College Faculty Don’t “Think Like America”

by James A. Bacon

It has become a widespread conviction on Virginia’s colleges and universities that faculty and staff should “look like Virginia” in their demographic make-up. There is no comparable obsession with hiring faculty and staff that “think like Virginia.”

Employees of James Madison University — faculty, staff, and administrators — donated more than $148,000 to Democratic Party candidates and political committees between November 2018 and November 2020, according to research conducted by Campus Reform. In other words, 92.9% of all JMU employees who made political donations gave to Democratic candidates or Democratic-aligned organizations such as Act Blue and Biden for President. Conversely, only 7.90% of campus money went to right-leaning candidates and organizations.

And that makes JMU the most conservative of the three public universities researched.

Radford University employees donated $46,003 to the Left side of the political spectrum compared to $3,660 to the conservative side — 94.0% compared to 6.0%.

But even Radford was less imbalanced than the College of William & Mary. There, faculty, staff and administrators contributed $201,506 to Democrats and lefties versus to $3,403 for right-leaning candidates and causes — 98.02% compared to 1.98%.

Not every employee or faculty member contributed, of course, and there’s no way to know how the non-donors lean politically. Also, there is the distinct possibility that the intolerance of highly vocal Leftists on campuses suppress donations by Republicans and conservatives that would create a public record of their political sympathies. Who would want to expose himself to being outed, criticized and made the subject of discrimination or retribution? There may be more Republican sentiment than indicated by the numbers but it’s underground, so to speak.

But evidence is accumulating that colleges have become intellectual mono-cultures — and that the problem is getting worse. Faculty members are being recruited on explicitly ideological grounds. At the University and other institutions — I don’t know if it’s so at JMU, RU or CWM, but it’s worth looking into — job applicants have to fill out “diversity statements,” and they must subject themselves to diversity “training.” What right-thinking graduate student in their right mind would want to pursue a lifelong career in such an environment?

A self-selection process occurs — something I can attest to from personal experience.

I was a graduate student at the Johns Hopkins University in the mid-1970s in the African history program. But I was an intellectual outlier. In other words, I wasn’t a Marxist or far leftist. I did not see colonialism as the root of all evil in the newly independent African nations.  And I was White. Although most African history professors at that time where White, too, they were tenured. There was agitation even way back then to increase the number of Blacks in academia, and the most obvious place to start was in the fields of African and Black studies. It dawned on me that committing four or five years earning a Ph.D. in a field in which I would be unemployable would not be a wise investment of my time. So, I took my M.A. degree, and I bolted.

The more lopsided universities become ideologically, the more hostile they will become to those with different views, the more the pressure for conformity will grow, and the more hostile the institutions will be for faculty, grad students and, most importantly, students with different views.

Places like Harvard and Yale have so much money in their endowments that they can afford to give the middle finger to the public without fear of retribution. But public universities make a mistake by doing the same. Public universities still rely upon state support and financial aid. Here in Virginia, where Republicans just recaptured a majority in the House of Delegates, they must cultivate the goodwill of Republican legislators. They can blather all they want about educating young people for the jobs of the future, but if they stand out as bastions of partisan hostility toward Republicans and the values Republicans believe in, they should not be surprised if legislators one day decide to give them the middle finger right back.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

29 responses to “College Faculty Don’t “Think Like America””

  1. VaNavVet Avatar

    It’s still a free country and folks can donate their money as they please. Perhaps if Republicans spent some time with the faculty and gained a degree of understanding that they are also Americans who merely happen to believe in a different approach to solving problems.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      How about that DD-214 you’ve been ducking.

    2. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      “It’s still a free country and folks can donate their money as they please.”

      Yes, and legislators can allocate money—or not—as they please. There’s a whole bunch of new GOP delegates heading to Richmond, who were elected by motivated voters who are pretty sick of entitled-and-arrogant academics living off the taxpayers’ and tuition-paying-parents’ dime.

      “Perhaps if Republicans spent some time with the faculty and gained a degree of understanding that they are also Americans who merely happen to believe in a different approach to solving problems.”

      Oh please please please, VA Democrats and MSMers, follow VaNavVet’s lead here. Tell Virginians that they need to spend time with Virginia’s highly-paid state college faculty, empathize with them and respond to their concerns. Tell the voters that it’s their fault that they aren’t responsive to the faculty’s concerns.

      1. VaNavVet Avatar

        Since when has it become a bad idea to actually engage with those who have differing views from you? I thought that was part of the purpose of BR. Compromise and leadership involves listening to the other side. Granted it is easier just to live in your silo and to play in the feedback loop.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          You clearly don’t understand Conservatives! 😉

  2. sbostian Avatar

    Jim, political donations are somewhat revealing; however, the problem is much worse than you can imagine. Try to get your mind around a Faculty Senate meeting in which a medical school professor proclaims to have devoted her entire career energy to “eliminating inequality”. Then imagine seeing that professor as you enter the OR for a high risk surgery. I witnessed the proclamation, but fortunately have not needed risky surgery afterward. There are some people who think like you and me in the university culture, but they are few and keep their mouths shut for fear of reprisal – even if they have tenure.

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Now do Liberty…. 🤷‍♂️

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      The irony is that you have an organization that is not transparent about it’s funding – espousing “transparency” on donations by others of opposite political persuasion and no, I don’t expect them to do a general approach to all higher ed… just their “targets”.

    2. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      Why? Liberty is a Private University vs all the institutions identified above being Public and I think it’s safe to say where their allegiances align.

      However for your edification the dollar values fell as follows:

      2020 $90,077 to Republican (91.75%) and $6,829 to Democrat (8.25%).

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “Liberty receives a majority of its revenues—more than $770 million annually—from government sources. In contrast to other schools like Hillsdale College or Grove City College, which don’t accept federal funds, students pay for Liberty with federal aid and federal loans”

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          Repeat after me, Liberty University is a private University. It is not associated with the Public Virginia Higher Education System.

          I don’t know if you aware of this or not but Federal Student Loans are used at Private Schools that doesn’t make that Public.

          I find it humorous you quoted Reason, but have no idea what that author was trying to say.

          Does any of that make Liberty a good place and Jerry a cool guy, no. It just points out that you lack the candor regarding what a public and a private University are. Perhaps maybe you didn’t know and you lashing out is your defense mechanism, either way your acting like a real Tina.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Hmmmm….

            “But evidence is accumulating that colleges have become intellectual mono-cultures — and that the problem is getting worse.”

            Also…

            “I was a graduate student at the Johns Hopkins University…”

            Conflating private and public is central to JAB’s piece. Seems that the Liberty figures you quoted are indeed to the point and demonstrate that the intellectual mono-culture in academia is not simply a liberal issue…. now do Patrick Henry College…

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            re: “liberal monocultures”

            that’s RICH!

            Like Higher Ed has not been liberal or characterized that way ever before.

            I don’t know where JAB was during Vietnam and the college kids of that era but clearly he was in a different bubble.

            He sort of admits this sometimes.

            He was always aligned with Conservatives even in College!!!

          3. Eric is correct to state that Liberty University is an intellectual mono-culture. But…. It is one of how many — maybe a dozen higher-ed? — institutions — that have conservative monocultures. Versus hundreds that are liberal monocultures? Moreover, as Matt Adams correctly points out, it is a private university. That means it does not receive significant funding from the General Assembly. (It does receive some modest funding, as all private colleges and universities do, but it is not part of the public university system, and that funding goes to all private institutions on the same basis.)

            What I advocate is creating higher-ed institutions where a wide spectrum of ideas can be taught, discussed and debate. Having both views from both the left and right is essential to creating a vibrant intellectual experience.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar

            Maybe one like George Mason and the Mercatus Center which seldom is mentioned in these complaints about mono-culture!

          5. You’re right, GMU does have the Mercatus Center. Don’t forget the Scalia School of Law or the fact that Walter Williams taught economics there. GMU is pretty darn woke and increasingly so, but it has more intellectual diversity than other Virginia higher-ed institutions. That’s why I don’t mention in the same breath as other public universities.

          6. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            He cited Virginia Public institutions troll.

            Learn what conflating means then attempt to use it. Also, the figures represented by Liberty are well an above the splits at the aforementioned Public Institutions.

            Why should I do anything, if you’re too lazy or incompetent to use Google that’s your problem.

          7. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Yes, because there is huge difference between 91.75% and 92.9%… smh…

          8. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “Eric the half a troll Matt Adams • 9 minutes ago
            Yes, because there is huge difference between 91.75% and 92.9%… smh…”

            It would depend on the numbers you were referring.

            I understand math can be hard for someone of you limited abilities.

  4. John Harvie Avatar
    John Harvie

    Jim, I’d love to believe your last sentence, but then again … I dunno.

    I’m disappointed but not surprised by the W&M numbers; I don’t talk as much about being an alum these days. Doubt Tech is any better also.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar

    Interesting trying to determine who funds this group. The Leadership Council “owns” it and their 990 (yes they are a 501(c)3 org) – shows a 20 million dollar budget with the following paid personnel:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/906b06fe354131fa728deb52185a0926982c4e64d9407c4d4390bc52d76fdbd7.jpg

    https://www.leadershipinstitute.org/aboutus/Files/2020990.pdf

    I don’t begrudge their conservatism nor their activities, they have a legal right to advocate for their beliefs and principles, but I do think folks should know how they are funded and who is funding them….up front – on their web page and here in BR.

    They’re not exactly a grassroots group in the traditional sense, and much more like a political PAC with little or no voluntary disclosure of funding.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      Can you post a comment that is relevant to the article for once.

  6. Moderate Avatar

    I spent yesterday afternoon doing the required training to serve on a Va Tech search committee. The diversity section addressed the problem of hiring folks like ourselves head on. I’ve said it before, I don’t think things are as one-sided at our universities as you insist that they are.

    How were these data collected? How did someone make sure they got information on every faculty and staff member? What about people who don’t give directly to candidates but give to groups that give to candidates? Do we REALLY get ALL the data about who contributes how much to whom?

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      OpenSecrets.org is one reference

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        http://www.vpap.org for local and state contribution data. Opensecrets.org seems to only cover federal contributions.

        1. Moderate Avatar

          You still have to have a complete and accurate list of people to look for. Often people give in ways that don’t show names. VPAP is the best we’ve got but I don’t think we can assume we know everything from even its data.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar

    re: ” Employees of James Madison University — faculty, staff, and administrators — donated more than $148,000 to Democratic Party candidates and political committees between November 2018 and November 2020, according to research conducted by Campus Reform.”

    Do we have a link to how they did their research?

  8. Donald Smith Avatar
    Donald Smith

    It amazes me how progressive academics feel that they are entitled to not only Virginia taxpayer’s money, but the money of parents and students paying tuition and fees for Virginia state colleges.

    At some point, a critical mass of parents will decide that the only way they can get those people to wake up and back off, is to apply painful countermeasures.

    For example—if a tenured professor at a VA state university teaches in an academic department that gets completely eliminated, can we fire that professor? We’re not firing individual academics, we’re eliminating whole departments. (Does every VA college need a Gender Studies, or Sociology, or Anthropology department?)

    If the current laws don’t allow the General Assembly and governor to apply countermeasures like that…well then, let’s get some new Assemblymen/women and write some new laws!

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      They don’t feel “entitled”. They are offering their services and the Colleges hire them.

      The current theme of Conservatives to focus on College Professors as individuals is illicit and wrong, and based on wrongheaded attitudes about how institutions should work.

      You ask about how someone is fired if they are tenured or there is a “need” for that position. You’d somehow have state-appointed officials decide that for each institution?

      And you’d inject politics and include the political leanings of the professor in the decision?

      This is how and why Conservatism fails, IMHO.

      You’d get away with it for one term and then out.

      It’s not the way that Colleges should be run IMHO and I bet even principled Conservatives would disagree also.

      Some of you guys sound like you want the Government to decide who can teach or not based on govt review of their “politics”. Fail!

Leave a Reply