Before the Bill of Rights, There was the Virginia Declaration of Rights

Virginia Declaration of Rights

by Thomas M. Moncure, Jr.

Reliable estimates place the number of Virginia residents born outside the United States at 12% to 15%. In 2012, for the first time since about 1650, a majority of residents were born outside of Virginia. And this native count includes first-borns who live in homes where Farsi or Hindi or Spanish is spoken. Ethnic Virginians -– those of us more than three generations deep — are now a distinct and shrinking minority in the Commonwealth.

This onrush of aliens has obvious political consequences: Virginia turning from red to blue. A more subtle, if more substantial consequence, is dramatic cultural change. Coming from foreign places like Guatemala or Foggy Bottom, these new residents tend to focus on the national or international. They have some awareness of the federal precedents -– the coming 4th of July holiday is a reminder –- but know little or nothing of the contribution of Virginia and the Virginians.

We ethnic Virginians have been remarkably poor stewards of our own history. June 12 marks the 248th anniversary of the adoption of the Virginia Declaration of Rights, the single most important document in the development of American constitutional liberty. In a more perfect Virginia this would be the most celebrated date on the calendar.

The Declaration was penned by the “unknown” or “forgotten” founder, George Mason, and is echoed in the federal Bill of Rights. It not only set forth our most fundamental rights, but also articulated the philosophical foundations on which our government is laid. While well worth reading in its entirety, the document contains two provisions that go to the heart of what is required of us as Virginians:

§15. That no free government, nor the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people, but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; and by frequent recurrence to fundamental principles.

§16. That it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other.

It is long past time to restore Virginia and Virginians in precedence and importance. Let us start with June 12th. This is not preening hubris, or fuzzy nostalgia, but rather reputable history. We need to inculcate in our newer residents that the place they occupy is more than a nice or convenient address. Those who share our land should also share our passion for the Virginia that we love.

Thomas M. Moncure, Jr., a descendant of John Washington and Richard Lee, resides in Colonial Beach.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

89 responses to “Before the Bill of Rights, There was the Virginia Declaration of Rights”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    re: " This onrush of aliens has obvious political consequences: Virginia turning from red to blue."

    whoa!

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Red to Blue? Sounds like the obsession here is from white to brown.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        would love to have a secret recording of more of his "thoughts" !

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          “And this native count includes first-borns who live in homes where Farsi or Hindi or Spanish is spoken.”

          native? Wondering the definition of native?

          1. those Democratics

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            which was the name of Conservatives at that time, yes.

          3. We don’t talk about the Southern Strategy.

          4. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            sometimes , it seems BR has this giant sign that says “echo chamber” but only certain
            folks can see it andt blather on………….

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    FFV?

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    The Library of Virginia houses the original draft written in George Mason's hand. Though he was present for the Constitutional Convention, Mason was one of three men who refused to sign the document. No Bill of Rights! The Library of Virginia has a warning label on this document. It would appear that declaring one's rights is offensive and disturbing to my left handed friends.
    https://edu.lva.virginia.gov/dbva/items/show/184
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b88fbd53c059abad9aaa807b9e8e1938cbf5a2cab71d4b55891e7b54f2fdeb0a.jpg

    1. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Not offensive to this one.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Does that include women’s rights to bodily autonomy?

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Sorry, batteries not included in 1776.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          How about assaults?

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            The nine volt battery does not come along until 1956.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            a dark day in history.

  4. WayneS Avatar

    It is also worth mentioning that to this day, the Virginia Declaration of Rights, with just a few additions/updates, serves as Article I of the Constitution of Virginia.

    By the way, thank you for posting this article.

  5. Marty Chapman Avatar
    Marty Chapman

    Back in the 70's, 4th graders got a dose of Virginia history! Opechancanough, John Rolfe, Gov Spotswood and the Knights of the Golden Horseshoe, etc.

  6. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I saw this sitting in the queue the other day and knew ya'll would tear into this. 🙂 Heck, I was born in Texas and my wife in the District so we're aliens, too.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Oh , not just you either…

      A rich culture of acceptance of "aliens" and immigrants:

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d36cb89fd6c9f20de77ce715f70545792ff25d198ee8a79e5f1e2c766c0a5782.png

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Moncure just sent me a note on FB that Texas was founded by Virginians so it counts. 🙂 Well, it was on an AFB and my parents were legally Virginians at the time, so yeah, it counts. On my mother's side.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Stephen Austin, the Great Empresario of Texas, born in Austinville, VA. Down near Wytheville. Sam Houston was born in Rockbridge County Virginia. We truly are the mother state.
        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4d739a85d9138458b734bc6fad099361a097b7da170b6cf9caa3c4dc33c46990.jpg

        1. Chip Gibson Avatar
          Chip Gibson

          Learned two important historical facts today. Thanks, Sir.

    3. Chip Gibson Avatar
      Chip Gibson

      God Bless Texas!

  7. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.”

    Ok, so Virginia adopts this language as Section 1 of their commitment to human rights in 1650 then proceeds to not only deny it to a large segment of the population for more than 200 years but turns on its own countrymen with violent rebellion in an attempt to continue to deny it to their fellow human beings. Then when forced to actually remove those human beings from bondage, proceeds to find another way to deny these same rights to those same human beings for yet another 100 years.

    This statement should be celebrated why….?

    1. VirginiaGroyper Avatar
      VirginiaGroyper

      I think interpreting colloquial colonial language through your modern egalitarian delusions could be the problem.

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        I think these words were fine and dandy unless it impacted the bank accounts of the authors.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Reading "Demons of Unrest" at the moment. The Unreconstructed Many will want it out of libraries. 🙂

      1. Marty Chapman Avatar
        Marty Chapman

        I have only read an excerpt. It seems to exclude the John Brown Raid, which I would argue, was the defining event in the run up to war.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      It goes hand-in-hand with the word “native” as used by European colonizers.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        indeed.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          And possibly as used in this article, especially in context of non-English speaking households.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            tone deaf context?

    4. Chip Gibson Avatar
      Chip Gibson

      Remember that only after Lincoln announced his intent to raise an Army and invade the Commonwealth of Virginia did she secede. She did not turn on her own countrymen. She defended her countrymen from invasion. And, North Carolina, Tennessee, etc.

    5. Chip Gibson Avatar
      Chip Gibson

      Remember that only after Lincoln announced his intent to raise an Army and invade the Commonwealth of Virginia did she secede. She did not turn on her own countrymen. She defended her countrymen from invasion. And, North Carolina, Tennessee, etc.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        well not all of them………

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “She defended her countrymen from invasion. And, North Carolina, Tennessee, etc”

        None of which are countries. But, if it dissuades your conscience to think that, fine, strike that and just say she was central to a Civil War based on her continuing to deny these very rights to her fellow human beings. Does not change the basis of my comment one iota.

        1. Chip Gibson Avatar
          Chip Gibson

          My conscience is fine. Your inaccurate and unwarranted slander of the Citizens of the Commonwealth is something worth reflection, however.

  8. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.”

    Notice what term is not included in this statement. This version is vastly superior.

  9. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “…there are two provisions that go to the heart of what is required of us as Virginians… §16. That it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other.”

    Why is not this portion of Section 16 also central requirement for us Virginians (third generation and aliens alike…)?

    “That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience”

  10. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Most of Mason's Virginia Declaration of Rights was written and debated at Raleigh's Tavern in Williamsburg. Though it is a reconstruction, this might be the most important beer joint in the U.S.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2ac8e483b4d2a432ef0b9225a9da31bf6495c95f3f620aee904bffc9276f19e1.jpg

  11. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    This post actually clearly shows how folks, "we", have diverged into very different camps about our history and heritage, including how we view the founding documents of our Country and State.

    It's like a totally different reality between what was written versus actually done, then today what we believe about it.

    1. VirginiaGroyper Avatar
      VirginiaGroyper

      When did your family arrive in Virginia, Larry? Just out of curiosity

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        born and bred Virginian… you?

        1. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          Why not just answer the question?
          Is it wrong for VirginiaGroyper to feel pride in being a Virginian?
          Better question, since you seem to believe Virginia and the USA are such horrible, hate-filled places, why are you here? Why don't you go to the place of Utopia where mankind has come closest to the noble ideals of Larry the G?

          And a genealogy lesson for you – to go back 5 generations, you have 32 branches, 10 is 1024.
          I don't think it would be possible to go back 20 generations, much less to Roman times and not have BOTH slave ownership and slave status in your lineage.
          Fallen human nature. England and US were the first to try to end it. It still exists. Even in this country with the illegal trafficking (sex slaves), but you do you, O Wise One.

          1. Walter, please delete this passage in your comment: "You're already here, and a horrible ingrate, besides ignorant, always wrong)"

            If you don't, I'll have to delete the entire comment, and Carol and I will have to consider suspending your commenting privileges.

          2. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            I deleted. I'll try.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I love Virginia, it's history and heritage but I also love the truth when discussing it and can't stand whitewashed versions that are simply not the truth.

            You confuse slavery – and learning from it then repeating the hate by instituting Jim Crow after slavery.

            It's about how you treated ALL Virginians and allowed them to have the same opportunities as other Virginians.

            Virginia chose not to do that for a century or more.

            When we talk about founding documents – we need to be honest about them and their application to all Virginians, not just highlight the parts you like.

            We did not do that in our schools which also were segregated long after slavery ended.

            Simple thing – tell the truth.

          4. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            When have I not? Never.
            But "telling the truth" also entails telling what was good. And, in exercising judgment, it also entails judging fairly. Someone important to all those "Christian nationalists" said something about that.
            If you favor killing babies, I believe you have little standing to judge the morality of others. How's that?
            Sure, it's prevalent. Everybody does it. Doesn't make it right. Make it "legal." Make it "illegal" to say it is wrong. It still is, and will always be, "wrong." Even after throwing all the hymn-singing Grandmas in jail.
            And that's "the truth."

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Telling the truth means telling the good and the bad instead of just what you prefer.

            We're not talking about "morality". We're talking about our founding documents including both the Constitution of the US and Va and how they were followed in governance that applied to all Virginians.

            Has zero to do with "morality" and baby-killing.

            Has everything to do with telling the truth about our history.

          6. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            As usual. Deflection and obfuscation.
            So, since it wasn't perfect (according to the brilliance and great wisdom of Larry the G), it should not have been done?
            Because imperfect people did it, it was not an important step forward? Because imperfect people did it. then it's necessary precondition to a better society doesn't count?
            And morality has everything to do with it. It is the basis of law.
            Judge not, lest you be judged. For the measure you give will be the measure you get.
            Just giving you the measure you deserve – why aren't you out there getting arrested at the abortion clinics with the grandmas O Great Moral One?
            Imperfect people did something great. You are not perfect. Neither am I. Nor is any human being. Quit being the moral relativist, blind guide you are and judge fairly.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I've been told by Carol to flag personal attacks and name calling. I've given you a lot of leeway. Please do apologize and keep your remarks on the issue.

            I'm flagging it.

            If it continues and Carol does nothing about it, I will block you.

          8. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            I have edited two comments Larry. And if you block me, I'd be OK with that. It's like waving the red cape in front of the bull. Still my fault for going after you, but I don't consider my comments "mean," as I can handle being called things.

          9. Lefty665 Avatar
            Lefty665

            FWIW My quality of life has been much better since Larry blocked me a couple of years ago.

            I cannot see his posts, but from the responses he gets I can infer how fortunate I am.

            Cheers

          10. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            Hearing wisdom from you and JWW…
            So my question is “why hasn’t HE blocked me?’
            I can only guess it is a deep psychological need to be assured that he is wrong, and makes up for his error… Kind of a great balance to the world…. I just don’t know!

          11. VirginiaGroyper Avatar
            VirginiaGroyper

            1613 aboard the John and Francis. Now when did your family arrive, and from which part of the world?

          12. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I have no idea. why does it matter?

          13. VirginiaGroyper Avatar
            VirginiaGroyper

            Oh, I think it matters a great deal. A nation is comprised of a people with a shared history. You keep saying “our founding documents,” but based on your response, they’re not yours. Arbitrating morality for a group you’re not a part of, while pretending to be, is disingenuous. And I think you know exactly from whence you came.

          14. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Ah… so the founding documents for Virginia were not for any/all Virginians, just certain ones?

            Apparently not even for all that got off ships originally?

            tell me more ….

          15. VirginiaGroyper Avatar
            VirginiaGroyper

            Why the deflection? No, they applied to white men of good character from the greater English world. This was also enshrined in the Naturalization Act of 1790. The use of the enlightenment-era phrase, “when they enter a state of society” excluded slaves from the VDoR, as they were not considered part of society.

          16. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            deflection? No, I asking you.
            You cited a date 1613 and I asked why it mattered. And you come back with 1790 and related.

            I asked a simple question, which was did the founding document apply to all Virginians?

            Now you say it did not?

            correct?

            Did it include women? black people? native americans? indentured servants?

            why? why not?

            If we're going to talk in glowing terms about our founding documents and we are good with it not applying to all Virginians… is that a "good" thing to laud?

          17. VirginiaGroyper Avatar
            VirginiaGroyper

            Lol why would they include any of the groups you mentioned? Indentured servants literally signed their life away for an opportunity – it’s implied in the name. Though many of them did buy their freedoms and rise to the House of Burgesses. Indians didn’t operate as part of the polity of Virginia. Women were not involved in politics. Blacks had zero education, and were not considered part of the English civilization. If you’re operating under the assumption that I believe in universal suffrage, you’re sorely mistaken. The egalitarian nonsense foisted upon us by your generation can’t end soon enough.

          18. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Uh… starting to well get the drift of your thinking and yes I give you this… you're being honest
            instead of beating around the bush! So.. the Constitutions – US and Va were not about the words they spoke , they were really only talking about white males ? Do you think those docs apply to blacks today? Immigrants? Native Americans?

          19. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Uh… starting to well get the drift of your thinking and yes I give you this… you're being honest
            instead of beating around the bush! So.. the Constitutions – US and Va were not about the words they spoke , they were really only talking about white males ? Do you think those docs apply to blacks today? Immigrants? Native Americans?

          20. CJBova Avatar

            Larry, how about leaving the flawed past and joining us in the modern world where our guiding principles apply to all.

          21. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I am not the one talking about how great the founding documents were. I referenced issues that are actually with us today and continue as a result of the “flawed past”. If we’re gonna talk about how great the founding documents were, let’s tell the truth. We’ve already had too much whitewashing and falsifying history.

          22. VirginiaGroyper Avatar
            VirginiaGroyper

            Yes, they were obviously talking only about white males. This is not a difficult exercise. Countless founders expressly said this. Not only did they make it explicit that this nation was to be white, but specifically of those from the British Isles. A government is instituted to represent the needs of a specific people, their unique station in the world, as well as their tendencies as a group. Human groups are not interchangeable and historical documents don’t exist in a vacuum and just automatically apply to everyone in the world. The real conflict in the country comes from ignoring these simple truths about humanity, and shoehorning every race and creed into the US under the guise of it being a “melting pot” – a lie conjured up in the early/mid 20th century. Those whose ancestors actually established the nation have a right to reject the farce, since they are actually “our posterity.”

            As for the modern day, I’d say the American experiment has clearly failed, and we’re witnessing a collapse similar to Rome. I think the combined effects of liberal democracy, and the forced installation of incompetents into key infrastructural positions have dealt the final blow. Universal suffrage has produced a Congress of geriatrics so focused on enriching their coffers through insider trading, that they’ve all been bought and paid for by lobbyists; and, well you know what the contest for the executive office looks like. For all of human history, we’ve rejected the equality of man until a few hundred years ago when a couple of aristocratic Virginians attempted to create an opportunity for a “natural aristocracy” to ascend in society. Boomers have been pumped with equality propaganda since birth, and as a result distorted colloquial language to mean whatever suits them in the modern day. The ability to ignore human reality in favor of something so clearly wrong is akin to a religion. It would be hilarious if it wasn’t so sad. The hubris of some second generation American telling those whose ancestors were the architects of the nation that they don’t have a right to steward their own ship is laughable. I take solace in knowing the younger generation of heritage Americans reject it.

          23. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            So, modern day – current Constitution US and VA – apply to all humans or not? If it did not start out that
            way, when did it change to be more “inclusive”? Change after slavery ended? Is the concept of public school available to all regardless of heritage valid?

          24. VirginiaGroyper Avatar
            VirginiaGroyper

            I don’t really understand what you’re asking. Are you wanting me to say that everyone is special and equal, or are we talking about legal protections in the country? If that’s the case, these documents are no longer relevant. We live in a post-Constitutional America where activist courts and foreign interests levy power through anarcho-tyranny at the expense of law abiding citizens. The country was nearly burned to the ground a few years ago because someone that should have been guillotined died while being arrested. Anyone ignoring this is willfully ignorant.

            I’m not sure that we willingly adapted to being more inclusive, as opposed to having it forced upon us. The American Mythos was changed following WW2 into something it was never meant to be through subversion. Now the US is allegedly somewhere that literally anyone can come to without question. You wouldn’t just show up in Japan, and say hey I’m Japanese now. You could point to Hart Cellar as a catalyst, but it most likely goes back further than that – likely the creation of the Federal Reserve.

            Sure, everyone can have their public school education. I’m not aware of anyone that’s been denied enrollment in such a comical institution. As food for thought, the public high school that was ranked number one in the state in the 50’s is now dead last; I’m going to go out on a limb and guess it’s not because they have too few boxes of crayola crayons.

          25. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            legal rights? everyone per the Constitution? yea or nay?

            When did that happen if it was not true in the original founding documents?

            Not the Emancipation Proclamation. right? When did the black man get the same rights as white men?

          26. Not Today Avatar
            Not Today

            Wait long enough and they always show themselves.

          27. VirginiaGroyper Avatar
            VirginiaGroyper

            I surmise you disagree with my assessment of the founders intentions?

          28. Chip Gibson Avatar
            Chip Gibson

            Compliments on maintaining the historical lineage and hope for Old Virginia.

          29. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Walt just use the block button on Larry and Eric. That is what I did. Totally done with those two. Never want to hear from them again. The block button allows you to not see them and they can't see you. It has improved my time on BR and good for lower blood pressure.

        2. Chip Gibson Avatar
          Chip Gibson

          My family arrived in Virginia during the 17th century. They would be ashamed to see the Old Dominion as it now stands; yet, would then strive diligently to restore her – as we should do. She is worth saving. Sic Semper Tyrannis.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            are we commenting to each other?

            IF so, let me say, I hold the founding documents in great regard and reverence and I take them at their word that it applies to all human beings in Virginia not just some and certainly not just those whose ancestors came long ago – which I find repugnant when/if we talk about who it does not apply to.

            No wonder we have problems today geting along with each other if one thinks the other does not deserve the promises int he founding documents.

            In my mind, I don't care where you came from or how or anything else, you are not better than others by virtue of your ancestry – PERIOD!

          2. Chip Gibson Avatar
            Chip Gibson

            Your accusations, in no way, represent what I and others here have stated. We are all allowed to embrace our own heritage. However, liberal Marxists have been very successful of late in tearing down the heritage of others in favor of their own deviant agendas. That must be righted or the Commonwealth, all of the Commonwealth, will cease to have any purpose or future. Without the past….

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            It’s okay to do that even if you want to live in your own bubble but when you pronounce it to other, they are
            also allowed to opine and even not agree ! It’s not an echo chamber!

            I value the truthfulness of heritage much more than a false vision or belief. If we cannot be honest about our heritage , the good , bad and ugly, how can we WANT to get better and address continuing wrongs?

            Calling the founding documents “marxist” because they claimed freedom and opportunity for ALL and
            not just some… is a perversion in my view. If the founding fathers actually did lie and never intended for the words to apply to all… then sorry – the promise of America is that some of us do believe that it does apply to all..and that some of our problems are actually due to the fact that some do not believe it applies to all.

            So which is it? were the founding fathers mouthing insincere words; they never intended it to apply to ALL or today do some of us believe they actually were insincere and we actually don’t have freedom for all?

  12. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    This will not happen until we go back to teaching civics writ large.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      72 point Bodoni bold?

  13. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Ohio-6 rated R+16
    2016 — Trump+32.0
    2020 — Trump+28.7
    2022 — Rep. Johnson+35
    Last night State Senator Mike Rulli +9 points

    “and don’t it make my red state blue”

    for the record, not too many newcomers in that district. It’s turning blue from years of lack of oxygen to the brain caused by Republican restrictions…

    https://x.com/lxeagle17/status/1800700829001036221?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

  14. Chip Gibson Avatar
    Chip Gibson

    Outstanding, Sir! Thank you for the highly inspiring voice of civility, reason, and right. I salute you.

Leave a Reply