Calls Increase for Judge Bennett’s Resignation

Adrianne Bennett

by Scott Dreyer

As reported here, the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) recently released a scathing report on the former Virginia Parole Board scandal from early 2020. As documented in 69 pages, the former board repeatedly broke both laws and the board’s own procedures to illegally release many prisoners convicted of violent crimes, and failed to notify the victims’ families.

The statute of limitations has since expired, so no members of that board will face any legal repercussions. One of those members was Roanoke City Mayor Sherman Lea Sr. (D). However, the former Chair of the Board, Adrianne Bennett, was later appointed to be a state judge in Virginia Beach before the parole board scandal became public knowledge.

Seeking some accountability, Del. Chris Head (R-Botetourt/Roanoke) as reported here has called on Judge Bennett to resign due to what the OAG described as a pattern of illegality and endangerment to the public.

Del. Head seems to be tapping into a large reservoir of voter ire. This frustration regards what to many appears to be a lack of accountability for political figures who do wrong and a two-tiered justice system that quickly punishes normal people but lets powerfully-connected individuals get off scot-free.

In an email to The Roanoke Star, fellow Valley House of Delegates member Joe McNamara (R-Salem/Roanoke) agrees with Del. Head’s call for Judge Bennett to resign from the bench. In his email McNamara wrote:

The unchecked abuses by the Parole Board under Democrat control shows just how bad things get when Democrats are given the full reins of power. That is why it was so crucial that Governor Youngkin fired the Northam-McAuliffe parole board members on day one of his administration. I commend Attorney General Miyares for bringing the abuses of Judge Bennett and others to light, and it is unfortunate that the statute of limitations for legal accountability have passed. This certainly warrants evaluation of future steps to prevent parole board abuses, and when necessary, implementation of steps to improve parole board accountability.

Del. Wren Williams (R), who represents a district including Franklin and Patrick counties, added his agreement in an email. When asked if he supported Del. Head’s call, Williams wrote:

Yes, I absolutely support the call for Judge Bennett to resign. During her time on the Parole Board, Judge Bennett showed a pattern of misconduct and willful disregard for the law and the Parole Board’s policies – from refusing to contact victims (including victims of rape), to falsifying reports, to unilaterally terminating parole supervision of 137 violent offenders (with an average sentence of life plus 28 years). The Attorney General’s report is nothing short of damning. Judge Bennett’s conduct is a blot on Virginia’s justice system and the judicial bench.

For the past two years, I have brought bills to bring transparency to the parole board and instances of judicial misconduct and discipline. Moving forward, the power held by Virginia’s justice system will come with accountability and transparency. We are fulfilling the promise we made to Virginians by making the system trustworthy and bringing the process into the sunlight.

Republished with permission from The Roanoke Star.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

22 responses to “Calls Increase for Judge Bennett’s Resignation”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Hey, wouldn’t an impeachment hearing be a better course? It’s one way of conducting an investigation, and is independent of resignation.

  2. Matt Adams Avatar
    Matt Adams

    “The unchecked abuses by the Parole Board under Democrat control shows just how bad things get when Democrats are given the full reins of power”

    I disagree with Del. McNamara’s statement, it has nothing to do with political party. Unchecked power by Government is how you get this, if it were to benefit someone with a R after their name, they would conduct themselves in a similar manner.

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Will we get a column on every GOP legislator who puts out a press release on this? Even those hundreds of miles from the judge’s jurisdiction? The Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission exists and it, along with the Supreme Court, is the proper venue for any such motions or complaints. She seems to already be on some level of suspension. I agree her actions on the Parole Board were wrong, but I also suspect she was doing exactly what the Governor who appointed her wanted done.

    1. VaNavVet Avatar

      Lets watch all the GOP delegates join in the grandstanding.

      1. It’ll probably look a lot like the recent screaming for Bert Ellis’ head by members of the other major political party.

    2. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      A criminals jurisdiction is where ever the thug wants it to be. BTW apparently she has no backbone to say no when what was requested was wrong.

    3. LarrytheG Avatar

      yep.

      You know what this is about when you read this:

      “The unchecked abuses by the Parole Board under Democrat control shows just how bad things get when Democrats are given the full reins of power. That is why it was so crucial that Governor Youngkin fired the Northam-McAuliffe parole board members on day one of his administration. ”

      There are existing laws, procedures for handling these issues. If they need to be reformed, tightened, etc – let’s see the legislation and take note if support (or opposition) is bi-partisan.

      We’ve got folks now days that hew towards doing business like is done in 3-rd world dictatorships IMO.

      We have laws and elections and an independent judiciary on purpose precisely so the 3rd world governance types are kept in check.

    4. Do you think the governor told her to violate the law?

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Probably no, and many of the problems involved failing to make notifications, but yes, I do think the “release all you can as fast as you can” attitude came down from the top.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          And because of COVID.

          1. I disagree. It was too early in the pandemic for Covid to have had any great influence on the parole hearings in question – unless Ms. Bennett and the other board members somehow knew in advance how bad things were going to get. 😉

            Also, there are many prisoners who are much less a danger to society than the people she oversaw the release of. When the state began releasing prisoners due to Covid they started with those who had less than one year left on their sentence and they took efforts to avoid releasing truly dangerous individuals. This parole board thing was different from that.

            Have you read the AG report? Or, more importantly, the Appendix to that report? I have perused a great deal of it, and I am of the opinion that most of the people she arranged to have released should not have been returned to society in any way or at any time, until their entire sentence had been served.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I responded with dates of when people in Washington knew things, but for some reason it was censored. God knows why.

            January 2020 there were Congressional briefings that were alarming enough that at least 3 Congressmen sold their equity holdings. It was 4 senators.

            https://fortune.com/2020/03/20/senators-burr-loeffler-sold-stock-coronavirus-threat-briefings-in-january/

            February 2020 was the Woodward interviews.

            March 6, 2020 the President issued his first warnings on traveling and attending group meeting.

            Somewhere in that gap, the Gubna and others had to have been alerted.

            Richmond is waaay to close to DC not to have heard something.

            “What did the president know, and when did he know it?” Eh?

  4. from Jan 25, 2023 Pilot-On Line story: “The report cherry-picked a time period for scrutiny that took place during a “once-in-a-lifetime pandemic,” Toscano said… (Toscano is Ms. Bennett’s attorney).

    March and April 2020 was the time period the AG studied because it was the time period during which parole grants dramatically increased and victim notifications stopped. There was no “cherry picking”

    Also, why would the “once-in-a-lifetime” pandemic influence parole decisions made during March and April of 2020? The state government did not announce any plans for Covid-related jail/prison releases until mid-April, 2020, and even then the only people being released were those with less than a year left on their sentence.

    People should stop trying to blame all of their poor decisions and [allegedly] criminal actions on the pandemic.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      “Also, why would the “once-in-a-lifetime” pandemic influence parole decisions made during March and April of 2020?”

      At that time period, vaccinations were just ramping up. I can see a parole board being more open to granting paroles at such a time. Prisons were thought to be particularly dangerous, I believe. I am not saying the claim is valid (I am honestly not following this one that closely), I am just saying that the concept is not implausible.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        2021 vaccines ramped up.
        2020 the pandemic was rampant.

        Prisons were considered ripe for the virus. Crowding by nature and poor conditions and limited medical services.

        I suspect a “let’s get some of these” outta har’s way had a little to do with it.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          You are correct. Vaccines did not ramp up until Q1-2 2021… how those years do blur…

        2. Yes. And the state set policy for early releases, basing the decision on time remaining on prisoner’s sentence. This person’s parole decisions had nothing to do with how much time remained on a sentence.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      See below. I’d be curious as to age and general health conditions of the early releasees.

      Remember 3/2020 was when Trump acknowledged that this stuff could be bad.

      1. Usually, if a prisoner’s health is being considered during a parole hearing the issue is front and center in the petition and during the hearing.

        I suspect that if it was a factor in any of the decisions in question Ms. Bennett (or others) would have already brought it up when defending her decisions.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          It was just one month early when the then 69-yo Texas Lt. Gubna said, “Everyone over 70 should sacrifice themselves to save the economy.”

          So, if these were all 20+ years in, over 65, yada, yada, there could have been influence from COVID concerns. Obviously, victim notification would have slowed the process. I would lay blame least on bleeding heart liberalism, and look more at prevailing circumstances, but either way things will out.

          1. Obviously, victim notification would have slowed the process.

            Yes, but victim notification is written into the law.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Well, I guess if the AG had been on top of things as he claims to be, the Statute of Limitations wouldn’t have lapsed. Only thing left is impeachment.

Leave a Reply