Barbie, Liars, and Newspapers Circling the Drain

by Kerry Dougherty

Warning: I’m a tad grouchy today. You see, I’m a hyperactive gym rat who hasn’t worked out since last Tuesday and has been slowed down by surgery. That happened Wednesday, by the way, when a skilled orthopedic surgeon sawed off part of my leg.

In other words, I’ve had way too much time to brood.

So, I’m starting the week with a litany of irritants that have totally ticked me off.

Number one: I’m sick of feminists protesting that Margot Robbie was cheated out of an Oscar while her male Barbie co-star Ryan Gosling got one.

How many of these same women protested when Riley Gaines was cheated out of her place on a podium by a man, Lia Thomas?

If that’s you, just shut up. No one wants to hear from you.

Plus, I actually watched Barbie on HBO Saturday night.

That may be the worst movie I’ve ever seen. The absolute worst. Worse even than Oppenheimer which was a total yawn, although many people pretend they liked it because it’s about a smart guy and lasted three hours. They think raving about this bore makes them appear intelligent.

It doesn’t.

I usually don’t say much about Donald Trump, but I am furious about this $83 million jury defamation verdict against him. Who in the world waits to come forward with allegations of rape 20 years old and only after the guy is running for office.

Besides Christine Blasy Ford, that is.

She was a disturbed woman who tried to wreck the life of a successful man — Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh — with a remarkably similar cockamamie marinated memory about an assault that never took place.

This latest apparent fabulist should not start planning to spend that money. If there is any justice left in this country, she’ll never see a penny. Surely there’s someone in the American court system who can put this right and send her back home to snuggle her cat, Vagina, and leave Trump alone.

Next, let’s talk about the sorry state of newspapers.

Most of you know I almost never read The Virginian-Pilot anymore. The reporting is shallow and the editorials sound as if they’re written by a college sophomore who’s just discovered Marxism.

But yesterday I was so bored, I Piloted myself.

As a result, I saw an indignant, imbecilic editorial that accused our governor of “buffoonery” for supporting Texas in its quest to protect the American people from the ongoing invasion on our Southern border.

Standing with Texas isn’t buffoonery. It’s the right thing to do. Long overdue.

Fixing the border is not the job of Republicans or the House of Representatives, even though those are the Democratic talking points right now.

It’s the job of the executive to enforce the immigration laws on the books and to reinstate the ones that were working before he took office and stupidly announced to the world that America was no longer a sovereign nation.

The Senate wants to continue to allow thousands of illegals to cross our border every single damn day? That’s not a negotiating point; that’s a surrender. And it’s not sustainable. The world is full of poor, desperate people living in crappy countries who want to come to the U.S.

Let them apply to come into the country legally and wait their turns. We have every right to say NO MORE. And many Americans are saying that and voting on that issue this November.

I’m sorry to be critical of news reporting in this once-readable paper, too, but Sunday’s front-page story on the driver who commandeered a car off the 14th Street pier is a prime example of why skilled editors are needed. When the paper offered buyouts to every employee who’d worked for the Pilot for 25 years or more it demonstrated — again — that the newspaper knew the cost of everything and the value of nothing.

First, this sort of tragedy is what we once would have called a really important, compelling story. A car seems to intentionally drive off a Virginia Beach pier, while apparently braking a couple of times, and someone has the wherewithal to actually film it.

So, what does this once-good newspaper do? It shoots the piece through with the boring gun. Puts it below the fold and sticks police jargon in the headline: “Vehicle drives off Virginia Beach pier”

“Vehicle drives off Virginia Beach pier”

VEHICLE? Seriously?

“Vehicle” is a terrible, colorless, bland, useless word. This was a car. A car drove off the pier.

Lordy, are the editors trying to drive readers away from the story?

The video of the car driving off the pier is all over social media. Looks like the paper initially linked to it online and then got cold feet. Why? The purpose of an online presence is to give subscribers a multi-media selection of sources.

I want you to see it. Here, take a gander:

 

According to the thin reporting on this story, the reporters don’t know how long the pier is and didn’t bother to find out, so they reported that “several online references” claimed it’s 1,000 feet.

Back in the day, a crusty old editor with a bottle of whiskey in his file cabinet would have ordered the reporter to go out there, with a tape measure if necessary, to get what we used to call “facts.”

Geezus.

Then the writers lapsed back into jargon saying the police hadn’t recovered a body and presumed there’s a “deceased person” inside the submerged car.

DECEASED PERSON? Is that anything like a dead body? A corpse? A drowned driver?

Oh, and then the newspaper tells us — with no apparent curiosity — that officials said divers were not sent down to the car.

WHAT?

Every time a tractor trailer goes off the Chesapeake Bay-Bridge Tunnel, divers are in the water almost immediately. Why not in this case?

A grizzled copy editor — even one reeking of whiskey — would have told the reporters to ask the cops why no divers were sent. There must have been a reason — perhaps a good one- – but it seems they took what the police spoon fed them and put it in print.

Finally, a police spokesman who’s mastered the art of saying very little, is quoted claiming that the cops are “trying to collect the right assets” to recover the vehicle.

At the risk of offending those of you who never cuss, what the hell does THAT mean? What assets? Money? Equipment? Skilled salvage personnel?

When will they have these mysterious assets?

We used to call those follow-up questions.

And they wonder why no one reads newspapers any longer.

Republished with permission from Kerry: Unemployed and Unedited.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

57 responses to “Barbie, Liars, and Newspapers Circling the Drain”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I recently got a notice that the cost of my digital subscription to the Pilot will increase by 70% at the end of this month. However, it will be ad-free. I called to cancel. Predictably, the representative offered to bargain. I ended up getting my subscription extended for six months at a monthly rate significantly lower than the one I have now. I don’t understand this business model.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I have ALWAYS said that those silly CBBT signs with the seagull on them were too small.

    Hope it was a bunion or smaller.

  3. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Did the “vehicle” drive itself?
    Was it an autonomous Tesla? Or a human driving the “vehicle?” A drunk human?
    Really pitiful.
    And one day all the Lefties out there suffering from TDS might lament the banana republic they are creating with lawfare…

    If they had any integrity (I know, another hypothetical), they would be protesting like crazy, but they don’t…

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Drunk, suicidal, and/or a teenager trying to disprove something they saw in a Marvel movie.

  4. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Did the “vehicle” drive itself?
    Was it an autonomous Tesla? Or a human driving the “vehicle?” A drunk human?
    Really pitiful.
    And one day all the Lefties out there suffering from TDS might lament the banana republic they are creating with lawfare…

    If they had any integrity (I know, another hypothetical), they would be protesting like crazy, but they don’t…

  5. LarrytheG Avatar

    I wonder what Kerry thinks about Facebook “news” for things like this… oh wait… she’s probably the admin for that group!

  6. Vehicle is an terrible, colorless, bland, useless word. This was a car. A car drove off the pier.

    “A grizzled copy editor – even one reeking of whiskey –” would know that the car did not drive off the pier – the car was driven off the pier.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      I guess it would depend if it was a Tesla on autopilot or not.

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Even better wording: a car plunged off the end of the pier.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Vehicle is perfect if you’re not sure, but want to get the first iteration published. If you aren’t sure what kind of vehicle it was, it’s possible it wasn’t driven by someone or something. Tesla comes to mind.

      But even if the reporter knew every minutia, vehicle is perfect for the headline. It draws the reader in.

    4. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      I guess it would depend if it was a Tesla on autopilot or not.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        Does the “pilot” part of autopilot mean the vehicle thinks it can fly or float? Asking for an AI friend.

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          It was clearly identifying as both items, when it took to the air before submerging under the water 🙂

          1. Lefty665 Avatar

            Interesting that it can do both for brief periods. Think Tesla charges a premium for those features?

          2. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Perhaps, but perhaps it’s reached autonomy and we are witnessing the birth of Skynet.

    5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Even better wording: a car plunged off the end of the pier.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        or “was plunged”, again the issue of causation. Was the car depressed, or just it’s accelerator pedal?

    6. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Vehicle is perfect if you’re not sure, but want to get the first iteration published. If you aren’t sure what kind of vehicle it was, it’s possible it wasn’t driven by someone or something. Tesla comes to mind.

      But even if the reporter knew every minutia, vehicle is perfect for the headline. It draws the reader in.

      1. A “self-driven” Tesla would not run through a vertical barrier. It probably wouldn’t even drive on a narrow pier. It’s “self-driving” mode would need to be manually over-ridden.

      2. A “self-driven” Tesla would not run through a vertical barrier. It probably wouldn’t even drive on a narrow pier. It’s “self-driving” mode would need to be manually over-ridden.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Would you bet your life on that? I have Eyesight on my cars. I used it once just to be sure it “worked”. Scared the stuff out of me.

          1. I would never let a car take over my driving duties at all.

          2. I would never let a car take over my driving duties at all.

          3. I would never let a car take over my driving duties at all.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I’ll set speed control for couple of minutes to shake feet, but in 40 years I can confidently say the total time is less than an hour.

          5. Lefty665 Avatar

            Jeez, cruise control is the reason I’ve kept a driver’s license since I got the first car that had one about 40 years ago. That’s for the better part of 2M miles over 25 years.

    7. Passive voice? Now I know why the editor drinks.

  7. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I recently got a notice that the cost of my digital subscription to the Pilot will increase by 70% at the end of this month. However, it will be ad-free. I called to cancel. Predictably, the representative offered to bargain. I ended up getting my subscription extended for six months at a monthly rate significantly lower than the one I have now. I don’t understand this business model.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      RTD playing the same game… $16.00 a month..and not even a yearly rate.

      Yes.. I would not call this a “business model” at all but hey… the entertainment industry in general seems sure they can sell folks low-ball streaming apps ….

      I think Dick, that there is a younger demographic that’s gotten into marketing these days and yep, they know their demographic but not the older one nor care.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar

      It’s simple, you paid too much the last time you renewed. The 70% increase was in hopes you’d do it again. (We already got this one hooked, reel him in.)

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Same with all subscriptions. Complain, and get a 50% reduction. The simple act of singing Steely Dan’s “FM” to the Sirius XM rep got me another 10%.

      1. The simple act of singing Steely Dan’s “FM” to the Sirius XM rep got me another 10%.

        To convince you to stop?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Until now, that hadn’t occurred to me.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Hopefully not hooked on Howard Stern or similar…
            😉

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Deep Tracks — all the songs you never heard or forgotten by the groups you liked.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            not the Blend or Bridge or 60’s hits? geeze…

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            That’s the wife’s car. Volume 8. No touch.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            can’t understand why you have to pay extra to get Howard Stern… oughta be a discount!

    4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      You like the new business model better – where local partisan “investigative journalists” FOIA their way into a perceived violation and sue for punitive damages to fund their occupation – banking on that sweet, taxpayer-funded, legal settlement payout…?

    5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      You like the new business model better – where local partisan “investigative journalists” FOIA their way into a perceived violation and sue for punitive damages to fund their occupation – banking on that sweet, taxpayer-funded, legal settlement payout…?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Yow! Yep!

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I have ALWAYS said that those silly CBBT signs with the seagull on them were too small.

    Hope it was a bunion or smaller.

  9. DJRippert Avatar

    Kerry is right about the faux Barbie outrage. Margot Robbie was cheated out of an Oscar, by the White supremacist patriarchy.

    Ok, cool.

    Who did get nominated for the Best Actress award?

    Emma Stone (for “Poor Things”), Carey Mulligan (“Maestro”), Annette Bening (“Nyad”), Lily Gladstone (“Killers of the Flower Moon”) and Sandra Hüller (“Anatomy of a Fall”).

    So, the White supremacist patriarchy skipped over Margo Robbie so they could nominate 5 other women?

    Meanwhile, the best director nominees included Justine Triet for “Anatomy of a Fall.”

    Besides that – who are the White supremacist, misogynists who make these decisions? A group of good old boys wearing MAGA hats sitting around the campfire after a long day of hunting rabbits?

    No …

    The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS) votes on the Academy Awards. Members include actors, writers, directors, costume designers, makeup artists, producers and other film industry professionals.

    10,000 liberal fops and dandies.

    Hey there, Barbie – let’s go party.

    https://youtu.be/ZyhrYis509A?si=75st3yRBSWdo486s

    1. Emma Stone (for “Poor Things”), Carey Mulligan (“Maestro”), Annette Bening (“Nyad”), Lily Gladstone (“Killers of the Flower Moon”) and Sandra Hüller (“Anatomy of a Fall”).

      So you’re saying they already had their quota of “White” best actress nominees?…

      1. Not Today Avatar

        To be fair, the category is actress and the people voting on nominations and awards would fit in st fine among BRs regular crowd. They, like Trump, are wealthy not good and decent.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          Even the irregular crowd that shows up isn’t good and decent.

          1. Not Today Avatar

            True.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      What can you say about a doll toy that treated Ken as a type of accessory for decades?

  10. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    Don’t watch WHSV TV news then, it’s another marxist station.

  11. VaPragamtist Avatar
    VaPragamtist

    “Vehicle” is a terrible, colorless, bland, useless word. This was a car. A car drove off the pier.

    If Kerry’s going to complain about “vehicle”, I’d argue that “car” is not much better. Terrible, colorless, bland, useless word. This was a sedan. A sedan drove off the pier.

    Or [year, make, model] drove off the pier

    Or [color, year, make, model, condition] drove off the pier

    This could go on and on. What a silly thing to get upset about.

    1. And it was probably an SUV, anyway…

    2. And it was probably an SUV, anyway…

      1. VaPragamtist Avatar
        VaPragamtist

        A sports utility vehicle? Why not an SUC (sports utility car)?

  12. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “ I usually don’t say much about Donald Trump, but I am furious about this $83 million jury defamation verdict against him. Who in the world waits to come forward with allegations of rape 20 years old and only after the guy is running for office.”

    First, that was only worth $5M. He just wouldn’t stop. That’s what netted him the remaining $78M. Plus, we needn’t mention the others.

    As for 20 years, Karen, how long did the woman who accused Al Franken wait? And she had THE Polaroid photographic evidence.

  13. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    Gotta love the fact that more and more journalists who think the most important thing is to share their views on news rather than report what happened where and when, are getting pink slips. Suicide by ideology.

    I still recall with considerable pleasure watching CNN Europe a couple years ago. No opining journalists. No self-appointed experts. Just a few people telling the audience what happened around the world.

Leave a Reply