Big U.S. Firms Hide Overseas Jobs

By Peter Galuszka

The immediate and critical question looming before the U.S. at the moment is how to create more jobs. It is Job One (pun intended).

Without jobs, tax revenues will continue to languish. GDP will drop. The need to cut more government services will become more pressing, although cutting is something that should be a secondary priority to creating jobs. If you have a car wreck patient in an emergency room, you give him blood first and stabilize him. Only then do you look at his longer-term problems.

President Barack Obama has been under the gun from the moment he was inaugurated from conservatives who are thumping the same old dogma that somehow Obama is anti-business. No matter what he does, he is wrong. Even when he tries business-friendly policies, such as proposing to end the payroll tax on Dec. 31, he is shot down.

The truth about being anti-business is somewhat dodgy, however. Large corporations complain that the climate is bad. So they continue to horde more than $1 trillion in cash that could be used to hire American workers. They whine about high taxes while some enormous conglomerates such as General Electric pay no federal income taxes.

Now comes a story in today’s Washington Post that shows that large U.S. companies, some of which are angling for tax breaks, do not reveal how many of their employees are based overseas and how many are in the U.S.

This goes to the heart of the hiring problem. Despite the stock markets’ volatility and the debt gloom in the U.S. and Europe, there’s plenty of business buzzing along in places such as Asia and Brazil. U.S.-based companies maybe hiring, but just not in the U.S. It’s a dirty little secret they don’t want the U.S. public to know. Companies such as Apple and Pfizer are “pushing lawmakers to cut their tax bills in the name of job-creation in the U.S.,” the Post says.  But they won’t say how many of their employees are in the U.S. Other tight-lipped firms include Hewlett-Packard and AT&T. Consumer products giant Procter & Gamble at first said it doesn’t reveal location of employees. When the Post pointed out that P&G CEO Bob McDonald revealed how many were overseas in a newspaper opinion piece (35,000 out of 127,000 total), they relented. To its credit GE does provide such information.

It’s the same old story with big corporations. What they say has to be verified and pinned down. Take Wells Fargo which snarfed up Wachovia in the 2008 bank crisis. They are finally renaming and rebranding themselves in Virginia at old Wachovia banks. They took ads that look like phony front pages of such newspapers at the Richmond Times-Dispatch and the Roanoke Times (ethical questions there) to announce themselves as our new best friends. Yet, Wells Fargo is also jamming it to its customers in test markets (not Virginia, at least yet) by charging them a new monthly fee for using their debit cards.

Wachovia, of course, is another story of a large, regional corporation gone bad. The bank had been founded by dour Moravians in Piedmont North Carolina. It had a reputation for reliable service (I have been a customer since 1970). Then First Union, a wild and wooly Southern bank with a lousy reputation, bought Wachovia and its name. Soon Wachovia was getting fined for laundering money from Mexican drug traffickers and was tanking by buying a firm known for dicey subprime mortgages. Goodbye, Wachovia.

What the jobs data suggests is how the U.S. has not kept with the pace of the globalizing economy. As once-U.S. firms broaden their overseas markets, they become less “American.” There’s nothing wrong with that, as long as the U.S. voters and government understand and respond in kind. As such corporations want things in a one-sided way to take advantage of overseas jobs and profits, the rest of us should be grown-up enough to respond in kind.

That means stopping this Easter Bunny belief that they are out for the good ole’ U.S.A. If they are hiring foreign workers over American ones, tax and regulate accordingly. If they are not contributing to the economic recovery by hiring here, keep that in mind.

We’ve been hearing plenty of fairy stories about the benefits of globalization for 20 or 30 years now. They date back to the go-go years of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher and the end of the Evil Empire. Results include the Euro and a quasi-united Europe. Look at those messes today. And don’t let the big companies get away with tax breaks while they deny Americans jobs.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

7 responses to “Big U.S. Firms Hide Overseas Jobs”

  1. the thought occurred to me. If the big corporations are outsourcing overseas and at the same time say that our corporate taxes are the worst in the world – then why ..in the world.. do they continue to do business in this country?

    Bonus Question: Why does Toyota and other Asian companies find it reasonable to “outsource” Japanese jobs to America?

    Why doesn’t Toyota close their plants in this country down and move them to cheaper labor like the rest of our manufacturing industry has?

  2. Peter, Peter, Peter…. Where do I begin?

    For now, let’s just deal with this one statement: “[Corporations] whine about high taxes while some enormous conglomerates such as General Electric pay no federal income taxes.”

    When corporations “whine” about high corporate tax rates, it’s not GE who’s doing the whining. The people who are “whining” are the ones who *don’t* get the special tax breaks. They are “whining” about the fact that rent seekers like GE hire lobbyists and donate PAC money to get special favors in Washington that those who don’t hire lobbyists and donate big bucks don’t get.

    The result of all those tax breaks for special interests are twofold: (1) corporate income tax revenues are lower, and (2) Democrats and other fools and charlatans seek to make up the difference not by eliminating tax favoritism but by raising the top tax rates.

  3. I think one of the problems is that American management is not all that good. Of course, there are well-managed US companies and good managers working at mediocre and even poorly managed companies. But too many top managers are solely focused on short-term gains and don’t have a clue how to position their companies for future gains. It is also so very easy to fall. Past success doesn’t guarantee current or future success.

  4. Groveton Avatar

    Peter is right.

    The shipping of American jobs overseas is happening at epidemic levels. And the companies doing the shipping are hiding behind political contributions and opaque language.

    I know a company that would proudly claim that they hired thousands of Americans in any given year. What they failed to mention was the fact that more of their American employees quit, were laid off, or got fired that year. Their net American employment was decreasing even as their revenues from American customers was increasing. All the while the company loudly touted its hiring of thousands of Americans.

    Other companies hide their off-shoring through the use of surrogates. They stop hiring American workers without ever opening a facility in somewhere like India. Meanwhile, very quietly, they are outsourcing their work that their own workers used to do to a company which uses Indian labor. The company can truthfully say that it doesn’t have any Indian employees. However, it does have plenty of shiny new outsourcing contracts with companies that have lots of Indian employees.

    Even the federal government is not exempt. The feds have rules which require much work to be done in America by Americans. However, the contractors have a trick or two up their sleeves. Let’s say a company is focused on computer processing contracts for Medicaid payments. They know when the existing contracts are coming up for bid. So, what do they do? They send a basic design for Medicaid payment processing software to their facility in Bangalore. The Indians write the system and ship it back to the US. Now, the company bids on the Medicaid projects. The company uses the Indian written system as a starting point in the bid. Therefore, it can bid much more cheaply than a company which intends to adhere to the letter and the spirit if the government policy by using Americans for all the labor.

    Guess which company wins the bid?

    Our future is being sold out from under us while our politicians shove campaign contributions into their pockets and stand idly by.

  5. Boy, Groveton does NOT sound like your average Republican, eh? I think all of them are all in a swivet about the Columbia Free Trade agreement being held up….

    Ironically, Ron Paul lines up with the Dems on “free trade” ….

  6. Groveton Avatar

    LarryG:

    Actually, my beliefs on this matter are almost exactly in line with those of Pat Buchanan.

    Patriotism is anti-partisan.

    A lot of people see the unholy alliance between “globalization” and our useless political elite as a major problem for America’s future.

  7. The bulk of our customers are going to be overseas, and that will require more overseas jobs and more overseas presence.

    Get used to it.
    Learn a foreign language.
    Wnat to major in Business? Better speak chinese.

Leave a Reply