Chap Petersen to the Rescue?

Senator Chap Petersen, D-Fairfax.

by Kerry Dougherty

Don’t look now, but Virginia may have its own version of maverick U.S. Senator Joe Manchin.

I’m talking about Democratic State Sen. Chap Petersen of Fairfax County. The lone member of Virginia’s General Assembly — from either party — with the stones to stand up to former Gov. Ralph Northam’s despotic executive orders last year and challenge them in court.

Petersen, a lawyer, didn’t prevail but he fought the good fight.

It appears Petersen may not be a fan of any executive orders, including the new one by Gov. Glenn Youngkin that reverses Virginia’s statewide school mask mandate.

That doesn’t mean Petersen believes kids should be wearing masks in school much longer.

In fact, in an email Petersen warned that if Fairfax County didn’t end forced masking by Valentine’s Day he’d join with Republicans in the Senate to pass a bill that liberates our school children.

In a piece for The Daily Wire headlined, “Standoff In Virginia As Schools Defy Governor’s Order Making Masks Optional,” investigative reporter Luke Rosiak — who broke stories on the shocking cover-up of sexual assault cases in Loudoun County schools — reveals that Petersen is ready to break ranks with Democrats who seem willing to keep masks on kids forever.

On Monday, Chap Peterson, a moderate Democrat who joined with Republicans to force school re-opening last year, said in an email to the Fairfax County Parents Association that Fairfax’s school board “must define an ‘off ramp’ for mandatory masking. That means plainly stated metrics as well as a final deadline (e.g. Valentine’s Day). They should announce that immediately. The forced masking policy is going to end very soon, i.e. in a few weeks. Otherwise, the General Assembly will again step in. IT IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE LONG-TERM SOLUTION.”

Republicans control the state house, while the Democrats control the state senate 21-19, meaning that any bill backed by Republicans and Peterson can be passed into law, with the Senate tie being broken by Lt. Gov. Winsome Sears, a Republican.

Youngkin gave school districts eight days to comply with his January 15 executive order that made masks optional in all schools, public and private. Essentially it reversed Northam’s order that muzzled all kids in grades K-12.

As schools reopened yesterday — the 8th day — some had complied, but many had not. That left some children — especially in liberal Northern Virginia — facing disciplinary action for removing their masks.

A showdown in the courts is coming. Regardless of the outcome, if Petersen joins with Republicans to pass legislation that outlaws forced masking, it’s over.

As it should be. The majority of states do not have statewide mask mandates.

Petersen’s worked with GOP leaders before. He and his Republican colleague Senator Siobhan Dunnavant, R-Henrico, crafted the bill that mandated in-person learning for Virginia’s school students last year and they joined together to object to Northam using the law to justify forced masking

As much as those on the left blindly worship masks as talismans or amulets that ward off COVID-19, fact is they don’t work very well and the damage done to children by forcing them to wear masks all day outweighs any benefit.

Just last week State Sen. Louise Lucas bragged that Democrats could thwart any of Youngkin’s proposals.

Not so fast, Senator. Looks like your brick wall has a gaping hole.

This column has been republished with permission from Kerry: Unemployed & Unedited.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

36 responses to “Chap Petersen to the Rescue?”

  1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    Someone needs to ask the Governor why he hasn’t ended the mask mandate on HIS executive branch agency employees.
    I’m against a mask mandate. But I can’t understand why he is willing to fight a war to end mask mandates on kids, but won’t free up his ADULT government employees and visitors.
    Has Miyares ended the mask mandate at the AG office?
    It’s very strange and seemingly hypocritical.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      Is that true? Is there also a Northam EO for masking for state employees that is still in place despite the “Day One” promises? Haven’t heard Kerry nor the other usual suspects in BR address this.

      1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
        Baconator with extra cheese

        Call any executive branch agency office. I was just at one yesterday and they have mask required signs right on the front door. Masks are required regardless of vaccination status.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          well that sounds a bit contrary to his position on masks in schools… or perhaps he believes masks ARE necessary at other venues besides schools.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      His kids are grown?

  2. So if the Court rules that Govr Y’s mask executive order is void, that does that mean that all of Govr C***man’s exec orders are also void, as well as others going forward?

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      No. The question is not whether Youngkin can issue an EO, but whether this EO tries to override an existing statute or the Constitutional provision which vested the power to operate schools in local school boards.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        And for Northam there was also a state of emergency, another legal wrinkle.

      2. Didn’t the closing of churches violate Section 16 of our state Constitution?

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          The U.S. Supreme Court would probably say it violated the 1st Amendment. As for the state constitution which guarantees “free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience”, I would argue that people were not prohibited freedom to exercise their religion. For public health reasons and for the protection of the whole community, including those who did not attend church, they were not allowed to gather in groups in churches. However, they were able to exercise their religion in other ways, such as by ZOOM.

          1. And why was the BLM/Antifa riots and looting allowed?

          2. Because virtual burning and looting via ZOOM just isn’t the same as real, live, physical destruction?

          3. The entirety of Article I, Section 16:

            Section 16. Free exercise of religion; no establishment of religion.
            That religion or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and, therefore, all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other. No man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief; but all men shall be free to profess and by argument to maintain their opinions in matters of religion, and the same shall in nowise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities. And the General Assembly shall not prescribe any religious test whatever, or confer any peculiar privileges or advantages on any sect or denomination, or pass any law requiring or authorizing any religious society, or the people of any district within this Commonwealth, to levy on themselves or others, any tax for the erection or repair of any house of public worship, or for the support of any church or ministry; but it shall be left free to every person to select his religious instructor, and to make for his support such private contract as he shall please.

      3. Nothing in Virginia Constitution, Article VIII, Section 7 (School Boards) or Virginia Code, Section 22.1-79 (Powers and Duties [of School Boards]) seem to give School Board jurisdiction and authority to make decisions about public health issues.

        Authority over schools concerning educational matters does not translate in authority to presume to enact policies that impinge on the authority and jurisdiction of other Virginia departments and agencies (e.g., law enforcement, department of health, judiciary).

        It will be interesting to see how broadly or narrowly Virginia courts will construe the parameters of School Boards’ authority over educational matters vis-a-vis policies that implicate matters traditionally committed to other agencies and departments of Virginia government.

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          Here is the constitutional language: “The supervision of schools in each school division shall be vested in a school board….”

          I agree that it will be interesting to see how broadly the courts construe this language. They may get that far. Instead, they may restrict their consideration to the 2021 statute.

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            Statute defense moot on August 1.

      4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Existing statute expires on August 1.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Worked well for Sinema. Manchin is from a state where registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans by 2 to 1 with an equal number undeclared, and where voting is a crapshoot. Results depend on how much oxycodone they took that morning.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Yeah, but them registered Democrats own guns and belong to the UMW… 🙂

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Hatfields and McCoys kinda stuff. Don’t forget, when “welfare” was a thing, WV had more multigenerational welfare recipients than any other state.

    2. YellowstoneBound1948 Avatar
      YellowstoneBound1948

      Vile and repugnant reply. You’re not funny.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Neither is being hooked by your doctor.

    3. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      It’s sad that Virginians are so insecure about their own state that they have to make fun of West Virginia.

      As they say, people in glass houses…

    4. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      It’s sad that Virginians are so insecure about their own state that they have to make fun of West Virginia.

      As they say, people in glass houses…

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Sadly, factual. The vote result causality was snark, but the State is a mess of contradictions and the biggest victim of the Sackler family drug kingpins.

      2. Haters gonna hate. With an apology to PM Churchill, ‘At leaat those addicted can change and get clean.’

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          What percentage?

      3. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        He’s just your standard everyday bigot, always has been.

        1. DJRippert Avatar

          He’s just another member of the Plantation Elite who looks down his nose at the deplorables who live outside the boundaries of the Greater Richmond Metropolitan Area.

  4. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Can there be any doubt that Covid has become…is entirely…political?
    Seriously, do School Boards actually care about the physical and mental health of the kids, much less the education? But being against evil Republicans (who are all SCIENCE! deniers) is so much more important!
    Hooray for Chap. And did he get “offramp” from BR?

  5. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Louise Lucas and the others in the Hard Progressive wing sit in very safe seats, usually with a Black majority. A couple of other key Democrats are considered unlikely to run next time, finally retiring, so they don’t give a damn. I personally love how their refusal to learn anything from the last election has them dug in on so many losing positions. Suicide is painless…it brings on many changes….

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Kerry needs a lesson in the procedures of the General Assembly. Before any such bill can get on the floor and be passed with Winsome Sears’ tie-breaker, it has to get out of committee. The Senate Education and Health Committee has a 9-6 Democratic majority. Petersen is on that committee, but, even if he supports such a bill, the supporters would need one more Democrat to support it.

    Another factor to consider, unless it is an emergency bill, any legislation would have a July 1 effective date. (An emergency bill requires a super majority vote, so that is out as an option.) So, “freedom” on Valentine’s Day is somebody’s pipe dream. At best, the General Assembly could prohibit mask mandates for next school year.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      I think Kerry and a few others like her might be counting their proverbial chickens…… cretin-style…. 😉

    2. DJRippert Avatar

      Youngkin and Petersen are playing political chess while dunces like Louise Lucas play political tic-tac-toe.

      All Petersen wants is a timetable for removing the mask mandate in schools. He is correctly concerned that the “government is always right” leftists will either drag their feet in removing the mask mandate or perhaps never remove it.

      Petersen has drawn a line in the sand, intellectually speaking. As COVID drags on and on people fall off the “government is always right” bandwagon.

      Even if the legislation fails in committee , Petersen and Youngkin will win in the hearts and minds of Virginia voters.

      Meanwhile, Sen Lynwood Lewis is a Democrat from the Eastern Shore on the Senate Education and Health Committee. He may find supporting an infinite mask mandate leaves him at odds with a fair number of his constituents.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        2/3 of Lewis’ constituents will live in Norfolk under redistricting. It is Northam’s old seat.

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      The law that proponents of masks claim overrides Gov. Youngkin’s EO expires on August 1.

Leave a Reply