Various proposed power line routes from Warrenton’s Blackwell Road substation. Dominion illustration. Click to expand.

by Steve Haner

One of the key skills in politics is to make your constituents happy with money provided from those far, far away. It is happening again as Fauquier County’s leaders want the General Assembly to force all Dominion Energy Virginia’s ratepayers to pay to bury a 230-kv power line out of sight from their voters. 

Taking readers of Bacon’s Rebellion back four years (and there were fewer of you then), the same thing happened with a transmission-scale line built along I-66 to serve an Amazon facility. Given that the power company makes its profit as a percentage of the project cost, convincing it to make the most expensive choice was not hard.

Dominion used its clout within the General Assembly to get legislative cover in one of the omnibus energy-regulation, utility-enrichment bills of the period. With that, the State Corporation Commission fell in line. The provision in question authorized another such “pilot program,” as if the technology for burying these lines was not already very mature. The SCC might have to ignore consumers and fall in line again.

The issue is the additional cost (probably tens of millions of dollars), including the cost of making any future repairs (cheaper with overhead lines if they fail). The issue should also be one of fairness, since in many other locations across the state similar lines just go up with no debate about an underground option.

The transmission line costs just get lumped in together all across Dominion’s system and are collected in Rider T on bills. These costs tend to fluctuate, so nobody really sees the impact of even a big project – but it’s there, and the offshore wind project will eventually be added as well  Costs are not assessed regionally or by district, although one option here would be a special assessment on those who think their lives will be damaged by looking at that power line.

Would customers willingly pay a hefty premium for the protected view? I doubt the Fauquier supervisors even raised that approach. They want all of us in the rest of Virginia to share.

The power line in question will run from the Blackwell Road substation near the edge of Warrenton and there are various routes under consideration. Dominion has this website as its main tool to reach out to the folks in the region, and has maps of options here and here.

It plans to start the SCC application process later this year and hopes to construct the line starting in early 2024. During that process some reliable estimates comparing the cost of the overhead versus underground construction will emerge. The buried lines also involve far more land disturbance.

The bill the 2023 General Assembly should approve would remove any special consideration or rules for an underground line in this case, and free the SCC to make the best decision on issues such as cost and reliability. Bets on that getting introduced?

The news reports so far do not include responses from the county’s legislators (probably shuffled by the new district maps).  This could become a campaign issue. Years ago, as a paid lobbyist for a major electricity user, it was my job to look askance at efforts to jam these costs onto industrial users, and I did engage in one such fight. Others will have to consider whether to accept or oppose this at the Assembly, but there is no consumer advocacy group of consequence.

It is noteworthy that of the politicians in the photograph (see below) touting their support for the underground Amazon line in 2018 only one is still in office, and he is the one from Southwest Virginia who represents zero Dominion customers. Perhaps Delegate Terry Kilgore, now House Majority Leader, will be back for a reprise .

 

 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

29 responses to “Bill to Bury Fauquier Powerline Comes to You”

  1. Ah, the magic response to quell the NIMBYs — bury the power line and bury the cost in the larger electric bill.

    If it works here, expect Dominion to try it everywhere.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      In fairness, I don’t see the company wanting to make this the standard. The buried lines are a pain if something goes wrong, far harder to repair than an overhead line. And their bills are going to skyrocket plenty over the next decade or two without adding this. It should be the SCC acting as decider of when this makes sense on new expansions. But if ordered, or if politically advantageous, Dom will happily take its 9.35% ROE on the more expensive project. This request will be a chip on the next political poker table around some future bill…

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Yeah, but then you never worry about ice (much less of a problem now, eh?) and trimming trees.

        It takes one helluva storm to knock out power in my neighborhood, like Isabel, than in the older hoods.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Oooh, speaking of which, a lightning strike hit the house or damned close last night. Just blew out a cable box power supply. But what’s cool is before I finished my jump, the wife’s iPhone let out with a message, “Lightning has struck 0.0 miles from your position.”

      3. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Oooh, speaking of which, a lightning strike hit the house or damned close last night. Just blew out a cable box power supply. But what’s cool is before I finished my jump, the wife’s iPhone let out with a message, “Lightning has struck 0.0 miles from your position.”

      4. WayneS Avatar

        They are much more expensive to repair when something goes wrong, but they have far fewer instances of something going wrong than do overhead lines. Properly designed and constructed underground power lines are far more reliable than their overhead counterparts.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      In fairness, I don’t see the company wanting to make this the standard. The buried lines are a pain if something goes wrong, far harder to repair than an overhead line. And their bills are going to skyrocket plenty over the next decade or two without adding this. It should be the SCC acting as decider of when this makes sense on new expansions. But if ordered, or if politically advantageous, Dom will happily take its 9.35% ROE on the more expensive project. This request will be a chip on the next political poker table around some future bill…

    3. Actually that is not the actual response. The actual response, and one that almost came to fruition in the Haymarket case, is bury the power line and make the applicant pay for at least the difference between overhead and underground construction.
      The argument revolves around what has been coined the “extension cord policy”, treat bulk power users without existing transmission service just like other landowners who require extension of distribution service to undeveloped properties.
      What you are leaving out the equation in circumstances such as that in Warrenton and previously in Haymarket, is that these bulk power users have located on relatively inexpensive properties without existing infrastructure and then filed load letters with Dominion which is mandated to bring them power.
      Dominion is likely somewhat agnostic with respect to the “extension cord” policy being adopted by either the SCC or the GA but the bulk power users are scared to death of it. Thus, their frantic response and lobbying as a result of the remand brief that voided the hearing examiner’s original route selection in the Haymarket case and ultimately led to Dominion settling with the NIMBYs on the underground option.
      Neither Dominion nor the Data Centers wanted that to go to the VA Supreme Court which both were aware of as as the inevitable next step had they not settled.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        from Dominions point of view, it some project has political support and they get their usual guaranteed profit, what’s not to like?

  2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    This issue, along with education, is the big buzz here in Warrenton. Fauquier has won past power tower battles. Dominion will have its hands full. Property owners here are as zealous as Colonel Mosby. I noticed 6 estates that went up for sale on Springs Road. Some people are leaving instead of putting up one more fight.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e373cd1d246c29527d1eb3fc31184184e46edae28abf51e22e0637fa42f87842.jpg

  3. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    Burying power lines is incredibly expensive, although costs in rural areas are probably a lot less than in suburban areas. A number of groups in McLean worked with proffer money to have utility lines buried at the intersection of Old Dominion and Chain Bridge Road. It cost well over $1.5 million to have an intersection and about 100 feet from the intersection buried. It just isn’t cost effective.

    Because of these high costs, the community task force that worked to update the McLean Community Business District Comp Plan voted not to include undergrounding utilities as an important goal in the revised plan.

    The costs should be paid by the cost-causers, the customers in Fauquier County who will use the line.

    1. killerhertz Avatar
      killerhertz

      The problem is they are two separate issues afaik. First the data center gets approved. Then dominion by law has to supply power to the datacenter. There is nothing forcing them to bury the lines from what I gather.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      You are exactly right. The costs are unaffordable, even in a “big roll”. We looked into paying to bury the residential power lines in my neighborhood 20 years ago. The advertised cost then was a million dollars a mile. Before they dealt with the very high water table here. We didn’t pursue it.

  4. Paul Sweet Avatar
    Paul Sweet

    I wonder if people will be as concerned about stream crossings and soil erosion from construction activities on a buried power line as they are for a pipeline?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      🙂

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      gas pipelines are probably 5-10 times the size of powerlines and powerlines are to serve existing customers at regulated rates as opposed to taking land from other property owners and moving gas to sell at the highest unfettered cost it can fetch including export.

      apples and oranges.. no cigar.

    3. killerhertz Avatar
      killerhertz

      Running a pipeline through a flyover state is not the same as cutting a massive right of way and installing buzzing transmission lines that are loud, ugly, and don’t benefit the community.

      1. Running an ugly pipeline through a flyover state, which doesn’t benefit that community but does provide energy to another community, is the same as cutting a massive right of way and installing buzzing transmission lines that are loud, ugly, and don’t benefit the community they pass through. Flyover peoples’ view of nature is no more or less worthy of protection.

        Whatever view you are trying to protect will likely be gone in a decade. The data center will bring new jobs, which bring more new jobs and more people means more houses, and there goes the neighborhood.

        1. killerhertz Avatar
          killerhertz

          Sorry but you can’t compare established suburban neighborhoods to the vast expanse of great plains states. The areas they are proposing to run lines isn’t empty farm land or undeveloped forest in the middle of nowhere. They’re established suburban neighborhoods in a quaint, sleepy town.

          Datacenters aren’t large employers long term. Computers run themselves and can be administered remotely once they’re built and installed. I work in engineering and have friends in this space so. I don’t believe you know what you are talking about. At most the local and state government will get some tax revenue while its in operation and that’s it. I’d prefer to preserve my neighborhood rather than allow them more income they can allocate to services I believe should be cut.

          1. I disagree. If you get to determine the value of the view from your window, they get to determine the value of the view from their window.

    4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      And high water tables in low-lying areas.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    There are advantages and disadvanges to above ground and buried power lines. For the HP lines, not so much with buried, except over navigatable rivers with shipping traffic, or just use an existing bridge, albeit the towers make a wonderful home to gulls and cormorants.

    The one big advantage that leaps immediately to mind is security of the grid. It’s a whole lot tougher to secure 100 miles of 100s of towers than the entry and exit points. Not like anyone ever sabotaged power lines, or pipelines, or railways, eh? I mean, what terrorist would attack, oh say, the Capitol building for example?

  6. From the map, it appears that there is a lot of undeveloped land in the area. Why not eliminate the power lines completely and build a solar/windmill farm with an associated battery bank/pumped hydro storage facility? More environmentally friendly and no unsightly old technology. /s

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Eric who comments here has solar and a ground-based heat pump. Up front costs are substantial but it pays for itself and then some.

      I would expect the wealthy with land and able to pay the up-front costs would be thinking about that.

      pump-storage is a no go unless done at utility scale and the utility can force existing property owners off their property to build the reservoir. Even then , pump storage is limited to how big a reservoir and that’s pretty much a no-go if it requires the state to grant eminent domain to a utility.

      Talk about NIMBY opposition!

    2. Dream on, a single data center building needs at least 60 megawatts on average. In order to generate that level of power (during daylight hours only of course) the standing rule of thumb would require 60 acres of solar panels to accommodate that demand, leaving in question what the data center would do at night or days with limited sunlight.

      1. killerhertz Avatar
        killerhertz

        But we were told PV solar will save us!

  7. killerhertz Avatar
    killerhertz

    I live in a neighborhood adjacent to the proposed lines. This proposal is ridiculous. These are 40 year old neighborhoods with established views that they are going to destroy.

    The AWS datacenter serves the government site on the other side of town. It doesn’t benefit us, and neither do the power lines.

Leave a Reply