Beware the Nerdocalypse

In the course of human evolution, first came hunting-gathering, then the agricultural revolution and then the industrial revolution. Arguably, the United States has evolved into a post-industrial society, though no one seems quite sure what to call it — perhaps the knowledge economy. But what comes after that?

The Singularity, according to entrepreneur-author Ray Kurzweil and a band of like-minded futurists. And what, pray tell, is the Singularity? Read this Associated Press article for a glimpse of what it’s all about. (I noticed this article because I just happen be reading Kurzweil’s book, “The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology.”)

The Singularity is, like the analogous point in the gravitational well of black holes, a point of no return: a point when society changes dramatically and irreversibly. The changes are driven by the massive increases in computing power that will pack the power of today’s supercomputers onto a single chip, along with progress in reverse-engineering the human brain, the development of Artificial Intelligence, and incredible progress in the fields of genetics, nanotechnology and robotics.

Kurzweil talks of an age of accelerating rates of return, turning traditional economics topsy turvy, as greater computational ability enables mankind to make new technological breakthroughs at an ever accelerating rate. In the singularity, which Kurzweil foresees taking place in the late 2020s, or about 20 years from now, we can expect to see the following: robots that surpass human beings in intelligence, incredibly lengthened human life spans, and robotic/nanotechnology-driven manufacturing processes that dramatically drive down the cost of producing material goods, inexhaustible supplies of cheap, clean energy.

Kurzweil is an optimist. He is aware that there is a dark side to every beneficial advance in technology, but he is confident we can control nightmare scenarios of robots taking over the world or swarms of self-replicating nanobots consuming the face of the earth like Pharoah’s locusts. Kurzweil may well be correct that we will be seeing smart robots and 150-year life spans in my lifetime (I’m 54). But, as another futurist, Alvin Toffler observes, different human institutions evolve at different rates. The realm of science is evolving faster than any other, the world of business is close behind. But the spheres of governance, politics and law lag way behind. Indeed, at times our capacity for collective action seems almost paralyzed by gridlock. Instead of creating a world of infinite blessings, skeptics suggest, the Singularity may bring the “nerd-ocalypse.”

What will the world be like when technology gives us super-intelligent robots, genetically altered designer babies and Methuselah lifespans but the human species remains stuck in its primate-driven lust for status and power? Talk about a social security crisis! Talk about the implications of wealth, class and differential access to resources!

If Bacon’s Rebellion lasts that long, you can rest assured that we will be examining the consequences of the Singularity for Virginia.
(Photo credit of Ray Kurzweil: AFB Access World.)

Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

13 responses to “Beware the Nerdocalypse”

  1. Anonymous Avatar

    Less than 2% of the population are farmers, and they produce incredible surpluses. What will we do when the entire economy operates that way? Go fishing? Play golf? How much stuff do we need?

    RH

  2. Jim Bacon Avatar

    N, Ray, the stuggle for material prosperity will be superseded by the struggle for power and status. There is no limit to human greed, no end game for conflict.

  3. E M Risse Avatar

    Jim Bacons says (quoting Toffler):

    “The realm of science is evolving faster than any other,..”

    VERY TRUE, BUT PRIMARILY WAHT WE CALL “FRONTIER SCIENCE,” NOT THE SCIENCE THAT THE VAST MAJORITY OF CITIZENS CAN UNDERSTAND, BELIEVE, INTERACT WITH OR APPLY THE BENEFIT FROM.

    THE ONLY BRIGHT SPOT IS IMPROVING HEALTH. THE PROBLEM IS NOT THAT CIVILIZATION IS NOT THREATENED BY LOSING TOO MANY PEOPLE, SOCIETY IS THAT WE ARE CREATING MORE AND MORE PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY ONES THAT WILL DO THE WORK THAT THOSE AT THE TOP OF THE PYRAMID REFUSE TO DO.

    “… the world of business is close behind.”

    VERY TRUE, BUT THE WORLD OF BUSINESS IS PRIMARILY EVOLVING TO PERFECT WAYS MAKE MORE MONEY IN SHORTER PERIODS OF TIME WITH TACTICS LIKE LEVERAGED BUYOUTS, SECURTIZING DEBT, CREATING THE DEMAN FOR MORE CONSUMPTION AND TACTICS THAT LEAVE MOST CITIZENS OFF THE GRAVY TRAIN.

    CITIZENS GET THE CRUMBS, THEY GET TO CONSUME MORE AND MORE BUT HAVE LESS TIME AND LESS ABILITY TO BE HAPPY AND, BASED ON THE 11 SEPT SIX YEARS LATER ASSESMENT, BE SAFE.

    AS NOTED IN PROPERTY DYNAMICS THE MAJORITY ARE RUNNING AS HARD AS THEY CAN TO KEEP UP AND HAVE NO TIME TO CONSIDER WHERE THEY ARE GOING.

    “But the spheres of governance, politics and law lag way behind. Indeed, at times our capacity for collective action seems almost paralyzed by gridlock.”

    VERY, VERY TRUE.

    “Instead of creating a world of infinite blessings, skeptics suggest, the Singularity may bring the “nerd-ocalypse.”

    DEMOCRACY AND FREE MARKETS DEPEND ON REVERSING / HARNESSING / CONVERTING (YOU CHOOSE THE TERM) THE “ADVANCES” OF BOTH SCIENCE AND BUSINESS-AS-USUAL.

    DID SOMEONE SAY FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE?

    EMR

  4. Anonymous Avatar

    Jim, I’m sorry to hear that, and I’m afraid you are correct.

    As usual, I can’t agree with EMR that tactics like leveraged buyouts and securitized debt have very much to do with the demand for consumption. When was the last time yu read the WSJournal before you decided to buy something?

    Securitized debt requires that something be securitized, and that means that at some level someone has to make or produce something first.

    And then there is this gem.

    “DEMOCRACY AND FREE MARKETS DEPEND ON REVERSING / HARNESSING / CONVERTING (YOU CHOOSE THE TERM) THE “ADVANCES” OF BOTH SCIENCE AND BUSINESS-AS-USUAL.”

    ?????

    Democracy depends on being able to vote for someone who isn’t lying to you and hiding the facts. Science is the best tool we have for discovering facts.

    Free markets depend on being able to sell what you have to a willing buyer. I think that IS business as usual, and we need more of it, not less.

  5. E M Risse Avatar

    Anon 11:32 said:

    “When was the last time yu read the WSJournal before you decided to buy something?”

    EXCUSE ME? HAVE YOU HEARD OF THE U OF M CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPROTS? CONSUMER CONFIDENCE FOLLOWS THE STOCKMARKET, WHICH DEPENDES ON ROIs IN SPECULATIVE INVESTMENTS, WHICH DEPENDS ON…

    “Securitized debt requires that something be securitized, and that means that at some level someone has to make or produce something first.”

    LIKE A SUB-PRIME MORTGAGE OR THE FLOAT OF INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY BETWEEN CLOSE AND OPENING OF MARKETS OR…

    “And then there is this gem.”

    “DEMOCRACY AND FREE MARKETS DEPEND ON REVERSING / HARNESSING / CONVERTING (YOU CHOOSE THE TERM) THE “ADVANCES” OF BOTH SCIENCE AND BUSINESS-AS-USUAL.”

    “?????”

    “Democracy depends on being able to vote for someone who isn’t lying to you and hiding the facts.”

    VERY TRUE BUT UNDER THE CURRENT POLITICAL PARTY SYSTEM SYSTEM NO ONE WHO CAN GET THE ENDORSEMENT OF OF ONE OF THE MAJOR PARTIES HAS THE FREEDOM TO NOT LYE OR NOT HIDE FACTS BECAUSE IF THEY DID, THEY WOULD NOT GET THE ENDORSEMENT OR REENDORSEMENT…

    “Science is the best tool we have for discovering facts.”

    ABSOLUTLY RIGHT. THE PROBLEM IS AGENCIES AND INSTITTUTIONS AS WELL AS ENTRPRISES ARE SPENDING ALL THE MONEY FOR SCIENCE TO FIND THE FACTS THAT MAKE SOME MORE WELL TO DO (OR THE RESEARCHERS MORE SECURE), NOT THE FACTS THAT HELP ALL CITIZENS BE MORE HAPPY OR MORE SAFE OR MOVE THE TRAJECTORY OF CIVILIATION IN A SUSTAINABLE DIRECTION.

    “Free markets depend on being able to sell what you have to a willing buyer.”

    FREE MARKETS REQUIRE WILLING AND INFORMED BUYERS. LIKE SOME NICE CHINEESE DOG CHOW?

    “I think that IS business as usual, and we need more of it, not less.”

    THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THOSE WHO FOCUS ON WHAT MAKES THE MOST MONEY IN THE SHORT RUN HOPE YOU CONTINUE TO THINK FOR AS LONG AS THEY CAN.

    EMR

  6. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Fun stuff to think about. It’s been part or all of my day job for almost 20 years.

    This fellows time line is way off. 20 years from now no computer will be as smart as the dumbest dog. Long way to go for the sci fi stuff.

    Nano-technologies will change many things – especially in health and information/entertainment. And, as usual, in war.

  7. Jim Bacon Avatar

    JAB, How do you see nano-technology being applied to military systems? Or is that one of those things that, you could tell me, but then you’d have to kill me?

  8. James Atticus Bowden Avatar
    James Atticus Bowden

    Other JAB: Nano-tech in communications means the Dick Tracy watch comes true – for example. It means making Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) like the pencil sized darts in Dune.

    There are other uses across the functional areas – formerly called the battlefield operating systems.

    Truth follows fiction. Life imitates art…sorta.

  9. Anonymous Avatar

    “When was the last time yu read the WSJournal before you decided to buy something?”

    EXCUSE ME? HAVE YOU HEARD OF THE U OF M CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPROTS? CONSUMER CONFIDENCE FOLLOWS THE STOCKMARKET, WHICH DEPENDES ON ROIs IN SPECULATIVE INVESTMENTS, WHICH DEPENDS ON…

    What!? Consumer confidence depends on the stock market? Where do you hang out, EMR?

    I don’t believe that I have ever heard a single person say that they were putting off a major purchase or a shopping spree for smaller items because of the stock market. It’s potential loss of jobs, kids in college, no raises for 2 or 3 years, need to repair something that can’t be put off, health care issues, etc.

    Deena Flinchum

  10. E M Risse Avatar

    Ms Flinchum said:

    “What!? Consumer confidence depends on the stock market? Where do you hang out, EMR?”

    “I don’t believe that I have ever heard a single person say that they were putting off a major purchase or a shopping spree for smaller items because of the stock market.”

    LET US REVIEW THE FACTS:

    70 TO 80 PERCENT OF THE US OF A ECONOMY IS CONSUMER SPENDING.

    OVER 40 PERCENT OF THE POPULATION OWNS STOCK. ALMOST ALL CITIZENS ARE INDIRECTLY IMPACTED, POTENTIAL LOSS OF JOBS, COLLEGE TUITION GOES UP BECAUSE ENDOWMENT SHRINKS, ETC.

    WHEN THE US OF A IS ATTACKED THE PRESIDENT SAYS “GO SHOPPING.”

    THE MainStream Media SOUND BITES THAT PASS FOR NEWS ON THE ECONOMY FEATURE THE STOCK MARKET, HOME SALES, AUTO SALES, PRICE OF GASOLINE, VALUE OF THE DOLLAR, BALANCE OF PAYMENTS, AND FED INTEREST RATES.

    ALL OF THOSE ARE INTERRELATED, ALL IMPACT CONSUMER CONFIDENCE.

    CITIZENS UNDERSTAND THAT THE ECONOMIC NEWS AND THE ECONOMIC INDICATORS ARE MANIPULATED FOR POLITIAL PURPOSES AND TO KEEP CONSUMER CONFICENCE UP.

    THEY ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT ANY OF THESE CAN HAVE AN IMPACT ON THEM BUT THAT THE STOCK MARKET IS THE BELL WEATHER FOR THE VAST MAJORITY BECAUSE IT IS EASY TO UNDERSTAND AND THE FIRST THING THEY HEAR OR SEE ABOUT “THE ECONOMY” EVERY MORNING AND EVERY NIGHT.

    THE ITEMS YOU LIST ARE, BY-IN-LARGE DECISIONS ON HOW TO ALLOCATE A LIMITED AMOUNT OF FUNDS A HOUSEHOLD HAS, NOT CONFICENCE IN THE ECONOMY THAT IMPACTS THE OVERALL LEVEL OF SPENDING.

    “It’s potential loss of jobs, SEE ABOVE

    “kids in college,” SEE ABOVE

    “no raises for 2 or 3 years, SEE ABOVE

    “need to repair something that can’t be put off, SEE ABOVE

    “health care issues, etc. SEE ABOVE.

    WHERE DO YOU HAND OUT MS. FLINCHUM?

  11. Anonymous Avatar

    I repeat myself: I don’t believe that I have ever heard a single person say that they were putting off a major purchase or a shopping spree for smaller items because of the stock market. And this is what we are talking about, spending decisions, right?

    I didn’t say that the stock market isn’t important. It ultimately affects my pension. HOWEVER I have never heard a single person attribute his/her spending decisions to the stock market. Not the first.

    FYI I hang out with people who work for a living, own little if any stock other than what is in their pension plans – those lucky enough to have a pension plan, and who would find your idea that the stock market is THE FIRST THING THEY HEAR OR SEE ABOUT “THE ECONOMY” EVERY MORNING AND EVERY NIGHT ludicrous.

    Deena Flinchum

  12. Anonymous Avatar

    It’s not exactly unheard of for the interests of Wall Street not to coincide with the interests of Main Street.

    It seems as if every time some company lays off (or downsizes, or fires, or off-shores) a bunch of workers, its stock goes up. Maybe the CEO of that company will be in the market for a yacht but I doubt that the displaced workers will be looking to spend big. Losing the best job you may ever be likely to have can wreak havoc with your confidence, consumer or otherwise.

    Deena Flinchum

  13. E M Risse Avatar

    UPON FURTHER REVIEW:

    Ms Flinchum, you are probably right.

    You live with RHTCs* and they have no time to figure out why they make the decisions they do.

    Some RHTCs* have figured out that the stock markets are just another gambling venue and that, as you point out, the stock market directly impacts CEO compensation and runs counter to the best interst of their Household.

    I suspect, however, that most RHTCs* do not even realize that the last thing they hear in the five minute news blurb on their favorite commute- time radio talk show or period music program is a the Dow Jones closing.

    EMR

    *RHTCs are Running as Hard as They Cans, the star players in PROPERTY DYNAMICS.

Leave a Reply