Biden Mounts a Direct Attack on America’s Most Successful Schools for Poor Minority Children

by James C. SherlockThis is pretty cringeworthy, even for the Biden administration.  We have new rules for federal funding for new and expanded charter schools that are demonstrably racist. They uniquely disadvantage the poorest minority students because charter schools are proven to help them learn better than any other option.But the rules are offerings to a higher power- – the teachers’ unions.  The Biden administration Education Department’s new rules for use of federal charter school startup funding are virulently anti-charter and appear to directly violate the law they pretend to enforce.  

They regulate the distribution of federal funding — $400 million annually — under the charter schools startup support provisions of the 2015 Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) (the Act).

Those new rules are unambiguously aimed to stop the expansion of New York City’s Success Academy (S/A) and non-profit charter management organizations (CMOs) like it that focus their efforts on educating poor minority children in our inner cities.

But the new broom sweeps away pretty much every charter that might apply.

The CMOs have proven amazingly successful — embarrassingly so for the teachers’ unions that hate them for it. These rules are political payback.

Actions are required by Virginia’s Governor and Attorney General.

Teachers ‘unions provided both torrents of money and ground troops for Mr. Biden’s campaign. They want the charter movement stopped. Mr. Biden is there for them.

Collateral damage are minority children in Richmond, Petersburg, Portsmouth, Norfolk and even in Virginia’s wealthiest school divisions, whose economically disadvantaged children would benefit enormously from charters to replace failing schools.

Under the new rules, Virginia will never get federal funding support for a new or expanded charter school. Ever.

We’ll have to move forward without them unless the rules are overturned.

Virginia’s charter school program. Only one of Virginia’s current seven charters is targeted to support poor minorities. Only one has a higher percentage of economically disadvantaged kids than the average for the state. That is Green Run Collegiate in Virginia Beach.

One of the seven, Richmond Career Education and Employment Charter School, has fewer than 30 students and cannot really be included for data purposes. So call the number of Virginia charter schools six.

At my personal request Success Academy has offered to assist, pro bono, VDOE in designing a new charter schools system for Virginia that is targeted to assist poor minority children.  

This is like having Tiger Woods offer to teach you golf.

I hope VDOE will accept the offer, even if the Commonwealth needs to fund those schools without federal money.  

Biden’s anti-charter initiative. George Will has written about the attempt by the Biden administration to effectively ban new charters through regulation.

So has The Wall Street Journal:

Under new Education Department rules proposed last month, it would become more difficult for charter schools to receive federal grants.
Applicants would have to prove that the existing public schools are overcrowded, even though those schools have declining enrollments while charters have thousands of kids on wait lists.
The new rules would also force charter schools to submit demographic data detailing the “racial and socioeconomic diversity of students and teachers in the charter school and the impact of the charter school on racial and socioeconomic diversity in the public school district.”
This would limit the ability of charter schools to open in low-income minority neighborhoods, which is where they are most needed, are most popular and have the greatest impact.

The WSJ neglected to mention some of the roadblocks.  A direct quote from the rules:

In its application, an applicant must provide a letter from each partnering traditional public school or school district demonstrating a commitment to participate in the proposed charter-traditional collaboration. (emphasis added)

When hell freezes over.

From New Hampshire’s Concord Monitor:

Under the proposed new standards, a charter school applying for federally funded startup grants would need to show that there is a demand and a need for their school in their area through the use of a “community impact analysis.” That analysis could rely on the fact that public schools are overflowing with students, or that there is an “unmet demand” in the community.

A letter from New Hampshire’s Governor Sununu:

By focusing on the number of seats, rather than the number of ‘high-quality’ seats, the new standard fails to consider that a driving force in parents’ decisions is the desire for their child to attend a school that meets their child’s unique needs. It cannot be ignored that enrollment is down in many big-city school districts due to parents choosing to leave closed or persistently failing schools.

A “supplemental” rule specifically would eliminate federal funding from charter schools, like S/A, that have focused so successfully on helping poor minority children. The specific language:

As a supplement to the application requirements in the ESEA, CMO NFP, and Developer NFP, the Department proposes new application requirements and assurances to help ensure the creation of new charter schools, and the replication and expansion of high-quality charter schools, that are: (1) Racially and socio-economically diverse …. (emphasis added).

That, in the guise of “equity,” is a poison pill aimed at the nation’s most vulnerable children. Some examples below are from real Virginia schools.

Virginia’s most economically disadvantaged schools. If Virginia were to develop inner-city charters, which is my personal goal, none of them could be racially and socioeconomically diverse. The existing public schools in Richmond, Petersburg, Portsmouth, Norfolk and some other cities are not racially and socioeconomically diverse.

Petersburg public schools in 2020 were 89% Black, 7% Hispanic and 83% economically disadvantaged.

Biden administration: Not economically or racially diverse.

Loudoun County. At the other end of the economic spectrum is Loudoun County, the richest county in America. I have compiled Loudoun school quality data from the VDOE website. I have annotated each school with its percentage of economically disadvantaged students.

Loudoun schools in aggregate have only 21% economically disadvantaged students compared to a statewide figure of 41%.

You could be forgiven for thinking Loudon schools must knock the ball out of the park in statewide SOL results comparisons. They have not, especially for racial and socio-economic minorities.

Loudoun County has only four of its schools that reach the state average for economically disadvantaged students.  The results of those four schools on federally required standardized tests are awful. See the spreadsheet.

The two public charter schools Loudoun already has, Hillsboro Charter Academy (3% economically disadvantaged kids) and Middleburg Community Charter (1% economically disadvantaged), are exactly what they appear to be: rich kids’ academies without tuition.

Those two charters have even made acceptance into the schools hereditary. God save the Queen.

Take Hamilton Elementary. Please. With only 12% economically disadvantaged kids, it managed to fail its Economically Disadvantaged, English Learner, Hispanic and Students with Disabilities students. It did not have enough Black students to measure. A clean sweep of failure.

Buffalo Trail Elementary has only 6.5% economically disadvantaged kids but failed utterly to educate them.

So what would happen if Loudoun were to apply to replace Hamilton Elementary or Buffalo Trail or, more compellingly, Frederick Douglas Elementary, Leesburg Elementary, Sugarland Elementary and Sully Elementary — look at them on the spreadsheet — with charter schools?

Biden administration: Not economically or racially diverse.

Success Academy.

The student bodies of S/A’s best-in-the-State-of-New York public schools in NYC are 94% minority and 90% economically disadvantaged. Yet they surpass the public schools of the richest enclaves in New York on State exams. Pretty much like Wise County schools surpass those of Loudoun.

Biden administration: Wise County, Petersburg and Loudoun schools are not economically or racially diverse.

Where are we?

Biden’s new “rules” gut the underlying law and are transparently meant to do so.

Does anyone drawing breath think that the new rules are aimed at anything other than the world-class charters in New York City that so vex the teachers’ unions’ leadership? The fact that the new rules effectively eliminate new federal charter funding virtually everywhere is absolutely intentional.

Virginia will never have another charter school if it relies on federal funding under these rules.

What to do about Virginia’s charter school program?

Governor Youngkin and VDOE should proceed with the design of a Virginia charter schools program that targets Virginia’s worst schools, does not require district approval and assumes no federal funding.

The federal Title 1 program requires the states to identify and help with federal money the 5% of worst performing schools. Yet the new rules preclude federal funding support to what has been proven most effective — replacing them with charters.

The only losers are the children. They don’t vote or make campaign donations.

As for the $301 million in Title 1 funds that are headed our way, I hope the Youngkin administration will find a better way to oversee their use than has been demonstrated in the past.

There is no objective evidence whatever that these funds have made a positive difference for the poorest children in Virginia schools, for whom they were meant.

Biden can’t tell Virginia what to do with state funds in state schools. Success Academy can help Virginia develop a plan that will gather big support among minority voters in Virginia as well as Republicans.  Presented as targeted at helping minority students, which is S/A’s specialty, it will be a winner. Perhaps the Lieutenant Governor can help design the program and help sell it. It would be a great issue for her. I know it is one she cares about very much. What to do about Biden’s new regulations? I have two recommendations. 1.  VDOE. The comment period was only 30 days. Federal regulations are normally posted for comment for 60 or 90 days. This may be overturned as a violation of regulatory policy.VDOE leadership should make a public issue out of those rules. They are designed on their face to disadvantage minorities.  2.  The Attorney General. Biden’s proposed “rules” violate the spirit and letter of Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).  From the Purpose clause (SEC 4301) of ESSA“Part C – Expanding Opportunity through Charter Schools”

It is the purpose of this part to— 

(3) increase the number of high-quality charter schools available to students across the United States; 

(6) expand opportunities for children with disabilities, English learners, and other traditionally underserved students to attend charter schools and meet the challenging State academic standards; (Emphasis added)

Yet the new rules are unambiguously designed to decrease the number of new charter schools and to contract the opportunities for children spelled out in paragraph (6) above.  

It is hard to imagine that the new rules can be defended successfully under that law. The way they are constructed, it is hard to see how any state would qualify for the charter startup money.  That is clearly the intent.

Attorney General Miyares should compel the Biden DOE to explain in court how the new rules are in compliance with the Congressionally-stated purpose of ESSA.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

31 responses to “Biden Mounts a Direct Attack on America’s Most Successful Schools for Poor Minority Children”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Just like the pooch by the record player in the old RCA advertising. When the teacher’s unions speak, Biden hears his master’s voice.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Attention teachers! Time to pay those dues to fatten the liberal war chest. I actually played an old shelac Victor Record today. Flatt and Scruggs Mule Skinner Blues.
      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a9607f2559f7236b75a01f41921d56b30ca1eac7109e271324be36df60f78cfd.jpg

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      We could start by removing all reading material from schools. That’ll make their jobs easier.

  2. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    I understood the General BR criterion was to publish pieces relevant to VA issues. Howzit that a perorational screed about Biden administration proposed regulations is featured? Is it sufficient for an article to carp about Biden’s actions in Ukraine and suggest the VA AG put a stop to them to qualify here?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      James, read it again. It is about the effect of the new rules on Virginia schools. In depth. But if you read it, you know that.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Not quite. It’s about your fantasy what COULD happen. More fantasy to suggest the VA AG should “compel” the fed!!! Last week a BR article urged the Governor to propose legislation authorizing counties to lower the voting age in non-federal state and local elections to 12 years of age. Your iteration notes that children cannot vote. That potential is more powerful than kvelling about what might happen. Suffrage for youth is a direct voice for the consumers and customers of education as opposed to the adults most of whom are long beyond the classroom.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Any thought on how to better educate children stuck in failing schools? The more money we send them, the worse the results.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      James, read it again. It is about the effect of the new rules on Virginia schools. In depth. But if you read it, you know that.

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    A faster track is needed for Virginia charter schools. No time to waste with the current long winded approval process.

  4. VaNavVet Avatar

    Perhaps the federal government should not be funding charter schools. It could be that they should get their funding from the states, counties, cities, or from private sources. Does the federal government need to be involved in everything?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      No. This law was passed to help kids whose local schools were failing them. Among the new rules, as I wrote, is one that requires the failing local schools to write a letter supporting the new charter. That is supremely cynical. You are as likely to see the sun set in the morning.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I agree that is cynical. If state law would allow the establishment of a charter school, the feds should not require the local school to approve.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          That is what I am saying, Dick. These new rules have nothing to do with educating children, and everything to do with protecting adults from accountability.

          Watch for the DOE to repurpose to some other use the $400 million in the budget for supporting the startup of new charters. They clearly do not intend to spend it for the reason it was appropriated. With Democrats in control of both Congressional appropriations committees this year, they will get away with it.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      When it comes to money, yes. When it comes to regulating how the money is spent, no.

      Democrats throw money at the problems. Republicans throw it at their friends.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Any thoughts on how to better educate the poor children in failing schools? We keep throwing money at it, and they keep getting worse.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Well, that’s a symptom, not the problem.

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          You’ve made that comment twice. Is your solution then to cut funding to school in poor areas…? That seems to be the implication…

          Edit: just read your latest. Seems that part of your solution includes NOT reducing funding to these schools… at least not right away.

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            Correct.

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    You have company from the other side of the political divide in opposing the proposed new regulations on charter schools. The Washington Post (Gasp!!) voiced opposition in an op-ed piece. The Democratic governor of Colorado opposed them loudly. (It just happens that he founded a charter network in Colorado some years back, so he may be a tad biased.)

    I understand your point that the requirement that student bodies be racially and economically diverse would have the perverse effect of preventing aid for Success Academy, which specifically targets low-income areas. But, not all charter schools or CMOs are like Success Academy. Without the “racially and economically diverse” requirement, what would prevent a for-profit charter
    school that was established in a predominantly upper-middle class and upper class neighborhood, and whose students primarily came from those ranks, from receiving federal funds?

    1. dave schutz Avatar
      dave schutz

      “..what would prevent a for-profit charter
      school that was established in a predominantly upper-middle class and upper class neighborhood, and whose students primarily came from those ranks, from receiving federal funds?..”
      Probably nothing. And this is a problem because?

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        If the regular public schools are so bad that an alternative is needed, that alternative should be available to all students.

        1. dave schutz Avatar
          dave schutz

          You are assuming that the existence of this hypothetical charter-for-the-rich (and do note that most charters serve less advantaged, it’s in the crap schools of poor towns that parents are most desperate to get their kids OUT) would somehow hurt poorer students. I don’t believe you are right. Charters do, however, damage the interests of the Grand Pooh-Bahs of the teachers’ unions, so there’s that.

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Applicants are picked by lottery and all lottery winners are accepted.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I have give this some thought. Perhaps if a charter’s school student population reflected the racial and economic characteristics of the division, that would be enough to satisfy the federal requirement. For example, if a Success Academy in Petersburg had a student population that was about 90 percent Black and 90 percent economically disadvantaged, it would meet the requirement.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        That is logical, but the intent of the new rules is to deny the money to any new or expanding charter. Period. That is why there are so many new rules. Few if any will be able to jump through all of the subjectively assessed hoops.

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      The law proscribes money going to a for-profit operator.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        That makes sense–it was one of Biden’s campaign promises.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          It was in the original law. The new rules proscribe outsourcing of any part of the operations, such as the cafeteria or school buses, to for-profit entities. Not sure how that helps the kids.

    4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      If you look back at my work, you will see that I try where possible to find common ground. In this case, the NAACP, SPLC and La Raza and their ilk should be united with me in opposing the Biden rules.

Leave a Reply