Alumni Free Speech Alliance to Safeguard VMI Campus Free Speech

The Cadet

newspaper and The Cadet Foundation were honored, by unanimous acclimation, to become full members of the Alumni Free Speech Alliance (AFSA). By this honor, Virginia Military Institute (VMI) cadets, alumni, faculty. and staff at VMI now join a prestigious collection of alumni groups representing Ivy League and other major institutions of higher education across the United States. These include Bucknell, Cornell, Davidson, Harvard, Lafayette, Macalester, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton, Stanford, University of North Carolina, University of Virginia, Washington & Lee, Wofford, and Yale.

Tom Rideout, AFSA co-chairman and president of The Generals Redoubt at Washington & Lee (W&L) University, issued the following statement on behalf of ASFA: “The Alumni Free Speech Association (AFSA) is thrilled to announce that The Cadet Foundation will represent the Virginia Military Institute as its fifteenth group member.

“AFSA was created in October 2021 for two purposes. One was to serve as an umbrella group to gather a strong nucleus of higher education alternative alumni associations with a shared mission of supporting free speech, academic freedom, and viewpoint diversity. It seeks to provide a variety of forums for information exchange and operational methods to pursue them. AFSA is building a tool kit, developing communications channels and content, and acquiring strategic allies to allow its members to pursue these goals on their specific campuses. The association also recognizes that its member groups will have unique collections of campus battles to wage, some with free speech issues and others without. So there exists an embedded goal to provide a place for information sharing on a range of broad problem-solving issues and capabilities.

“Secondly, as higher education administrations persist in placing ‘social justice’ agendas ahead of providing traditional educational services, it is anticipated that pressure will grow to create more alternative alumni association groups. Their goals might be returning to the delivery of classic liberal arts education or offering truly science-based STEM curricula. Or it might be fighting to assist faculty members whose teaching is burdened with demands for compelled speech. Or it might be resisting the imposition of litmus tests for applicants to teach in higher educational institutions, tests being imposed by ever growing and uncontrolled bureaucratic Diversity, Equity and Inclusion staffs. AFSA is committed to creating a growing number of new groups to champion free speech issues and other campus specific issues.”

“So AFSA offers a welcoming salute to cadets at The Cadet, The Cadet Foundation and especially VMI cadets. We look forward to your assistance in precisely targeting your considerable resources in the struggle to save higher education from itself.”

As reported in The Wall Street Journal, “free speech, academic freedom and viewpoint diversity are in big trouble at U.S. universities. But many of those worried over the state of campuses are almost resigned to the idea that the forces of intolerance have won.” To open the dialog and allow free expression of all ideas without fear of retaliation or pressure, AFSA member groups are nonpartisan and will protect the rights of faculty and students across the ideological spectrum.

In a recent survey by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), who recently delivered VMI a formal warning on freedom of speech violations regarding The Cadet, “more than 80% of students reported self-censoring their views at least some of the time, with 21% saying they censor themselves often. The survey, of more than 37,000 college students on 209 campuses, shows growing support among students for various forms of censorship, especially of conservative speakers, with 66% of students saying that shouting down speakers on campus may be justified. Other polls report similar results.” The survey also found that tolerance for free speech among faculty is slightly better, but it is in decline.

According to AFSA’s website, “The Alliance brings together alumni groups that have a focus on supporting free speech, academic freedom, and viewpoint diversity at their colleges and universities. Members of the Alliance believe that free speech, academic freedom, and viewpoint diversity are critical to the advancement of knowledge and to very concept of a university. Yet surveys show most students at colleges and universities have little understanding of these principles. Most students oppose free speech.”

AFSA sees free speech, academic freedom, and viewpoint diversity as critical parts of the foundation of every college and university and, their research shows, “Many institutions may already be reaching a breaking point.”

Membership in AFSA not only brings significant resources to the Corps in protecting their individual and collective free speech rights, but tremendous opportunity for individual cadets.

For example, AFSA recently provided opportunities for students and other member representatives to participate in a Capitol Hill event. The Congressional Roundtable on Free Speech held in the Capitol, led by Rep. Greg Murphy (R-NC), a Davidson graduate and a strong supporter of free speech, was live-streamed and included leaders of the House Education and Labor Committee. Two students from AFSA member schools, Washington and Lee (W&L) and University of Virginia (UVA), participated, as did representatives of the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA), FIRE and the Young Americans Foundation (YAF). The Cadet Foundation is currently coordinating for representatives from The Cadet staff and the Corps to participate in future events as The Cadet editorial staff and First Class leadership select.

“We are delighted that The Cadet Foundation has been accepted for membership in this prestigious organization,” says Tim Cordle ’79. “AFSA is comprised of devoted alumni from the top-shelf colleges and universities in the country, bound by a passionate defense of the most-critical, most-basic right. The Corps and the Institute at-large will benefit greatly from this relationship, and we look forward to working with the VMI Board of Visitors, administration, faculty, and staff to ensure that the Corps is guaranteed the unlimited exercise of this precious freedom.”

On behalf of AFSA, Rideout issued a strong commitment to support free speech at VMI, “With your Cadet newspaper and The Cadet Foundation, AFSA pledges to join alumni and especially cadets in order to return maximum self-governance to the Corps of Cadets by restoring and strengthening their voice in defense of their right to free speech.”

Cadets, faculty and staff who want to become involved, have issues, concerns or questions regarding free speech at VMI or need assistance can contact a member of The Cadet editorial staff, the Cadet Foundation, or their representative to AFSA, Tim Cordle ’79 directly or by email at: FreeSpeech@cadetnewspaper.org.

This post was originally published in The Roanoke Star. Used with permission.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

41 responses to “Alumni Free Speech Alliance to Safeguard VMI Campus Free Speech”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The foundation believes in free speech as long as it does not involve someone espousing LGBTQ viewpoints. https://www.baconsrebellion.com/wins-defends-lgbtqia-performance-artist-at-vmi/

    1. Turbocohen Avatar

      What do LGBTQ viewpoints have to do with free speech?

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Go to the link I provided and you will see that foundation members objected to having a LGBTQ speaker on campus.

    2. LesGabriel Avatar

      If you have information that the foundation does not believe in free speech for someone supporting LGBTQ viewpoints, please share it.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        As I mentioned above go to the link I provided and you will see that foundation members objected to having a LGBTQ speaker on campus.

      2. Got to any of the interviews about VMI in the last few months and you’ll get a good taste of what this alumni cohort feel about “free speech.” The short of it is that their definition includes suppression of things they disagree with.

        1. So it’s a Democratic organization.

    3. Mr. Hall-Sizemore

      I’m trying to give your comment a fair shake.

      I now see that certain individuals have opposed a specific LGBTQ speaker. I’ve acknowledged that.

      But your original statement is critical of the entire foundation, implying that the foundation opposes all LGBTQ speakers. Unless you’ve got more, that’s a bit of a stretch.

      Additionally, is that the standard which should be used to judge foundations you support? Let’s say I find an individual or group of individuals within a foundation, would that be sufficient to characterize the entire foundation?

      I realize it was a quick comment, not an expose, but it still paints with a broad brush.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        re: ” I now see that certain individuals have opposed a specific LGBTQ speaker. I’ve acknowledged that.

        But your original statement is critical of the entire foundation, implying that the foundation opposes all LGBTQ speakers.”

        so the idea is that SOME LGBTW speakers MIGHT be supported?

        THAT seems even MORE of a “stretch”… call me skeptical

        1. Mr. Hall-Sizemore kindly posted a link to the audio of an interview which provided more details regarding the objections. Have you listened to it?

          At one point, it was suggested that a person of more stature, or someone holding public office (possibly with similar LGBTQ views) would have been better suited to the venue and occasion. I believe a female member of Congress was suggested.

          But even the information provided is only helpful to understand the views of select individuals, not the foundation itself which was criticized. That was my primary point and one that you have ignored.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Why do you need to “understand the views of “select” ” if free speech is for everyone?

    4. I went to the link and don’t agree with objections to that speaker at VMI. VMI cadets should be old enough to grapple with mature subject matter. Those opinions, however, are also free speech.

      The major difference between those objections and what we see happening at many other colleges and universities is that Kimberly Dark was apparently allowed to speak without being shouted down or driven away. It often doesn’t work that way for conservative speakers at other Higher Education institutions.

      The topic of this article is the Alumni Free Speech Alliance (AFSA). As was mentioned by another commenter, do you have any evidence of that group protesting the appearance of Kimberly Dark at VMI? If not, your accusation is baseless.

        1. Thanks. I stand corrected.

          One wonders if any have reconsidered their position.

          1. These guys? They haven’t reconsidered any opinions since they graduated from VMI.

        2. Listening now.

          He definitely objected to Kimberly Dark.

          Part of the objection appears to have been the absence of a speaker with an opposing view for balance. Has VMI invited someone with an opposing view since then?

          They also think the occasion of the anniversary of VMI accepting women deserved a more fitting speaker. Why not a successful alum from that class?

          It would be interesting to see a complete list of similarly honored speakers over the last few years.

          I would not object to an LGBTQ speaker, but I don’t think visiting speakers should all come from left (or right) of center.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            new rules?

          2. I’ve looked at who has spoken at VMI and it appears to have been a good mix over the years.

            I wouldn’t object to Kimberly Dark speaking.

            I’m new to BR but I think freedom of speech is much broader than just who is allowed to be a guest speaker. Do all students and faculty feel free to express their opinions about controversial topics at VMI as well as other public colleges and universities?

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            We agree. So why do some need to look at who might speak to decide?

            why not just support any/all speakers and not weigh in or oppose some?

          4. You would have no objections to any speaker? Really?

            Everyone has a right to speak, but not necessarily to be honored with a paid speaking engagement at a public institution. That’s my opinion anyway.

            If you think you disagree, then
            you would support VMI paying these people to speak there? I would not.

            Nick Fuentes?

            Louis Farrakhan?

            Alex Jones?

    5. That’s correct. “Free speech” is the cover story, not the intent. The people fighting for this brand of “free speech” are on the record opposing LGBTQ speakers, removing objectionable books in the VMI library, and banning the teaching of “inherently divisive topics” at VMI. They have no clue what the first amendment means, and should be ignored.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        re: ” The people fighting for free speech are on record of opposing LGBTQ speakers, removing objectionable books in the VMI library, and teaching of “inherently divisive topics” at VMI.”

        True that!

      2. Please provide specific examples of the individuals of whom you speak. Who specifically within AFSA is “on the record’ opposing LGBTQ speakers at VMI.

        I’m not saying they don’t exist. I honestly don’t know of any. If you say they do exist, please provide those examples.

        1. I’m not referring to AFSA, I’m referring to the VMI alums pushing for more “free speech” at VMI. Some of these folks who support the Cadet foundation, which joined AFSA, went on the John Reid Show to argue that an LGBTQ speaker should not have spoken at VMI, that the library had titles that taught CRT and should be removed, that DEI was banned by executive order by the gov., and that Youngkin should step because the head of VMI criticized these same alums. John Reid’s show is on Audacy, so you can listen to these segments.

          1. Okay. Appreciate the explanation.

        2. I’m not referring to AFSA, I’m referring to the VMI alums pushing for more “free speech” at VMI. Some of these folks who support the Cadet foundation, which joined AFSA, went on the John Reid Show to argue that an LGBTQ speaker should not have spoken at VMI, that the library had titles that taught CRT and should be removed, that DEI was banned by executive order by the gov., and that Youngkin should step because the head of VMI criticized these same alums. John Reid’s show is on Audacy, so you can listen to these segments.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    Just a quick question. Is the “standard” for “free speech” not the same at private institutions like Liberty?

    Is it okay for them to restrict free speech even though they are also “higher ed” that is theoretically encouraging free thought and expression as part of what higher ed espouses as a value?

    1. Private institutions should do what they promise.

      “Get the world-class education and Christian foundation you’re looking for at Liberty University. Since 1971, Liberty has had a singular vision of developing Christ-centered men and women with the values, knowledge, and skills essential for impacting the world for Christ.”

      https://www.liberty.edu/about/

      When I go to an Italian restaurant, I expect to find Italian food. If not, I feel like they are misrepresenting their business.

      This isn’t hard.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        so private institutions don’t need to have free speech?

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          The Constitutional guarantee of free speech applies to governmental actions. VMI is government-supported; Liberty is not. That is why Liberty can have compulsory chapel attendance.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Liberty, like most collegiate religious institutions, receive govt funded tuition and function as not for profits protected by IRS regulation. It’s more accurate to state that VMI is govt sponsored.

  3. Who wrote this schlock? Just awful.

    1. See the notation at the end.

      “originally published in The Roanoke Star. Used with permission.”

      1. That’s not who wrote it, though. It just says it published in that “newspaper.”

        1. I wrote to the Roanoke Star. Here’s the reply regarding authorship.

          “it was submitted for sharing by the Cadet Newspaper – no author was given.”

          1. Got it, thanks. They have a habit of doing that. They just ran an accusatory oped by a “current faculty member” with no name attached. Very poor form. Lacks intellectual integrity, no way to determine the author’s credibility, let alone if the author is indeed a faculty member, or respond. First Amendment indeed.

      2. Matt Adams Avatar

        Perhaps his use of a slur was Freudian.

  4. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    “…honored by unanimous acclimation…”. I’m acclimed to challenge this notoriety.

    1. It honestly reads like a press release from a one party state. “Glorious victory for defenders of the proletariat…” blah blah blah…

  5. In my opinion, the Roanoke Star should have published this as opinion/commentary, not as news.

Leave a Reply