Another Takeaway from the Special Grand Jury Report in the Circuit Court of Loudoun County

by Kathleen Smith

Earlier this month, the special grand jury’s findings in the Circuit Court of Loudoun County were released to the public. The special grand jury had been impaneled by Commonwealth’s Attorney General Jason Miyares to investigate accusations regarding Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) and its handling of a student disciplinary case. After reading the report, it is clear there was a significant lack of leadership and communication at LCPS.

According to its website, Loudoun County Public Schools employs nearly 13,000 people. That large number says a lot about the size of the communication problem evidenced in the report. In comparison, the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office is the largest sheriff’s office in Virginia and it employs about 800 people at six locations. The Loudoun County Social Services offices employ 2,227 people.

With an organization the size of LCPS, there are going to be barriers to communication. Those barriers exist between every building, every floor, every office, and every department. That is normal. So, what does it take to make communication work within an organization of that size?

Leadership matters. Bridging matters.

Consider that 83,000 students benefit from the services of Loudoun County Public Schools. In addition, realize that many of these same 83,000 students (and their families) may also need social services, court services, and law enforcement services at any given point in time or on an ongoing basis throughout the school year. When that happens, there needs to be communication between LCPS officials and the other services involved.

The report is very clear: that communication did not happen.

Knowledge of the incidents in question were kept compartmentalized and buffered within various departments of Loudoun County government. This is not unlike what the CIA does to keep its secrets from leaking. But, unlike the CIA, in this case young people were hurt because of the secrecy. The Grand Jury report also mentions that communications were further stifled because the Superintendent and the Sheriff were at odds and LCPS employees were afraid to speak out against the Superintendent.

Think of concentric circles where the innermost circle represents the students and the event; the next circle represents the school building staff (school resource officer, principal, assistant principal) and families; the next circle represents the outside-of-the-building staff assigned the problem (director of school administration and probation officer); and the outermost circle represents the top leadership (the Superintendent, the Sheriff, the School Board, and the judge).

Aside from the father of the first victim, there were six people mentioned in the report who clearly recognized that there was a problem and attempted to communicate that problem, either within their own circle of influence or outside of their circle:

1. A classroom aide (red circle);
2. Two students who reported they were being stalked by the assailant—one of whom was later assaulted (red circle);
3. The assailant’s grandmother (blue circle);
4. The probation officer (blue circle); and
5. The Director of School Administration (green circle).

Yet, despite this, nothing was done.

This is the reason leadership matters: Organizations have an automatic impulse to buffer problems with useless solutions under the belief that if they can shield the problem, containment is satisfied. But good leaders don’t let that happen. Instead, they build bridges with others involved in the problem. That lends itself to good communication. Leaders who build bridges commit their organizations to processes that become highways of good communication.

In this case, it appears there were no highways or bridges. The path from the center circle — the core of the problem — to the outermost circle was little more than a metaphorical dirt road that led to a dead end. The only travelers on that dirt road were four adults and two minors.

Given the size of Loudoun County, the problem of communication shortcomings is magnified. Yet, for the people most affected in the inner circle, the size really makes no difference. Three young students and their families will live with the consequences of what happened for a long time. Other adults will blame themselves for doing nothing or accomplishing nothing.

In any organization, for leadership to be effective, officials must constantly monitor the flow of communication and act immediately when there is a breakdown. Sadly, in this case, LCPS leadership did not do that.

Agency leadership in Loudoun County must find a way to build super-highways with clear signs and wide lanes that can accommodate the communication needed to serve the people. Loudoun County should eliminate those dirt roads that lead to dead-ends.

All government agencies, regardless of size or the number of people served, should work to build bridges that better serve constituents. Many thanks to the Special Grand Jury, who by sharing its findings, choose to build a bridge rather than a buffer. It is a start.

Dr. Kathleen M. Smith has been an educator since 1975. She has served as the Regional Director for the Mid-Atlantic States for Advanced l Measured Progress (now Cognia) and the Director of the Office of School Improvement with the Virginia Department of Education. She served as a Board Member At-Large for the Virginia Council of Private Education.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

25 responses to “Another Takeaway from the Special Grand Jury Report in the Circuit Court of Loudoun County”

  1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Agreed. Communication is needed. Transparent would be ideal. The author mentions dirt roads with dead ends. Loudoun has the most miles of dirt roads. 300! The most in the commonwealth.
    https://wtop.com/gallery/loudoun-county/loudoun-county-unpaved-roads-make-virginias-endangered-historic-places-list/

    1. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      I remember when Braddock Rd turned into a dirt road somewhere near the Loudoun County line. That was maybe 20 years ago.

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          You don’t find anything on that map with that density of dirt roads a similar distance from Richmond.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Yes. From Bull Run Post Office Road all the way to Rt 15 nothing but loose gravel and crater sized pot holes. Poorest part of Loudoun. Tar paper shacks, hand pump in the front yard, and the out house in the back. Now a four lane highway with million dollar homes on both sides.

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          All those folks probably moved to Manassas…

  2. Deckplates Avatar

    Gov’t agencies are inherently noncommunicative. Policies, Processes, and Culture all make it easier to just not say anything vs. making the effort to communicate. There has to be positive motivation to get into the communications & bridging business. Moreover, successes, in everything they pursue, should be identified & rewarded in ways which promote that.

    “In any organization, for leadership to be effective, officials must constantly monitor the flow of communication and act immediately when there is a breakdown.”

    THE key to not repeating that terrible incident is leadership, as the article aptly points out. Moreover, not just the leadership of LCPS, but in a coordinated effort for all the counties, and relative government agencies. Acting right away when stuff goes askew, usually requires less effort to deal with it.

    “Leadership matters. Bridging matters.”

    Bridging takes place when it is promoted and expected. Recognizing how that failed in LCPS, we do have an opportunity to better put that in place, in all of Virginia. It is NOT a technical problem; it is a Leadership & Policy & Process & Culture challenge. Leaders are taught not born.

  3. LarrytheG Avatar

    What I’d also point out here is that the Virginia State Police had a “failure” in vetting that mentally ill trooper.

    Do we blame this on VSP “leadership”?

    Is that the accountability we seek?

    Leadership is far from infallible. Written policies that must
    be followed or else will transcend leaders, good and bad.

    As much as we like, the real world is that not all leaders are everything we want or expect them to be and the idea that we’d just fire them whenever they fail and hire new ones is not a viable approach IMO.

  4. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    Th simplest explanation for all this is cover up for the Supt and his dozens of assistants and protection of the perverts.

  5. Where are the leadership changes? Firing the superintendent was a start, but that’s all it was. A fish rots from the head, but it doesn’t stop there. More have got to go to remove miscreants, get the organization’s attention and change the culture. C’mon Loudoun clean house.

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      It would take a very experienced superintendent to run a system with 13,000 employees and 94 schools. Place like that can afford no mistakes from top leadership.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        One of the problems with Loudoun is the institution itself. It still runs at the top level as if there were still just 4 high schools not the 17 currently in use. The school system is just too big for one boss to micromanage.

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          Some other states seem to prefer smaller school districts. In one case, they seem to prefer school districts consisting of exactly one high school and the elementary/middle feeder schools.

          But in these same other states, school districts have taxing power and are completely separate from the city/town/county that the serve.

  6. Outstanding analysis, explanation and conclusion. It is far and away the best discussion I have seen yet on this issue. You clearly not only care about the issue, you know what you are talking about. Thank you very much.

    Now, how do we get someone to listen to you?

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      Thanks.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar

    A good fact-filled blog post that really demonstrates that the Loudoun School district is in some ways akin to a company with thousands of employees.

    Leadership is important , I won’t argue that, but corporate policies are also because not every supervisor or leader is top notch as much as we want them to be or expect them to be.

    You can fire leadership that fails but there is no guarantee at all that the next person won’t also fail if there is a lack of corporate policy on issues that REQUIRE communication.

    It’s ought not be a “nice to have” or a ” leaders must do it”, it ought to be ” You WILL do these things, or you WILL get fired”.

    Every corporation has these ” you do or you get fired” things.

    I’d really wonder if any school the size of Loudoun would be similar and I’d ask – for all big schools, do we depend on leadership for these things rather than codified policies that all abide by no matter their position in the food chain?

    If you don’t have such written policies, it DOES depend on leadership but anyone who thinks “good” leaders are infallible and never make mistakes… is expecting way more
    than reality in my view.

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      Those policies are the highway that connects the level. Leadership has to ensure they are in place and practiced.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I agree. A lack of those written policies and compliance totally depends on leadership prerogatives.

  8. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    The superintendent was a world class jerk and should have been fired about two weeks after the second assault happened and the facts were clear. That is a failure of the school board.

    But you know, Kathleen, that the schools are in the hands of their principals. Those people are the captains of their ships. I too read the whole report.

    The principal in the first high school had more than enough information before that attack to justify an out-of-school suspension for that now-felon pending investigation and resolution.

    If we ever get to the point at which our principals are afraid to act or need permission from the division to act, the schools will be unsafe by definition. We may have reached that point in some divisions.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      One knows their own…

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Timing is everything. “What did the President know and when did he know it?”

  10. LarrytheG Avatar

    I’m not going to try to defend anyone in the leadership in Loudoun but just want to point out that there are hundreds of leadership actions and decisions that maintain and operate the school system and to ask are we looking at “failures” across the board of leadership in general on a wide variety of issues or are we looking at one or two specific things they failed at even as they did effectively lead in most other areas?

    Just as we’re probably not going to fire the head of the VSP for the failure to vett that trooper.

    Or, we may not fire the head of the Dept of Corrections for the deaths of 2 inmates recently.

    Or even the TAT at UVA.

    We don’t go on witch hunts for leaders thar we don’t like especially ones with partisan tints.

    And rare is the leader who has a 100% “good” record and the reality is we should judge on the whole job not one thing unless that one thing is essentially a deal-killer mostly attributable to one person . When a failure occurs that involves several or many people and we talk about a lack of “communication” , is process and policy also at issue?

    I’m quite sure the VSP will, after an investigation is done, lay out changes so it does not happen again, Wil they fire
    the leadership of VSP for not making sure those changes were in place prior?

    Same thing with DCOR. An investigation is underway. It appears they had contracted out the medical services and the medical services had a failure. Are we going to fire the SCOR leadership over that?

    I’ll finish again by NOT defending Loudoun leadership but a proper investigation is likely to find ore than one point of failure and firing the top guy may well not “fix” the problem and certainly no more than hiring a replacement leader that folks think won’t also make mistakes of his/her own.

    Is it partisans who will pick ONE issue and then demand “accountability” basically in hopes of damaging an entity they feel is run by folks they disagree with?

    1. “I’m not going to try to defend anyone in the leadership in Loudoun but…”

      Sure seems like a defense to me. And you call others “partisans.”

      So if this had happened to an administration YOU disagreed with, you would be putting up a similar defense? Call me skeptical.

      This ONE issue as you have put it, deserves the attention it has been getting (and more) for three important reasons.

      1. Two minors were sexually assaulted at public schools. That’s serious.

      2. The second assault was completely foreseeable, yet nothing effective was done to prevent it.

      3. Those who spoke out, not only were not listened to, one was arrested.

  11. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    A very good piece that starts to maybe address some of the structural issues behind these failures. I suspect every very large bureaucracy faces similar issues. (As an aside, this is similar to many findings of workplace injury/fatality investigations – even down to the diagram used and yes breaking down barriers to communication is often a key learning in these cases).

    I am still waiting for the LCSO to answer (or even be asked) those “hard questions”…

Leave a Reply