Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Virginia Public Schools – Telehealth

by James C. Sherlock

Among the comments about my last article on this subject, a reader brought up my next topic — use of telemedicine for mental health support in schools.

I am a believer in telemedicine

  • to the degree the professions are; and
  • to the degree that such practices are circumscribed by law in Virginia.

I find, however, that creating the professionally specified environments for such telemedicine in the schools

  • can be very difficult if not impossible;
  • requires too much effort in schools stretched in their primary missions; and
  • imposes liability they do not need.

Even then parents will have to get past the cultural stereotyping by the psychiatric community, which I will detail.

The community school model can provide tele-clinical environments and services in the vicinity of schools, but I recommend the schools stay out of it beyond testing for referrals.

Tele-Psychiatry.  The American Psychiatric Association (APA) and the American Telemedicine Association (ATA) published in October 2022 Resource Document on Best Practices in Synchronous Videoconferencing-Based Telemental Health (Resource document).

I will caution readers to read the entire document rather than jumping straight to the section on “Child/Adolescent Populations.”

Read in “Program Development” about the needs assessment.

Then read “Legal and Regulatory” Issues:

  1. Licensure and Malpractice;
  2. Scope of Practice;
  3. Prescribing – a major difference between psychiatrists and psychologists. Psychiatrists are M.D.s and regularly prescribe controlled drugs in their practices;
  4. Informed Consent;
  5. Billing and Reimbursement;
  6. Patient Education.

Then read “Standard Operating Procedures/Protocols.”

Prior to initiating TMH services, any organization or provider shall have in place a set of standard operating procedures or protocols that should include (but are not limited to) the following administrative, clinical, and technical specifications.

• Roles, responsibilities (i.e., daytime and after-hours coverage), communication, and procedures around emergency issues.
• Agreements to ensure licensing, credentialing, training, and authentication of providers as well as identity authentication of patients according to local, state, and federal requirements.
• A systematic quality improvement and performance management process that complies with any organizational, regulatory, or accrediting requirements for outcomes management.
• Procedures for identifying patients who may best be served by TMH, in-person, or hybrid care.
• Procedures and guidance for transitioning patients between TMH and in- person care.
• Procedures for technology selection.

Read about “clinically supervised settings.”

Then about “clinically unsupervised settings” — instances where the mental health provider is providing services to patients in settings without clinical staff immediately available. That is the situation many schools would face.

Both settings have daunting requirements.

Then the “Technical Considerations.”

Organizations shall ensure the technical readiness of the telehealth equipment and its arrangement within the clinical environment. They shall have policies and procedures in place to ensure the physical security of telehealth equipment and the electronic security of data. Organizations shall ensure compliance with all relevant safety laws, regulations, and codes for technology and technical safety.

Then the “Physical Location/Room Requirements.”

Then “Clinical Considerations including patient and setting selection, ethical considerations, cultural issues.

Finally under “Specific Populations and Settings” you will get to “Child/Adolescent Populations.” Read that.

Blatant stereotyping of patients. Then read the considerations for other listed populations and settings.

There you will read that their professional judgments include some of the most simplistic, race-centric (if not racist) preconceptions and stereotyping you will ever have seen in print.

You will see, for example, they expect no guns or “kinship” anywhere but in rural communities. You know, White Scotch-Irish people. Perhaps guns and kinship are as far as they dared go.

Black kids, indigenous kids, Asian kids and Latinx (ouch) kids are affected by “intergenerational trauma, interpersonal racism, vicarious racism and intergenerational racism.” No guns there.

No drug and alcohol problems specified in any of the listed communities.

Perhaps because psychiatrists are dealers in drugs to children.

Psychiatrists and drugs for kids. Informed by those stereotypes, psychiatrists can and do prescribe antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti-ADHD medicines and mood stabilizers.

Scary thought.

A Harvard study warns of the side effects and cautions parents to ask questions.

  • What is this medication for?
  • What are the potential side effects?
  • How long should my child stay on this medication?
  • What else should I understand?

The study warns:

Especially for children and teens, it is essential to approach behaviors holistically by considering biology, psychology, and social and environmental factors.

Social and environmental factors like the stereotypes in the Resource Document?

Will all parents know to ask those questions? No.

Another reason for the schools to stay out of it.

Tele-Psychology. The American Psychological Association has published, minus the insulting and perhaps disqualifying stereotypes of the psychiatrists, Guidelines for the Practice of Telepsychology.  

It sets technical standards, operating procedures, physical location requirements and other guidelines similar to those of the psychiatrists.  

But there are no drug prescriptions.

Bottom line. Schools will have a very hard time meeting all of the mental telehealth requirements.

They would be badly advised to try. Two words for schools: practicality and liability.

I have recommended in the past that we pursue in medically underserved communities community schools served by adjacent or nearby medical facilities.

If the community schools model is executed, telemedicine for clinical mental health support is possible.

I just don’t advise the schools participate beyond testing for referrals.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

22 responses to “Child and Adolescent Mental Health and Virginia Public Schools – Telehealth”

  1. Maria Paluzsay Avatar
    Maria Paluzsay

    I would never authorize psychiatric telehealth for my children, although my 18-year old occasionally has a telehealth session when her counselor is away. One cannot properly observe a patient or situation virtually. Much is lost without full body language and the nuances of live interpersonal communication. On top of that, one cannot know who else is present or recording where the child is. Lack of privacy is lack of security, and kids have a hard enough time believing their session is a safe space (because often it isn’t). Telehealth is laziness, the therapist needs to bother to show up.

  2. Thomas Dixon Avatar
    Thomas Dixon

    The more you acquiesce to the belief your child or yourself for that matter need a psychiatrist to solve your problems, the more dependent you become and the more hopeless you feel.
    But on the plus side, lots of people and entities will be making lots of money and more people will have excuses for their lack of ambition.

  3. Carter Melton Avatar
    Carter Melton

    We are already asking teachers and schools to do too much in a controlled combat zone…and consequently a lot of it isn’t done very well. You are exactly right…schools should stay out of the clinical medicine business.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      The schools are not disinterested 3rd parties. The kid with “problems” are in their midst. Both the kid and the school may need “help”.

  4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “A Harvard study warns of the side effects and cautions parents to ask questions.”

    Do you have a link to the actual study? This is a summary. This is good advice for parents offered by Dr. Kim regardless.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Did not think to do that. Will do so when I get home.

    2. Warmac9999 Avatar

      But, but, but, you said the psychotropic medications weren’t dangerous. And, by the way, do you think the government is going to label any medicine “causes violence” rather than watch out for suicidal thinking and behavior. And do you think suicidal behavior is just the person committing suicide and not involving others? Maybe, you ought to read a bit about teenage mass murder and its connection to psychotropic drugs. Maybe, you ought to read about the horrors and sadness of these cases. And, unfortunately, I have had the discussions.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        I said they are not dangerous and they are not. I never said they had no side effects. They clearly do… as does aspirin. They are not creating mass murderers as you claim.

        1. Warmac9999 Avatar

          So, to you, a drug class that creates suicidal intentions and behaviors is not dangerous.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Tylenol is dangerous by your definition.

  5. From the guidelines:

    Technology offers the opportunity to increase client/patient access to
    psychological services. Service recipients limited by geographic
    location, medical condition, psychiatric diagnosis, financial constraint
    or other barriers may gain access to high quality psychological
    services through the use of technology. Technology also facilitates the
    delivery of psychological services by new methods (e.g., online
    psychoeducation, therapy delivered over interactive videoconferencing),
    and augments traditional in-person psychological services.

    Scary stuff that technology. Wouldn’t want to get too close, it might improve services.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      My reference to it was to keep it out of the schools. Other than that, they can do what the state regs permit.

  6. The guidelines themselves are excruciating. Written by PhDs paid by the word? For example:

    “Psychologists using telepsychology to provide supervision or consultation remotely to individuals or organizations are encouraged to consult others who are knowledgeable about the unique issues telecommunication technologies pose for supervision or consultation.”

    Translation: Ask someone who knows. Duh! What a pearl of wisdom. 32 words that could be expressed by 4 words.

    “Psychologists providing telepsychology services strive to be familiar with professional literature regarding the delivery of services via telecommunication technologies, as well as competent with the use of the technological modality itself.”

    Translation: Read the manual. Usually abbreviated as RTFM by tech support. 31 words that are commonly expressed by 4 letters.

    This may be a clue why psychological services are not helping schools cope with socialization/discipline. Exposure to this stuff could drive a 1st grader to start shooting.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Real psycho-babble, eh?

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Spot on, Lefty.

      1. I’ve now gone to sleep twice while reading the guidelines. They’re my new tool to cure insomnia.

        1. Warmac9999 Avatar

          They are not written to inform or educate, simple to provide a cover story so complex that nobody can really understand them.

          1. They’re not hard to understand or complex, just profoundly verbose and tedious. The authors desperately needed an editor with a ‘tude, and a copy of Strunk & White, “Elements of Style”. Then RTFM.

          2. Warmac9999 Avatar

            They are verbose and tedious for a reason.

          3. Yeah, they’re written by psychology PhDs without adult supervision.

Leave a Reply