by Jon Baliles

Early voting has begin in Virginia and the Richmond casino advocates have gone all-in with the mayor and City Council to make sure the referendum got back on the ballot and now are betting the house with an absurd amount of money to make sure the referendum passes this time.

Jimmy Cloutier at Virginia Investigative Journalism has an interesting piece on the all out effort by the casino advocates to buy their way to a victory at the polls  this time around. He points out that two out-of-state companies (Urban One, based in Maryland and Churchill Downs, based in Kentucky) have already raised $8.1 million which “dwarfs the amount of money raised in every Virginia legislative race and ballot initiative in state history, according to an analysis of campaign finance data by OpenSecrets.”

Urban One CEO Alfred Liggins said on WRVA the other morning that Richmonders “deserve” another opportunity to vote for the casino. He also said, “I feel blessed that Richmonders are going to have a second time to consider this project.” And that would certainly be appropriate language since he and the casino advocates are asking and “encouraging” many church leaders over the next six Sundays to tell their flocks that a casino in Richmond is just what the man upstairs would want us to be blessed with. They want the churches to lead the praying for a casino so the casino owners can then do their own kind of preying.

Liggins also said the rebranded Richmond Grand Resort and Casino as “absolutely a new design,” even though Axios Richmond took a look at the rebranding pictures and schematics and found that Aside from the new name and new renderings, the only other substantial change [from 2021] to plans for the facility is a promise to include pickleball courts in a 55-acre park surrounding the venue.” Pickleball and slots are coming. How did we ever survive before?

Spending more than $8 million for a local ballot initiative could be a tell (to use a poker term) of several things — the advocates plan to buy their way to victory with door-to-door canvassing, ballot harvesting, etc.; they will try and paint a picture of a benevolent development project that won’t serve investors but rather provide funding to solve every problem the city faces; or possibly that their idea for a predatory casino is not as popular as they think and they are spending as much to make it seem like a sure thing/done deal.

Regardless of the flood of money, casino opponents are still determined to fight the proposal, even though they have only raised about $200,000 so far.

“This makes David and Goliath look like a fair fight,” said Paul Goldman, a political strategist and former chairman of the Virginia Democratic Party, who is leading his second campaign against the casino. “This is like David versus Goliath and his entire family.”

To give you a sense of how much money casino advocates are spending, they have spent (as of August 31) $479,000 to groups to canvass the city and knock on doors, and just recently they paid the Unite Here hospitality workers union $800,000 to earn their support and also knock on doors.

All of this spending will continue as early voting gets underway and November 7 approaches; and remember, the casino owners also promised to pay the city $26.5 million within 30 days if the referendum is approved.

So right now the casino advocates are committed to spending at least $34.6 million to buy their way into being a player in Richmond (and by the time it is over, it will very likely be north of $40 million). That is an incredible amount of money spent for a local referendum in Virginia (or anywhere else). And to put it in perspective, that is more than 2-1/2 times the amount of money spent by every single candidate for Mayor, City Council, School Board, Sheriff, Commonwealth’s Attorney, Clerk of the Court, City Treasurer, and Dog Catcher in Richmond in the 21st Century (just kidding, we don’t elect a dog catcher).

The casino advocates will soon be coming to a doorbell near you and they will stop at nothing and spare no expense to get the referendum past the finish line this time — there is just too much money to be made. They will spend whatever it takes of their money to get their hands on your money, and preying on those who can least afford it.

Jon Baliles is a former Richmond City Councilman. Republished with permission from RVA 5×5.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to ““Blessed“ Is the Second RVA Casino Referendum”

    1. Texas has almost no indian reservations, and thus fewer places to put in a Casino. Texas was one of the last states to legalize pari mutuel betting on horse racing. It never made much money in Texas and horse racing is slowly fading away.

      Sports betting has not be legalized in Texas. https://www.cbssports.com/promotions/sports-betting-in-texas-when-it-will-be-legalized-how-to-bet-online-where-to-get-picks-best-promos/

      As has been reported many times, Hawaii and Utah are the only two states that have no form of legalized gambling. https://www.civilbeat.org/2022/01/gambling-is-illegal-in-hawaii-but-las-vegas-is-only-a-plane-ride-away/#:~:text=Hawaii%20and%20Utah%20are%20the,no%20form%20of%20legalized%20gambling.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        can Texas keep people from betting on their cell phones?

        1. I believe that gambling companies can keep one from getting on one’s cell phone because those sports book companies are not permitted to operate in Texas. In listening to a podcast about how a coach was caught betting on college baseball, it was explained that the betting ap requires the location feature to be turned on and the betting is associated with the phone. The sports books used third party companies to ensure that they are following the laws of all of the states.

  1. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    People of Richmond. I beg you. Quit being stupid. You got the first vote right, surprisingly. Look at all the other City of Richmond “big” projects. How’d they do? How about basic things, like trash pickup? Schools? Tearing down those statues sure made things better, right? (Well, maybe for the Mayor’s friend with the juicy, never shoulda happened contract). Encouraging “vice” (organized gambling is a sucker’s game – the house always wins, and the worthless “public servants” get their grift) is not a long term fix.
    Now, you have to do your part. First, I really think the having children outside of marriage thing has to be acknowledged as a bad thing. Get married. Have a stable household. Then have kids. Sorry for that bit of truth.
    Second, quit voting for race hucksters. Insist on schools that work. Pastors – help form such schools – even homeschool pods, but do something to support “fixing” the horrible education system.
    Third, work on the crime – be proactive with the police. Make it uncomfortable for the criminals to do their thing in your neighborhood.
    Richmond has the potential to be a great city. Again. But you need to quit relying on “leaders” who are grifters. The casino is all about more grift. And will lead to more drugs and more crime. That kind of money has strings with it.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    Casinos might be on their way to quaint obsolescence the way that mobile sports betting is exploding…

    Some folks gotta gamble. Always been this way and laws to stop
    it have failed over and over and now with the advent of the internet and cell phones… it’s all over, if someone wants to throw their money away, no one to stop them any longer!

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Yeah, but it’s the buffet…

      Even Bugsey knew that the family man gambler would spend 1000s just fulfill his need to lose a couple of 100.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        There is something about the “atmosphere” in casinos that is different/not present at other venues.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Yes, the clouds of cigarette smoke! Just kidding.

          1. And a complete lack of clocks.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            lotta “smells” if you know what I mean!

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Spending that much is just a sign of how much more, many multiples of that amount, the industry expects to siphon from the suckers, er, customers. And I’m talking about profit, only a portion of gross spending and losses by bettors.

  4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    When Richmond voters defeated the casino the first time, Petersburg saw its chance. Joe Morrissey worked hard to get a referendum authorized for Petersburg. When Richmond took steps to get a second chance, Morrissey was able to get budget language creating a study of the feasibility of casinos in both cities. When his bill authorizing a referendum in Petersburg this year was killed in the 2023 Session, there was hope that there would be budget language stopping Richmond from having a second referendum and allowing Petersburg to have one. https://www.progress-index.com/story/news/casino/2023/02/03/virginia-senate-panel-again-kills-petersburg-casino-referendum/69868469007/
    I have been told by someone who is very familiar with the process that Louise Lucas was adamant in her opposition to a Petersburg referendum because the consensus is that a casino in Petersburg would hurt the existing casino in Portsmouth. With Lucas in line to be chairman of Senate Finance if the Democrats maintain the majority in 2024, few Senators of either party were going to cross her on this issue.

    I do not like the idea of casinos (and would vote against one if I lived in the city of Richmond), but, if the state is going to allow them, Petersburg should be allowed. As has been discussed on this blog, Petersburg is a really poor city. The casino complex proposed for Petersburg would have, in all its stages, cost around $1.4 billion. One can easily imagine what that type of investment and that many jobs would have done for the city.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      And then you see the decrepit ex-Ramada alongside I-95 and ask, really, do you want to sink your capital in that city? I’m sorry to see what has become of Petersburg, my first paying newspaper job was at the Petersburg P-I. Yes, it would be logical to just let any locality do this and let the market decide which ones fail, if, if, anybody is allowed. I would prefer Virginia hadn’t allowed this at all (and I was once a paid lobbyist on one of the bills.) The control being exercised over this by the Assembly is ripe for trouble.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      And then you see the decrepit ex-Ramada alongside I-95 and ask, really, do you want to sink your capital in that city? I’m sorry to see what has become of Petersburg, my first paying newspaper job was at the Petersburg P-I. Yes, it would be logical to just let any locality do this and let the market decide which ones fail, if, if, anybody is allowed. I would prefer Virginia hadn’t allowed this at all (and I was once a paid lobbyist on one of the bills.) The control being exercised over this by the Assembly is ripe for trouble.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I too would prefer this not be allowed at all. But the genie is out of the bottle and it ain’t going back. From what I heard and read, the proposal made to Petersburg was a serious one. The company has made it clear, I hear, that, if the Richmond casino goes forth, it will not be building in Petersburg.

  5. Right out of the Dominion Energy playbook

  6. VaPragamtist Avatar
    VaPragamtist

    Only because you jokingly mentioned dog catcher. . .its kind of funny because even Richmond’s chief dog catcher has a history of corruption.

    But in Richmond she’s managed a successful marketing campaign for RACC, one that makes her look good and helps hide any negativity. So when comparing to the casino referendum. . .a massive marketing campaign built to hide any negativity about casinos. . .the joke is more apt than probably intended.

    Key takeaways: Richmond is corrupt from the top down; and marketing can hide corruption.

Leave a Reply