Boomergeddon Update: Medicare HI

Image credit: 2016 Medicare Trust Fund Board of Trustees annual report
Image credit: 2016 Medicare Trust Fund Board of Trustees annual report

by James A. Bacon

The Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, one of the four major components of the Medicare program, will run out of money in 2028 — two years earlier than previously projected. That appraisal comes from the Medicare Board of Trustees, which, the last time I checked, is not funded by the Koch Brothers.

The news of the accelerating structural crisis in the nation’s health care safety net stirred only the slightest of ripples in the news media, which buried the story deeper than an Iranian nuclear research facility. One would think the news to be of more than passing interest to the program’s 55.3 million recipients and thus to major media, but the nation’s elite journalists are so obsessed with the latest Tourettes-like tweets by Donald Trump that they cannot bestir themselves to ask the presidential candidates how they intend to preserve the social safety net.

This news comes soon after Congress and the Obama administration avoided the impending depletion of Social Security’s Disability Insurance (DI) trust fund only through the expediency of folding it into the Old Age Survivors Insurance trust fund, thus accelerating by a year the impending breakdown of both by 2034.

Medicare and Social Security will not collapse when the trust funds run out, but the gap between spending and revenues will have to be covered either by a hike in taxes, a cut in benefits or an increase in government borrowing, each of which would be grievous in its own way. The magnitude of this gap, caused by the retirement of the Baby Boomer generation, will precipitate the nation’s greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression — what I call Boomergeddon.

And to what do we owe the accelerating crack-up of Medicare’s hospital insurance program (often referred to as Medicare Part A). Not to accelerating health care costs, ironically enough. “Since 2008, U.S. national health expenditure (NHE) growth has been below historical averages, despite having accelerated in 2014 mainly due to insurance expansions,” state the Medicare trustees.

But having said what the problem is not, the Medicare trustees fail to explain what it was. That is understandable, given the politically sensitive nature of what appears to be going wrong — weak job growth, the low labor participation rates, and less-than-expected payroll revenues. After real-world economic performance has under-performed forecast economic forecast every year for seven years running, the Obama administration appears to be adjusting its long-range forecasts for purposes of long-term budgetary planning.

Nobody wants to admit, least of all in an election year, that economic growth and job creation stink. But that is precisely what underlies the rush to ruin of Medicare, Social Security and the federal budget deficit generally. A weak economy means weak revenue.

Bacon’s bottom line. Boomergeddon is running right on track. The Congressional Budget Office projects a $534 billion deficit this year. (We don’t hear about that number from our journalistic elite either.) Were it not for monetary easing, ultra-low interest rates and multi-billion remittances from the Federal Reserve Bank, the deficit would be far bigger. In any case, CBO projects a cumulative $9.4 trillion in deficits, to be added to the existing $19 trillion national debt. The U.S. is on track to carry World War II levels of borrowing by the mid-2030s, the big difference being that in 1945 the war was over and the nation could demobilize its massive military, while in 2035 the nation will not be in a position to demobilize its social safety net.

Meanwhile, the structural budget deficit of the United States must be viewed in the context of chronic deficits of the European countries and Japan, and the massive over-leveraging of the Chinese economy. As McKinsey & Co. pointed out in a 2015 report, the global economy has added $57 trillion since the Great Recession; rather than de-leveraging, virtually every major nation has doubled down with increased borrowing. Systemic risk has never been greater. All it takes is a black swan event, and financial chaos will rip through the global economy, transmitted by financial linkages that public policy makers don’t even know exist. The Bear Stearns/Lehman Brothers financial panic will be a picnic by comparison.

The question, as always, for Virginians is this: How do we as citizens and taxpayers protect ourselves from the inevitable financial reckoning? Borrowing more is not an answer. (Somebody please tell Richmond Mayor Dwight Jones, who proposes raising the city’s debt limit in order to borrow $580 million more in bonds over the next 10 years.) Building new transportation mega-projects that require subsidies indefinitely into the future is not an answer. Expanding social welfare programs like Medicaid is not an answer. The storm is coming, and we must prepare.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

15 responses to “Boomergeddon Update: Medicare HI”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    more inaccurate and erroneous blather from those who don’t seem to care about whether what they say is actually true or not.

    this is a big problem with you guys…

    ” The Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, one of the four major components of the Medicare program, will run out of money in 2028 ”

    this is not true.

    it’s demonstrably not true.

    what will happen – IF NOTHING IS DONE – i.e. no changes made – is that the fund will not be able to pay 100% of costs.

    that’s NOT the same as “running out of money” – by a long shot but don’t let such misleading rhetoric dissuade those who like to engage in such misinformation and disinformation…

    Before we ever get to that point – the most obvious corrective action is to increase the co-pay from folks who make more than 85K a year in retirement income, completely remove all government subsidies for medicare advantage which essentially uses taxpayer money to pay for the original 20% co-pay that Medicare required before a GOP-controlled Congress approved Medicare Advantage.

    Medicare Advantaged should go away entirely – and every person on Medicare should have to pay a 20% co-pay for all charges unless they are means-tested as financially incapable.

    Anyone who has 85K in retirement income, owns one or more homes and 500K in assets should have to pay substantially more than they do right now.

    but in no way, shape or form – does Medicare Part A – “run out of money” -that’s just flat out a mis-representation of the facts but repeated over and over by folks who have an pre-disposed agenda against Medicare at the start.

    1. More inaccurate and erroneous blather from someone who thinks before he writes….

      It is true that the Hospital Insurance program will not run out of money. It will continue to be funded by payroll taxes. But the payroll taxes will not cover the full cost of administering the program. The payment-expenditure gap will be covered by monies stashed away in the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund.

      That Trust Fund will run out of money in ten years.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    nope. The SURPLUS money built up over the years will run out but Medicare Part A -will not – not as long as the FICA tax -which funds is – is collected.

    You are playing cute games with words like “trust funds” per the way the anti-medicare ideologues 0f which you clearly are associating yourself with – typically depict the issue.

    The TRUTH is – that Medicare Part A will NOT RUN OUT OF MONEY –

    this word game being played is inherently dishonest in my view.

    there is no effort what-so-ever – making this clear and instead it’s portrayed as something not true.

    and the second level of disinformation here is implying that this has something to do with the deficit and debt – which it does not.

    Social security and Medicare Part A are funded from FICA taxes not general revenues – and by DESIGN – they reduce what they pay out when FICA can no longer fund it 100%

    that’s the way FICA/SS/Medicare Part A where designed originally.

    they have nothing what-so-ever to do with the deficit and debt.

    1. Your rhetorical nit-picking is simply astonishing.

  3. CrazyJD Avatar

    What’s always interesting about Larry’s posts is his predilection for finding the tiny points that he considers inaccurate, expanding them to be an enormous lie that will doom the foundations of the Republic… all the while ignoring the larger points being made. He never really challenges them. In Brexit terms, he might be called a wicket keeper.

  4. Hill City Jim Avatar
    Hill City Jim

    I just wish this blog had an “ignore” button.
    Jim, can you give him his money back?

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    well it’s not “tiny” points when major issues are purposely and continuously misrepresented by those who apparently are just fine with that. I’m not.

    the debate is worth having – on legitimate terms… using actual facts…

    perhaps we should re-think the CONCEPT of Social Security and Medicare Part A (as well as Medicare Part B) – but having the debate on disinformation is a disservice to everyone.

    The debate over deficit and debt is also important and it’s just as important to understand what spending goes into the deficit and debt – and what does not.

    It’s also important to understand what Mandatory spending is – and is not.

    but the way we go about these things these days is totally polluted by those who have agendas and who seek to actually confuse the issue rather than clarify it.

    and HCJ – you DO have an ignore button guy.. and you whining that you don’t .. what can I say guy?

    1. Aaaarrrrghhh!

      Jim B: “Medicare and Social Security will not collapse when the trust funds run out, but the gap between spending and revenues will have to be covered either by a hike in taxes, a cut in benefits or an increase in government borrowing, each of which would be grievous in its own way.”

      LarryG: “what will happen – IF NOTHING IS DONE – i.e. no changes made – is that the [medicare trust] fund will not be able to pay 100% of costs. [T]hat’s NOT the same as “running out of money” – by a long shot but don’t let such misleading rhetoric dissuade those who like to engage in such misinformation and disinformation….”

      Great God Almighty! Who wants to discuss this semantic drivel? The operating fund (aka “medicare trust fund”) will run negative in a few years. The backup operating fund (aka “hospital insurance trust fund”) will run negative a few years later. That total shortfall has to be replenished someway, somehow. Jim thinks that FACT is significant and worth discussing. Larry is entitled to his opinion that it isn’t significant, but not to the FACT of the shortfall, whatever name he puts on it (“will not be able to pay” sounds unequivocally like a shortfall to me!). We really don’t need any more ad hominem name-calling addressed not only to Jim but his entire readership, such as: “More inaccurate and erroneous blather from those who don’t seem to care about whether what they say is actually true or not. This is a big problem with you guys…”

      Now before I shut up, I have two real questions raised by this post. Jim, you refer to “the politically sensitive nature of what appears to be going wrong — weak job growth, the low labor participation rates, and less-than-expected payroll revenues.” OK, I understand the first and last, but what about “low labor participation rates”: what is that a reference to? And LarryG, you make the broad statement, “Social security and Medicare Part A are funded from FICA taxes not general revenues – and by DESIGN – they reduce what they pay out when FICA can no longer fund it 100%.” That wasn’t my understanding but it does raise a couple of structural questions: if these trust funds are emptied, does that automatically cut benefits? And is there any reason they can’t be replenished from general revenues rather than increased FICA taxes?

      And I have this feature to offer everyone else:
      http://i1220.photobucket.com/albums/dd459/Huggybear45/ignore-button.jpg

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Worth understanding – that Trust Fund has different meanings and are funded in different ways – some of them from earmarked taxes like FICA -but other taxes also – like the Federal gas tax, airport fees, as well as premiums for Medicare and Federal govt civilian and military – health insurance and pensions.

    Medicare Part B is NOT FICA-funded but it still is called a Trust Fund – because premiums collected from subscribers are put into that Trust Fund. In addition – the govt puts money into it. 75% of Medicare Part B is funded by the govt and 25% is funded by subscribers. It all goes into a “Trust Fund” but that fund will NEVER “run out of money” because it is continuously funded – 25% from subscribers , 75% from the govt (taxpayer subsidy) – and YES – THIS TRUST fund DOES very much add to the deficit and debt.

    But so is the Trust Fund for the Military/Civilian Pensions – also funded from contributions from employees – and the govt – and yes.. adds to deficit/debt – and yes -has 100-year unfunded liabilities also.

    Further – health care (trust funds) for the military – both active duty – as well as their dependents – and retired – as well as the VA are ALL – ALSO – ENTITLEMENTS – that add to deficit and debt and also have 100-year unfunded liabilities.

    I do not expect Jim to go into depth about these other trust funds and how they operate – but I DO think to purposely focus primarily on SS and Medicare – and ignoring these others – in any discussion of deficit and debt – just truly distorts the actual reality of the deficit and debt aka Boomergeddon.

  7. Acbar, the labor participation rate is the percentage of the adult population of working age (18 to 65) that is participating in the labor force, i.e. working. The rate peaked around 2000, started declining in the 2000s, and plunged in the 20101, as shown by this chart from the U.S. Department of Labor Statistics:

    https://www.baconsrebellion.com-content/uploads/2016/06/labor_participation_rate.jpg

    Labor participation hasn’t been this low since the early 1970s, when many women stayed home. The significance is obvious: The fewer people working, the fewer people paying payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Social Security and FICA have been adjusted over the years as revenues and payouts drifted from the original scheme – mostly because people are living longer than when it was first created and one fix is to extend the retirement age.

    The reason we have a surplus – a “trust fund” right now is because Ronald Reagan worked to change SS in anticipation of future needed changes.

    Jim continues to dredge up this canard about “running out of money” as part of his adopted premise from the ideological -driven that SS and Medicare are fiscally irresponsible and not sustainable and their common tactic is to use misinformation and disinformation about the ‘trust fund” – ” running out of money” and it works because like other things like health care – the average person does not know – has not taken the time – to know and so it “works”.

    But Jim knows better or should.

    He ALSO KNOWS that FICA taxes are NOT General Revenues and as such were explicitly designed to function without a connection to deficit and debt but he never fails to dredge up that ideological-driven lie also.

    FICA and Medicare Part A have no effect on the deficit nor the debt but there is no shortage of purveyors of this falsehood – some are parroting what they heard -and believe without actually finding out and some who do know are purposely deceiving others… count the folks at Heritage, CATO, etc who regularly produce “papers” about SS and deficit and debt.

  9. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Acbar asked: ” “Social security and Medicare Part A are funded from FICA taxes not general revenues – and by DESIGN – they reduce what they pay out when FICA can no longer fund it 100%.” That wasn’t my understanding but it does raise a couple of structural questions: if these trust funds are emptied, does that automatically cut benefits? And is there any reason they can’t be replenished from general revenues rather than increased FICA taxes?”

    It was done that way on purpose to explicitly keep it separate from the ebb and flow of the general revenues and budget – and it remains that way – and you do NOT want it to start using general revenues to make up shortfalls for the same reason it was not created that way to start with.

    You want it to remain separate – for it’s own sustainability and to not adversely affect the general revenues fund.

    it needs to be actuarially adjusted from time to time JUST AS Jim Bacon”s Long Term Care insurance was – because SS and Med A are actually INSURANCE to start with – more precisely they are an Insured Annuity designed to not only pay retirements but disability, death benefits and hospital care but not providers – Medicare Part B does that.

    Another fact – not recognized and acknowledged by the ideological-driven opponents like Mr. Bacon – people who do not “work” – do not pay into Social Security – do not get it. Anyone who does taxes can tell you that how much people get with Social Security varies by what they paid into it – and it they did not pay into it – they don’t get it – so it’s NOT “welfare” either.

    Again – Jim should know the facts as a journalist – he should take pains to know them – and he should clearly deal with them honestly even as he would express his disagreement with the concept …

    as opposed to doing what Heritage and other like-minded are doing which is purposely deceiving people – on the facts – because they are ideological opposed to the CONCEPT. That”s not a honest approach but unfortunately it works because the average person does not understand the facts and these propaganda types have no intention of actually dealing with the facts.

    Let me say – some time ago – I was attracted to BR because I admired what I thought was a no-nonsense, fact-based blog that Jim spent time making sure the facts were correct – on a wide spectrum of issues.

    As time as gone by – things have slipped on that front and it is truly dismaying….

    we do not have to agree – we all have our philosophical leanings – but we should not be playing games with facts… and on this issue – and health care in general, and education – we seem to be fast and loose these days of late.

    one addendum here on the issue – Medicare Part B is NOT funded from FICA but from general revenues and all the dangers of affecting general revenues and vice versa DO APPLY.

    Jim should make that crystal clear – he should show the difference because Part B IS a real threat to the budget and deserves on-target discussion and reform – which I have alluded to many times here – because Part B is sold to seniors for $122 a month – even if they have 85K in annual income, own 2 houses , 3 cars and have a million in assets… they still pay that $122 a month and that has to change. It’s become a de-facto subsidy to people who should be paying far more for their health care than they are.

    MedicAid – you’re not going to change except in the wet dreams of the truly whacked out budget zealots – because the simple fact is virtually everyone who receives MedicAid are kids, women with kids, the elderly in nursing homes and the handicapped and disabled. Only the truly whacked out are going to abide by tossing these folks onto the streets…

    These are all issues worthy of dialogue and debate here in BR – but they should be based on facts – of which Jim should be taking the lead in providing in the initial blog post.

    So, yes – I do react when he starts off with the same disinformation drivel being promoted by these so-called “think tanks” that purposely intend to deceive folks.

    I expect more from Jim…

    1. Larry, I remain mystified by your criticism. What about this statement from the blog post do you disagree with?

      Medicare and Social Security will not collapse when the trust funds run out, but the gap between spending and revenues will have to be covered either by a hike in taxes, a cut in benefits or an increase in government borrowing, each of which would be grievous in its own way.

  10. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Jim – you are playing word games here by using phrases like ” will run out of money in 2028″

    The trust fund is an account – it does not “run out of money”.

    ALL FICA taxes collected go into that account – and all money paid out in benefits comes out of that account.

    As long as FICA taxes are collected it will never run out of money and to word any phrase that way is deceptive and misleading and you know it – you’re playing games like your think tank friends do.

    what happens is this.

    FICA taxes are collected and put into the trust fund. Benefits paid are taken from that fund.

    In the past – since the last adjustment was made to FICA and SS during Reagans term – in anticipation of the boomer generation – FICA generated more in taxes than it paid out in benefits.

    The “surplus” was intended to make up shortfalls in payouts in the event that more adjustments were needed and not done right away.

    When the surplus is used up – and no adjustments made – the fund is not “out of money” – it will continue to receive – on a daily basis – FICA taxes and it will continue to pay out – on a daily basis SS and Medicare Part A payments but by law it cannot pay out 100% of scheduled benefits – it can only pay out what FICA is expected to generate.

    the fund never goes “broke” or “runs out of money”.

    when you use those words to describe the fact that the surplus that was generated has been used – AND you do so by conflating it in the context of Boomergeddon and deficit and debt you are promoting something that is not true.

    It COULD BE – that a decision might be made to make up the FICA shortfall with general revenues but it is also quite likely – even more likely that reduced benefits will be paid out and/or FICA will be adjusted.

    This is no more a fiscal disaster than your Long Term Care insurance having to adjust it’s premiums to deal with actuarial changes not 100% predicted.

    To depict it as such is simply not the truth -no more than it’s the truth that the insurance company “jacked up” your rates as you said.

    Either you do not understand or you purposely intend to portray these things in a different way than the SS trustees or the insurance company see them.

    In all cases – it’s impossible to predict actuarial trends with 100% accuracy – whether it’s FICA/SS or private insurance – that’s not fiscal disaster, aka boomergeddon no more than the man in the moon.

    And the real irony here is that – without mandated FICA – what would happen to many folks? They’d end up on MedicAid – and that WOULD be a fiscal disaster.

    Every industrialized country on the face on the earth has some form of mandated savings for retirement and health care – better to make people put aside money that for other taxpayers to pick up the tab for entitlements later or just pretend we’ll let those folks die in the streets like 3rd world countries.

    there are no countries on earth that don’t have that kind of mandate that end up with a better situation than the industrialized countries that do have that mandate – NONE! All those non-mandate countries are 3rd world or developing world whose old, sick and helpless literally die in the streets …

    so you can continue to be “mystified” and post this deceptive ideological tripe and I’ll continue to “de-mystify”… deal?

  11. JOHN BR Avatar

    For those who have not noticed, there have already been massive tax increases to support medicare and social security.
    The maximum social security tax is now over $7,000.00. Forty years ago, when many boomers started working, it was well under $1,000.00. So a boomer has seen the annual tax increase by more than 700%.

    When medicare started, the tax was $23.00 a year. Now many people pay thousands. An increase of over 1000%.

    Without these huge increases, the system would have died years ago.

    What has happened is that the government agencies running such programs have grown massively and benefits are paid to many who were never intended to get coverage.
    Unless expenses are controlled and unless politicians stop buying votes with your medicare and social security dollars, the system will eventually fail no matter how high the taxes go.
    And I don’t mean social security benefit increases. Compared to what they contributed over their lifetimes, most boomers will get much smaller monthly checks than people who retired 20-30 years ago.

Leave a Reply