Coming Soon to a School Near You: “Equitable Grading”

by James A. Bacon

The inexorable logic of “equity” has come to the dispensing of grades in Virginia public schools. Having effectively abandoned the hard work of raising the educational achievement of minority students, Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS) is lowering standards — implementing “equitable grading” practices in order to combat “institutional bias” and eliminate racial disparities in grade outcomes, reports the Washington Examiner.

What does this mean in practice? Removing grade penalties for late assignments. Allowing students to retake tests and redo assignments. Eliminating zeros as grades and setting a grade floor of 50 on a 1-to-100 scale, even if the student never submits the assignment.

Incredibly, advocates of equitable grading contend that it can promote learning and improve educational outcomes. “Despite what some might posit, this change has resulted in real increases in student learning and not masking a lack of learning,” said the FCPS High School Principals’ Association in a June 14 letter to outgoing Superintendent Scott Braband.

The Fairfax County Parents’ Association begs to differ.

“When you discard points and grades, you also discard objective measures of learning, thereby allowing people to claim learning has happened when it has not,” the group told the Examiner. “It once again raises the question of whether FCPS is committed to providing students with a high-quality, rigorous education, or whether their goal is simply making it look like students are receiving a high-quality, rigorous education.”

The parents’ group described the initiative an “unresearched experiment being run on our kids that is the product of a discussion where opposing views were shut out and interest groups citing thin empirical evidence reached a consensus.”

According to the Examiner, school officials have been less than candid with parents about the changes, which have been working their way through the school system for years.

The Principals’ letter to Braband provides the following narrative:

Many of us who work in FCPS remember when Ken O’Connor’s 15 Fixes for Broken Grades was published [in 2011], FCPS created numerous professional development opportunities for school leaders and teachers to begin reimagining their grading practices and ridding our school system of 150 year-old schools of thought around grading and assessment. In 2015, FCPS Instructional Services began to renovate our grading system to be more reflective of standard of equity in grading. That work, memorialized in regulation 2340.7p, made advances but stopped short of, for example, providing division-wide provision to allow students to earn the full grade reflective of what they earn on a retake rather than a ceiling of 80%.

Finally, the pandemic forced us to move forward an even stronger commitment to equity for our students with the unilateral implementation of a revised last-work policy that recognized the need to help students with their school-home balance, the removal of the zero, and the implementation of a 50-100 point scale. Again, the right work.

In May of 2021, HSPA committed to the next level of this work. This decision came as a result of the progress made with equitable grading practices in over 70% of our high schools…. We were intentional and inspired by the district’s overall focus on equity.

The letter goes on to describe how the principals’ association sent out teams of teachers to learn from colleagues at other schools, formed committees, conducted surveys, led focus groups, held meetings with stakeholders and had “informal discussions with school board members.”

Bacon’s bottom line: Fairfax County is not an outlier. I know for a fact that similar “equitable grading” practices were applied last year in Henrico County Public Schools. In all likelihood, they have been implemented in other “progressive” school districts as well.

Equitable grading is a travesty. It is the enemy of excellence. It is the ultimate expression of “the soft bigotry of low expectations.” Adopting this philosophy will harm the students it purports to help.

First, grades provide feedback to students and parents. How well is the student mastering the subject matter? Does he or she need to buckle down? Does he or she need help?

Second, by getting endless second chances, students learn to skate through school rather than applying themselves and working harder. They learn to feel entitled to passing grades for inadequate work. Much to their detriment, they will carry that expectation into the workforce.

As always, minority students will be hurt the most. They will learn that there are no consequences for slovenly work. They will learn habits that will hold them back in life. Unforgivable.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

73 responses to “Coming Soon to a School Near You: “Equitable Grading””

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    First of all, this is obviously not an impulsive move on the part of Fairfax County schools. And it is not a result of what you would call the current “woke” philosophy. The reexamination of the grading philosophy started over 10 years ago and new approaches have been implemented gradually.

    Grades are not being eliminated. So, the feedback is still there. As for “endless” second chances, is that really the policy, or is there a chance for just one re-take? And what is wrong with that? A student takes a test, does not do well. She has gotten feedback; she knows where her weak areas are in this material. She gets to retake the test (a different one, I presume) and she does well. If the goal is for the student to learn the material, that goal has been accomplished. The goal should be the learning, not the grade.

    The major change seems to be in the maximum score someone can get on a re-take. It used to be 80, but that cap is being lifted. That makes sense; if a student gets 95 percent of the questions correct on a test, his score should be 95, regardless of which test he took.

    By the way, re-taking tests is not a new practice. I can remember occasions in high school in which a large percentage of a class did not do well on a test and the teacher gave students the option of taking a re-test.

    1. This is obviously … not a result of what you would call the current “woke” philosophy.

      Dick, how can you say this when the philosophy is explicitly designed to advance “equity”? It’s called equitable grading!

      The woke philosophy didn’t spring wholly formed into the school system during the Northam administration. Progressive school systems have been increasingly concerned about “equity” for several years. Along with “equitable” grading, there also has been the preoccupation with “equitable” disciplinary practices.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        but were we CALLING it “woke” back when it began?

      2. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Equity, historically, was blended into the harshness of common law and statutory law to produce fairness. Historians note this woke principle dates to the 1800s. For this reason, the harshness of the death penalty has been nearly eliminated. Sentencing guidelines and judicial autonomy reflect equity. Unrelenting quantitative measurement is not the sole criterion for excellence. Learning and student progression to competence and more can succeed with equity.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          It’s a silly thing.

          We don’t hire only the very best lawyers or engineers.

          We hire the ones who have passed the minimum standards and they may well not be the best at everything.

          Ditto for other occupations like nursing or police officers or soldiers.

          And none of these professions give you one chance to pass and then you’re out of luck.

          The whole point is to keep learning until you do reach a level that is what you need to do that work.

          For kids coming up through the schools, you don’t want them to stop trying or quite just because they “failed” a test or even a course,

          Even folks who got “A”s in college flunked some courses or did badly at them.

          You want kids to keep trying over and over until they succeed.

          Even Robert E. Lee sucked at strategy at times.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            What’s truly silly is equating education and learning with employment access. Not only kids are involved in the continuing learning process. “Do overs” are in the great American tradition. Every reader and commenter on BR is engaged in that process. Occasionally, the authors too.

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            ““Do overs” are in the great American tradition.”

            Look at our last President’s golf game for instance (and his marriages and business practice now that I think about it…)

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Indeed. It’s like thinking that once the kid is finished with K-12 or College they are “done” with learning, the need to continue learning and achieving.

            It’s like thinking that once a football player achieves all the can at football that they’re done for the rest of their life.

            It’s a dumb way of thinking and that demonstrates a need for those that think that way to get better themselves.

          4. MisterChips Avatar
            MisterChips

            That’s a good point. I realized early in my career that low test grades were too harsh. I had a class policy 25 years ago that I would not give a grade less than 50 unless you refused to submit the assignment. A 50 is failing, 64 is passing in my system. If you have 2 tests per 4 week grading period and score a 20 on one and a 100 on the other you still won’t have a passing test average. Why bother? If I give you a 50 instead of a 20 you can at least get your grade up to passing if you try. A 78 on the next test would get you to a D average. If you don’t try and take another 50 then you fail. I think it gives hope without giving away the store. However, we may disagree about a grade of zero for not turning in an assignment. If you don’t turn in your work you deserve a zero and nothing more.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Thanks for your view!

            And you do recognize that not all kids , not all adults , learn and achieve or “fail” – it’s a continuum and some kids need more time to get situated.

            Used to be, we automatically thought some of these kids would get sorted out with a stint in the military.

            And some of them did!

            Others need other paths but to stigmatize them as “failures” before they ever get out of k-12 is harsh even though some probably deserve it.

      3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “Dick, how can you say this when the philosophy is explicitly designed to advance “equity”? It’s called equitable grading!”

        According to JAB, Aristotle was “woke”… perhaps he was at that…

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          indeed. Anyone who is not a knuckle-dragger is “woke” for sure.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar

      So, you’re suggesting that anyone who does not do homework or scores badly on tests has a disability and the solution is a group IEP without individual diagnosis to address the underlying disability? The plan for remediation is to limit the discredit for failure to do the work to 50 instead of 0, to allow retesting when tests are failed and to blame it all on inequity?

      With most disabilities it is relatively easy to describe the dysfunction, in this case failure to do required work, and/or testing failure. There are many different possible causes for most issues. Identifying them and resolving them is harder but crucial to achieving lasting behavior change. Fuzzing up the dysfunction through minimum grades, retesting and blaming inequity is a disservice to the kids. It avoids addressing the underlying issues.

      A fundamental requirement of rehabilitation/special ed is that the individual acknowledges the disability. Accepting that something is wrong has to happen before change can be accomplished. If disability is masked as inequity the student is shielded from the necessity to come to terms with the reality that something is wrong and thus has no reason to change dysfunctional behaviors.

      FCPS have profoundly failed their duty to their least able kids. JABs conclusions are right on target. His concluding sentence is the verdict:

      “They will learn that there are no consequences for slovenly work. They will learn habits that will hold them back in life. Unforgivable.”

    3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Mr. Dick it just doesn’t work. My last three years I had to deal with equitable grading practices. It really is endless second chances. Grades are not being eliminated but self-discipline is now meaningless. Why study the first time? Take the test. Figure out what is on it. Take it again. That is the mind set of many teenagers. We don’t have time to make 2 sets of tests all year long.

      Readiness and preparation are far more equitable practices for students to engage in.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        However many of those undisciplined teens figured out from the fist test the material for the second sound like they learned.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          “…fist test…” 😬

    4. I just do not get this, Dick. You say, ” A student takes a test, does not do well. She has gotten feedback; she knows where her weak areas are in this material. . . . The goal should be the learning, not the grade.” But what incentive does she have to try to study those weak areas and do better and thus learn from this experience, rather than simply conclude it doesn’t matter enough not to move on?

  2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    The goal should be the learning, not the grade.

    If this is true, and I believe it is, why have grades. Just tell me what he does and does not know or should know, as it has been taught, but still does not know.

    Grade equity– Really, well if you give a zero for missed homework, but the student scores a 98% on a unit test, the average could be a little less than 50. challenge me to learn not to earn.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      That was the story of my schooling, high test scores and 0s for turning in homework. I failed classes that scored homework and passed those grading based on tests. Fringe benefit, I got an early appreciation of irony.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Grading is a tough issue. Spent 23 years trying to figure out how to do it. There is no answer. Well, no great ones.

    Finally settled on a 10-pt scale with a 50-point minimum. When forced to implement +/- brackets, I settled on a 4-point “plus” bracket without a “minus” bracket. Yep, grade inflation. Too bad.

    Penalties for late or retake was 10 points. A letter grade is a crushing penalty even when averaged in.

    Finally, all girls who laughed at my jokes got “As”. Seemed fair.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      no matter size or shape or whatever?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Hey! That would be sexist!

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          did it include transgender?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I dunno. Could I tell?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            usually…. no?

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      What was it that John Houseman said in the Paper Chase? There are no final answers only more questions.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Nevertheless, he earned it…

    3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      In the old days one asked for (and often got) “extra credit” work to make up for bad grades. In the end it was up to the discretion of the teachers who got those opportunities and for how much. It seems to me the “equitable” version offers that opportunity to do “extra credit” to all in an equal basis and takes the “discretion” out of the equation… sure that will piss some people off…

    4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      In the old days one asked for (and often got) “extra credit” work to make up for bad grades. In the end it was up to the discretion of the teachers who got those opportunities and for how much. It seems to me the “equitable” version offers that opportunity to do “extra credit” to all in an equal basis and takes the “discretion” out of the equation… sure that will piss some people off…

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Think about this. A student who is struggling gets an “F” on a test. Instead of continuing with the next area they go back and re-study the material on the test they failed. How well are they going to do on the new material? Fail again, retake again and fall further behind? Unless they reform their approach to learning the student will just fall further and further behind. So, then the “equitable” approach will be to slow down teaching overall so that those who didn’t study the first time will be able to keep up as they re-take test after test.

    Thank goodness for the SOLs. That’s becoming the only real way that citizen – taxpayers can tell if children are really getting educated.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      naw… according to Youngkin, the SOLs are a dishonesty GAP!

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      The weakness of the SOLS? It’s the minimum standard. Why go beyond that in teaching if accelerated material is never even tested? Younkin should raise the bar for SOLS first chance he gets.

      I do get your point. At least we have something on paper for every kid. Important feedback for citizens and parents.

      1. MisterChips Avatar
        MisterChips

        Youngkin should abolish SOLs and replace them with a better tool to measure learning. A simple test in 5th, 8th and 12th grades would tell you if the schools are generally successful at teaching a minimum standard.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          “A simple test in 5th, 8th and 12th grades” would only memorialize what the kids have or have not learned. They will be far too late to changed the arcs of the failed kids.

          1. MisterChips Avatar
            MisterChips

            True. However, that’s exactly what happens now, at least in high school. I can’t speak to the whole state but in my high school a student who scores a 400(lowest passing score) in Algebra 1 and passed the course will move on to Geometry being extremely weak in Algebra and all the SOL test does is memorialize that fact. It will still fall on the Geometry teacher to correct (hopefully) those deficiencies as best they can in the limited time while preparing for the Geometry SOL. Most Geometry teachers will not have the time or desire to go back and research Algebra 1 SOL scores for each of their students. The algebra deficiencies will be obvious without the added work. It would be great if all teachers could spot those deficiencies and change the child’s course. That’s part of my point. We have a multi-billion dollar test program in Virginia which produces no more than what could be provided with a much simpler and cheaper test program. Furthermore, this whole discussion is beside the real point that the Algebra 1 SOL test environment is making students weaker in math regardless of whether they pass the SOL test.

    3. Lefty665 Avatar

      But then we renorm and lower the cut scores on SOLs too. So much for establishing a standard and holding to it. Equity you know, it’s all for equity.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        My oldest son went to FCPS, graduating in 2008, before this woke crap took hold. I’m now reduced to paying a small fortune to send my youngest son to a private school despite living in the Langley school district. I just can’t abide the idiocy going on in the FCPS. This county always had challenges like affordability and traffic congestion. However, the libtwits running the place have turned Fairfax County into blazing dumpster fire. I hope to get out before the housing prices in the county completely crash.

        Hopefully, Fairfax will serve as a warning to others in places like Florida and Texas – the libtwits coming in from places they defiled will not have learned their lessons from the places they ruined. They are a plague who will destroy wherever they form enough of the population to start calling the shots.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          Didn’t JAB write that fictional novel: Plague of Libwits? Report to us from Nirvana when you relocate.

        2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Wow! Langley High had the supreme reputation for rigor and academic excellence.

          The warnings are not heeded. A Texas school district hired Eric Williams, the wingnut who ruined Loudoun.

        3. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          According to JAB, “woke” has been going on for a long time but only lately have Conservatives been calling it out.

          Yes, you should move to a less progressive place. They need you! You’d then become the libtwit!

        4. Lefty665 Avatar

          “They are a plague who will destroy wherever they form enough of the population to start calling the shots.”

          Rather like locusts.

    4. MisterChips Avatar
      MisterChips

      This is the point of good teachers. If I see Larry failing I will offer to help reteach him so he will be ready for the next test and break the cycle. Most students don’t have Algebra problems, they have problems in 7th grade that don’t get fixed until they fail Algebra 1 four or five times and then give up because they think they suck at math. Unfortunately, there are way too many teachers who model the scenario you described. Test and move on. If Larry doesn’t accept help, that’s a different problem.

      You give the SOL’s too much credit. I apologize for sounding like a broken record. The SOLs are destroying education, not measuring it. I just got a new directive mandating the DAILY use of the state approved online calculator. It’s called Desmos if you want to learn about it. It’s a really great tool that is frequently abused to improve test scores. Too many schools are teaching Desmos and not math because Desmos is part of the math SOL tests. We are currently sacrificing the student’s understanding of math just so we can report higher SOL pass rates. It’s a scam. “Don’t teach math, teach them how to get the answer on the SOL test”.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Mister Chips – ” The SOLs are destroying education, not measuring it.”

        What would you do instead?

        1. MisterChips Avatar
          MisterChips

          Honestly, I’m not sure. I would certainly jump at the chance to sit down with you and 5 or 6 others on this forum and figure it out. It needs a thoughtful analysis. My instincts tell me that a simple test done in one sitting could tell you whether a school was doing its job, in general. I see it as a Fermi problem. I think something like a 2 hour GED type of test would do. Not a gatekeeper to graduation, Just a test given every year or every other year to see how the school is doing. It wouldn’t be perfect but it could paint enough of a picture to know whether the school is working. It kind of reminds me of the graduation rate calculations. In Virginia we have multiple methods for calculating graduation rate. OGR (On-time Graduation Rate), FGI (Federal Graduation Indicator), and GCI (Graduation Completion Index). Hundreds of people making rules and trying to come up with an accurate number using different algorithms. Just divide the number of graduates by the number of students and you get a graduation rate that will be close enough to evaluate the school. Principals with the authority and motivation to transfer poor teachers would be a help too. Testing is a strange thing. I’m generally not in favor.

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            “Just divide the number of graduates by the number of students and you get a graduation rate that will be close enough to evaluate the school.”

            Check out the standards for graduation now: https://doe.virginia.gov/instruction/graduation/credits/index.shtml#:~:text=To%20be%20eligible%20to%20earn%20locally%20awarded%20verified,an%20appeal%20process%20administered%20at%20the%20local%20level.

            “To be eligible to earn locally awarded verified credits in English, mathematics, science, or history/social science, a student must:

            – Pass the high school course,

            – Score within a 375-399 scale score range on any administration of the Standards of Learning test after taking the test at least twice, and

            – Demonstrate achievement in the academic content through an appeal process administered at the local level.”

            Seriously, under those rules it is impossible not to graduate if a kid just hangs around.

            How do you think that is being administered?

          2. MisterChips Avatar
            MisterChips

            It’s all a scam. Your observation is correct. We keep lowering the bar to the point that it’s almost impossible not to graduate if you hang around. We do that so the graduation rate can be as high as possible. My general observation is that schools have a higher graduation rate than they did 25 years ago but a much lower quality of graduate.
            The SOL program, including the LAVC (locally awarded verified credits), is nothing but a smoke screen to provide cover for our lower standards. Schools “look” good with a high pass rate on certain SOL tests and a high graduation rate but the learning isn’t there.
            I’m speaking in generalities here. I believe in public education and accountability. There are good and bad schools, many great teachers and some really brilliant students. My goal is to try and get some sunlight on the system so it can be improved for children and taxpayers.

  5. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Sound and fury!!! Seems to me grading on a curve is equitable grading by another name. If there is an “enemy of excellence” it’s absolutism, a criterion unachievable by most. Once the ends of the curve are determined, all else is relative, or equitable. Are not “endless second chances’ a traditional American value?

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Yes they are and that is why summer school was invented.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar

      Ooh! Thanks, it’s a Jim McCarthy excellence is unachievable by most Silly Walk.

      It depends on the subject. Almost all can be excellent in basic math and incompetent in quantum mechanics.

      “Are not “endless second chances’ a traditional American value?”

      Tell it to the families of the crew of the Challenger, or the soldiers at the airport in Kabul.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Excellent!!!

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          Thank you, you flatter me.

  6. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    FCPS has spent hundreds of millions of dollars over the years, including federal, state and local funds, trying to improve educational results of kids “at risk.” Schools with significant number of these students have smaller class sizes, extra support teachers (e.g., math and reading), more teacher aides, additional counselors and psychologists. The Division has experimented with year-round school for certain kids.

    I guess this means that they have failed and failed miserably. What would be interesting is to see what has happened career and compensation-wise to those people who designed and administered these programs. (Note that I am not poking at the teachers). If truth be known, these people are either still in their jobs or got promoted. There is no accountability.

    So, just castrate the grading process and make everyone pass. The fact that people will leave the school system and enter the world of work totally unprepared is immaterial. Not really, more agencies, bureaucrats and woke politicians will ignore the facts and demand reparations. By the way, reparations would mean more jobs for multi-degreed people who vote for Democrats. And if a student can get through K-12 not knowing anything, it would be inequitable to deny that person a masters degree just because they haven’t passed the requirements.

    Allowing a test retake is not per se unreasonable. Maybe, each student should be permitted to retake one test and two quizzes per semester. But allowing retaking every test and quiz is simply admitting the school system failed.

    Not counting homework assignments means there is no reason to give homework assignments. And it also cuts off a source of feedback to the teachers and students. Why not just come out with a statement that FCPS abolishes homework assignments altogether? We don’t need to push kids to compete with Russia, the EU, India, China, Indonesia, Japan. etc.

    And then there is the rank hypocrisy of not extending equity to other school activities, such as sports, music, art and drama. Why do only the good players make the girls or boys basketball teams? What about the clumsy kids who are lucky to make one of 50 free throws? What about people like me who are essentially tone deaf? Shouldn’t we be in the band or choir? I may not be able to hold a tune, but I can sing loudly offkey.

    Unfortunately, our public educators are following the same path as journalism, abandoning all standards to achieve a desired result.

  7. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    ” They learn to feel entitled to passing grades for inadequate work. Much to their detriment, they will carry that expectation into the workforce.”

    That has already happened. Equitable grading practices have been going in Loudoun for 6 years now.

  8. Turbocohen Avatar
    Turbocohen

    The soft racism of low expectations knows no bounds. Equitable Grading is merely another trap. Underperforming students are just as capable as anyone else of remaining confined to the plantation of ignorance maintained by the urban left.. When you take away a hard working students sense of pride of achievement by placing them in a similar test score category as everyone else who just got by.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I dunno. Low expectations has seemed to have an effect on the Right.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        And the Right has failed to meet even low expectations. Unfortunately the Dems have adopted those low expectations and doubled down on them.

        Surely we can all do better, but both cupboards are bare.

  9. Thomas Dixon Avatar
    Thomas Dixon

    How about equitable basketball scoring? Maybe some schools due to their student population, in the name of equity, should be allowed to only hit the rim for that two pointer. Just following the illogic.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Yeah, eliminate aggregate point scoring!! That’ll keep fans in the stands. Equitable scoring in football = more Zzzz.

    2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
      f/k/a_tmtfairfax

      Too bad for the old Washington Senators that there was no equitable competition. Washington, First in War, First in Peace, and Last in the American League. Equity suggests that they should have started the season with 75 wins.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        When they started to get good Fing Calvin Griffith sold them off to Minneapolis. Harmon Killebrew, Micky Vernon and Wayne Terwilliger were some of my childhood heroes,

  10. Lefty665 Avatar

    FCPS embrace of “equity” grading combined with their rejection of special ed for students with disabilities discussed yesterday are indications that FCPS have abandoned the goal of providing good education for its least able and disabled students.

    It is easy to teach able kids. Abandonment of the less able is a travesty, an educational abomination and a violation of the law specifically as it relates to kids with disabilities.

  11. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Hey , even the tax services allow “re-takes” for those certifying to do folks taxes… !!

    And DMV allows them also…..

    Why I bet Doctors and Lawyers can “re-take” also, no?

    When one is uber-tuned into “woke” these days, the essential duty is to not only make sure no stones are unturned but double-check and ask why there are stones to start with…. an never-ending thing…

    1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
      f/k/a_tmtfairfax

      Lawyers can retake the bar exam. The Vice President had to do this. But if one has multiple failures, he/she is not likely to be hired as an attorney. There are too many smart and capable law school graduates looking for jobs.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        Engineers can retake the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) & Professional Engineer (PE) exams as many time as it takes to pass.

        What your responding to, is someone who doesn’t know professional certification because they don’t hold any and never have.

  12. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Well,… it DID happen!”

    Judy Tenuta dead at 72. RIP Goddess of Love.

  13. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Hot Stock Tip! Jacobs Solutions, NYSE: J, buy, buy, buy! I’m backing up the truck!

    Jacobs Solutions is the parent company of the contractor that operates Los Alamos Labs and the ONLY source of US plutonium. If things go south in Ukraine, I’ll make a killing!

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      Pessimists can buy stock in Rosatom. Either way killing is assured.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Hot selling items in Kyiv are iodine tablets and condoms.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          “Hey little girl get the jeep with a dirty old man for an iodine tablet?”

          Very thoughtful of people making propaganda videos about Russian rapes, but they probably know something about the hygiene of Ukrainian women.

  14. Ruckweiler Avatar
    Ruckweiler

    The consequence of this so-called “equity” will be kids who’ll further become as dumb as a box of rocks. All this is being done because black students, primarily, have a culture of education being “actin’ white” which I first experienced as a Florida high school teacher. Reality is not a strong point in education these days. The country WILL pay a huge price, if not already, for this foolishness.

  15. Ruckweiler Avatar
    Ruckweiler

    The consequence of this so-called “equity” will be kids who’ll further become as dumb as a box of rocks. All this is being done because black students, primarily, have a culture of education being “actin’ white” which I first experienced as a Florida high school teacher. Reality is not a strong point in education these days. The country WILL pay a huge price, if not already, for this foolishness.

  16. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    I didn’t bust my arse to be salutatorian for nothing.

  17. this is how i do all those DIE and other required BS training… i blast straight to the test and keep retaking it until i meet the minimum questions answered correctly is reached.

Leave a Reply