Child Endangerment at Home and on the Border

by Kerry Dougherty

Baby Boomers are fond of social media posts that glorify their raised-by-wolves childhoods.

They usually go something like this:

We drank out of garden hoses, rode in the back of pick-ups, didn’t have seat belts let alone car seats, came home when the street lights went on, thought Howard Johnson’s was fine dining, played with BB guns and knives and earned our immunization to chicken pox, mumps and measles the old fashioned way. The fat kid in our class would be considered skinny today.

The implication? We’re tough. Today’s youngsters are pampered.

It’s worth remembering that not everything was wonderful when Boomers were growing up.

Suitcases didn’t have wheels.

Telephones were tethered to the wall.

Televisions received only three channels.

I could go on.

But one thing I remember well from my childhood in a small New Jersey town was that by the time I was six my mother would routinely send me to a corner store to buy her Pall Malls. The shop was probably about half a mile from our house.

Putting aside the issue of selling cigarettes to kids, absolutely no one back then thought it was dangerous for a child to set out alone on foot, crossing streets and dodging cars to engage in minor commerce. My mom never worried about a visit from Child Protective Services.

Try sending a young child alone to a nearby store today and you could wind up in handcuffs and your kid in foster care.

Or you could end up on CNN like Danielle and Alexander Meitiv of Montgomery County after they allowed their 10-year-old son and 6 1/2 year-old daughter to walk home from a playground.

“Maryland Family Under Investigation For Letting Their Kids Walk Home Alone,” blared the headline after the parents allowed their unaccompanied children to find their way home. Two police squad cars stopped the kids, Child Protective Services was summoned and the parents were roundly accused of neglect.

Yep, for letting their kids walk a short distance alone.

Which brings us to the unaccompanied minors at the border.  CNN reports that an average of 370 are arriving at the border every day. From February 28 to March 20, border patrol picked up 11,000 children. Government officials are frantically working to unite these kids with their parents or other family members.

Some of these children may have been kidnapped. But many were entrusted to coyotes or set out with others in caravans headed north. Child endangerment on steroids.

But the official reaction to their trek is evidence of a mind-boggling double standard. The parents of these illegal immigrant children are not charged with neglect or endangerment as American parents would if they allowed their kids to walk just a couple of miles alone.

Last week we saw the harrowing infrared images of two tots being unceremoniously dumped over the border wall by adults on the other side.

Question is, if their parents are located will they face the same treatment American parents would if they allowed their kids to walk to a park?

Someone be sure to ask that of Vice President Kamala Harris – America’s border czarina – as soon as she finds the time to go to the border and see the harrowing scenes of child endangerment for herself.

This column is republished with permission from Kerry: Unemployed & Unedited.

 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

40 responses to “Child Endangerment at Home and on the Border”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Consider that the parents did not send their kids north to pick up a pack of smokes but to instead improve or even save their lives (like many, many immigrants from our history).

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Consider the fact that some of those children are completing the journey the parents died trying to make.

      Perhaps the saddest thing is there are relatively few, in the 10s of 1000s perhaps, Americans who could imagine what life as a real refugee is like, and not just staying at the Sheraton until the hurricane passes while waiting on hold with State Farm, either.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Leave it to Kerry and like-thinking “Conservatives” to draw this analogy…

    geeze…

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Speaking of refugees, after a 4-month hiatus, my grey tree frog is back under the BBQ cover. I suspect he’s found a summer home. I’ll have to check to see how long these critters live.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Perhaps doing without food for, oh say, a week while you dodge gangs… nah, never mind.

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Right. Those are indeed excellent reasons why parents should not abandon their children at the border to a foreign country.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Providing the parents are still alive. It’s not Detroit in Guatemala, much more like Hell. And, for the life of me, I cannot imagine why.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Correct. The parents are sacrificing much of their lives to try to give their kids a better chance at life than they had.

          It’s pretty sad.

  4. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    Where in New Jersey?

  5. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Oh, I think Kerry has a valid point. This is not a crisis to the Powers that Be, because it is a plan. I’m not sure it is a wise plan, because in the 2016 election Trump showed surprising strength among Hispanic voters, and this is the reason — opposition to wide open borders. This is Biden really screwing up. Some of the Democrats get that.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Trump really only upped his hispanic vote in Florida largely due to Cuban Americans. It is ironic that Cubs is the only country in the region with which we actually have an open border… still…

      I think it is a leap to suggest it was all due to border policies.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Trump did much better than expected among Texas latinos living along the border with Mexico. Only one reason for that comes to mind.

        “But in Texas, 41 percent to 47 percent of Hispanic voters backed Trump in several heavily Latino border counties in the Rio Grande Valley region, a Democratic stronghold.”

        https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/trump-s-gains-among-latino-voters-shouldn-t-come-surprise-n1246463

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Basically, the article says that ~40% have historically backed the Republicans. They like the economic message.

          God knows why. “Texas — A Whole ‘nother Country.”

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Latino men shifted to Trump, not so much the women.

            But take someone like Chase in Virginia. Does anyone think the Latino votes will go to her or others like her?

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I think Cuba has a better chance than the Cubs…. if you consider all that ivy an open border.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          Now I can’t fix it!! Alas…

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well- warmed, and well-fed.” — Herman Melville

  7. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    The border crisis and migrant child debate takes me back 125 years ago when America faced a similar episode. Practical solutions came from the Social Gospel Movement. Settlement houses like this one, The White Door, served thousands of children and families. The White Door was in a poor Brooklyn slum whose Jewish residents had fled eastern Europe and Syria. The White Door offered free kindergarten, free meals, and literacy classes to children. The teachers also provided classes in sewing, cooking, gardening, civics, history, singing, and religious training. My great great grand aunt Myrta Lockett Avary pulled this together. She was able to rub elbows with wealthy socialites and major figures such as Theodore Drieser, Jacob Riis, and Teddy Roosevelt. They provided the funding.
    Myrta may not have solved the crisis of her time but she did put a dent in it. Wouldn’t it be nice to see the 1 percenters step up their game? Clearly our government have no concrete plan.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0a0ce147514902de5b528e0d241b910fb478c9921f62a2281e1116f7a6d83727.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4a692c66185a6d426243a85e70b7c38b0cab493aa2a0b7eaa92c7d9701599b59.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/043f2ef6f7f782cc10d82917cb4429afe97557469f0095ce6e01c10c9b70a2d4.jpg

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      The breadth of your knowledge of history and your personal connections to it always amaze and delight me.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Thanks Mr. Dick. Myrta Lockett Avary is from your neck of the woods. Born December 7th, 1857. Aaron’s Creek Halifax County.

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          Not only in my neck of the woods, but in my woods! I grew up in the Aaron’s Creek community. We lived next to my grandfather who ran the general store there. We moved to “town” (Halifax) when I was 12 years old. I don’t remember any Locketts living there then, however.

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            The Lockett’s packed up in 1860 and moved to bustling downtown Lombardy Grove. That is over by Union Level and Busy Bee Corner. You and I are probably the only two on the blog who could get to these places. Was that general store down by old mill and dam on Aaron’s Creek? My friend Ronnie Vaughn and I have a historical highway sign to put up on Rt 58 for Myrta. Waiting for sunnier days before we put up. It’s a beauty too!

          2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            The general store was on the road on which you turn off of Rt. 58 to go to Virgilina. The name Ronnie Vaughan sounds familar. We were pretty good friends of a family of Vaughans who lived on Rt. 58. The man of the house was Al Vaughan and he operated a crop-dusting service. It fascinated me that they had a field next to their house for landing an airplane, as well as having an airplane.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I agree with Dick but also ask – was the “White Door” a government program and why don’t we, today, have a collective mindset to do something like White Door again?

        In terms of the border. What can/should the US do with respect to people coming across, especially kids? What should we be doing that the Government is not doing?

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          The White Door was entirely a private endeavor. The Progressivism of the 1890s did not seek government solutions to social problems. Old school progressives sought grass roots social institutions such as the YMCA, the Salvation Army, and the White Door as the best remedy. Government sanctioned Progressivism does not emerge until the New Deal era under President Roosevelt. Where is the collective mindset? Well today the White Door is a building of 1 bedroom apartments for the wealthy urbanites. Rent is $2,800 a month for 1 bed, 1 bath, and a kitchenette. You can buy the three bedroom apartment upstairs for 1.3 million.
          https://cdn-img-feed.streeteasy.com/nyc/image/38/365977538.jpg

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            James – today – is there no citizen sentiment for a White Door type charity, perhaps in spite or instead of the Govt “progressive”?

            Seems like if citizens took the bull by the horns so to speak that it would not be a bad thing, and in fact, a good thing. No?

          2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            It is a matter of scale. Even in the 1890s, the White Door-type facilities were not numerous enough to care for all the immigrants flooding into New York City.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Got all these kids coming to the border for a better life and how are Americans responding these days? Not like the White Door!

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Yes. But it sure looks like the sentiment that engendered White Door back then is long gone…. lots of opposition now and very little “white door” folks.

          5. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            It is a matter of scale. In the 1890s there was no income tax on individuals. The tax rate was 0%. Beyond that, it seems in retrospect that the immigrants of the 1890s assimilated with private progressivism and no income tax.

          6. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            ” In the mid-1800s, thousands of Chinese came to California to either work in the gold fields or later to build the railroad. By 1870 there were roughly 63,000 Chinese in the United States. Popular sentiment in the U.S. quickly turned against Chinese immigrants, leading Congress to ban further immigration with the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act.

            During the 1800s Chinese were mostly found in rural areas. In 1870, only 24 percent of California’s Chinese resided in the San Francisco Bay Area. After the Exclusion Act, the Chinese American community went through a series of changes. By 1900, two-thirds of the state’s Chinese lived in urban areas, and 45 percent of them were living in the Bay Area. Many ex-miners and railroad workers migrated to cities looking for jobs. More sinisterly, anti-Chinese riots in Seattle, Washington; Rock Springs, Wyoming; and other regions of the West drove hundreds of Chinese from rural areas to the relative safety of big cities like San Francisco for a modicum of protection from white racism.”

          7. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            ” In the mid-1800s, thousands of Chinese came to California to either work in the gold fields or later to build the railroad. By 1870 there were roughly 63,000 Chinese in the United States. Popular sentiment in the U.S. quickly turned against Chinese immigrants, leading Congress to ban further immigration with the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act.

            During the 1800s Chinese were mostly found in rural areas. In 1870, only 24 percent of California’s Chinese resided in the San Francisco Bay Area. After the Exclusion Act, the Chinese American community went through a series of changes. By 1900, two-thirds of the state’s Chinese lived in urban areas, and 45 percent of them were living in the Bay Area. Many ex-miners and railroad workers migrated to cities looking for jobs. More sinisterly, anti-Chinese riots in Seattle, Washington; Rock Springs, Wyoming; and other regions of the West drove hundreds of Chinese from rural areas to the relative safety of big cities like San Francisco for a modicum of protection from white racism.”

          8. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Talk to Bill, Melinda, Jeff, and Spanky. They have so much dough that can’t spend it all before they leave.

          9. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Those guys do a lot already. I’m talking about grass roots… like the good old days.

          10. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            In the 1890s there was no income tax on individuals. That wasn’t implemented until 1913 as I recall. Now that government takes over 1/2 of my income I assume even the hapless politicians and equally hapless high ranking government officials they appoint can take care of the country’s business.

          11. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Yes. And we had virtually no roads or public schools or health care , GPS, electricity, hydro, on and on… we started taxing so we could invest in infrastructure and services that would provide more opportunity and wealth.

            Back then – we dumped sewage in rivers and bays such that people got disease.

            People died of things that today are unheard of.

            Private wealth did not build this country for most of us. Taxes did.

            Yes. Take a 25% tax bracket. Add in Virginia 5% then the 15% for FICA and quite a few folks pay in that scale.

            How far different is it from most developed countries?

            Developed countries invest tax dollars in infrastructure, services, education and health care, and it shows up in higher standards of living, higher life expectancy, wider opportunity for many more than have opportunity in 3rd world or dictatorships.

            Developed countries collect taxes and invest in things that benefit people, jobs, industry, etc.

            But folks still bitch and complain…especially Conservatives !

            If we listen to them – we’d be better off with 3rd world taxes… eh?

            😉

          12. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            In the 1890s there was no income tax on individuals. That wasn’t implemented until 1913 as I recall. Now that government takes over 1/2 of my income I assume even the hapless politicians and equally hapless high ranking government officials they appoint can take care of the country’s business.

        2. There’s also the fact that The White Door was a project of the 1890s — before the income tax and before the welfare state. (1) Wealthy philanthropists had more disposable income, and (2) needs were greater because there was no social safety net. I’ll bet The White Door engendered a lot more upward social mobility than welfare programs do today.

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Right on the money Mr. Bacon.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            So, because the govt “helps”, we no longer should also help ourselves?

            I have to tell you Jim, there ARE a lot of folks who STILL volunteer and help others and it IS needed.

            Unfortunately, most of them seem to be “liberals” and Conservative types just have their grievances about govt and higher ed and who knows what else.

            The part of America that I’ve always believed in was that each of us would feel a need to give back for others – regardless of our political philosophies.

            Is it true that most of the “give back” folks these days are liberals?

Leave a Reply