws willy-nilly does not mean they must pass laws willy-nilly.

        If we were to start fresh today, we’d likely get even less time to consider issues before voting.

        Please don’t tell me you think this is a good thing.

        PS – I was referring to major last minute revisions in my original comment.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          I always thought the last part about conference committee voting – interesting.

          Changes made on multiple things sometimes and then the whole package is sent to the rest of the GA to vote on – up on down – one vote – no more debates or voting on individual items… just the final package up or down.

          1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            Debate is allowed on conference committee reports. But you are right; in the end, the vote is on the whole package, up or down.

  6. Super Brain Avatar
    Super Brain

    The GA misses Walter Stosch. There is one CPA there who is from Roanoke. He is more partisan than effective.
    This is another example of the lack of time for effective legislation. Title 58.1 of the Code needs to be updated to reflect modern commerce.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Another CPA was Kevin Miller, quieter but equally as smart as his brother Clint. Fewer and fewer in the Assembly have real business experience, either. It shows.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Being a CPA does not automatically make someone good at legislative budgets or public finance. Developing a budget is more about policy than it is numbers.

      For example, two of the most effective money chairmen in recent times were Sen. John Chichester (R-Stafford) and Del. Chris Jones (R-Suffolk). Chichester was an insurance broker and Jones was a pharmacist.

    3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Being a CPA does not automatically make someone good at legislative budgets or public finance. Developing a budget is more about policy than it is numbers.

      For example, two of the most effective money chairmen in recent times were Sen. John Chichester (R-Stafford) and Del. Chris Jones (R-Suffolk). Chichester was an insurance broker and Jones was a pharmacist.

  7. Irene Leech Avatar
    Irene Leech

    In fairness, wasn’t the digital tax just included in the total budget, not addressed as a standalone bill that made it to both floors? Our practice of only voting the budget up or down and preferring that questions not be raised before the vote, makes it a bit easier to understand legislators not knowing what they passed.

    1. That being the case, “we” need to change “our” practice.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      The sales tax on digital services was addressed in a standalone bill, but it did not get out of committee in the House.

      Proposed amendments to the budget may be considered separtely in each house when it is considering its version of the bill. Those amendments are then subject to an individual vote, but it is rare that an amendment proposed by House Appropriations or Senate Finance is defeated on the floor.

      Members, and the governor, include provisions in the budget bill that could be considered as separate bills often because their passage is more likely when they are included in the budget than if considered separately.

Leave a Reply