Brace Yourself. Here Come the State Spending Cuts.

The outlines of the spending cuts that Gov. Timothy M. Kaine has in mind to close a looming $3 billion revenue shortfall in the $77 billion biennial budget are coming into view.

As Jeff Schapiro reports in the Times-Dispatch today, Kaine will focus on controlling state payroll, which runs about $5 billion annually (or $10 billion over two years). The commonwealth could save $250 million by canceling 2 percent pay raises for state employees this year and next. Layoffs are an option, but the savings are offset by expensive severance benefits to state employees. I’m betting that vacant positions will remain unfilled, with reductions to be made through normal attrition.

The state can tap another $400 million or more in the rainy day fund, and it can finance some construction projects by borrowing money instead of paying cash. (Whether that option makes sense in today’s financial environment, however, may be debatable.)

The Governor has set an example to the rest of the state administration by finding $900,000 in cuts from the Executive office budget this year and $1.4 million next year. The second-year cuts will amount to 10 percent of the office budget. And that’s on top of $667,000 in cuts from previous initiatives.

According to a press release, cuts in the Governor’s Office include elimination of 8 positions through layoffs and turnover, trimming the grocery bill for “official events” by 25 percent, reductions in travel on state business, cuts in staff cell phone costs, newspaper subscriptions and travel, sending more invitations by email instead of snail mail, and smaller dry cleaning bills for linens at special events. You know the Governor’s Office is getting serious when the order goes out: No more bottled water.

Bacon’s bottom line: Emergency measures are fine for emergencies, which the current budget crisis clearly is. But the culture of state government is such that the costs inevitably creep back ito the system. The Warner administration cut hundreds of jobs, but a few years later, state employment levels hit new highs. In other words, there were few long-term gains in productivity that allowed the state to do the same work with fewer employees. Imposing temporary austerity measures is no way to run an organization for long-term efficiency.

The commonwealth has many smart, highly motivated employees. I’ve met them. They’d be an asset to any organization. But state government has lots of deadwood, too, which no one seems able to root out. I have friends who work as contractors for state government who tell stories, which should horrify tax-paying citizens, of nincompoops in do-nothing jobs. Stae workforce productivity remains a huge issue.

Have you seen any new restructuring and reform initiatives lately? Does anyone know which of the restructuring initiatives of the Warner administration have been completed? It does little good to slash costs for a year or two then return to Business As Usual. State government needs to find ways to drive costs out of the system permanently.

Gov. Kaine will have more to say about state spending priorities later today. His personal parsimony sets a good example. But tax-paying Virginians deserve a lot more.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

9 responses to “Brace Yourself. Here Come the State Spending Cuts.”

  1. I’m personally mistrustful of the numbers stated. If only the Commonwealth adhered to GAAP standards, we would all enjoy the enlightenment of transparency in government. Alas, we are left to trust in a highly political accounting process.

    As an employee of the Commonwealth, I have a great deal of firsthand experience with the institutional waste you speak of. There are, however, trade-offs. Speaking anecdotally, most of the less productive workers are those who have served the state for years or decades. As a white collar worker with in-demand technology skills, job security and a low stress work environment are important reasons that “smart, highly motivated” people will accept state employment over higher paying positions in private industry.

    The rank-and-file employees of the Commonwealth could be partners in the effort to reduce waste, but that requires leadership and a willingness to take an honest inquisitive look at each agency’s policies and initiatives. In my experience, the heads of agencies and departments don’t really care about saving money. If we really care about efficiency, we would take a longer view and reorganize the entire bureaucracy, eliminate some of the old school hierarchy and implement more cross-functional teams and departments. Of course, that process carries its own up front cost. Unfortunately, Virginia does not have a great track record at creating efficiency.

    Great example: the partnership between VITA and Northrop Grumman. VITA was formed to provide a state-wide umbrella to reduce the cost of procuring hardware and basic IT infrastructure for state agencies. In practice, the partnership cripples procurement, increases costs, and slows down implementation of technology solutions. Virginia now has our very own Halliburton.

    Where there’s no will, there’s no way.

  2. Gloucester Avatar
    Gloucester

    I agree with Rabbit and I’m a state employee. If you look closely at the list of budget reductions, you will find very few programs that have been eliminated and very few reorganizations listed.

    I’ll give Gov. Kaine and his Chief of Staff this: they called for eliminating underperforming programs when the guidance went out, but few bureaucrats are bold or creative enough to make a tough call. They drop an employee here or there or order less copy paper.

    What we have left are programs only on paper, barely limping along, with their workload spread out over the remaining staff. It becomes easy to be a slacker under those conditions–put off work in one moribund program with claims that you’re working on another and going to twice the number of useless meetings.

  3. Larry G Avatar

    what is the number one job of any government agency?

    Government employees seldom are stumped by this question whereas “civilians”, even those who say they want a smaller government – are.

    The answer is that the number one mission of any government agency is to – stay alive as an agency.

    That means… if you lead that agency… you fight for funding.. you do power points showing your accomplishments and explaining why your mission is vital and needed… and when forced to.. cut a finger or toe off.. as long as the rest of the body survives…

    When the boss of a private agency shows up and says that people are not longer buying buggy whips or buying betamaxes, even the boss, supervisors and employees understand the realities.

    But there is no equivalent in government.

    If a govt agency is created, it must have been a good reason why – and that reason is – forever.

  4. Darrell -- Chesapeake Avatar
    Darrell — Chesapeake

    “interesting chart at the referenced URL.

    I wonder where Virginia fits in the list…”

    Why that would be right after Maryland, in spot 11.

    Looking at VITA, I see a small version of NMCI. Company supplies the Enterprise, hires former government workers, and leaves the customer a catalog of computers. Meeting IT contingencies becomes an operational nightmare of inflexibility.

  5. Looks like Kaine decided that Virginia is fat on Correction facilities.

    here are two data points:

    1. – the Department of Corrections has become the largest state agency in terms of the number of employees – bigger even than VDOT.

    2. – earlier this year, it was discovered that the Dept of Corrections had too many beds and was selling that space to other states.

    … it would seem that Kaine picked an obvious place to cut .. unless one believes that the state could actually “make money” (i.e. pay for correction officers salaries) by taking in other state’s inmates.

    so… is Kaine’s approach a good approach?

  6. I’m going to comment on the NMCI/VITA issue since I actually did work in that arena.

    Here’s my take:

    Many organizations – govt and non-govt – develop what I call “stove-pipe” mentalities .. that result in, for want of a better phrase – “sub-cultures” within the bigger corporate entity.

    These sub-cultures have figured out how they want to do their function … sometimes there are good reasons…. sometimes it’s just how one guy in that agency thinks how things computer should be done.

    What I’d run into was things like – two agencies – one of them preferring DELL computers with MS Word and the other one preferring .. differently-configured Gateways with WordPerfect…

    Some agencies were scrupulous about network security… others had none – and wanted none..”it would “restrict” the way they do business”.

    Anyhow…long story short – trying to get these agencies to do things computer in a standardized way is an awful job.

    With a company like Walmart – doing that is a strategic necessity.

    You tell the agencies how the company is going to standardized .. and if they fight against you – you fire the malcontents and do the standardization.

    If something got overlooked/forgotten.. you go back and fix it..

    but .. you do end up standardized.. which is vital IMHO.

    With the government – you have folks who become obstacles to this – who cannot be fired.

    They can put one roadblock and another in the path.. they can stand back and watch sand get in the gears and do nothing.. because they essentially don’t support … their role of deciding how their system works becoming subordinate to a corporate function standard.

    When you step back from the stovepipe politics – all you see is the turmoil and tumult of the attempt to standardize.

    I delt with this stuff.

    We’d have folks go out and buy software – incompatible with their desktop hardware AND network security – install it on their computer – which would then go belly-up… and then they’d call for support and tell the tech that if they didn’t figure out what was wrong and fix it pronto – that they’d have them fired….

    Again.. when you see two corporate entities merge – in the background – out of sight of most folks – they must standardize their computer operations .. and it’s a difficult task.. that requires folks to make changes…

    but they cannot and will not tolerate.. these little fifedoms that oppose change but with government – the “opposition” often has tenure.

    The contractor gets caught in the middle of this.

    They have their marching orders from corporate but trying to accomplish what corporate wants – is sometimes in direct opposition to what these little stovepipe operations want.

    and if you think this is not a serious problem… go back and read the 911 report – the part that talked about the intelligence agencies refusing to share information with each other…

    it’s a reality….

  7. Anonymous Avatar

    My question is why the spending cuts now? Because of the Economic crisis?

    “the number one mission of any government agency is to – stay alive as an agency.” You mean like March of Dimes? They solved their mission, and then invented a new one. One far less likely to be “solved”.

    How many government agencies have the kind of success that March of Dimes saw? On the otherr hand do we need a state tea taster and mattress inspector?

    “the question about stagnated incomes is really a multi-part question. Here is the better question, and its multi-part answers:

    1. Did household income stagnate or decline for households with no earners at all? YES.

    2. How about for households that had a decline in the number of earners? YES.

    3. How about those that had the same number of earners? NO.

    4. How about those that had an increase in the number of earners? NO.

    By now it should be obvious that an even better question is: Did the middle class income earner participate in the overall economy’s growth? It’s a better question because it removes the confusion caused by differences in the number of earners per household.

    So let’s take a look at how “income per earner” did for each of the quintiles of household income.

    The chart below shows the result for the period 1994-2007. Note that any possible definition of the “middle class” would show that middle class earners’ incomes did not stagnate or decline. In fact, they grew in tandem with the 3.2% average growth rate of overall disposable income per capita (a derivative of GDP).

    The Skeptical Optimist now provides evidence that on an “income per earner” basis, income grew at about the same rate (3.4% to 3.9%) for all income groups between 1994 and 2007, and actually grew the fastest (3.9%) for the bottom quintile (see chart above). In other words, between 1994 and 2007, the rich have gotten richer, the middle class has gotten richer, and the poor have gotten richer, all at about the same rate. “

    http://boomerang.blogs.com/optimist/2008/10/the-rumor-about.html

    RH

  8. If we are all richer.. how come we have all these foreclosures and our 410K …cratering while the corporate guys went home with millions.. even if their company went bankrupt?

  9. Anonymous Avatar

    Being richer doesn’t mean you cannot overspend.

    They went home with millions because they negotiate their job conditions better than you and I.

    We don’t have “All these forclosures” Most Americans own there homes outright or are able to make their mortgage.

    What we have is irrational panic following irrational exuberance. Do your part and go buy some stock today.

    What do you mean by cratering? Even with all the losses I have taken (like justabout everyone) my accounts have still “made” me 500% more than I have “lost”. Anyway, all the money that’s in there is money I didn’t need for anything else – the mortgage and groceries were paid for. Where was it supposed to go – more land speculation?

    You think the data is wrong? That we actually are NOT richer? That we cannot afford to support a government that does ITS job without going bankrupt?

Leave a Reply