Charlottesville Police Morale in the Dumps

Question: Has the current political climate in the city caused you to reduce your normal policing activities (traffic stops, arrests, community policing, etc.) for fear of being targeted by community groups? Dark blue = yes. Light blue = no. Green = undecided.

by James A. Bacon

Morale in the Charlottesville Police Department is in the tank. Large majorities of respondents to a survey conducted by the Virginia Police Benevolent Association said they did not believe that either Police Chief Rashall Brackney or the command staff had their backs; 90% said that the political climate in the city caused them to reduce their normal policing activities — traffic stops, arrests, community policing — for fear of being targeted by community groups.

Eighty-four percent of the 62 members who responded said they had considered other career options, and 81% said the police chief, in her role as a leader, made them feel less secure in their future with the Charlottesville Police Department.

“They don’t feel like they have a voice with their leadership,” said Michael Wells, senior vice president of the Police Benevolent Association’s Central Virginia Chapter Board. “I know it was bad working conditions, I just didn’t know that it was that bad. Lack of trust and leadership is a big thing that stuck out to me.”

Policing in Charlottesville has been in turmoil since the Unite the Right rally in 2017. The event, in which white supremacists from around the country clashed with anarchists, proved traumatic to the left-learning community in Charlottesville and Albemarle County. In the finger pointing that ensued, Charlottesville police were subject to widespread criticism. In 2018 the city appointed RaShall M. Brackney, an African-American woman, as chief.

The City of Charlottesville website describes Brackney’s impeccable progressive credentials. Noting her work in social and racial, justice, her biographical summary notes that she “is a recognized expert in the areas of harm reduction, procedural and restorative justice practices, and community-police relations.”

Among Brackney’s more controversial decisions was the dissolution of the department’s SWAT Team after allegations of misogynistic and other inappropriate behavior. Two officers resigned and one was terminated. The disciplinary actions were not received well. Meanwhile, against the backdrop of the George Floyd protests last year, a vocal defund-the-police movement in Charlottesville has urged a reallocation of funds from law enforcement to harm-reduction programs.

According to the Virginia State Police “Crime in Virginia 2020” report, Charlottesville had 101 sworn officers and 24 civilian employees. The college town is not known as a violent place. Indeed, the city reported no murders in 2019. However, according to the Crime in Virginia report, there were five murders in 2020. Negligent manslaughters increased from zero to three over the same time. On the other hand, following national trends during the COVID-19 epidemic, overall crimes were down by about 20%.

Bacon’s bottom line: Brackney’s defenders likely will defend her record on the grounds that she’s dealing with entrenched racism and misogyny in the ranks. But no good can come from a police force whose officers feel they will be exposed to second-guessing by community critics and higher-ups if an encounter with citizens goes bad. Risk-averse officers are less aggressive about enforcing the law. As the community senses the reticence, bad guys will exploit their greater freedom of action. We’ll see what happens.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

45 responses to “Charlottesville Police Morale in the Dumps”

  1. FluxAmbassador Avatar
    FluxAmbassador

    Checking the Charlottesville city budget – the number of reported crimes between CY19 and CY20 fell and the number of arrests fell in an almost 1:1 ratio. But sure, it’s fear of consequences for what might happen if they do their job wrong that’s leading to fewer arrests.

    “…90% said that the political climate in the city caused them to reduce their normal policing activities — traffic stops, arrests, community policing…”

    I can’t think of any other group who could admit to doing less work because they didn’t like the amount of oversight they were getting where the conservative response wouldn’t be “Wah wah, suck it up buttercup, snowflake, get another job, etc.” But when it’s the physically active authoritarian arm of the state all of the sudden we’re supposed to care about morale.

    We all have bosses. For public servants that boss is the public they serve. If these cops don’t like their bosses they’re free to try to find new ones.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      ” Indeed, the city reported no murders in 2019. However, according to the Crime in Virginia report, there were five murders in 2020. Negligent manslaughters increased from zero to three over the same time. On the other hand, following national trends during the COVID-19 epidemic, overall crimes were down by about 20%.”

      ” … the number of reported crimes between CY19 and CY20 fell and the number of arrests fell in an almost 1:1 ratio.”

      Murders and manslaughter vs “reported crimes”.

      2019 vs CY19 AND CY20.

      Are you sure you don’t mean FY19 and FY20?

      Charlottesville’s budget year goes from July 1 through June 30.

      Charlottesville’s calendar year (CY), unsurprisingly, goes from Jan 1 – Dec 31.

      Now, go edit your comment and pretend you’re not writing half assed commentary.

      1. FluxAmbassador Avatar
        FluxAmbassador

        The assertion of the quoted police is that they’re doing less of their job because of hurt feelings. The materials referenced by myself and Jim Bacon suggest that if they were indeed doing less of their job it’s because there’s less of their job to do. Despite the instance of this blog that be it COVID or crime deaths are the only thing that matter, the conversation is broader than that.

        Maybe spend less time on invective and name calling.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          The heck you say. invective and name calling are what a lot of Conservatism is actually about these days and BR needs to do their full share!

          I was never a fan of things like “community policing that basically meant stop and frisk , stopping vehicles over tailights then doing searches, and militarized SWAT groups.

          THen in C-ville… Is this the same force that was roundly criticized by Conservatives for their behavior in the Unite the Right fiasco?

          Finally, ” allegations of misogynistic and other inappropriate behavior”

          Would be nice to know more …. hard to believe if they had this problem it was only for the SWAT outfit. Many SWAT teams are also regular force officers, not just SWAT only.

          1. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            My frustration with you is that your comments are off-topic and you refuse to address the matter at hand.

            In the case of Kendi and public schools.

            Fairfax County Public Schools paid $20,000 for a one hour presentation from Kendi. Is there any doubt about that?

            Kendi equates capitalism to racism. If you read what he wrote there would be no doubt about that.

            If Kendi isn’t a capitalist what is he? There are only so many economic systems in the world.

            Writing endless comments that say nothing more than McCarthyism, McCarthyism, McCarthyism degrades this blog.

            If you don’t want (or can’t) address the questions at hand then don’t waste everybody’s time with off topic comments.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            This thread is about Charlottesville and their police. Right?

            And YOU are actually the one off topic!

            I’ve addressed the issue in the proper thread. quite a few comments, in fact.

            And I’ll respond more – in the proper thread.

            The waste of time here is the idiots who can’t be honest about the issues.

          3. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            “The heck you say. invective and name calling are what a lot of Conservatism is actually about these days and BR needs to do their full share!”

            “The waste of time here is the idiots who can’t be honest about the issues.”

            Do you even read what you write?

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            All the time but also what you write which is grade A BS a lot of the time.

            You’re being dishonest about CRT IMHO.

            You’re not telling the truth.

            You’re purposely distorting it which is par for the course for some these days.

            There are close to 6000 teachers in Loudoun, Do you want to tell me how many claim CRT is being taught there?

          5. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            The people in the Frankfurt School who first developed Critical Theory were avowed Marxists.

            If Critical Race Theory is built upon Critical Theory then Critical Race Theory is built on a Marxist philosophy.

            I’ve seen the video of a Loudoun County teacher, Monica Gill, directly and unambiguously state that Critical Race Theory is the lens through which all the curricula is taught.

            You have no evidence whatsoever that Ms Gill is lying.

            Please provide the video or transcript of other Loudoun County Public School teachers refuting what Ms Gill said.

          6. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            You need to take this thread to the proper one.

            There is ZERO evidence this woman is telling the truth. Out of 6000 co-workers, how many corroborate her claim?

            It’s just a lie and you’re supporting it. shame on you.

          7. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Clearly he doesn’t or he can’t read.

        2. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          If you don’t believe that morale affects organizational effectiveness you should say that.

          If you don’t believe that organizational effectiveness is important for a police department you should say that.

          If you don’t believe that leaders should be accountable for morale you should say that.

          “Eighty-four percent of the 62 members who responded said they had considered other career options, and 81% said the police chief, in her role as a leader, made them feel less secure in their future with the Charlottesville Police Department.”

          In most organizations that would be sufficient reason to dismiss the leader for cause.

          1. FluxAmbassador Avatar
            FluxAmbassador

            Sanctimony is no better a response than sarcasm. Obviously morale is an important part of any organizations effectiveness, but there are two things at play here:

            1) They claim they’re doing less of their jobs because they’re unhappy, which is directly contradicted by the outlined fall in crime being linearly related to the fall in arrests.

            2) What they’re complaining about is “fear of being targeted by community groups,” and while I’m sympathetic to the broader argument that employees who find the oversight conditions of their job changing mid-career will be in a bind, in this specific instance I’m not. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes is one of the oldest questions asked in civilization, and the answer is: the people. If the watchmen don’t like being watched by the people they’re supposed to serve then they shouldn’t be watchmen.

            2a) There’s also the question of – are they unhappy because they’re just trying to do the job we think they should or are they unhappy because they can’t abuse the power of their badge anymore? The dissolution of the SWAT force and the reason for it points to the latter.

            “In most organizations that would be sufficient reason to dismiss the leader for cause.”

            I thought Naive was another commenter here.

          2. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            “Among Brackney’s more controversial decisions was the dissolution of the department’s SWAT Team after allegations of misogynistic and other inappropriate behavior. Two officers resigned and one was terminated. The disciplinary actions were not received well.”

            Where in that statement do you see evidence that the SWAT team members resigned or were terminated because they can’t abuse the power of their badge anymore?

            Facts not in evidence.

            Do you think it’s a good idea to dissolve the SWAT team in a city where there have been recent riots that resulted in death?

            Do you believe leaders are responsible for the morale of those who they lead?

            Do you believe Charlottesville should defund its police force? If so, by how much?

          3. FluxAmbassador Avatar
            FluxAmbassador

            I am making an inference about the dissolution of the SWAT team, yes, but given the relationship misogyny has with spousal murder, mass shooters, rape, and other forms of abuse it’s an informed one.

            Given the efficacy of the SWAT team in preventing that death and other damages that day I’m not sure your question is making the case you think it is. But yeah, I’m fine with the decision to dissolve the SWAT team.

            I believe leadership plays a critical role in morale, but what’s clear from Bacon’s post is that what the police are really upset about is the community watching over them. Their problem is that they don’t think leadership will shield them from criticism from the people they’re nominally supposed to serve, not that leadership is engaged in managerial malpractice.

            I’m not a Charlottesville resident so I can’t speak to their specific needs, but in general if we put more resources into crime prevention via social services and jobs programs then we’d see a reduction in crime. That’s why crime rates tend to dip when the economy is good. Obviously not all crimes – plenty of violent crime has nothing at all to do with material well being. And of course police don’t prevent crime in the first place, by their nature they’re reactive not proactive.

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Psssst… they hate when you actually look into the data they are skewing, y’know…

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “…the political climate in the city caused them to reduce their normal policing activities — traffic stops, arrests, community policing…”

    Every cloud has a silver lining…

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Indeed, perhaps there is a need to shed employees who are not suited to the job

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Blaming the workforce for poor morale is managerial incompetence.

        Dissolving the SWAT team four years after the deadly riots in Charlottesville is strategic incompetence.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          What? Are you saying SWAT teams would have made a difference against the tiki-torch crowd?! They tend not to shoot at any one wearing khakis, y’know…

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            SWAT teams were there. Some carrying torches.

          2. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            Another absurd comment of no value.

          3. FluxAmbassador Avatar
            FluxAmbassador

            “Should the police get rid of the SWAT team that failed to make a difference during a deadly riot after the deadly riot?” is certainly an interesting question.

          4. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            Had the SWAT team been properly directed to keep the two sides separated – yes, they would have made a difference.

            If you want an analysis of the failures in Charlottesville during the riots you should read the Hunton & Williams report.

            https://www.policefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Charlottesville-Critical-Incident-Review-2017.pdf

    2. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      If you believe in defunding the police you should say that.

      If McAuliffe believes in defunding the police he should say that.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        I believe in removing armed cops who are licensed to kill by the state in our name from fund raising duties (or perhaps more apt… shakedown initiatives). Terry likely does not agree with me, fwiw…

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          I have no idea what you are trying to say. You don’t want the police enforcing traffic and parking laws? If that’s the case then shouldn’t those laws be taken off the books by the politicians rather than ignored by the police?

          1. FluxAmbassador Avatar
            FluxAmbassador

            And what should be done to police who refuse to enforce the laws?

          2. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “FluxAmbassador DJRippert • 9 minutes ago
            And what should be done to police who refuse to enforce the laws?”

            Police don’t have the authority to “refuse” to enforce Laws. They don’t get discretion on the matter. If you want a law to no be enforced, politicians must repeal said law.

          3. FluxAmbassador Avatar
            FluxAmbassador

            The amount of people you can watch speed past a state trooper who has decided they’re not going fast enough to make his enforcement of the speed limit worth his time would argue otherwise.

          4. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “FluxAmbassador 28 minutes ago
            The amount of people you can watch speed past a state trooper who has decided they’re not going fast enough to make his enforcement of the speed limit worth his time would argue otherwise.”

            Umm no, what you’re witnessing is the trooper taking into account his life and your life before making a stop.

            9 your fine, 10 your mine.

          5. FluxAmbassador Avatar
            FluxAmbassador

            That’s still discretionary enforcement of the law. You may agree with it and it may be understandable, but that’s still what it is.

          6. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            No, no it’s not.

            It’s based upon the premise that not all speedometers read the same.

          7. FluxAmbassador Avatar
            FluxAmbassador

            The RADAR gun doesn’t care about your speedometer. In fact, you can tack on operating an unsafe vehicle if the calibration on the speedometer has not been properly maintained.

          8. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            A RADAR gun is only as good as the last time it was calibrated and by who that action was undertaken.

            Hence why are vast majority of RADAR gun cases that are appealed are throw out.

            “In fact, you can tack on operating an unsafe vehicle if the calibration on the speedometer has not been properly maintained.”

            You just tried to place two different arguments into the same conclusion. It doesn’t work that way. How would one know if their speedometer is calibrated correctly? It’s not a tested item, furthermore is modern vehicles that’s an action undertaken by the ECU not a tach sensor on the transmission.

          9. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            “I have no idea what you are trying to say. You don’t want the police enforcing traffic and parking laws?”

            See you DO know what I am trying to say.

            “If that’s the case then shouldn’t those laws be taken off the books by the politicians rather than ignored by the police?”

            If only there were another way for enforcing traffic and parking laws without armed agents of the state being involved…

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/6848b8edd019c8f67e31a34976baeedbf92c118795ae2b5b83eaede43e04db50.jpg

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9dd53307c9ec4f64de3ce360f55123bbe3ff8264f9201db21ae1e238c4928d9c.jpg

  3. Carson Martin Avatar
    Carson Martin

    “I will send my terror ahead of you and throw into confusion every [porker] you encounter. I will make all your enemies turn their backs and run.” EXODUS 23:27

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Question: Has the current political climate in the city caused you to reduce your normal policing activities (traffic stops, arrests, community policing, etc.) for fear of being targeted by community groups? Dark blue = yes. Light blue = no. Green = undecided.”

    Question: If I give you an excuse for not doing your job that will not reflect badly on you, your training, or your beliefs, but blames others, would you agree? Y N

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Every organization from football teams to military units to accounting departments assess the morale of their workforce. Well run organizations know that morale affects organizational effectiveness. Properly managed organizations insist that the leaders of various units take accountability and responsibility for morale.

      Badly run organizations try to blame the workforce for poor morale.

      Poor leaders try to excuse their poor leadership by blaming the workforce or the methods used to assess morale.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Except when it’s political and fake and then what?

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Once again you are assuming facts not in evidence. What possible evidence do you have to show the survey is either fake or political?

          If you have such evidence you should bring it forward.

          1. FluxAmbassador Avatar
            FluxAmbassador

            I have a hard time imagining you’d be as credulous about the results of any other worker survey proctored by the worker’s union as opposed to a neutral third-party.

          2. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            I have led dozens of teams as large as or larger than the Charlottesville Police Department. I considered the morale of those teams to be a top concern. Questionnaires given to the teams were always a big part of assessing morale.

            If you believe the questionnaire was unfair you should state your basis for that belief.

          3. FluxAmbassador Avatar
            FluxAmbassador

            I have no idea if the questionnaire was unfair, but the fact that it was the police union doing the survey instead of a disinterested third party speaks clearly to it being political.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Yes, you do. The question posed in the article is a leading question.

Leave a Reply