AG’s Office to Review UVa Handling of Shooting Threat

Attorney General Jason Miyares has agreed to conduct an external review of the events that led up to the shooting deaths of three University of Virginia students Sunday. He will enlist special counsel to assist his office in the completion of its work, said spokesperson Victoria LaCivita.

The review will produce a report to be shared with students, families, the larger UVa community, and government officials. “The Attorney General will work with deliberate speed while ensuring that all necessary resources remain devoted to the criminal investigation being conducted by state and local authorities,” she said.

Miyares’ statement comes after a request for the review issued by the UVa Board of Visitors. In a letter to the Attorney General, Rector Witt Clement wrote the following:

University Police have requested that the Virginia State Police assume primary responsibility for the continued criminal investigation of this tragic incident. University Police officials, along with other state and federal law enforcement agencies, will continue to assist the Virginia State Police in the criminal investigation of this matter, which we expect will support successful prosecution of [the alleged shooter Christopher Darnell Jones, Jr.], a fellow University student.

As the investigation proceeds, there are many valid questions about the shooting that have yet to be answered and are unlikely to be answered in the course of criminal proceedings.

Accordingly, we write today to request that you exercise your authority under Virginia law to appoint outside special counsel with expertise in these matters to conduct an independent review of the University’s response to the shooting, as well as the efforts the University undertook in the period before the tragedy to assess the potential threat Mr. Jones posed to our community. Finally, we request that the special counsel review all relevant University policies and procedures and make recommendations if opportunities or needs for change are identified.

— JAB


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

8 responses to “AG’s Office to Review UVa Handling of Shooting Threat”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar

    I hope he looks into this:

    ” COLONIAL HEIGHTS, Va. — When Christopher Darnell Jones Jr. attempted to purchase a gun from Dance’s Sporting Goods in Colonial Heights in July 2021, the licensed dealer ran a background check.

    As it turns out, the Virginia State Police Firearms Transaction Center (FTC) denied Jones’s request because of a pending felony charge out of Petersburg, according to Virginia State Police.

    Jones had also recently been convicted of a gun crime in Chesterfield.”

    https://www.wtvr.com/news/local-news/christopher-darnell-jones-jr-failed-background-check-gun-purchase-november-16-2022

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      That’s OK … the UVa Judiciary Committee was on the job!

  2. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Miyares cannot lead this. In my lay opinion he is deeply conflicted because UVA is his client, and he owes them zealous representation. Lawsuits are coming and he will be defending the school. The letter to me seems to be asking for outside counsel, which would be appropriate. Just like the U.S. AG appointing special counsels at the federal level. For once, the school is very happy to agree the AG is actually their top lawyer and they will rush to hide under his umbrella and the doctrine of sovereign immunity.

  3. Carter Melton Avatar
    Carter Melton

    If they have a cool million laying around, maybe they will be lucky enough to get Barns and Thornburg….just tell ’em on the front end what you want…and bingo..there it is

  4. Carter Melton Avatar
    Carter Melton

    If they have a cool million laying around, maybe they will be lucky enough to get Barns and Thornburg….just tell ’em on the front end what you want…and bingo..there it is

  5. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Miyares cannot lead this. In my lay opinion he is deeply conflicted because UVA is his client, and he owes them zealous representation. Lawsuits are coming and he will be defending the school. The letter to me seems to be asking for outside counsel, which would be appropriate. Just like the U.S. AG appointing special counsels at the federal level. For once, the school is very happy to agree the AG is actually their top lawyer and they will rush to hide under his umbrella and the doctrine of sovereign immunity.

    1. You are correct. In the letter they specifically ask for “outside special counsel”, which clearly means not the AG.

  6. But will any of those at UVA who failed to protect the campus through their inaction be held accountable and fired? Nope.

Leave a Reply