Chaos In the Streets, er, In the Sidewalks

by James A. Bacon

Sidewalks are going to get very crowded, and now is the time to start thinking about what to do about it.

We all know that self-driving cars soon will become a common sight, but a white paper, “The Last Block,” by Canadian Bern Grush, an occasional contributor to Bacon’s Rebellion several  years ago, contends that small robotic vehicles — delivering food and packages, sweeping, removing snow, measuring, monitoring, surveilling, repositioning dockless scooters — will precede them.

Dozens of companies from Amazon and FedEd to Starship and Uber, are building small sidewalk-bound robots to deliver food and parcels over the “last mile.” The arrival of these vehicles will require a significant re-thinking of the function and design of streets, sidewalks, and parking.

Virginia is not ready to accommodate a swarm of delivery bots. But there is still tie to get prepared.

Writes Grush:

The 21st century has brought many changes to the urban space between traffic lanes and buildings. The prior century — the century of the automobile — had relegated much of this space to storing cars for owners as they lived, worked, shopped, or visited. Some would be reserved for loading zones and the occasional bus stop. Nearer to buildings, the remaining space would be for pedestrians, and even this space was interrupted by driveways, fire hydrants, bus shelters, and sometimes a tree, a place to set, or a post to lock a bike.

This pattern is giving way to an even greater multiplicity of uses, including ride-hail pick-up and drop-office, ecommerce delivery, protected bicycle lanes, e-bikes, micro-transportation docks, and even al fresco dining. (Speaking of al fresco dining, I read elsewhere recently that the encroachment of restaurants upon sidewalks is creating problems for handicapped people in wheelchairs!)

These new uses, contends Grush, are not transient. Indeed, pressure on sidewalks could well increase as motors shrink, batteries last longer, and  entrepreneurs innovate new forms of transport and introduce new services.

The widespread commercial deployment of driverless vehicles still awaits the resolution of safety legal liability issues. Although the regulatory and political barriers for delivery bots are much lower, Grush says, they are not insignificant. Delivery bots will have to navigate increasingly crowded sidewalks, running “a gauntlet of human legs, barking dogs, baby strollers, planter boxes, and uneven pavement — a much more disorderly environment than the highly regulated city streets where robotaxis will operate.”

Economics will drive the ubiquity of delivery bots. Writes Grush:

Any technology that lowers local delivery costs could help restore the fortunes of local businesses and begin to heal the economic harm merchants have endured from the coronavirus pandemic. According to FedEx, this is because “[on] average. more than 60% of merchants’ customers live within 4 km of a store location … demonstrating the opportunity for on-demand, hyper-local delivery.” In the scenario FedEx is describing, an on-demand service would move goods and food directly from merchants to customers using small robotic machines, with the local merchant acting as warehouse.

Last-mile delivery costs could be driven as low as a dollar.

As delivery bots begin crowding sidewalks, the competition for space and passage in these public spaces will increase. Much of the history of urban planning has revolved around resolving the conflicting rights and prerogatives of private vehicles, transit vehicles, goods delivery, bikes, and pedestrians. More parking or more bike lanes? More loading zones? Dedicated lanes for buses? Better protections for pedestrians. Sidewalks, parking lanes, and street lanes can be reconfigured, but only at considerable expense.

In early 2020, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) launched an intelligent transport systems project to work out new operating guidelines.

“These machines will need to be prioritized, scheduled, queued, bumped, and placed in holding patterns regardless of nearby human oversight, and all without blocking crosswalks, bicycle lanes, micromobility users, no-stopping areas, or transit stops,” writes Grush. “This must be done safely, mixed with human-operated vehicles, without inconveniencing active transportation or pedestrian traffic, and with regard for human accessibility challenges.”

Grush proposes eight principles for operating principles for robots on sidewalks. Rule One: Robots must grant rights-of-way to humans in close proximity — but rules of engagement must consider how to prevent a robot from being immobilized for extended times in crowded circumstances. Read his white paper for more.

The bots are coming. Will Virginia be ready for them? Or will we succumb to chaos in the sidewalks?


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

64 responses to “Chaos In the Streets, er, In the Sidewalks”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Some cities are safe from these things, unless they’re built like the Mars Rover. Ever try to walk on a Norfolk sidewalk?

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Not to mention they are opening themselves up to a new form of mugging.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      I wonder if you could convert one of those things into a cooler and program it to follow you around.

  2. WayneS Avatar

    Are the companies which will profit from these robotic vehicles going to pay the costs of sidewalk upgrades?

  3. WayneS Avatar

    “…and even this space was interrupted by driveways, fire hydrants, bus shelters, and sometimes a tree, a place to set, or a post to lock a bike.”

    A place to set what?

  4. I believe all of these complications are why aerial drones will be the real issue.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Spoken like a Yemeni.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      and none of them actually restricted to ground-only or aerial-only either.

      We are just beginning on this and I think it’s the equivalent of the changes we’ve seen with computers, internet, cell phones, etc, we’re at the beginning.

      https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Tj-9lOgd2FY/maxresdefault.jpg

      1. WayneS Avatar

        As a general rule of thumb, a malfunctioning computer, internet or cell phone cannot kill anyone.

        A malfunctioning drone or autonomous vehicle on the other hand?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          hells bells, anything automated can kill someone, like a malfunctioning traffic signal or MRI or even a car with computer controlled functions…

          no?

          1. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Traffic signals have “conflict monitors” in them. They will detect a controller malfunction and put the signal in red/yellow flash. And it takes some rewiring to get a traffic signal cabinet to run in full-color operation (as opposed to red/yellow flash) without the conflict monitor installed. So it’s not like a technician could accidentally leave the conflict monitor unplugged and have the traffic signal operate normally.

            I think that was intentional..

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            unless that part fails also – and they do.

            and even when they work, there are more than a few idiots who defeat the intent!

          3. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            A failure of both the conflict monitor and the controller is extremely unlikely.

            And, as I mentioned, while it’s not impossible to defeat the conflict monitor, it’s also not going to happen accidentally. Which means that if it does happen, it was intentional, with all of the legal implications.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            But nothing, NOTHING, can do it as efficiently as a UAV hitting a landing KLM 747.

            I was going for a still from Afghanistan where the separation was in 10s of feet, but a video is way cooler…
            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-OQVJQAu3ug

            For completeness
            https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Harvey-Smallman/publication/235079903/figure/fig2/AS:299805856288769@1448490694191/A-near-miss-between-a-UAV-and-a-commercial-airliner-over-Kabul-Afghanistan-in-2004.png

        2. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          It appears someone (ahem below) isn’t aware of “vital” logic and the requirements of such.

          1. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            I noticed that the first drive-by-wire (ie, no throttle cable) car that I ever owned has two position sensors on the accelerator pedal, so there is no way a fault could happen without the computer being able to detect it.

            I have an older car with cruise control and a vacuum-operated servo for opening the throttle. The brake pedal has a valve attached to it which releases the vacuum in the cruise-control servo.

            Backups and redundancies like this are common, from what I’ve seen.

          2. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Vital Logic uses a double break system and always fails to the most restrictive state.

            If your TPS fails the ECU isn’t going to make any assumptions, it’ll just cut throttle all together.

            Cruise control in general is a feedback system, had to build one to operate within +- a specific RPM when loaded in college.

          3. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Drive-by-wire vehicles have both a TPS (throttle position sensor, on the electronic throttle body) and an APP, accelerator pedal position sensor (at least that is GM’s term for it).

            On older vehicles (with a throttle cable), the TPS wasn’t a critical sensor. Most Ford vehicles (and probably other makes too, I never tried it) would start and run (although not very well) with the TPS unplugged. I suppose that this was by design so that a failed TPS wouldn’t strand you.

          4. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Perhaps it entered you into a reduced power or limp governing your speed and or shifting. I recall my wife’s Explorer having a throttle body issue which put it in limp mode on 66 on her way home from work one morning.

          5. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            It probably does go into limp-home mode with the TPS disconnected.

            I once had my car go into limp-home mode due to the intercooler duct popping off the throttle body.

            The computer thought it was overboosting, and cut back on the power if I pushed the accelerator too far. If I was gentle with the throttle I could drive it with the acceleration of, say, a Geo Metro….

            I drove it straight to the dealer and they reconnected the duct. All was well.

          6. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Ah the good old Geo brand.

          7. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Yea, and it’s amazing how slow turbocharged cars are without the help from the turbo.

        3. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          What do you call a UAV with a broken data link?

          An unguided missile.

          1. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            I think most of them are programmed to stop and stay in one place when the data link is broken.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Oh, if you did that on purpose…

          3. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            “How to make a 2.4GHz Wi-Fi jammer with a discarded microwave oven…”

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            A GPS jammer with a D-cell battery can knockout a 3 square mile area. Imagine an airport…

            The problem was that jamming GPS from the ground won’t effect aircraft, enter the drones.

          5. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            The FAA has been decommissioning the outer marker transmitters. GPS can do it all so there’s no need for that old tech, or so that’s the theory.

  5. Brian Leeper Avatar
    Brian Leeper

    No sidewalks where I live. No shoulders either. And running over one of these is likely to provide infinitely more joy and amusement than running over a mailbox or a trash can, for the sort of person who does things like that.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      I see lots of stop signs with shotgun damage. I can only imagine what the good ole boys who drive around shooting stop signs will do once they start seeing these things.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        unlike stop signs, these things will have cameras.

        1. Brian Leeper Avatar
          Brian Leeper

          A good good ole boy can put a bullet right through one of these things at a distance that far exceeds the range of the camera.

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Or the neighborhood kids will have already spray painted the camera over as they do circles in the cul-de-sac.

          2. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Ever seen the movie “Hot Fuzz”? There’s a funny scene in it where all the neighborhood kids are spray painting the neighborhood surveillance cameras.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Hitting the cameras first will get extra points.

          4. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            More extra points for burning them out with a high-power laser.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            not necessarily…. and especially if there is more than one and the second one catches the first ….

            mobile cameras are going to change the security game. There will be “cop eyes” everywhere.

      2. Brian Leeper Avatar
        Brian Leeper

        It’s not just stop signs where I live. It’s any sign, anywhere.

        By the way, it’s only a Class 4 misdemeanor to shoot a gun across a street. (The maximum is a Class 1 misdemeanor, for such heinous offenses as speeding more than 20MPH over the limit, or failure to signal).

        https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/18.2-286

        https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title46.2/chapter8/section46.2-862/

        https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title46.2/chapter8/section46.2-860/

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Why is it I get the feeling your pickup has a 2 by 12 bolted to the front bumper?

      1. Brian Leeper Avatar
        Brian Leeper

        I don’t have a pickup. I do have a Chevy Volt.

        Edit: I will be getting a 1998 Nissan Frontier from a deceased relative’s estate. But it is fully emissions legal and passes the Virginia safety inspection with no problems. And I just replaced the shocks in it and I’m putting new tires on it because the old ones, despite having plenty of tread, are well over 10 years old.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          1 by 3… balsa

          1. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Wouldn’t meet the Federal requirement for a 5MPH impact rated bumper.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Neither does the car.

          3. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            The Volt is actually a heavy car. Almost 3800 lbs. All that road-hugging weight has to make it much safer, than, say, a RAV4, which weighs less and has a higher center of gravity.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I can’t remember. Was the Volt the all ev or hybrid? I do recall the taillights made it look like a goat… not a GTO, a real goat’s eyes.

          5. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            It’s a hybrid. The taillights don’t resemble a goats eyes to me.

            I’ve probably deprived VDOT of a thousand bucks in gas tax revenue with it, that they would have otherwise spent on hookers and blow.

          6. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I thought Volt was mostly EV with a backup gas reserve that only got used when the battery was done. no?

          7. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            It’s a plug-in hybrid to be specific.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    and these : electric bikes and variants:

    https://www.bpmimports.com/wp-content/uploads/r750-bike-9-yellow-1.jpg

    which are going to dramatically change the way that city streets are used.

    The fossil-fuel powered car is going to be gradually squeezed out of places where more of these start to be used.

  7. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Jim Bacon and I have disagreed on much over the years. One area where we agree is that walkable communities are in higher demand by citizens than non-walkable communities.

    In many cases, the difference between walkable and non-walkable comes down to sidewalks.

    Why are there still so many places with plenty of room for safe, effective sidewalks that don’t have sidewalks. Or they have sidewalks that end for half a mile before starting up again.

    If sidewalks increase the value of real estate why is it so hard to get them built?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      why? Because property owners don’t want them, won’t allow public access much less pay for them.

      That’s the standard libertarian private sector free market!

      If you want sidewalks you have to have government and government that will require them even after the initial development is built.

      Ironically, Bacon has, over the years, talked about the suburbs but that’s one of the big differences in exurban locales – i.e. subdivisions that do not have sidewalks.

      Sidewalks, like roads, are a public facility, and one that does not exist unless Government does it.

    2. Brian Leeper Avatar
      Brian Leeper

      In the neighborhood where my dad’s house is, built in PWC (Prince William County) in 1987, there are curb cuts for sidewalks, but no sidewalks were ever installed.

      It would be interesting to find out if PWC required sidewalks in new developments back then (at least on paper. We all know that what the regulations say and what actually happens are very often two different things).

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Hey! Does his neighborhood have paved roads? Then, be grateful.

        1. Brian Leeper Avatar
          Brian Leeper

          Yea, gotta adjust your expectations to the prevailing Virginia “standard”.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Sidewalks? You mean bicycle and skateboard highways.

      Because you have to maintain them. Tree root incursion, and frost heaves (yes even in Virginia water freezes at 32 degrees) and in 10 years they look like scattered Lego blocks.

      Walk on the right facing traffic.

      1. Brian Leeper Avatar
        Brian Leeper

        I lived in a townhouse community built in 1994. When I moved out in 2017, the sidewalks, which had never had any repairs done to them, looked as good as they did the day they were installed.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          No trees.

          1. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Actually all the townhouses came equipped with a builder-installed Bradford Pear in the front yard.

            The de-installation process involved a windstorm, a chainsaw, a dumpster, and a stump grinder.

    4. WayneS Avatar

      “Why are there still so many places with plenty of room for safe, effective sidewalks that don’t have sidewalks. ”

      One reason might be that they cost about $60 per linear foot to construct a five foot wide sidewalk – and that’s assuming no significant grading or earthwork is needed prior to installation.

      PS – Sidewalks capable of supporting the things pictured in this article would need to be wider than 5 feet.

  8. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Jim Bacon and I have disagreed on much over the years. One area where we agree is that walkable communities are in higher demand by citizens than non-walkable communities.

    In many cases, the difference between walkable and non-walkable comes down to sidewalks.

    Why are there still so many places with plenty of room for safe, effective sidewalks that don’t have sidewalks. Or they have sidewalks that end for half a mile before starting up again.

    If sidewalks increase the value of real estate why is it so hard to get them built?

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Good enough to put in twice…

    The future of organized crime.
    https://i0.wp.com/c1.staticflickr.com/1/599/30792521394_c47e121b66_b.jpg

  10. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Here’s the bot that will freak people – it’s a police bot:

    https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/images/ic/1920×1080/p08cvbqh.jpg

    imagine a herd of these in high crime areas.

Leave a Reply