Ban Cellphones in Schools? It Can be Done!

Photo credit: U.S. News and World Report

by Dick Hall-Sizemore

Schools around the country, including in Virginia, are beginning to effectively ban students’ use of cellphones in schools.

According to available data, about 75 percent of schools in the country ban the non-academic use of cellphones during school hours. However, in most cases, the ban is enforced sporadically. Teachers are put on the spot to enforce it, which creates another source of tension in the classroom. Enforcement is inconsistent— some teachers are OK with some cellphone use; others might feel that they would not be supported by the administration; others might not want to deal with angry parents over the issue.

Technology has made the implementation of a ban much easier. Yondr, a San Francisco-based company, makes a magnetically sealed pouch that can be used to keep cellphones unavailable for use. They have been used at concerts to prevent attendees from filming performances, but schools have been their biggest customers recently. It works simply: When students arrive at school, if they are carrying their cellphones, they place the devices in the pouches which, when closed, are magnetically sealed. During the day, the cellphones cannot be accessed. When leaving the school, the pouches can be unlocked with a docking device.

Several school districts in Virginia have adopted the devices either wholly or on a pilot basis and others are considering doing so. Hopewell city schools adopted the program last year; Charlottesville did so this year. Those are relatively small school systems, each with only one high school and one middle school. Richmond, a much bigger school district, has implemented the program on a pilot basis in six of its schools this year — three high schools and three middle schools. The Petersburg school board is considering putting in the program. Roanoke city schools were a pioneer in Virginia on this issue. They put the Yondr devices in math classes in two high schools on a pilot basis. Obviously, the division did not follow up on the pilot; it has recently conducted a survey on cellphone use in schools and how to control it.

A recent article in The Washington Post examined the results of using the Yondr devices in a Connecticut middle school. In addition to students being less distracted from their work in school, administrators reported the following changes:

  • Group vaping sessions where students would coordinate to meet in restrooms to smoke prohibited electronic cigarettes? Finished;
  • Using AirDrop to share inappropriate photos during class? No more;
  • Social-media-fueled arguments during school? Over;
  • Shorter rest room breaks;
  • Teachers no longer have to engage in power struggles with students.

The students reported some positive results as well. They feel like they are making more friends and they are actually talking face to face to each other.

Officials of the school system are not naïve. They realize that some students may be sneaking cellphones into the school. Their solution for such a situation is simple: automatic detention for any student taking out a cellphone.

Opposition to the bans has come not only from students, but, more importantly, from parents. Many Charlottesville parents were incensed that they would not be able to communicate with their children personally via cellphone. The assistant principal of the Connecticut middle school profiled in the Post article reminded parents that they could call the school in case of an emergency and that the school would contact them in case of an emergency involving their child.  In addition, teachers had cellphones to use in the case of an emergency.

Furthermore, in the case of a school shooting, you want students hiding and keeping quiet, not talking on their cellphones or having their cellphones going off in response to incoming calls from anxious parents. As for those parents who like the convenience of being able to contact their kids with last-minute schedule changes or reminders, the assistant principal commented, they “had to just to get over it.” They could call the school office which would relay messages to their children.

Several months after the implementation of the program, most parents seemed reconciled or even appreciative. As long as they were assured adequate plans were in place to cope with any emergency, they were “totally fine,” commented one parent.

It seems this is a solution to a problem that bedevils many schools.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

31 responses to “Ban Cellphones in Schools? It Can be Done!”

  1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Nice article Mr. Dick. We the teachers, we have been screaming about this since the days of pagers. No one ever listened. Why the change of heart from superintendents and school boards? Did they think we were crazy or just making problems up? Your pouch idea is good one but might run afoul with the Code of Virginia.
    https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacodefull/title18.2/chapter9/#:~:text=Any%20person%20who%20unreasonably%20or%20unnecessarily%20obstructs%20the,required%20is%20guilty%20of%20a%20Class%202%20misdemeanor.
    https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter5/section18.2-164/#:~:text=Maliciously%20prevents%20or%20interferes%20with%20telephone%20or%20telegraph,he%20is%20guilty%20of%20a%20Class%201%20misdemeanor.
    I had to chuckle reading the code. The language still protects telegraphs!
    Automatic detention for sneaking a cellagram in? Runs against the grain of PBIS and Multi Tiered Support Systems. Endless alternative options have to be explored first.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      The two Code sections you cite include the conditional terms, “maliciously” and “unreasonable”. I doubt if any court would rule that preventing students from having access to cellphones during the school day was a malicious or unreasonable obstruction of the ability to summon emergency help.

      I think automactic detention for violating the ban on cellphones and failing to lock one up could be integrated into PBIS without any trouble.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        For years and years the Code was what my old boss at BWHS would reference as the barrier to cell phone intervention policies. He told me the school board lawyers advised against it. Also 9/11. Pagers and cell phones were ringing off the hooks that day at school. Can’t interfere.

        I looked at the crazy looking chart for actions that must be taken when dealing with assigning detention. I found at least 8 steps that had to come first before escalating to detention. There are probably more but I had difficulty following the PBIS/Multi Tiered Systems Chart.

      2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Mr. Dick I can’t help but to wonder about the change of heart by school leaders. This problem has gone unchecked and in plain sight for 3 decades now. Could it be that school boards now want to control the cell phones to control what kids are filming at school? The endless fights and so on that gradually work their way into the local 6 o’clock news segment?

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          You are much closer to it than I am, but I would guess that not wanting the fights filmed may be a factor. Also, cellphones are much more ubiquitous (is that a tautology?) now. Also, from what I have read, the problem was much more exacerbated by the COVID-related school closures. Finally, the technology is now available to enforce a ban consistently, without the teachers having to badger kids during the class.

        2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          You are much closer to it than I am, but I would guess that not wanting the fights filmed may be a factor. Also, cellphones are much more ubiquitous (is that a tautology?) now. Also, from what I have read, the problem was much more exacerbated by the COVID-related school closures. Finally, the technology is now available to enforce a ban consistently, without the teachers having to badger kids during the class.

    2. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      When I was in school, PWCS had a very strict policy against pagers and cellphones.

      The assumption back then was that if you had one of those, you were a dealer.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Exactly. When I first started teaching in Loudoun it was easy to pinch the pot dealers. Many of them would attach the clip of the pager to their hats. Thanks to baggy pants hung low they never could run fast enough from me.

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          I used to work with an older guy that referred to a couple of our coworkers as “baggy pant #1” and “baggy pant #2”.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    OTOH, we’ll lose a lot of really funny videos of science experiments gone awry.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      There are always some tradeoffs.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        That is the crux of the biscuit.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Alas, these things come more slowly nowadays; “Those who would have security at the cost of humor shall have neither.”

  3. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    How did our parents handle not being able to reach us by cell phone when our generations were in school? And I even remember my wife calling our daughter’s middle school to give her a message.

    1. Teddy007 Avatar
      Teddy007

      But do the schools still have a system to get a message to an individual student?

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        That’s a valid concern.

        It is entirely possible that everyone who knew how to answer the phone and take down a message, and locate a student in whatever class they may be in, and have someone deliver the message to that student…

        …they could all be retired by now.

        When I was back in school most of the office ladies were pretty old then. Can’t imagine this new generation trying to figure out how to accomplish something without an “app”.

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Good article, Dick.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The parents are the big obstacle these days.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      As the guy in Connecticut said, they will just have to get over it. But, how will that play with Youngkin’s mantra that parents know best?

  6. Teddy007 Avatar
    Teddy007

    At the high school level, most if not all of the students have a notebook computer. The students can keep up with their social media through that instead of just their phone. And if they are using Whats App, they can even message through the computer.

    1. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      I’d expect that the notebooks are pretty well locked down and firewalled so they can’t do that.

      Any school division that’s giving out notebook computers to students that aren’t firewalled and locked down is asking for trouble.

      1. Teddy007 Avatar
        Teddy007

        The students can bring their own notebook computers. And h as one ever heard of a VPN. If one can find away around the policy, then all of the students will know away around the rules.

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          They can bring their own notebook computers. But they won’t be able to use the wi-fi if it’s been locked down like it should be. Additionally, they should probably NOT be allowed to bring their own notebook computers at all. Sure, they could bring their own wireless hotspot to use their own notebook computer with, but again, that should not be allowed (and is easily detected as a rogue access point).

          A VPN can easily be blocked, both at the firewall level and at the operating system (Windows) level.

          1. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            I was teaching a class last money (Apr 29) in a Fairfax County public school. Around 50% of the student had their own computer and half had a school issued computer. And all of them had some access to the internet and I would bet that some of the privately owned computers had VPN. And firewalls are sort of pointless these days when everything going across the router is encrypted.

          2. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            I sure hope you aren’t teaching any sort of computer class. Your last statement about firewalls is completely wrong and evidences a lack of understanding about how they work.

            I’ll give you a hint. Encryption is like the envelope around a letter. It prevents you from seeing the contents.

            But the source and destination addresses are written right on the outside in plaintext. They have to be, for the letter (or in the case of a network, the packet) to be delivered.

            That’s what a firewall uses to allow or deny packets.

            A strict access control that might be appropriate for a public school would allow for access to a certain set of IP addresses and ports corresponding to websites that are allowed.

            All other traffic, including VPN and instant messenger traffic, is blocked.

            A firewall, however, is just one technology among several like proxy servers and intrusion prevention / intrusion detection systems that can be used to control access.

            Each of these devices performs different functions and a comprehensive solution will use more than one of them.

            Even the wifi can be locked down so that only an authorized laptop can be used to connect. EAP, extensible authorization protocol is often used for this.

          3. Teddy007 Avatar
            Teddy007

            Just so long as the firewall knows the IP addresses to all of the VPN’s and all of the anonymizers’. The students are very good at finding the holes in the firewalls and no firewall is perfect.

          4. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            It doesn’t need to if the policy is a whitelist of allowed IPs, which it probably should be for a public school.

            ALLOW ip1
            ALLOW ip2
            ….
            DENY ANY

            The last line blocks everything that wasn’t allowed through by the first lines. Processed in order.

          5. WayneS Avatar

            A strict access control that might be appropriate for a public school would allow for access to a certain set of IP addresses and ports corresponding to websites that are allowed.

            That is how the wi-fi at my son’s high school operated, at least while he was there. The firewall did not block individual IP addresses – it blocked all IP addresses except those specifically allowed by the school administration. It also allowed only authorized computers to connect.

          6. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Sounds like they have or had some good IT people set it up, which is not always the case.

  7. If there’s a silver bullet to improve school discipline and academic achievement, banning cellphones from schools is it. Cell phones are only part of the problem, but they’re a big part of it, and the remedy is unambiguous, straightforward, and free from culture-war issues.

  8. Ronnie Chappell Avatar
    Ronnie Chappell

    Thanks, Dick, for writing this and sharing it.

Leave a Reply