Aside from Insinuating Matt Daniel is Anti-Semitic, Shapira’s Latest Piece Wasn’t So Bad

by James A. BaconThe Washington Post’s

Ian Shapira has finally published his piece about Matt Daniel, head of the Spirit of VMI PAC and one of the more vocal critics of the current VMI leadership. It may be the most balanced piece Shapira has ever written in his coverage of VMI — admittedly, an extremely low bar to clear. Even though Daniel declined to answer his questions, Shapira made a decent effort to present his point of view by quoting from the public record. 

I cannot say what accounts for this departure in Shapira’s journalistic practice, but it cannot entirely be coincidence that Daniel had pre-empted a feared hit job by publicly releasing a list of questions that the WaPo reporter had emailed him shortly before publication. (Bacon’s Rebellion reported on those questions here.)

Still, Shapira can’t help being Shapira, and he described two incidents that grotesquely insinuated that Daniel has Nazi and/or anti-Semitic proclivities.

Here is the first incident:

By the end of 2020, Daniel said on Facebook that he opened an account under the username @EggBoyRises on Gab, a social media platform popular with white supremacists, neo-Nazis and other far-right figures. About six months later, the Spirit of VMI also started a Gab account.

Both accounts have been used only rarely. But, in one December 2020 post on the @EggBoyRises account, a drawing of “Egg Boy” stands next to what appears to be an ostrich with its head in the sand under a sign that reads, “Leftie Training Camp Station #1.” The comment above the drawing reads, “EGG-BOY UBER ALLES!”

The phrase “Über Alles” was once in a verse of the German national anthem and means “above all.” But it was cut from the song after World War II because the phrase was embraced by the Nazis and is considered offensive.

I don’t know much about Gab — I’ve never used it, never visited it — but I do know that it became popular with conservatives and the far right after it became clear that Twitter and other social media were suppressing their views. Linking Daniel to neo-Nazis for using Gab would akin to linking Shapira to Antifa by noting that Twitter is “popular with Antifa and other radical revolutionaries.” Guilt by association. Guilt by extremely tenuous association.

As for the phrase “über alles,” I suspect that Shapira is reading way too much into the cartoon. Many people, conservatives at least, use it as a negative phrase. The term is meant to invoke Nazi-like authoritarianism. I’m not sure whether Daniel meant his “EggBoy” cartoon character to be sympathetic, or unsympathetic, or ironic, or whatever, so I cannot say for certain what he meant to convey with the words “über alles.” But I know for a fact that Daniel is not a Nazi sympathizer, so I would interpret the cartoon (based on Shapira’s description) as a derogatory reference to the authoritarian tendencies of lefties.

Here is the second incident:

He’s also invoked the names of the World Economic Forum’s executive chairman Klaus Schwab, and Jewish billionaire George Soros — favorite targets of antiglobalist and antisemitic conspiracy theorists.

In a LinkedIn post that’s been taken down, he wrote, “[I]t’s the Dr. Evil Gepettos like the Klaus Schwabs, George Soros (and others) that create hell on Earth.”

This time Shapira is shamelessly linking Daniel to anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists. This is an old trope of the left. Conservatives who criticize Soros, a leftist who happens to be a Jew, are criticizing him because he is Jewish — not because he is a leftist. I can guarantee you that Daniel could give a flying fig what Soros’ ethnic identity is. He is criticizing Soros for the left-wing causes he has used his wealth to underwrite.

This is vintage Shapira. He doesn’t explicitly state that Daniel is anti-Semitic. Instead, he selects facts and creates a context that invite the reader to infer that he is anti-Semitic. Nicely lawyered, Mr. Shapira, nicely lawyered. You’ve managed to smear Daniel while protecting yourself against a libel suit.

Still, all things considered Shapira’s story was less odious and one-sided than usual, so he deserves an attaboy. Good job, Mr. Shapira. You have elevated your standards.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

34 responses to “Aside from Insinuating Matt Daniel is Anti-Semitic, Shapira’s Latest Piece Wasn’t So Bad”

  1. I’m guessing Ian Shapira is not a fan of the Dead Kennedys…

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I’m guessing Mr. Daniel doesn’t listen to the Kinks.

      1. Probably not.

  2. OMG, there is no equivalence between Twitter and Gab, geez. Two seconds of research would have prevented you from making such a silly statement. Gab was founded by an anti-semite and is a well-known haven for the same: https://www.adl.org/resources/blog/andrew-torba-five-things-know-0. It’s where the PA synagogue shooting was planned. Speaking of journalistic integrity, I also think you need to address the other statements in the article, including referring to the Ferguson rioters as “animals,” “pimps,” “drug addicts,” “whores,” along with the cartoons depicting Mr. Shapira as “vermin,” a “bloodsucking pest,” and a homosexual. Are those acceptable statements to you from someone you regularly feature and your org has partnered with?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      It’s easy than that. Gab actually says it’s “alt-right”. Kinda clear.

      1. “I don’t know much about Gab — I’ve never used it, never visited it — but I do know that it became popular with conservatives and the far right after it became clear that Twitter and other social media were suppressing their views.” Perhaps a rudimentary search could have rectified one’s lack of knowledge about Gab? You know, I don’t know much about Ashley Madison, never used it, never visited it. But I do know that it’s popular with married folks trying to network;-).

        1. I see what you did there…

  3. DJRippert Avatar

    Shapira has to deal with the fact that enrollments at VMI are down 25%. At most universities that would be an indication of an existential crisis. While the administration focused on DEI, removing Confederate statues, etc they apparently under-appreciated the fall off in enrollment. Those enrollments at VMI are occurring at a time when The Citadel’s enrollment is very healthy. Perhaps, contrary to Shapira’s insinuation, DEI was not the most pressing problem facing the institution.

    As for Soros, there is no conspiracy theory. Soros’ PAC has pumped money into Virginia Commonwealth Attorney campaigns in an effort to get liberals elected. These liberals use the discretion of their office to push social justice causes by not prosecuting certain crimes with which they disagree. This extra-legislative behavior is disgraceful and anti-Democratic.

    1. Just to be clear, I think everyone recognizes the enrollment drop as an existential crisis. The difference is that the administration is proposing real solutions, and the regressives are proposing ending DEI and brining back the statue of Stonewall. One of those items is serious; one is culture war lunacy.

      1. Not to mention, there’s no real evidence that the DEI stuff is really tied to the enrollment drop as applications to the I had been declining for a decade and no one in the Admin or BoV did anything about it.

        1. Correct, there’s no evidence that’s the case. In fact, The Citadel’s bumper crop of new students this year is evidence that DEI is not a deterrent.

          1. DJRippert Avatar

            It is evidence that the management of VMI took their eye off the ball.

      2. DJRippert Avatar

        If a corporate CEO saw a drop of 25% in revenue and continued to prattle on about DEI the priorities for that CEO would be brought into question. If a financial journalist wrote articles over and over about the company’s DEI programs the journalist’s priorities would be questioned.

        When your house is on fire it’s not the time to start switching out the faucets in the bathrooms.

        VMI has been excessively focused on removing references to Stonewall Jackson, conducting DEI surveys, etc since Northam began his crusade against that institution.

        It seems that VMI took its eye off the real problem.

        1. This is rich. No one is yammering about DEI except for the PAC, Villani and their supporters. It’s monomaniacal. The administration and BOV are 100% focused on addressing the drop in admissions; it’s the PAC and their supporters who are arguing for removal of Gen. Wins, the DEI department and bringing back Stonewall. Use your own standard–if you saw a 25% revenue drop, but people claiming to care about the company were prattling on about removing DEI and messing around with the statuary, would you consider them serious? Neither would I.

        2. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          Higher Ed, despite your wishes, is not in commercial competition for revenues nor are institutions regarded solely for enrollment. Most HE institutions are not-for-profits in purpose. No shareholders to satisfy.

        3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          “Northam began his crusade against that institution.”

          All done in the name of removing the stains from the former governor’s tarnished reputation with no regard to the collateral damage done.

    2. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Shapira does not at all have to deal with the fact of declining enrollment at VMI. Conspiracy speculation linking Soros, CAs, and VMI is, frankly, nuts. If this prospect were true, it may be asserted that Fauxy News election lies were Murdoch initiated to depress VMI enrollment. Makes as much sense.

    3. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Shapira does not at all have to deal with the fact of declining enrollment at VMI. Conspiracy speculation linking Soros, CAs, and VMI is, frankly, nuts. If this prospect were true, it may be asserted that Fauxy News election lies were Murdoch initiated to depress VMI enrollment. Makes as much sense.

      1. DJRippert Avatar

        Shapira’s constant refrain of racism, racism, racism missed the big point – 25% enrollment decline.

        The equivalent would be a series of articles reporting on the wheat crop in Ukraine while ignoring the war with Russia. Even if the wheat crop reports are accurate they would miss the bigger issue.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          Y’all seem to be stuck on the enrollment decline. I suspect if Shapira were to link it to his opinions, you’d have yet another gripe. The Ukraine analogy is bonkers.

  4. What falling sky prognostication was that? Perhaps you’d care to share an actual quote.

    Here’s what I remember writing: “Although I have been highly critical of Shapira’s reporting in the past, it is premature to comment on what he might write.”

    1. “You drew clear inferences that Shapira would deliver another hit piece.”

      Evidence, please.

      1. DJRippert Avatar

        There is no evidence. When JM makes a misstatement he never corrects it. He engages in what some call “silly walks” – misdirection and obfuscation.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          Check out the quotes above from the article. If y’all can parse them as misstatements, demonstrate that. BTW, try to develop some original snark of your own.

    2. I haven’t seen the cartoons in question, and I don’t know the context of the quotes you’re referring to. Why don’t you give me a specific example to respond to?

      1. Can you see how they might be interpreted as bigoted?

        Bigoted? No, no, and perhaps if one does not understand satire.

      2. DJRippert Avatar

        How is that cartoon you posted bigoted? The cartoonist has disdain for Post reporters? That’s bigotry in your mind?

        I don’t think the cartoon is particularly funny or clever but I don’t see the bigotry.

        1. Matt Adams Avatar

          You’ll have to excuse Michael, his knee jerk reaction is to defend Ian at all costs. Tends to happen when you’re a source for the reporter in question, almost like a conflict of interest. Oh wait, it is.

      3. Following up, JB–any thoughts on the items below? Do you find those images and comments acceptable? Would you post them on your website? Or the comments about Ferguson (“animals,” “whores,” etc.)? Have you done any more research into Gab? If so, any reassessment about using that website and posting “uber alles” on it? Do you intend to partner with the PAC going forward?

        1. You seem to be obsessed with the term “uber alles”, which means nothing more than “above all”.

          So, here you go:

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quLqEu4mUOU

          1. Let Bacon answer the question, please, instead of running interference for him. I don’t care about the term Uber Alles. I care about the obvious use of the term when posting a website that hosts neo-Nazis. Here you go: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FhEmEUshso

          2. I’ll answer any question I want to answer. Mr. Bacon, I assume, will do the same. I claim no influence over him.

            Question: Is the use of the phrase ‘uber alles’ always offensive, or only when a conservative uses it? For instance is the title of the book Trump Über Alles: Rhymes for Trying Times offensive?

          3. If you’re going to hijack my attempt to get Mr. Bacon to respond, at least try to read my prior statement carefully so you don’t have to ask a question I’ve already answered. Context matters, so in the context of posting on a neo-Nazi webstie…etc. etc. As they say, do the math.

          4. Thank you for admitting that you think you are the arbiter of what and what is not the correct context for the use of language that “could be interpreted as offensive”.

Leave a Reply