Charlottesville: Where All the Children Are Above Average

by James A. Bacon

Virginia has its very own Lake Wobegon, Garrison Keiller’s fictional Minnesota community where “all the children are above average.” According to a presentation made to the Charlottesville School Board last week, students in the City of Charlottesville aren’t just “above average” — they’re way above average. Indeed, the city’s public school system has identified 86% of the city’s students as “gifted,” according to the Daily Progress.

The 86%-gifted finding is all the more remarkable when you consider the fact that only half (50%) of Charlottesville public school students passed their English Standards of Learnings (SOL) exams in the 2018-19 school year, and only 20% qualified as “advanced.”

The state requires school systems to screen, refer and identify students for gifted education. The gifted label allows students to to attend summer residential governor’s schools. Gifted students also are given enrichment lessons and activities.

One might be tempted to laugh off the finding as the outcome of excessive touchy-feeliness by hand-holding, kumbaya-singing hippies passing for teachers who think that everyone is special in his or her own way. But that doesn’t seem to be what’s happening. The Daily Progress article alludes to a racial-justice angle. Under the old way of identifying “gifted” children, White students made up 73% of the gifted program, meaning only 27% of gifted students came from all other racial/ethnic classifications — Asian, Black, Hispanic and mixed race. Under the new approach, 33% of Black kids were given the gifted designation.

The sad reality is that only 4% of African American students in Charlottesville schools scored well enough on their English SATs to earn the “advanced” designation. Waving a magic wand and declaring students “gifted” does nothing to help them learn.

The Virginia Department of Education requires local school systems to identify their gifted students and develop programs to maximize their potential. Back in the days when Virginia was focused on building a world-class educational system that prepared young people to compete in a global arena, such thinking made sense. But Virginia has entered a very different era. Today the preoccupation is eliminating racial/ethnic disparities in outcomes. When gaps in educational achievement exist, they must be narrowed by any means necessary.

Many programs geared toward academic excellence are under attack as a reflection of White supremacy and institutional racism — everything from tracked classes that segregate students by academic ability to regional Governor’s Schools that admit only the intellectual elite. Charlottesville’s move to identify the vast majority of students as “gifted” is best viewed as a leveling strategy designed to reduce the outward signs of racial disparities without doing the hard work of addressing the system’s underlying failures.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

40 responses to “Charlottesville: Where All the Children Are Above Average”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    “Gifted” is not limited to students who can do well on SOL reading tests. For example, students can be “gifted” in art or music.

    That being said, it does seem strange that, in a system in which only half passed the SOL English test, 86 per cent of the student body is “gifted”.

    I have never like the concept of “gifted” programs. First, “gifted” is a subjective concept. VDOE regulations define “gifted” students as “those students …who demonstrate high levels of accomplishment or who show the potential for higher levels of accomplishment when compared to others of the same age, experience, or environment” in one or more of the following areas: general intellectual aptitude, specific academic aptitude, career and technical aptitude, and visual and performing arts aptitude.

    Second, I always suspected that “gifted” programs were created to appease suburban parents who did not want their kids lumped in with “ordinary” students.

    Third, these programs provide advantages to kids who already have advantages due to their home environments and exacerbate the differences and “otherness” already existing between categories of students.

    Fourth, the programs send a discouraging message to students not chosen. “I am not gifted. Why try?’

    Fifth, rewards such as more intellectually challenging programs, special summer programs, etc. should be earned through hard work in school, not because one is “gifted”.

    Sixth, there is a danger that students who are labelled “gifted” will begin to view special treatment as something that is their due in life.

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      Don’t worry. It appears they are doing away with “gifted” programs. When everyone is gifted no one is gifted.

      I was a “talented and gifted” (TAG) student years and years ago. Got the crap beat out of me because I was a “TAG F-g”. Luckily I grew into a defensive end and that ended. But we had to get in with good grades plus an IQ score of 130 plus. On a bell curve that’s about 2% of the population.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Wow! Motorcycle accident?

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      So what I got out of this – perhaps – is that this is the way to direct more resources towards kids if they are “gifted” and if not, they don’t get the extra resources?

      Do gifted kids get more resources than non-gifted kids – even kids who are on the lower end and need extra resources to get them up on grade level?

      1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
        Baconator with extra cheese

        In some ways gifted kids get less “resources”. But they get the level of work needed to grow.
        We didn’t need reading specialists or classroom assistants. Hell I could read the newspaper at 4. My mom made sure of that.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          but a more difficult curriculum with higher skilled teachers – foreign languages, higher level math, etc?

          How about special needs kids? Do they get more resources?

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Whether the program is called “gifted” or some more antiseptic term it is a necessary operation in a lot of public schools. Contrary to liberal doctrine there are a lot of smart, ambitions kids in low and middle income homes. The kind of kids who would get quickly dumbed down if not for the gifted programs.

    My high school was on a list of below average public schools in a recent article written by Jim Sherlock. There were plenty of Black students of modest means who went on to West Point, Brown University, William & Mary, etc. Many were in the accelerated academic programs (i.e. gifted). There were also plenty of White kids living in trailer parks in those programs who went onto UVa, Virginia Tech, etc. I’m not sure that they would have gotten into those colleges or would have succeeded in college if they weren’t in some kind of academically accelerated program. The basic curriculum being taught wasn’t going to get you into a good college or allow you to thrive in college.

    The alternative is that wealthy kids will go to private schools where there will be plenty of accelerated classes / gifted programs. If you’re a smart kid who wasn’t lucky enough to pick the right parents … I guess you get dumbed down in public school and do the best you can.

    Nobody blinks an eye when the top few percent of athletes play on special AAU traveling teams or get selected to various all-star lists. Nobody cries in their beer over the kids not selected to these elite teams. But when it comes to academic skill … all children are above average I guess.

    That seems like a pretty good way for America to commit economic suicide.

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      I agree with DJ. I went to school with a Black kid from a trailer park who is now a Phd Physicist. And I was white trash myself and made something out of myself.
      My parents couldn’t provide me the enrichment my “gifted” teachers gave me.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        there are exceptions to the norms – the question is what is the norm.

        What do the stats show? Why are their differences in racial outcomes?

        Seems like there are two choices:

        black folks just don’t perform as well as whites and end up with fewer successes …. we get that implication all the time in BR

        or … what… ??? what are other possibilities?

        Do you believe that blacks perform less well than whites?

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I agree with you generally. My interpretation of “gifted” is different from accelerated classes and I think VDOE labels “gifted” programs as something other than accelerated classes.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        that’s my impression also.

        but no question, some kids get extra resources…than others…

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Well, not technically. The TAG programs were initially to balance at one end the resources being used at the other end. Remedial courses are more expensive than those designed for the hoi polloi

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Do you mean reading and math specialists in the low k-12 grades or remedial classes later on?

            What kinds of course material are provided to TAG students? Does it require more/different instructors than teach the hoi polloi?

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Maybe they meant gifted as in donated?

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      Or gifted as in the parents gave them to the system?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        System is too polite of a word for a thresher. Va’s K-12 is an Eli Whitney contraption.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Using “gift” as a verb is one of those perversions of the English language that drives me bananas!

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        30+ years in DoD contracting has calloused me to such irritants. Bananas as a predicate adjective? Ah! A fruiting.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          On the govt side – “gift” and “contractor” would get you the door.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Or very, very wealthy.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            but very retired…..

  4. Will Vehrs Avatar
    Will Vehrs

    I was fortunate a few years ago to be a “preferred” substitute for a gifted fourth grade teacher in Chesterfield County. When I was needed, it was a much harder gig than a regular class. The teacher expected more from her students and the sub. I had to grade papers and leave a detailed report responding to the teacher’s instructions.

    The gifted teacher left four pages of single-spaced instructions and lesson plans for specific instruction. Students were held to extremely high standards of completing assignments and turning in their work. No disruption of class was tolerated, e.g., talking or moving around the classroom without a purpose. The assignments were challenging with advanced math problems, long writing/research assignments and presentations to the class after a rigorous process of being approved in steps by the teacher.

    How was it different than regular classes? Students were not constantly being pulled from class to work with specialized “tutor” type teachers. Classroom size was smaller in regular classes, but there were almost always behavior issues that I didn’t see in the gifted class. These issues took away a significant amount of instructional time. I used to say that the loudest gifted class was still quieter than the average level in a regular class. Instructions and lesson plans for a regular class were usually a page and a half, if that.

    While the gifted students were almost all obviously bright and inquisitive, there were many bright students in regular classes. What seemed to separate the two was the level of commitment in the gifted class and the teacher’s expectations.

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      Yup. My classes were taught like a college class. No coddling. No talking back. No excuses.
      It required a level of discipline and emotional maturity on top of intelligence.
      One kid was from a bad situation (abuse and poverty) and he had behavioral issues. He made it, but it was a hard adjustment. We were close friends and he ended up becoming a professional film producer in LA. I doubt he would have achieved that without teachers pushing him to be more in middle and high school. He frequently was taken into the hallway for a butt chewing and a lecture that he could be more. His dad was a PTSD alcoholic veteran and his mom was an abused Vietnamese lady who spoke no English. Plus he got it bad in his Black neighborhood for being half Asian and a TAG F-g on top of that.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Back in the day in my neck of the woods, it was called College Prep but taught by the same instructors who taught the regular classes.

        But this was high school, not elementary.

        It’s in elementary where kids are often “classified” as high, low middle then divided up in those groups and material taught specific to each level.

        There seems to be no real process of checking back later on the kids to make sure they are still correctly classified, and if so, the die can be cast.

        Some kids start fast. Others start slow. Some have learning disabilities, once addressed, helps them perform at higher levels. The classic case is dyslexia or sometimes just the need for glasses.

        “Tracking” has been at issue for quite some time because of the tendency of kids to not be able to escape their initial placement.

        So some of us were lucky and had a good track to the higher level material once we hit middle and high, but others never had that opportunity because they were initially classified as “low”.

        I think Cville might be using this approach to get rid of tracking.

  5. Donald Smith Avatar
    Donald Smith

    “the city’s public school system has identified 86% of the city’s students as ‘gifted.’”

    And the city’s public school system expects to be taken seriously? By rational adults with common sense?

    If 86% of the people are “gifted,” then we’re all “gifted,” in one way or another.

  6. Brian Leeper Avatar
    Brian Leeper

    Apparently, this sort of thing is not unusual for Virginia. Seems like the Commonwealth has a bit of a history with overstating it’s achievements:

    https://source.wustl.edu/2018/06/sorry-virginia-u-s-history-isnt-all-about-you/

    And who can forget:

    “To be a Virginian, either by birth, marriage, adoption or even on one’s mother’s side, is an introduction to any state in the Union, a passport to any foreign country and a benediction from Almighty God,”

    So it’s no wonder that 86% of them are gifted. Apparently, being born in Virginia just might be enough to qualify.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Going on across the country, not just in Virginia.

      What Charlottesville is saying, in effect, is that kids who are not ‘officially” talented may also need extra resources also to perform at higher SOL levels which is where the shortfall is. Virginia ranks in the top 10 for 4th grade reading and math but by the 8th grade they’ve fallen substantially in the rankings. Somewhere between 4th and 8th grade, something is not working and needs to be addressed.

      Cville may well be taking a weird path but my bet is this is about this SOL issue in the regular kids.

      1. Brian Leeper Avatar
        Brian Leeper

        I can guarantee you that not even 10% of the morons I went to school with in Manassas would have qualified as gifted.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Oh I’m sure , but:

          1. almost all kids are born innocent

          2. every kid that grows up with a bad education – the rest of us will pay taxes to support – even morons.

          This idea is not political, but practical.

          1. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            It is true that the schools in Manassas were (probably still are) not very good, and I have often wondered if some of the bad outcomes that I am aware of had something to do with that. On the other hand, culture plays a role in it as well, and trash culture (of which Manassas has and has had plenty of) isn’t conducive to good outcomes either.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            School is about the only way a kid has a chance to escape “trash culture”. Many a kid has been influenced by a good teacher and gone on to be what his parents were not.

            We don’t want a system that preordains that fate – but the opposite. It’s what good teachers do.

          3. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            It can work the other way too–decent parents, but the kid is somewhat susceptible to peer pressure, and the trash culture at school leads to a bad outcome.

            Schools in areas with a predominant trash culture tend to not be very good.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            They do because of neighborhood income stratification. Poorer neighborhoods ten to have less good schools and teachers and principles choose where they want to work if they are good and/or veterans. The poorer schools get staffed by newbies and lower performing, who other schools do not want.

          5. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Some of the biggest screwups I went to school in Manassas with had fairly well-to-do parents. And money? Manassas was more “wealthy” (the incomes were higher, property values higher) than the place I lived before, but the trash culture factor was a lot higher too. They do say money can’t buy class.

          6. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            indeed. But they can afford tutors for their trashy offspring….

          7. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Try addiction rehab counselors.

          8. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            and that too – their kids end up with material wealth, no matter their “culture”.

          9. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Some of them do. I know of someone who got a $500k inheritance and managed to blow through it in a year. Easy come, easy go.

          10. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            seen that also… They are the sons and daughters they raised…

          11. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Some of the biggest screwups I went to school in Manassas with had fairly well-to-do parents. And money? Manassas was more “wealthy” (the incomes were higher, property values higher) than the place I lived before, but the trash culture factor was a lot higher too. They do say money can’t buy class.

Leave a Reply