After Arctic Blast, Do We Still Want to Californicate Our Grid?

by Scott Dreyer

An old saying goes, “You don’t miss the water till the well runs dry.”

In modern days that might be, “You don’t miss the electricity till you lose the lights. And heat. And hot water. And wifi. And TV. And microwave. And phone charger. And electric blanket, and The Roanoke Star….”

Around here, blackouts were common over Christmas weekend. Some lost power for a day or two, but one friend today told me her Roanoke Valley suburb lost juice Thursday night and didn’t get it back till Monday evening. Those extended power outages, combined with the brutal temperatures, high winds, and the fact that it was Christmas weekend, caused misery for many. The death toll nationwide from the storm is already 60, and might climb higher as more bodies are found.

One Roanoke insurance agent told me her office has been flooded (pardon the pun) with calls from policy holders reporting frozen pipes and now water damage.

At my home office, it was 6 degrees Saturday morning. Ironically, friends of ours were in upstate New York for Christmas, where it hit a low of 7, so it was colder here than there. A friend in southwest Roanoke County recorded 2 degrees. At Paint Bank, on the western edge of Craig County near the West Virginia line, it was -5.

Another feature of the storm was its magnitude. Last Friday, some 240 million people were under a weather warning or advisory; that was more than two-thirds of the entire U.S. population of 330 million. The map of wintry hazards “depicts one of the greatest extents of winter weather warnings and advisories ever,” the National Weather Service said.  It was freezing in Atlanta and flurrying in Miami.

I would be remiss not to point out the incredible irony. Granted, one weather event–no matter how extreme–does not prove a trend. However, it’s remarkable how, after years of being warned the world is getting hotter and hotter, we just endured a storm that broke record lows in some places. In March 2000, the British newspaper Independent warned that, due to Global Warming, it was likely that in the near future English children would never see real snow.

The extreme cold should have showed us (again) the need to have affordable, reliable energy.

Where does our electricity come from?

In the Old Dominion as of 2021, 60% comes from power plants that burn fossil fuels (3.3% from coal and 56.6% from natural gas). Utilities convert that into electricity which they run to homes and businesses by power lines. Nuclear energy provides 30% of our electricity. About 2% comes from hydroelectric dams that generate power as water runs past turbines in the dam. Even though Smith Mountain Lake is known as a recreational haven, it was developed mainly for this purpose; the huge lake for fishing and fun is actually a by-product.

The much-ballyhooed “green energy” provides only a tiny sliver of our current power needs, with solar making about 4% and wind part of the “other,” comprising 0.6%.

Fossil fuels get a bad rap, but today’s power plants that burn them use new technology and scrubbers in the smokestacks that make them burn cleaner than ever before. Plus, coal is abundant in our area of the Southern Appalachians, and perhaps the world’s biggest natural gas reserves are right next-door in West Virginia. When we burn coal or natural gas, we are using domestic reserves God gave us, supporting American jobs, and keeping the supplies and money here at home. In contrast, by importing more oil, we have to transport it overseas which risks ship leaks, plus the money often goes to enemy nations such as Russia.

When Democrats controlled Virginia’s Governor’s Mansion and both houses of the General Assembly after the anti-Trump 2019 elections, they passed the “Virginia Clean Economy Act” (VCEA). That makes Virginia the only state in the union with a law mandating we have 100% renewable energy by a set deadline. Virginia has two large utilities that produce and sell electricity. One is Dominion Power, which, as reported here, was allegedly involved in a sleazy scandal to suppress rural, Republican, gun-rights voters in the 2021 elections. The other is Ohio-based Appalachian Electric Power (APCO).

VCEA forces Dominion to go 100% renewable by 2045 and APCO by 2050.

In their jihad against fossil fuels, the General Assembly has been shutting down some coal-powered generators, with all but two to stop burning coal by 2024. By stopping the use of affordable coal, electricity prices rise. Plus, since most everything in our economy requires electricity in some regard, that triggers a chain-reaction that drives up prices for everything, which partially explains the highest inflation we’ve seen since the 1970’s.

Renewable energy, though promising in theory, has pitfalls. Windmills don’t generate power on calm days, and often have to be shut down on gusty days like last Friday. Solar doesn’t work on cloudy days like we’ve had much of the last few weeks. Dominion is planning a gigantic windmill farm off the coast of Virginia Beach, but as reported here, it might cause the extinction of rare Right Whales. Or, as reported here and here, the large, noisy windmill farm off the coast of Hampton Roads could endanger our submarine and U.S. Navy fleet based in Norfolk at a time of heightened global tensions and the first large land war in Europe since 1945.

On Christmas Eve, a time usually reserved for mirth and merriment, The Roanoke Star issued this stark headline: “Appalachian Power Issues Emergency Energy Reduction Request to All Users.”

Since our power grid was buckling regionally, as well as nationwide, how are we to manage if we keep mothballing fossil fuel-burning plants and relying more on shaky and more expensive alternatives?

Reliable, affordable energy is a “must have” in today’s economy, and as we’ve seen in the storm-related deaths, it’s also a matter of life and death.

Who passed the VCEA that is shutting down affordable coal-powered generators? Two Roanoke members of the General Assembly: Democrat Sen. John Edwards and Del. Salam “Sam” Rasoul.

As reported here, many Virginians last summer were shocked and fuming to learn that the Democrat-controlled General Assembly and Governor Ralph Northam tied future car sales in the Commonwealth to fuel and emissions standards set by California. The end game is to have only electric vehicles for sale in the Old Dominion.

This raises many questions:

  • In the recent blackouts, many people without electricity drove their (gas-powered) cars to go visit or stay with friends or in a motel, to go shopping, to find a warm spot, or just to avoid cabin fever. In a blackout, are those poor souls also condemned to stay in a dark, cold house, if they can’t charge their car to go out? Of, if their car has enough battery to leave home, what happens if the charging stations are closed, or have huge lines?
  • In January 2022, as a fitting capstone to the hapless Northam administration, a sudden snowstorm paralyzed busy I-95 between Richmond and DC. To people freezing overnight in their cars, some holding elderly passengers needing medications, or infants, Gov. Northam’s glib advice was basically: “Wait till tomorrow and the sun will help melt the ice.” But I digress. James Bacon in Bacon’s Rebellion wrote: “Here’s a problem with current battery technology: the colder the outside temperature, the faster lithium ion batteries lose power. According to Green Car Future, a pro-EV website, the Tesla Model S owner’s manual comes with this warning: ‘In cold weather, some of the stored energy in the Battery may not be available on your drive because the battery is too cold.’ Here’s a related problem: electric vehicles’ heating systems rely upon resistance heaters, which require great amounts of electrical energy. As Green Car Future notes, ‘Right at the times you will need that burst of energy … your battery power is being obstructed by the cold conditions.’” So, how are drivers supposed to drive or even survive in an electric vehicle if they are caught in a blizzard?
  • Voters choose members of the 140-member General Assembly to write laws…for Virginia. What legislators from the Roanoke area voted to put Virginia car owners in a “Made in California” straightjacket? Democrats — Sen. Edwards and Del. Rasoul. If those politicians aren’t doing their job but instead simply outsourcing their responsibilities, why are they still in the General Assembly and drawing a Virginia taxpayer-funded salary? The next General Assembly convenes in Richmond on January 11, 2023. If both Edwards and Rasoul find writing laws for Virginians too burdensome and they just want to outsource the job to California, then they need to resign to make room for new folks who will actually make laws for Virginia.

If they don’t resign, Roanoke Valley voters have the chance to replace them this coming November. We can’t afford to “Californicate” our power grid and car options.

For the sake of our liberties, prosperity, and what we hold dear, Sen. Edwards and Del. Rasoul should be removed from office.

Scott Dreyer M.A. of Roanoke has been a licensed teacher since 1987 and now leads a team of educators teaching English and ESL to a global audience. Learn more at DreyerCoaching.com.

This column first appeared in The Roanoke Star and is republished with permission.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

64 responses to “After Arctic Blast, Do We Still Want to Californicate Our Grid?”

  1. A bit of fun:

    https://www.cfact.org/2022/12/30/blackouts-for-christmas-a-sick-grid-gift/

    Blackouts for Christmas, a sick grid gift

    By David Wojick

    The beginning: “Many people got a blackout for Christmas. Or for Christmas Eve Day. Or even worse the Night Before Christmas, when it was zero at my place. But I was lucky as my 8 hour blackout was Friday, so all I lost for Christmas was phone and Internet. But I had already received the four day blackout the Thursday-Sunday a week before. Geez!

    Oh but I also got an actual Christmas gift. An email from my power company (if you can still call them that) with this holiday request: “Please Conserve Energy During the Extreme Cold”.

    How much I wondered? No Christmas dinner? No holiday lights? Apparently so, for this is (part of) what they said:

    “Here are some simple ways you can reduce energy use:

    –Turn off non-essential appliances, equipment and electric lights – including HOLIDAY LIGHTS – that you do not need or are not using.
    — Postpone using major electric household appliances, such as STOVES, dishwashers and clothes dryers.”

    No lights, no stove, no Christmas.”

    Lots more in the article. Please share it.

    Replacing reliable power with unreliable power makes power unreliable. Imagine that!

    1. Did the email include a Grinch emoji?

      He is green, after all.

    2. Interestingly, PJM did not request all of the new bulk load users (data centers) to reduce their power consumption. Perhaps they will send the residential consumers bags of coal to keep warm with without impacting their (and the data centers) “green” profile.

      1. One guess as to who approved the new bulk load users? The same people that want us to get rid of coal and natural gas power plants. Did you know that these data centers have large diesel generators for when the power goes out? Those should be regulated too, but the owners of those data center are big campaign contributors.

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          Aren’t they required to get EPA permits for those generators if they are over a certain size?

          By the way, I know of a data center up in Sterling that was torn down. That’s when they discovered that the diesel tanks had been leaking diesel fuel into the ground for YEARS.

          The company that ran the data center had to be aware of it. It was said by employees working there that the area always stunk of diesel fuel.

  2. A bit of fun:

    https://www.cfact.org/2022/12/30/blackouts-for-christmas-a-sick-grid-gift/

    Blackouts for Christmas, a sick grid gift

    By David Wojick

    The beginning: “Many people got a blackout for Christmas. Or for Christmas Eve Day. Or even worse the Night Before Christmas, when it was zero at my place. But I was lucky as my 8 hour blackout was Friday, so all I lost for Christmas was phone and Internet. But I had already received the four day blackout the Thursday-Sunday a week before. Geez!

    Oh but I also got an actual Christmas gift. An email from my power company (if you can still call them that) with this holiday request: “Please Conserve Energy During the Extreme Cold”.

    How much I wondered? No Christmas dinner? No holiday lights? Apparently so, for this is (part of) what they said:

    “Here are some simple ways you can reduce energy use:

    –Turn off non-essential appliances, equipment and electric lights – including HOLIDAY LIGHTS – that you do not need or are not using.
    — Postpone using major electric household appliances, such as STOVES, dishwashers and clothes dryers.”

    No lights, no stove, no Christmas.”

    Lots more in the article. Please share it.

    Replacing reliable power with unreliable power makes power unreliable. Imagine that!

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “However, it’s remarkable how…”

    No, it is not…

    “The much-ballyhooed “green energy” provides only a tiny sliver of our current power needs…”

    Actually, nuclear and hydroelectric are considered “green” as they don’t contribute to climate change. That means that 40% of our power (by your calculations at least) come from “green”, non-carbon-based sources.

    “In contrast, by importing more oil, we have to transport it overseas which risks ship leaks, plus the money often goes to enemy nations such as Russia.”

    You do realize we are exporting our natural gas overseas, don’t you…? And that Canada is the largest source for imported petroleum…?

    “By stopping the use of affordable coal, electricity prices rise”

    Coal is not “affordable”…

    “…which partially explains the highest inflation we’ve seen since the 1970’s…”

    No, it doesn’t.

    “Since our power grid was buckling regionally as well as nationwide,…”

    Well, that is what an over reliance on fossil fuels and a refusal to invest in new infrastructure (in the name of “Conservative” fiscal policy) gets you.

    1. Please explain how coal is not affordable.

      1. Coal has gone from about $90 a ton a year ago to over $190 a ton today. That is more than doubled in price.

        1. And yet it is still cheaper than solar and wind.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            No it is not

          2. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            It is, especially after stripping out Government subsidies, you just are not willing to admit it.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Wait! Are you saying coal ain’t subsidized?

          4. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            Not the way Solar and Wind are. Sure there have been tax subsidies, but then crazily regulated which jumps up costs.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Would you care to sum, and adjust for inflation, 100 years of coal subsidies, and then say that?

          6. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            Without coal and gas, Europe would be speaking German or Russian, and Hawaii would be part of Japan.

          7. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Point was subsidies. Stay focused. But as for Europe speaking German without coal and gas, it’s precisely because of a lack of coal and gas that they AREN’T speaking German. Buat again, it’s total subsidies.

          8. LarrytheG Avatar

            Hawaii uses coal?

            Most islands don’t have native fossil fuels resources and use diesel to generate electricity at about 3 times what it costs on the mainland.

            not exactly cheap:

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3936e1132f1043e9d7f6b6ac2bc812685ff940956411e38ada44d2a6d7f674d0.jpg

          9. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            We won WW2 in large part to our industrial capacity, driven by energy and other raw materials. No coal, no steel.

          10. LarrytheG Avatar

            Agree. But is coal-powered electricity in Hawaii cheap?

          11. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            If that is how you read it I apologize for being too quick, a coal plant in Hawaii would probably not make sense, except perhaps a while ago in Oahu (certainly not now). I was trying to respond to the question of decades of coal subsidies. For a number of years, WW2 era and before, and again after the 70’s energy crisis, coal was in our National Interest for a number of reasons. Obviously, much less so now, but I do think it still plays an important part for base load generation as I already stated in other threads. Plus it has other industrial uses, the most significant is in steel making.

          12. LarrytheG Avatar

            20% of our electricity is still generated by coal.

            I don’t think Hawaii uses much coal and the bulk of their electricity comes from diesel oil and electricity costs 30 cents kwh and more.

            Would wind and solar be cheaper than that?

          13. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            No it is not… the Levelized Cost of Energy for coal is higher than natural gas, geothermal, wind, and solar by a factor of 2 or more for most of those and that is before subsidies. The facts just are not with you here.

          14. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            You sent a link with no context. Was the coal assuming carbon capture? Was the coal cost based on the assumption a new plant is built, or existing plants? Did you look at coal and gas in todays high prices, thanks in part to heavy regulation and cost increases, or average costs? Its been a while since I reviewed these types of calculations, but I have done them in the past, and coal, nuclear and and gas always was the low cost producer (other than existing hydro plants) , costs are artificially higher now for a variety of reasons.

            I have no doubt wind and solar are down, and I fully support them, but they cannot be relied on for more than a certain percentage of production, you need base load driven by nuclear or fossil fuels.

          15. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Levelized Cost of Energy is a well defined and time honored financial analysis term which provides a basis for comparison of energy production alternatives. You can examine the basis of that figure if you like. It is well documented. Nuclear has one of the highest LCOE, btw.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levelized_cost_of_electricity

        2. Randy Huffman Avatar
          Randy Huffman

          Bunk. Coal mining is a capital intensive operation, you can’t open a mine without significant investment in capital, a slew of permits, low cost funding, and utilities or steel companies who are willing to commit for the long term. But thanks to the push for Green, ESG and other mindless but powerful forces, support isn’t there. What major company in their right mind since the middle of Obama’s Presidency is willing to take that risk? That is why the cost of mining has jumped.

          Bet you already know that, don’t you?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Randy – you need to go look up levelized cost of electricity. It’s not partisan. it includes all costs.

            https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf

          2. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            I did glance at that, and will spend time on it later. But it is projected costs of new construction, and for coal, its hard to decipher how carbon capture plays in. Who is going to permit a new coal plant today without carbon capture? Do that, and costs skyrocket. Also, I bet it it bases projection on costs now which are artificially high. But I only glanced at it and cant spend time on it now.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            Hey – it’s agnostic, pure economic – dollars….

            take a closer look when you get time…

            it’s independent of carbon capture.

        3. Thanks Brandon.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        In human lives, what’s the cost of coal?

        1. Randy Huffman Avatar
          Randy Huffman

          The answer is obvious, but not for the reason you are suggesting. Without coal, no industrial revolution. what else needs to be said?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            So lives don’t count? As long as … what?

          2. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            Of course lives count. That is the point I am making with the positive contributions coal and gas have created.

  4. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Re: this winter in Germany
    What did Germans use to heat their homes before burning wood?
    Electricity!

    What did we use for light before candles?
    Electricity!

    “Climate change” is grift. Period. An unholy alliance of political and academic grifters. Having our idiot politicians mandate how an electric utility is madness. Having political hack types running Dominion Energy is madness. The wind power will NEVER work. It is intermittent and unreliable and hard to store and transport.
    What happens when the temperatures drop? Wind stops blowing. Madness, madness everywhere.

  5. Here is part of the solution. The Feds have finally admitted that renewables are causing reliability problems. A small step in the direction of sanity.
    https://www.cfact.org/2022/12/27/ferc-considers-constraining-renewables/

  6. Agreed. Like California, the power grid cannot be under the purview of a private company. Profit-motivated control only results in corner-cutting to maximize revenue.

    Transition control of the grid from Dominion to the state, ensuring regulatory oversight and that the needs of the people are met, not the shareholders.

  7. Deckplates Avatar

    The climate change issues are really non-issues, as a human cause & effect scenario. As no person on this earth can affect, increase or decrease, the earth’s surface temperature. All of those minor temperature changes, up & down are caused by that big “red ball in the sky” ≈ 93 million miles from the surface of the earth. And YES, they are cyclical.

    Now, there is one very interesting point the article explores, holding elected representatives accountable for their damaging acts. What is appropriate, in the laws of Virginia, to investigate, and prosecute elected representatives for passing legislation which knowingly has a negative effect on the populace? They know it, but be damned to the public, as they pass it anyhow.

    Elected representatives should follow their constituencies. However, all should be done above board, obviated to the public for scrutiny, and committed to positive results. Should we not have consequences for elected representatives damaging the society, either economically or socially by their so called “Agendas?” And to the point, how serious does it have to get before we only “vote em out”?

    No, not a political witch hunt, as too much of that has been done, and the economic & social costs have been tremendous. It is time to focus on the heretofore, disenfranchised voters.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Putin and Biden could easily affect the global temperature. That, which can be done deliberately, can also be done inadvertently.

      1. That method might lower global temperatures a bit more than anyone wants.

        By the way, did you ever notice that the continuous upward trend in global temperatures started about a decade after the 1963 ban on atmospheric nuclear testing in 1963? Prior to the mid-70s, global temperatures had been fluctuating a little bit but had held more-or-less steady since about the mid-1940s. Some scientists predict that ten years is the length of time the climate of earth would be affected by a small, regional, nuclear war.

        Coincidence? Maybe.

        But then again, maybe the best way to arrest the continuous increase in global temperatures is to lift the ban on atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons.

        😉

        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8c8fd3100957eb59c15f7a97347d494f24c0a45e5c648e1c1227177872410689.jpg

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          All that good Nevada dust? Could be.

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I dunno. What’s Ken Lay have to say? Oh yeah, right, I forgot.

    If those panels are in Buffalo, they’ll be clear long before the roads.

  9. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    “After Arctic Blast, Do We Still Want to Californicate Our Grid?”
    Short answer YES, US liberals cannot tolerate fossil fuels or the people that use them. They have the motive and legal opportunity to stop most fossil fuel projects, and they intend to do so. If we want to have a working society , we basically have to wait until liberals figure out their proposed “plumbing” does not hold water.

  10. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    I’m all for getting rid of them and huge fines + jail time if they didn’t have all non fossil fuel generation of power.

  11. I’ll be keeping my generators well maintained.

    Whatcha gonna do when your well runs dry?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viNWp5P8glQ

    If those politicians aren’t doing their job but instead simply outsourcing their responsibilities, why are they still in the General Assembly and drawing a Virginia taxpayer-funded salary?

    Seriously, though, that is a good question.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      The original version by William Bell is so good. The session musicians? Booker T. and the MGs the house band for Stax Records.
      The author scores numerous common sense points about the perilous state of energy in Virginia. I fully expect the blue/green team to double down.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxoqzP_2nNk

      1. Nice! He also co-wrote “Born Under a Bad Sign” with Booker T.

        William Bell is still alive, by the way. He’s in his early 80’s and lives in Memphis.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      My panels easily supply small electronics charging, refrigeration, and lights. In the correct waters, don’t need anything else, But, won’t pitch the 5kw genset for stinkin’.

      1. If I was at least 75% certain that I was going to remain in Virginia after I retire, I would go solar w/batteries a propane generator back-up for my entire house.

        But I am not, so I will not.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          You strike me as a gulf coaster. A man could spend his life collecting shells on the beach and it would be a life well spent.

          1. Alabama has some gulf coast, does it not?

            EDIT:

            Just checked the map. I may have to go Florida panhandle; not sure I want to live near Mobile.

  12. Randy Huffman Avatar
    Randy Huffman

    Apparently Coal is still very affordable in China, they produce over 4 Billion tons in 2021, compared to just over 500 Million tons in US, and are still building plants. Yet aren’t they the biggest producer of solar panel’s…Hmmmm.

    https://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/5-countries-that-produce-the-most-coal-1097549/5/

      1. Randy Huffman Avatar
        Randy Huffman

        Yet they still build coal plants, unlike most of the developed world. They called for an increase of production of 300 Million tons, that is more than half of US total production!

        https://www.msn.com/en-ph/news/money/china-to-increase-coal-production/ar-AAWxGH8

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          they have how many more people?

          also:

          China is a leader in nuclear power and has pledged over the next 15 years to build more than 150 nuclear power stations

          China is doing “all of the above”.

          They’re not opposed to solar or wind.

          By Charlotte Elton • Updated: 25/10/2022
          China is planning the world’s largest wind farm, a facility so huge it could power the whole of Norway.

          Chaozhou – a city in China’s Guangdong province – has revealed ambitious plans for a 43.3 gigawatt facility in the Taiwan Strait.

          Operating between 75 and 185 kilometres offshore, the 10km long farm will feature thousands of powerful turbines.

          Because of the windy location, these turbines will be able to run between 43 per cent and 49 per cent of the time.

          Work on the project will start before 2025, the province says. Once completed, it will eclipse the world’s current largest wind farm. The title is currently held by the Jiuquan Wind Power base in China, a massive site with a 20 gigawatt capacity.

          A massive floating solar farm orbiting in space could soon be reality. Here’s how it would work
          These EU countries are aiming for 100 per cent clean power by 2030
          How much energy will China’s new wind farm produce?
          The facility will have 43.3 gigawatts of power-generating capability. But how much is that really?

          A gigawatt is one billion watts and it takes around 3 million solar panels to generate one gigawatt of power.

          One gigawatt could power 100 million LEDs, or 300,000 average European homes.

          So China’s new facility could be capable of powering 4.3 billion LED lights, or 13 million homes.

          Norway gets over 99 per cent of its energy from hydropower plants with a 31 GW power generating capability – less than the new Chinese facility.

          Canva
          Renewables are a key part of the transition away from fossil fuels.Canva
          How much wind power capacity does the world have?
          At the end of 2021, the world’s total onshore and offshore wind power capacity exceeded 830 GW. China accounts for more than half of this.

          In 2021, it installed more offshore wind generation capacity than every other country in the world over the last five years.

          The global superpower hopes to generate a third of its electricity from renewables by 2025.

          1. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            You are making my point, they are doing all of the above, unlike the US. What is the point of cutting out some of the most cost effective and reliable producers of coal generation when China and other countries are building coal plants? They are saying what the Developed country leaders want to hear on wind/solar while doing what they want to do to in cost effectively generating electricity needed for manufacturing.

            I have nothing against wind and solar, I just put solar on my roof, but am a firm believer of continued use of fossil fuels and developing nuclear.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            I’m for modern nuclear – not the 60 yr old designs but not for coal.

            I’m fine with gas being what we use when wind/solar are not available.

            I’d like to see SMRs get to commercial stage and deployed.

            If SMRs turn out to be safe, won’t melt down and modulatable (up and down) I’d be fine with them being everywhere.

            I live10 miles from a Nuke ..on an earthquake fault!

            We get coal by destroying mountaintops – and the rivers that flow from them – they turn to acid

            China gets coal from deep mining – at horrible costs to their people.

            I’m NOT in favor of living in caves or in cold homes or anything like that and I don’t think I’m alone on that either.

            Only the wackadoodles want that and they are not mainstream and a tiny minority.

  13. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    To be fair, traditional fossil fuel generating equipment can and does fail too. Duke Energy Progress, a major power company in NC, instituted rolling blackouts during the big pre-Christmas storm. https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article270559742.html

    1. Yes that is why we used to have a 20% reliable reserve margin for generation. Long gone and maybe time to bring it back.

  14. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Good thing the Democrats pushed infrastructure money…. Some of which is…

    $400 million for upgrading Virginia’s airports

    $8 billion for Virginia’s highway and transit systems

    $536.8 million to repair Virginia’s bridges

    $400 million for the City of Norfolk’s Coastal Storm Risk Management Project which will help reduce and manage flooding for major portions of the city

    $141.7 million for the Norfolk Harbor Deepening and Widening Project

    $46.256 million to replace lead water lines in Virginia

    $25 million for the expansion of I-64 in New Kent Count

    ** the biggest upgrade to Virginia airports could be FREE. Just go back to calling it Washington National.

  15. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    OTOH, if gas and oil were really such a “hot” commodity…

    “ The U.S. government on Friday said it received one bid for the right to drill offshore for oil and gas in Alaska’s Cook Inlet near habitat for bears, salmon, humpback whales and endangered beluga whales.

    Hilcorp Alaska LLC submitted the sole bid — $63,983 for an area covering 2,304 hectares or 5,693 acres.

    The company is a unit of Hilcorp, which is the largest privately held oil and gas exploration and production company in the United States. It already has leases to drill for oil and gas in onshore areas of Cook Inlet, which stretches from Anchorage to the Gulf of Alaska.

    The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, which conducted the sale via livestream, was offering leases for 193 blocks totaling some 958,000 acres (388,000 hectares) but received just one bid for one block.

    The U.S. Interior Department in May said it would not move forward with the Cook Inlet lease sale due to a “lack of industry interest.” But over the summer, Congress passed legislation that called for a Cook Inlet lease sale by year’s end and two Gulf of Mexico lease sales next year. The provisions were part of the Inflation Reduction Act, a sprawling package that also included major investments to fight climate change.”

Leave a Reply